For The Record

FTR #519 More on the History of the Islamic Fascist Axis

Pales­tin­ian Islamic Jihad rally, 4/15/2005. PIJ is an off­shoot of the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood. Do the par­tic­i­pants in this rally appear to be mak­ing an Islamic ges­ture?

Recorded July 24, 2005

REALAUDIO

In the wake of 9/11, the Lon­don bomb­ings and other, less-publicized ter­ror­ist inci­dents, this pro­gram sets forth more infor­ma­tion about the his­tor­i­cal devel­op­ment of the fascist/Islamist rela­tion­ship. (FTR#456 is a com­pendium of many of the fascist/Nazi links to con­tem­po­rary terrorism—9/11 in par­tic­u­lar.) After high­light­ing a num­ber of arti­cles rel­e­vant to 9/11 and fas­cist con­nec­tions to that inci­dent, the broad­cast presents an infor­ma­tive paper detail­ing the devel­op­ment of the Third Reich’s rela­tion­ship with the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem—an SS offi­cer, key Axis spy and (even­tu­ally) the first leader of the Pales­tin­ian national move­ment. Hus­seini was an offi­cer in the Turk­ish army in World War I, dur­ing the period in which the Turks com­mit­ted geno­cide against the Chris­t­ian Arme­ni­ans. After the British assumed con­trol of much of the Arab ter­ri­tory for­merly held as part of the Ottoman Empire, they groomed al-Husseini as a pri­mary func­tionary of theirs in the Mid­dle East. A mur­der­ous anti-Semite, al-Husseini even­tu­ally became the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem—the lead­ing Mus­lim cleric in the British pro­tec­torate of Pales­tine. It is note­wor­thy that the British reversed their 1922 agree­ment to abide by a League of Nations man­date to pro­vide for a Jew­ish home­land in Pales­tine, in order to curry favor with the Arabs. (Of course, the Arabs con­trolled the vital oil resources of the Mid­dle East and, because of that, were deemed more impor­tant for British impe­r­ial aspi­ra­tions in that part of the world.

Pro­gram High­lights Include: Yeslam Binladin’s offer to pay for his brother’s legal defense in the event of Osama’s cap­ture; a state­ment by the father of 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta sup­port­ing the Lon­don tran­sit bomb­ings; the fact that Atta’s father bears the same name as a key al-Qaeda weapons pro­curer (who’s brother financed al-Qaeda and was rep­re­sented by Home­land Secu­rity chief Michael Chertoff); the con­ver­sion of British fas­cist David Myatt to Islam; Myatt’s asso­ci­a­tion with the Islam­o­fas­cist imam of the Fins­bury Park mosque; the League of Nations’ 1922 endorse­ment of the con­cept of a Jew­ish home­land; the Grand Mufti’s ille­gal ele­va­tion by the British to his posi­tion of power between the wars; the Grand Mufti’s ini­ti­a­tion of pogroms against the Jews between the World Wars; the Grand Mufti’s even­tual align­ment with Nazi Ger­many dur­ing World War II; the World War II era Arabs’ say­ing “In Heaven Allah, on earth, Hitler.” For more about the gen­e­sis of the fascist/Islamist axis, see—among other pro­grams—FTR#’s 371, 383, 414, 416, 453, 473, 514.

1. Begin­ning with dis­cus­sion of Osama bin Laden’s half brother Yeslam, the pro­gram notes that he has vol­un­teered to pay for Osama’s legal expenses should he ever be cap­tured. This is sig­nif­i­cant. Yeslam has main­tained that he has had noth­ing to do with his half brother or ter­ror­ism. The evi­dence sug­gests oth­er­wise. For infor­ma­tion about pos­si­ble terror/9–11 con­nec­tions of Yeslam and the bin Laden family’s Euro­pean hold­ing com­pany SICO (which Yeslam heads), see—among other pro­grams—FTR#’s 355, 498, 499. “One of Osama bin Laden’s half broth­ers said he would pay for the ter­ror mastermind’s defense should he ever be cap­tured, Yeslam Bin­ladin said in a broad­cast inter­view. ‘For sure,’ Yeslam Bin­ladin responded when asked if he would help pay. ‘Every­one has the right to defend him­self, any­one who is accused of doing some­thing.’”
(“Bin Laden Rel­a­tive to Pay for His Defense” by Nadia Abou El-Magd [AP]; Las Vegas Sun; 7/3/05; p. 1.)

2. “Yeslam and Osama are among 54 sons and daugh­ters of the late Saudi con­struc­tion mag­nate Mohamed bin Laden, who had 22 wives. Yeslam said he believed his half brother, thought to be hid­ing in the rugged moun­tains along the Afghan-Pakistan bor­der, was still alive. ‘I don’t think he’s dead,’ he said in the inter­view recorded on May 28 that aired Sun­day on the Dubai-based Al-Arabiya satel­lite tele­vi­sion sta­tion. When asked why U.S. forces had still not been able to track bin Laden down, Yeslam responded: ‘I don’t know, ask them.’” (Idem.)

