Lis­ten:
MP3 Side 1 | Side 2
RealAudio

It is important to note that the distinction between the domestic and foreign policy implications of the incidents is, to a considerable extent, academic. The attacks, seen from a military/foreign policy standpoint, are inextricably linked with their domestic impact. As the title of the broadcast indicates, the attacks can be accurately considered as a sneak attack by a foreign power—the Underground Reich—and its Fifth Column in the United States national security establishment. The 9/11/2001 attacks can also be viewed as promoting the domestic political and police powers of the seated political interests. The fact that they were followed by the passage of sweeping law enforcement and intelligence provisions which may be used to abridge the constitutional freedoms of American citizens and to stifle legitimate political dissent is not to be overlooked. The fundamental thesis here is that, in addition to being an attack on the United States by the Underground Reich, the September 11 assaults constitute "nation building" in this country by the Bormann group. Circumstantial evidence suggests that the Bush family may well be the American "point element" for that remarkable and deadly organization.

1. This program begins with background discussion of "nation-building" in the United States by elements associated with the Underground Reich. The Bush family's history is inextricably linked with that of the Third Reich. W's great grandfather (George Herbert Walker) was one of Hitler's earliest financial backers. Walker (whose last name is the President's middle name) brought his son-in-law, Prescott Bush Sr., into his Nazi-linked businesses. The program reviews the role of Sullivan & Cromwell attorney Allen Dulles in attempting to mask the Bush family's Nazi assets, as well as highlighting the confiscation of several of those companies by the Alien Property Custodian during World War II. (The Secret War Against the Jews: How Western Espionage Betrayed the Jewish People; John Loftus and Mark Aarons; Copyright 1994 [HC]; St. Martin's Press; ISBN 0-312-11057-X; pp. 360-61.)

2. It should be noted that the postwar liquidation of the Union Banking Corporation (one of the Bush Nazi-linked businesses) provided much of the capital foundation for the Bush family's postwar economic endeavors. Another (the Hamburg-Amerika line) became a key element of the Bormann organization. The economic and political component of a Third Reich gone underground, the Bormann organization controls corporate Germany and much of the rest of the world. Created and run by Martin Bormann, the organizational genius who was the "the power behind the throne" in Nazi Germany, the Bormann group is a primary element of the analysis presented in the For the Record programs.

3. Next, the program reviews Allen Dulles' pivotal role in helping to boost Ibn Saud to the throne of Saudi Arabia, and their mutual connection to British fascist Jack Philby and the Third Reich. (Ibid.; p. 21.)

4. Dulles, in turn, utilized his political protégé Richard Nixon to help import Nazis and Third Reich collaborators into the United States to counter what the Republicans felt was excessive "Jewish influence" in the American electorate. (Ibid.; p. 122.)

5. The principal spokesperson for this operation (the Crusade For Freedom) was Ronald Reagan and the official principally involved in arranging for the fascists to emigrate to the U.S. was William Casey, campaign manager for the Reagan/Bush campaign in 1980 and Reagan's CIA director. (Ibid.; p. 605.)

6. A major element in the Crusade For Freedom was the resettlement of an entire SS intelligence unit (the Vorkommando Moskau) in the New York/New Jersey area to counteract "Jewish influence" in that region. (Ibid.; p. 496.)

7. When Nixon became president, the Nazi émigrés were permanently incorporated into the Republican Party. The chairman of the Republican National Committee who oversaw this incorporation was the elder George Bush. (Ibid.; pp. 369-71.)

8. Turning to the present, the program highlights the fact that most of the Al-Queda prisoners in Cuba are Saudi nationals. ("Detainees Are Mostly Saudis" by Carl Nolte; San Francisco Chronicle; 1/19/2002; pp. A1-A10.) Despite this fact and the Saudi nationality of 15 of 19 hijackers, Bush did not name Saudi Arabia as part of the "axis of evil."

9. The program supplements previous discussion about the Saudi involvement with Al Queda, highlighting the analysis of one U.S. diplomat that the United States had, in effect, become the hired mercenaries of the Saudis. ("Annals of National Security: King's Ransom" by Seymour Hersh; The New Yorker; 10/22/2001.)