3. Next, the pro­gram high­lights the incen­di­ary com­ments of 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta’s father. Atta’s father endorsed the Lon­don bomb­ings, and promised a 50-year war between Mus­lims and the West. Inter­est­ingly, and per­haps sig­nif­i­cantly, Atta’s father has the same name as the brother of Dr. Magdy el-Amir, a financier of al Qaeda who was rep­re­sented in court by Michael Chertoff, now the direc­tor of the Depart­ment of Home­land Secu­rity. Dr. el-Amir’s brother was a weapons pro­curer for al Qaeda, snared in Oper­a­tion Dia­mond­back. Are Atta’s father and Dr. el-Amir’s brother the same per­son? (For more about Dr. Magdy el-Amir, Chertoff and Oper­a­tion Dia­mond­back, see FTR#’s 495, 500.) “The father of one of the Sep­tem­ber 11 hijack­ers said today he had no sor­row for what had hap­pened in Lon­don and claimed more ter­ror­ist attacks would fol­low. Egypt­ian Mohamed el-Amir, whose son Mohamed Atta com­man­deered the first plane that crashed into the World Trade Cen­ter in New York, said there was a dou­ble stan­dard in the way the world viewed the vic­tims in Lon­don and vic­tims in the Islamic world.”
(“Father of 9/11 Hijacker Warns of 50-Year War” [RSS World News]; Daily Mail; 7/20/2005.)

4. “El-Amir said the attacks in the US and the July 7 attacks in Britain were the begin­ning of what would be a 50-year reli­gious war, in which there would be many more fight­ers like his son. Speak­ing to a CNN pro­ducer in his apart­ment in the upper-middle-class Cairo sub­urb of Giza, he declared that ter­ror cells around the world were a ‘nuclear bomb that has now been acti­vated and is tick­ing.’ Curs­ing in Ara­bic, el-Amir also denounced Arab lead­ers and Mus­lims who con­demned the Lon­don attacks as being trai­tors and non-Muslims. He pas­sion­ately vowed that he would do any­thing within his power to encour­age more attacks.” (Idem.)

5. Pre­sent­ing a win­dow into the mind­set of con­tem­po­rary Islamists, the pro­gram presents excerpts of a dis­turb­ing inter­view with Dr. Ahmad Dewidar, imam of the Islamic Soci­ety of Mid Man­hat­tan and a lec­turer at Man­hat­tanville Col­lege. Viewed as ‘the face of the next gen­er­a­tion of Mus­lims in Amer­ica, Dewidar is
a truly dis­gust­ing, hor­ri­fy­ing char­ac­ter. Espous­ing views that would make Hitler proud, Dewidar doesn’t think that Mus­lims were respon­si­ble for 9/11 and feels that Jews con­trol the U.S. gov­ern­ment and news media. Such extrem­ism exem­pli­fies why Mr. Emory’s uses the term “Islam­o­fas­cist” to describe peo­ple like Dewidar. Note that the inter­view here was posted on the web­site of the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood. Note also that Dewidar expresses the view that Mus­lims were not behind the 9/11 attacks—a view echoed by many of the Inter­net con­spir­acy geeks and sig­nif­i­cant ele­ments of the so-called 9/11 truth move­ment. “ . . . QUESTION: ‘What steps did you take to fend off the accu­sa­tion that stuck to the Mus­lims – [i.e.] that they were behind 9/11?’ DEWIDAR: ‘Although a large part of Amer­i­can soci­ety believes that 9/11 was an oper­a­tion planned and fab­ri­cated in order to forge a new real­ity of world rule under the so-called ‘New World Order,’ most of soci­ety got the mes­sage from the Mus­lims that they were in fact the ones behind [the attacks]. [Ital­ics are Mr. Emory’s.] This mes­sage was reflected in the [fact that] the Tal­iban and Osama bin Laden took respon­si­bil­ity for the event, as well as in the reac­tions of glee in the Arab and Mus­lim world to what hap­pened. As far as the Amer­i­can gov­ern­ment is con­cerned these events –whether or not these events were planned, or pinned on the Mus­lims, or some­thing else—provided an oppor­tu­nity for [the Amer­i­can gov­ern­ment] to leg­is­late dubi­ous laws that restrict the growth and pres­ence of Islam in the U.S., such as the [anti-] ter­ror­ism law, and other laws. But as far as Amer­i­can soci­ety is con­cerned, the sus­pi­cion towards any­thing Islamic—in the streets, in places of recre­ation and com­merce, and in workplaces—remains a heavy bur­den on the Mus­lim cit­i­zen in Amer­ica. The media—most of which is under Zion­ist con­trol—has helped to spread this per­cep­tion. [Ital­ics are Mr. Emory’s.] When [the media] see a bearded Mus­lim sell­ing fast food on any street in any state, they put the cam­era lens in front of him and inter­view him as though he rep­re­sents Islam. At the same time, they ignore every mod­er­ate Islamic voice, every seri­ous, sci­en­tific Islamic model, and every expert reli­gious scholar. We are try­ing to deal [with this phe­nom­e­non] through con­stant con­tact with the media and by reg­is­ter­ing com­plaints with its direc­tors.’”
(“Head of Islamic Cen­ter in Man­hat­tan: Many Amer­i­cans Believe 9/11 Was Fab­ri­cated to Enable the Forg­ing of a ‘New World Order” [Inter­view with Dr. Ahmad Dewidar]; MEMRI Spe­cial Dis­patch Series No. 928; 6/30/2005; [Excerpted from an inter­view on the Mus­lim Brotherhood’s web­site www.ikhwaonline.com and MBC TV; pp. 1–2.)