10. Next, the program reviews an element of discussion from past broadcasts: the World Muslim Congress (WMC). (The Beast Reawakens; Martin A. Lee; Copyright 1997 [HC]; Little, Brown & Co.; ISBN 0-316-51959-6; pp. 225-226.) A key player in the Afghan war against the Soviets, this organization embraces the convergence of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, the Saudi government and royal family, American neo-Nazis and elements of U.S. intelligence. (Idem.)

11. The military buildup being requested by Bush is projected as rivaling that requisitioned by Reagan. ("Bush Wants $120 Billion Budget Boost for Pentagon" by James Dao [New York Times]; San Francisco Chronicle; 2/2/2002; p. A11.) It should be emphasized that in combination with Bush's tax cuts, scheduled to take effect incrementally over the next several years, the military buildup will recapitulate the enormous deficit spending of the Reagan /Bush administrations. These deficits, in combination with the realization of the Euro, will do immense damage to the United States. (The enormous debt incurred by the Reagan administrations and the first Bush administration was managed by borrowing against the dollars held as reserve currency. In addition to being (probably) a weak currency, thereby making U.S. manufacturing exports relatively expensive for Europeans to buy, the Euro will erode the dollar's status as a reserve currency. One should not lose sight of the fact that Bin Laden called for his followers to attack America's economic strength. It is Mr. Emory's belief that Bin Laden and the Bush administration are controlled by the Underground Reich. Bush's fiscal policy will do enormous damage to the United States. In the short run, the Bush defense program (like that of Reagan) will constitute a sort of "military Keynesianism." (Remember that Reagan's military build-up was justified by the Saudi/Bush/CIA concocting of the phony "oil shortage" of 1979-80.) In the short term, Americans will be put to work manufacturing weapons. The high-tech industry of the Silicon Valley (Democrat-friendly in recent years) may be put to work making high-tech anti-terror technology. Bush's proposed missile shield will be channeling a considerable amount of money (and jobs) to Southern California's aerospace industry. This might be viewed as an element of domestic nation-building, with California having been a bastion of Democratic electoral strength in recent years.

12. Next the program highlights the extent to which the Bush political agenda benefits companies connected to his family and associates. A major beneficiary of the Bush defense build-up will be the Carlyle Group, intimately connected to the Bush family and involving key Saudi "petrodollar" associates of the Bush milieu, up until recently including the Bin Ladens. ("Crony Capitalism, U.S.A." by Paul Krugman; New York Times; 1/15/2002; p. A23.)

13. In addition to Bush's defense policy, his education program may well benefit his siblings and their Saudi business associates. At a recent conference in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, the Bin Ladens (among others) expressed anxiety about their U.S. business ties. Bush's younger brother Neil was using that (in part) Bin Laden-sponsored conference to recruit Saudi investors for his new educational software company, which figures to be a beneficiary of his brother's education program. ("Neil Bush's Saudi Business Connection" by Michael Isikoff; Newsweek; 2/4/2002; p. 6.)

14. In the con­text of nation-building in the United States, the pro­gram exam­ines the bomb­ing of the U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998 as a dis­cred­i­ta­tion of the Clin­ton admin­is­tra­tion both at home and abroad. The bomb­ings were designed to inter­dict a rap­proche­ment between the Islamic fun­da­men­tal­ist regime of Sudan and the U.S. (Dol­lars for Ter­ror: The United States and Islam; Richard Labeviere; Copy­right 2000 [SC]; Algora Pub­lish­ing; ISBN 1–892941-06–6; p. 349.)

15. Whereas many African, Mid­dle East­ern and Islamic coun­tries con­demned the Clin­ton administration’s assess­ment that the Al Shifa phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal plant was con­nected to Al Queda and being used to man­u­fac­ture chem­i­cal weapons, that was, in fact, the case. (Ibid.; p. 358.)

16. In that con­text, one should remem­ber that Khalid Bin Mah­fouz, whose fam­ily is con­nected to the BCCI, the Bush fam­ily (through Car­lyle Group and Arbusto energy, and to Bin Laden milieu, was closely con­nected to the owner of the plant. (Ibid.; pp. 359–60.)

17. In addi­tion to being used to attack Clin­ton abroad at a time when he was fac­ing impeach­ment at home, the attack was attrib­uted by the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood to Clinton’s desire to dis­tract from his domes­tic prob­lems stem­ming from the Lewin­sky scan­dal. (Ibid.; p. 367.)