6. “ ‘To con­clude, I would like to say that Amer­i­can society—without relat­ing to any given gov­ern­ment position—is an active soci­ety that loves life and is quick to for­get. It will get over the events of 9/11 eas­ily, on con­di­tion that we offer them proof that we are inno­cent of this crime . . . .’ [Ital­ics are Mr. Emory’s.]” (Ibid.; p. 2.)

7. “QUESTION: ‘What is the extent of the Mus­lim community’s influ­ence on Amer­i­can soci­ety?’ DEWIDAR: ‘The Zion­ist com­mu­nity num­bers only three mil­lion, but they con­trol the gov­ern­ment, the pol­i­tics, the econ­omy, and the media in the U.S. [Ital­ics are Mr. Emory’s.] At the same time, the Islamic com­mu­nity num­bers 11 mil­lion, but its influ­ence is weak. . . . QUESTION: ‘Are the only obsta­cles that pre­vent the orga­ni­za­tion and influ­ence of the Mus­lim com­mu­nity obsta­cles related to its inter­nal affairs? DEWIDAR: ‘Of course not. Many are inter­ested in pre­vent­ing our influ­ence in society—first and fore­most the Zion­ist lobby, which influ­ences the media at present, so that we can­not spread our ideas and spot­light our lead­ers and our suc­cess­ful mod­els. Even when a Mus­lim tries to work in the media, he has to con­tend with five mil­lion media employ­ees who are con­trolled by the Jews. [Ital­ics are Mr. Emory’s.] If he is a genius, and they are forced to employ him, he works behind the cam­era, not in front of it. . . .” (Idem.)

8. In eval­u­at­ing and ana­lyz­ing the Lon­don tran­sit bomb­ings, it is impor­tant to take into con­sid­er­a­tion the fact that a num­ber of British neo-Nazis have embraced the Islamist cause. A for­mer “Nazi-Satanist” David Myatt has become a Mus­lim in order to fight against “the Jews.” Note that Myatt was received and lauded by Omar Bakri Mohamed, impli­cated in the Lon­don bomb­ings and taken into cus­tody shortly after­ward. (For more about the neo-Nazi/Islamofascist link, see—among other pro­grams—FTR#’s 352, 443, 456, 499.) “...the charis­matic leader of the Eng­lish neo-Nazi move­ment, David Myatt, now become Abdul Aziz ibn Myatt, appeals to those nos­tal­gic Axis mem­bers and to all ene­mies of the Zion­ists, to embrace with him the Jihad, the ‘true mar­tial reli­gion’ , which will most effec­tively fight against the Jews and the Amer­i­cans. Another sign of this rap­proche­ment: on April 3, 2003, the Salafist Lon­doner Omar Bakri Mohamed, leader of the move­ment al Mouha­jiroun as well as being imam of the Fins­bury Park mosque and a recruiter of a num­ber of youths who went off to join al Qaeda, offi­cially received Myatt and accorded him a ‘wel­come into Islam’, spec­i­fy­ing to jour­nal­ists that the neo-Nazi past of this neo­phyte had ‘no spe­cial impor­tance once their goals con­verged in com­mon’.”
(“The Reds, The Browns and the Greens” by Alexan­dre Del Valle; Occi­den­talis; 12/13/04; p. 2.)

9. More about the Euro­pean neo-Fascist/Islamofascist link: “Proof of the Euro­pean and trans-national dimen­sion of the new pro-Islamist dimen­sion of the extreme right is in Lon­don, where one of the prin­ci­pal cen­ters of Islamist pros­e­lytism, the Islamic Coun­cil of Defense of Europe, is based. This insti­tu­tion is ani­mated by old neo-Nazi mil­i­tants. At its head, one finds Tahir de la Nive, a Franco-British con­vert to Islam who, imi­tat­ing David Myatt, extols the gen­eral Islamiza­tion of Europe as the sole ‘rem­edy for deca­dence and American-Zionist impe­ri­al­ism’. Quite respected among the ‘national-revolutionary’ milieus, among skin­heads and in the heart of the New Right, Mr. de la Nive, an old mujahid who had gone off to fight the Soviet ‘infi­dels’ in the 1980s, advo­cates a kind of ‘Euro­pean Islamic nation­al­ism’ and pub­lishes a bilin­gual French-English review, Cen­tu­rio, which ‘treats of the mil­i­tary prob­lems in the frame­work of Islamic phi­los­o­phy and war’. In a recent work pref­aced by Omar Amin and Chris­t­ian Bouchet, Les Croises de I’Oncle Sam [The Cru­sades of Uncle Sam], this Brown-Green ide­o­logue calls on all neo-Nazi mil­i­tants to join rev­o­lu­tion­ary Islam and denounce every form of com­pro­mise with the ‘dia­bolic’ forces of American-Israeli impe­ri­al­ism. Other cen­tral fig­ures of Eng­lish fas­cism, the direc­tors of the World Union of Socialists—Colin Jor­dan, the ‘Fuhrer’ of the Eng­lish National Social­ist Move­ment (NSM), and John Tyndall—have since 1988 been maintaining

con­tacts with Pales­tin­ian ter­ror­ist milieus as well as with the regime of Muam­mar Kad­hafy. On his side, the head of the Eng­lish Nation­al­ist Move­ment, Troy South­gate, has declared in the columns of the Franco-English national-revolutionary jour­nal W.O.T.A.N. (Will of the Aryan Nations); ‘In Pales­tine, the cru­elty of Zion­ism is evi­dent and we can­not but sym­pa­thize with the Pales­tin­ian peo­ple, who, just as our­selves, have seen their land soiled and despoiled by the igno­ble par­a­site which is ‘inter­na­tional Jewry.’ The ENM salutes Hamas and totally sup­ports the armed strug­gle against those who have viciously attacked the ances­tral her­itage of an entire nation’.” (Ibid.; p. 4.)

10. Most of the pro­gram con­sists of a lengthy excerpt of an excel­lent arti­cle about the his­tor­i­cal devel­op­ment of the Islamist/Nazi link. It is very impor­tant to note the role of British impe­r­ial strat­egy in cat­alyz­ing the begin­nings of the Nazi/Islamist con­nec­tion. “The end of World War I brought an end to the Ottoman col­o­niza­tion of Pales­tine. Towards the end of the war, Britain issued the Bal­four Dec­la­ra­tion sup­port­ing the ‘estab­lish­ment in Pales­tine of a national home for the Jew­ish peo­ple ....’ The orig­i­nal reac­tion of the Arabs was mixed. While many Arabs opposed the Zion­ists, Emir Faisal — who was the son of for­mer Mecca ruler Sherif Hus­sein and later King of Iraq — signed in 1919 a dec­la­ra­tion in sup­port of the Bal­four Dec­la­ra­tion, even sup­port­ing all nec­es­sary mea­sures ‘...to encour­age and stim­u­late immi­gra­tion of Jews into Pales­tine on a large scale, and as quickly as pos­si­ble to set­tle Jew­ish immi­grants upon the land through closer set­tle­ment and inten­sive cul­ti­va­tion of the soil.’ But peace between Arab and Jew would not last.”
(“Nazi Influ­ence on the Mid­dle East Dur­ing WWII” by David Storobin, Esq.; Global Politi­cian; 1/6/05; p. 1.)

11. The bulk of the pro­gram con­sists of the read­ing of a long, infor­ma­tive arti­cle on the gen­e­sis of the Nazi/Islamist con­nec­tion. Of para­mount impor­tance in this analy­sis is the cyn­i­cal colo­nial­ist realpoli­tik prac­ticed by the British. After assum­ing con­trol of Pales­tine under a man­date from the League of Nations, they ille­gally ele­vated Haj Amin al-Husseini to his posi­tion as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in order to court the pow­er­ful Hus­seini clan as allies in the main­te­nance of this part of their empire. (The Hus­seini fam­ily wielded con­sid­er­able influ­ence in both Jerusalem and Mecca, and were thus seen as piv­otal to British colo­nial ambi­tions in the Mid­dle East.) Note that Hus­seini had been in the Turk­ish army dur­ing World War I dur­ing the period in which the Turks per­pe­trated geno­cide against the Chris­t­ian Arme­ni­ans. He was engag­ing in mas­sacres of Jews from 1920 on. Later—as an SS offi­cer and key ally of Nazi Germany—he exer­cised his polit­i­cal abil­i­ties against the British Empire. “On April 4,1920, Haj Amin al-Husseini orga­nized thou­sands of Arabs to attack Jews in Jerusalem. Arab police either stayed away or joined the riot­ers. The pogrom con­tin­ued on April 5. By the time order was restored by a Ze’ev Jabotinsky-led Jew­ish mili­tia, 5 Jews were killed and 211 injured. At least two Jew­ish girls were raped. Al-Husseini was sen­tenced to 10 years impris­on­ment, but after a few months of hid­ing in Tran­sjor­dan (now Jor­dan) was par­doned by Her­bert Samuel, a British Jew who served as the High Com­mis­sioner of Pales­tine.” (Idem.)

12. “A year later, on May 1, 1921, al-Husseini orga­nized another round of pogroms. On that day, Zion­ists clashed with Com­mu­nists dur­ing the May Day parade. Com­mu­nists were quickly dis­persed, but Haj Amin al-Husseini made sure not to miss the oppor­tu­nity and quickly sum­moned his forces. When riot­ing ended on May 6, at least 13 Jews were mur­dered. While the British colo­nial pow­ers admit­ted that Arabs insti­gated the vio­lence, they decided not to press charges against al-Husseini because they felt he was pro­voked by Zion­ists who demanded estab­lish­ment of the Jew­ish state.” (Idem.)