18. Mr. Emory then sum­ma­rizes a cyn­i­cal, Machi­avel­lian rela­tion­ship between the Repub­li­can estab­lish­ment, the Israeli right, and the Pales­tin­ian nego­ti­at­ing team. It is Mr. Emory’s view that this rela­tion­ship was instru­men­tal in desta­bi­liz­ing Clinton’s for­eign pol­icy and weak­en­ing his domes­tic polit­i­cal consensus.

19. Cor­rec­tion: Mr. Emory mis­states the dis­pute between Clin­ton and the Repub­li­cans. The Repub­li­cans tried to move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Yitzhak Rabin and Clin­ton viewed this as inim­i­cal to the peace process, and the leg­is­la­tion passed by the Repub­li­can dom­i­nated Con­gress was vetoed. (Ibid.; p. 167.)

20. The dis­cus­sion con­cludes with an excerpt­ing of a text by James Stew­art Mar­tin, who was in charge of the Eco­nomic War­fare Divi­sion of the anti-trust divi­sion of the Depart­ment of Jus­tice dur­ing World War II. Martin’s task was to inter­dict the German-American indus­trial and finan­cial axis of which the Bush fam­ily was an inte­gral part. He was unsuc­cess­ful in doing so. He con­cluded the 300 page book he wrote about his expe­ri­ence with a warn­ing about the eco­nomic and polit­i­cal con­di­tions that made the rise of Hitler pos­si­ble. “The ecopo­lit­i­cal mas­ters of Ger­many boosted Hitler and his pro­gram into the driver’s seat at a time when the tide in the polit­i­cal fight between the Nazis and the sup­port­ers of the Weimar Repub­lic was swing­ing against the Nazis. All of the men who mat­tered in bank­ing and indus­trial cir­cles could quickly agree on one pro­gram and throw their finan­cial weight behind it. Their sup­port won the elec­tion for the Nazis. We must assume that the same thing is not yet true in the United States. We do have eco­nomic power so con­cen­trated that it would lie in the power of not more than a hun­dred men-if they could agree among themselves-to throw the same kind of com­bined eco­nomic weight behind a sin­gle pro­gram. They have not agreed yet. . . . If the United States should run into seri­ous eco­nomic dif­fi­cul­ties, how­ever, most of the con­di­tions for a re-enactment of the Ger­man drama would already exist on the Amer­i­can stage. The slight dif­fer­ences within the camp of the fra­ter­nity then may be the only real bar­rier to the kind of inte­gra­tion of the finan­cial and indus­trial com­mu­nity behind a sin­gle repres­sive pro­gram, like that which the financiers and indus­tri­al­ists of Ger­many exe­cuted through Hitler. Are we safe in assum­ing that it would take a grave eco­nomic cri­sis to pre­cip­i­tate the dan­gers inher­ent in eco­nomic con­cen­tra­tion? The basic inte­gra­tion of the finan­cial and indus­trial groups in the United States is evi­dent when we look at the increase of con­cen­tra­tion in the past few years.” (All Hon­or­able Men; James Stew­art Mar­tin; Copy­right 1950 [HC]; Lit­tle, Brown & Co.; p. 295.)

21. A col­umn cited ear­lier in the pro­gram points that the sit­u­a­tion that Mar­tin warned about is dan­ger­ously present under the Bush admin­is­tra­tion. “It was CBS Mar­ket Watch’s exec­u­tive edi­tor, not some whin­ing polit­i­cal com­men­ta­tor, who warned that ‘a small group of busi­ness lead­ers exert enor­mous clout over Bush and his team in get­ting the rules changed to their ben­e­fit.’” (“Crony Cap­i­tal­ism, U.S.A.” by Paul Krug­man; New York Times; 1/15/2002; p. A23.)

22. Again echo­ing James Stew­art Martin’s warn­ing to the world with a quote from the last para­graph of his 1950 book All Hon­or­able Men: “The moral of this is not that Ger­many is an inevitable men­ace, but that there are forces in our own coun­try which can make Ger­many a men­ace. And, more impor­tantly, they could cre­ate a men­ace of their own here at home, not through a delib­er­ate plot to bring about a polit­i­cal cat­a­stro­phe but as a calm judg­ment of ‘busi­ness neces­sity.’ The men who would do this are not Nazis, but busi­ness­men; not crim­i­nals, but hon­or­able men.” (All Hon­or­able Men; p. 300.)