13. “The 1921 riots came shortly after al-Husseini was appointed Mufti of Jerusalem by the British — in vio­la­tion of elec­tion results. The two pri­mary Arab fam­i­lies in Jerusalem were the Hus­sei­nis and the Nashashibis. When Great Britain con­quered Jerusalem, a mem­ber of the al-Husseini clan was mayor of Jerusalem, but was sub­se­quently removed by the colo­nial gov­ern­ment with a mem­ber of the Nashashibi fam­ily appointed in his place. In March 1921, the Mufti of Jerusalem — a Hus­seini — died. The High Com­mis­sioner of the colony con­sid­ered it desir­able to bal­ance the Nashashibi mayor with a Hus­seini mufti, with Haj Amin al-Husseini being his pre­ferred can­di­date for the posi­tion.” (Idem.)

14. Note that the Mufti’s ele­va­tion by the British was ille­gal. “The elec­toral col­lege nom­i­nated three can­di­dates for the posi­tion of the Mufti. Under the long-established law, the colo­nial power was to choose among the top three vote-getters. How­ever, the pre­ferred can­di­date of the Brits, Haj Amin al-Husseini, placed fourth, receiv­ing only about 7% of the vote. To the local Islamic lead­ers (out­side the Hus­seini clan), the young man’s lack of reli­gious prepa­ra­tion and knowl­edge made him an unac­cept­able can­di­date to be the top reli­gious leader in Jerusalem. All of the top three can­di­dates were Nashashibi-sponsored, while the Hus­seini clan focused its ener­gies on pro­mot­ing Haj Amin. The British inter­vened and forced the most pop­u­lar can­di­date, Sheikh Husam al-Din, to with­draw, thus push­ing al-Husseini into third place. The young man with­out any reli­gious train­ing sud­denly became the most pow­er­ful Islamic cleric in Jerusalem.” (Ibid.; pp. 1–2.)

15. “A few months later, in Decem­ber of 1921, the British admin­is­tra­tion estab­lished a Supreme Mus­lim Coun­cil with full con­trol over the Waqf (reli­gious trusts) and the Shariah (Mus­lim reli­gious courts). Haj Amin al-Husseini was appointed Pres­i­dent of the body. Within a year, the man who orga­nized mul­ti­ple mas­sacres, became the leader of all the most impor­tant bod­ies in the colony: reli­gious (as a Mufti), legal (Shariah) and finan­cial (Waqf). A 1937 Royal Com­mis­sion report noted al-Husseini had ‘no legal lim­i­ta­tion to his power.’” (Ibid.; p. 2.)

16. “Con­trol­ling a spec­tac­u­lar sum of money and the right to appoint Pales­tin­ian Islamic preach­ers, al-Husseini built a ‘polit­i­cal machine’ that brought the reli­gious and polit­i­cal estab­lish­ment under his dom­i­na­tion. Through them, he was able to arouse reli­gious fanati­cism against Jews and the West. His preach­ers urged their flock to ‘go out and mur­der the Jew­ish infi­del in the name of the holy Koran,’ con­stantly declar­ing that ‘he who kills a Jew is assured of a place in the next world.’”’ (Idem.)

17. The Grand Mufti’s hatred of Jews (and sub­se­quent alliance with the Third Reich) was matched by that of Mus­lim Broth­er­hood founder Has­san al-Banna. (For more about the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood, see—among other pro­grams—FTR#’s 343, 455, 456, 473, 513, 514, 518. Use the search func­tion linked at the top of this descrip­tion to find more infor­ma­tion about the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood.) “Mufti hated Jews for the same rea­sons as Hasan al-Banna in Egypt. Jews, espe­cially the arriv­ing Zion­ist immi­grants, brought a modem, Western/European way of life, a direct oppo­site of what the fun­da­men­tal­ists wanted. Just as Banna, Hus­seini felt per­son­ally threat­ened by West­ern cul­ture. ‘The Jews have changed the life of Pales­tine in such a way that it must inevitably lead to the destruc­tion of our race .... The Jew­ish girls who run around in shorts demor­al­ize our youth by their mere presence.??

?” (Idem.)

18. In the con­text of the Israeli-Palestinian con­flict, it is inter­est­ing to note that the United Nations’ estab­lish­ment of Israel fol­lowed a prece­dent of inter­na­tional law estab­lished in 1922. “The year 1922 brought the worst pos­si­ble news to al-Husseini. The League of Nations rec­og­nized the land west of the Jor­dan River as the ‘Jew­ish National Home.’ The British White Paper of 1922, divided Pales­tine with 77% to the east of the Jor­dan river given to Arabs, while the 23% to the west left for the Jew­ish peo­ple. Shortly there­after, the League of Nations con­firmed the divi­sion in its man­date sys­tem, urg­ing Great Britain, as the Manda­tory power, to ‘facil­i­tate Jew­ish immi­gra­tion,’ as well as ‘close set­tle­ment of Jews on the land.’ The League of Nations even man­dated that no ‘ter­ri­tory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the con­trol of, the Gov­ern­ment of any for­eign Power,’ thus reject­ing any Arab claims to what has since become known as Israel, West Bank and Gaza. Indeed, the Arab peo­ple are never even men­tioned in the Man­date.” (Idem.)

19. “Sherif Hussein’s two sons were thus appointed Kings. Faisal became the King of Iraq, while Abdul­lah the ruler of Tran­sjor­dan. The Hashemi clan orig­i­nally fled from the Ara­bian Penin­sula to Cyprus, but then set­tled in Tran­sjor­dan, lead­ing the fight against the British. Mak­ing Abdul­lah the King of Tran­sjor­dan sat­is­fied the Hashemites after the embar­rass­ing loss Mecca. But as far as al-Husseini was con­cerned, it wasn’t bad enough that he didn’t get a state, but his worst ene­mies in the Arab world — the Hashemites — were now rul­ing two coun­tries (Tran­sjor­dan and Iraq), while Zion­ists had their goal legit­imized by the League of Nations. The Kings of Iraq and Tran­sjor­dan –despite see­ing their father back­stabbed by the Eng­lish — were mod­er­ates, friendly to the West and accept­ing of the Jew­ish state in the Mid­dle East. As the world was split into fas­cist and demo­c­ra­tic camps in the 1930’s and 1940’s, al-Husseini and Has­san al-Banna found them­selves on the oppo­site side of the Hashemites.” (Idem.)

20. More about the Grand Mufti’s manip­u­la­tion and exploita­tion of the geo-political and colo­nial dynam­ics of the Mid­dle East between the World Wars: “The Mufti, who sup­ported estab­lish­ment of Greater Syria in what is now Israel, Syria, Jor­dan, Lebanon, West Bank and Gaza, decided to focus his efforts on tak­ing over Pales­tine and Tran­sjor­dan, while under­min­ing the British and the Hashemites in Iraq. Years later, UK’s Colo­nial Sec­re­tary Ormsby-Gore would report to the House of Lords: ‘The Mufti ... is play­ing his own dynas­tic game, and that game undoubt­edly is to become not merely the sov­er­eign of Pales­tine, not merely to be crowned or uncrowned King of Pales­tine, but first head of Pales­tine, then Pales­tine and Tran­sjor­dan com­bined, and then the whole of Syria, and, of course, in that posi­tion to be regarded as the leader of the Sunni world. ... He is a man of quite unlim­ited polit­i­cal ambi­tion. He was a Turk­ish Staff Offi­cer (dur­ing World War I) — and inci­den­tally a Turk who knew him thought he was the blackest-hearted man in the Mid­dle East.’” (Ibid.; p. 3.)

21. Turn­ing on his British bene­fac­tors, the Grand Mufti grav­i­tated toward Hitler. As will be seen, al-Husseini became one of Nazi Germany’s most impor­tant allies, and played a role in bring­ing about the Holo­caust. “Within weeks of Adolf Hitler’s ascen­dance to power. Mufti of Jerusalem Haj Amin al-Husseini con­tacted the Ger­man counsel-general in Pales­tine. With excep­tion of fund­ing anti-Semitic riots, Ger­mans rejected the Arab’s over­tures until 1937, when Adolf Eich­mann and Her­bert Hagen were sent to Pales­tine to estab­lish a frame­work to pro­vide Hus­seini with mil­i­tary and finan­cial aid by Nazi Ger­many and Fas­cist Italy.” (Idem.)

22. “By then, the Mufti had already proven his anti-Jewish cre­den­tials to the Ger­mans by orga­niz­ing a three-year long riots and mas­sacres. On April 19,1936, a crowd of Arabs stum­bled upon Jews in the town of Jaffa. Hav­ing been incited by Mufti-spread rumors that Zion­ists were killing Mus­lims, the crowd decided to kill three of the Jews they met. Six days later, the Arab Higher Com­mit­tee was cre­ated, with al-Husseini pre­sid­ing over the new body. The com­mit­tee openly endorsed past vio­lence and began orga­niz­ing future dis­obe­di­ence. On May 5, the British colo­nial author­i­ties warned al-Husseini against com­mit­ting ille­gal acts, but did not appear par­tic­u­larly deci­sive. Within weeks, mas­sive vio­lence broke out. By Octo­ber 1936, nearly 300 peo­ple were killed and another 1,100 wounded.” (Idem.)

23. Note that the British cod­dled the Grand Mufti and even­tu­ally reversed the Bal­four Dec­la­ra­tion (which rec­og­nized the Jews’ aspi­ra­tions for a home­land in the Mid­dle East.) “Colo­nial forces arrested a few pawns and one major leader, but took no action against the Mufti. The New York Times reported on June 14,1936 that al-Husseini had suc­ceeded ‘in con­vinc­ing expe­ri­enced high British civil ser­vants that he is work­ing for the government’s inter­ests [and that] it was in the inter­est of the gov­ern­ment that he should also be pres­i­dent of the new Arab High Com­mit­tee,’ so that ‘Haj Amin el-Husseini enjoys the government’s com­plete con­fi­dence as its unof­fi­cial adviser on the Arab side of the sit­u­a­tion .... The gov­ern­ment believes that he and only he is in a posi­tion to appease the Moslem masses; there­fore it gives him every sup­port while at the same time play­ing into his hands.’” (Idem.)

24. “Con­tin­u­ing its pol­icy of sid­ing with the Mufti, in June the Brits arrested scores of mem­bers of the Defense Party spon­sored by the rival Nashashibi clan, despite lack of any evi­dence that the Nashashibis were involved in the mas­sacres. Ninety per­cent of Arabs in the Sinai con­cen­tra­tion camp belonged to the Defense Party, with another 10% com­ing from smaller polit­i­cal move­ments. None of the Husseini-backed peo­ple were sent to the con­cen­tra­tion camp.” (Idem.)

25. The cyn­i­cism and anti-Semitism of the British toward the Jews was matched by the Soviet Union and the Com­mu­nist Party: “The UK was not the only power help­ing the Mufti in 1936. The USSR-sponsored Com­mu­nist Party of Pales­tine also did its part. After the 1929 mas­sacres (includ­ing the slaugh­ter of 68 Jews in Hebron), the Com­mu­nist Party issued a state­ment that ‘rev­o­lu­tion­ary move­ment with­out pogroms [anti-Semitic riots] is impos­si­ble.’ The Com­mu­nists even con­sid­ered the Mufti ‘too mod­er­ate’ in his fight against Jews.” (Idem.)

26. A mem­ber of the Com­mu­nist Party became the intel­li­gence chief for the Mufti’s mil­i­tary cadre dur­ing Husseini’s pogroms. “In the run-up to 1936–39, the Pales­tin­ian leader began coor­di­nat­ing orga­ni­za­tion of anti-Jewish vio­lence. In Novem­ber 1935, Com­mu­nists declared that Zion­ists were killing Arab fel­la­heen, as part of the Mufti’s pro­pa­ganda cam­paign to spark Arab rage against the Jews. On the eve of the first riots, Com­mu­nists met al-Husseini to work out the final terms of their roles in the upcom­ing vio­lence. Com­mu­nist Party mem­ber Nimr Uda became the Intel­li­gence chief for Mufti’s mil­i­tary units. Another Com­mu­nist rep­re­sen­ta­tive, Fuad Nasir, was named deputy to Abdul Qadir Hus­seini, com­man­der of Arab fight­ers in south­ern West Bank.” (Ibid.; p. 4.)

27. The British Peel Com­mis­sion vio­lated the League of Nations Man­date regard­ing the Jew­ish home­land. Even­tu­ally, the British reneged com­pletely on the Bal­four Dec­la­ra­tion. “By 1937, Britain real­ized that the Mufti was spon­sor­ing the vio­lence not just against Jews, but against the Eng­lish as well. Al-Husseini fled Jerusalem and set­tled in Lebanon. So glad were the British to see the Mufti leave that they did not even bother to ask the French pow­ers gov­ern­ing Lebanon to extra­dite al-Husseini. Mean­while, in an attempt to please the Arabs, UK’s Peel Com­mis­sion vio­lated the League of Nations Man­date and offered a pro­posal to divide the land des­ig­nated as the ‘Jew­ish National Home’ by the

League of Nations Man­date of 1922 despite a spe­cific man­date pro­hi­bi­tion against such divi­sion. Instead, under the Peel Com­mis­sion pro­posal of 1937, only a small part of the land would become the Jew­ish state. A year later, the Peel Com­mis­sion issued another pro­posal, with even less land offered to Jews. Some time later, the British issued the White Paper of 1939 reject­ing the idea of a Jew­ish National Home and severely restrict­ing Jew­ish immi­gra­tion. It was hoped for in Lon­don that such con­ces­sions to Arab nation­al­ists would appease al-Husseini and his sup­port­ers. Yet, only two years after the White Paper, the Mufti would come back to strike the British again.” (Idem.)

28. The Grand Mufti’s alliance with Hitler per­mit­ted his forces to attempt to seize Iraq on behalf of the Axis: “In 1940, it looked as if Hitler’s armada was unstop­pable. Hav­ing already con­quered France, Aus­tria, Czecho­slo­va­kia, Poland, Nor­way, Den­mark, Hol­land, Bel­gium and Lux­em­bourg, Hitler and his friends in Italy, Spain and occu­pied coun­tries were clearly the rulers of con­ti­nen­tal Europe. Hitler had also allied him­self with the USSR under the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 1939 which divided East­ern Europe by giv­ing the Baltic States and parts of Poland and Roma­nia (as well as Fin­land, which Joseph Stalin couldn’t occupy) to the USSR, while let­ting the Ger­mans take over west­ern Poland, Roma­nia and other Euro­pean nations. Mean­while, the Japan­ese were the dom­i­nant force of Asia, seem­ingly set to impose their con­trol on that con­ti­nent. Britain’s Win­ston Churchill stood vir­tu­ally alone against the Fas­cist onslaught, with the United States mired in rad­i­cal iso­la­tion­ism, refus­ing to take part in what many Amer­i­cans saw as a Euro­pean war.” (Idem.)

29. The one region where the British still had sig­nif­i­cant influ­ence was the Mid­dle East. Hitler set out to change that. Hus­seini wanted to get rid of the Hashemites. Both men wanted to get rid of the Jews and the Brits. It was a mar­riage made in heaven.” (Idem.)

30. “Despite a pow­er­ful Navy, the United King­dom and its army was mod­est in size and spread thin through­out the Empire. Mid­dle East and espe­cially Iraq seemed like the next pawn to fall to the Third Reich.” (Idem.)

31. “Britain responded with severe eco­nomic sanc­tions which, cou­pled with UK’s defeat of Ger­man forces in North Africa and pres­sure from the Iraqi royal fam­ily, brought down the pro-German gov­ern­ment on Jan­u­ary 31,1941. Kay­lani and other pro-Axis Iraqi, under the influ­ence from al-Husseini, con­spired to mur­der the Abdul-Illah. Two months after the Kay­lani left gov­ern­ment, the regent of Iraq fled the coun­try and the old Prime Min­is­ter was back in power.” (Idem.)

32. “In 1940, King Ghazi (son of King Faisal I) died, leav­ing only his four-year-old son to gov­ern. Emir Abdul-Illah, the regent for the young Iraqi King, felt the need to bring Rashid Ali al-Kaylani into the gov­ern­ment as the Prime Min­is­ter, despite the latter’s sup­port for Nazi Ger­many and links with al-Husseini. The new head of state imme­di­ately shifted the poli­cies of Iraq in favor of Nazi Ger­many, guar­an­tee­ing sup­ply of nat­ural resources to Hitler, as well as refus­ing to cut its tied with Italy. The for­mer Mufti of Jerusalem and his sur­ro­gates fre­quently acted as the government’s rep­re­sen­ta­tives with for­eign­ers. Kay­lani also asked from Hitler the right to ‘deal with Jews’ in Arab states — a request that was granted.” (Idem.)

33. “Britain responded with severe eco­nomic sanc­tions which, cou­pled with UK’s defeat of Ger­man forces in North Africa and pres­sure from the Iraqi royal fam­ily, brought down the pro-German gov­ern­ment on Jan­u­ary 31,1941. Kay­lani and other pro-Axis Iraqi, under the influ­ence from al-Husseini, con­spired to mur­der the Abdul-Illah. Two months after the Kay­lani left gov­ern­ment, the regent of Iraq fled the coun­try and the old Prime Min­is­ter was back in power.” (Ibid.; pp. 4–5.)

34. Note that the Grand Mufti’s pro­tégé Kay­lani fled to the allegedly neu­tral Saudi Ara­bia. (For more about the role of fas­cists in found­ing the mod­ern state of Saudi Ara­bia, see—among other pro­grams—FTR#361.) “As one of its first acts, the new admin­is­tra­tion sent its artillery to attack UK’s Royal Air Force in Habaniyya, caus­ing the Brits to respond by invad­ing Basra. The hoped-for sup­port from Nazi Ger­many never came and Kay­lani fled to Saudi Ara­bia. [Ital­ics are Mr. Emory’s.]” (Ibid.; p. 5)

35. “Haj Amin al-Husseini, who issued a fatwa (Islamic reli­gious rul­ing) call­ing on all Mus­lims to help pro-Axis gov­ern­ment in Iraq, became one of England’s most wanted men. In May 1941, a group of Jew­ish fight­ers, includ­ing David Raziel, the leader of the right-wing Irgun (pre­de­ces­sor of today’s Likud Party in Israel), set out for Iraq to assas­si­nate the for­mer Mufti on a mis­sion spon­sored by the Churchill admin­is­tra­tion. The mis­sion, how­ever, ended pre­ma­turely when Raziel was killed by a Ger­man plane. Real­iz­ing the threat to his life, al-Husseini fled to Europe dressed as a woman.” (Idem.)

36. “He was offi­cially received by Adolf Hitler on Novem­ber 28,1941, who agreed to estab­lish a bureau for al-Husseini which was used to spread pro­pa­ganda on behalf of Nazi Ger­many, orga­nize spy rings in Europe and the Mid­dle East, and most impor­tantly, estab­lish Mus­lim Nazi SS divi­sions and Wehrma­cht units in Bosnia, the Balkans, North Africa and Nazi-occupied parts of the Soviet Union. After the meet­ing, the Mufti was also named SS Grup­pen­fuehrer by Hein­rich Himm­ler and referred to as the ‘Fuhrer of the Arab World’ by Adolf Hitler him­self.” (Idem.)

37. “The largest Mus­lim Nazi SS unit was the 13th divi­sion known as ‘Han­jar.’ Hus­seini also orga­nized smaller, less effi­cient units, includ­ing the 21st Waf­fen SS divi­sion known Skan­der­beg . . . and the 23rd Waf­fen SS divi­sion known as Kama and made up mostly of Alban­ian Mus­lims. Thus, the Hitler’s Mufti orga­nized or helped to orga­nize three out of 27 Waf­fen SS divi­sions formed before 1945 (eleven other SS divi­sions were formed in 1945, but most of these were of ques­tion­able cal­iber and accepted sol­diers of ques­tion­able skill). Accord­ing to the Ency­clo­pe­dia of Holo­caust, Hus­seini ‘orga­nized in record time’ Croa­t­ian units that went on to mas­sacre hun­dreds of thou­sands of Ser­bian Ortho­dox Chris­tians. Jacen­o­vac, the third largest death camp where over 200,000 peo­ple met their death, was run by Croa­t­ian Ante Pavelic with the aid of al-Husseini. In all, at least 800,000 Yugosla­vian civil­ians were mur­dered by pro-Axis regimes ofU­tasche and Pavelic, with sig­nif­i­cant aid from the units estab­lished by the ‘Fuhrer of the Arab World.’ Tens of thou­sands of Jew­ish peo­ple out­side Yugoslavia also per­ished when the Mufti per­suaded not to trade them for Ger­man POW’s held by the Allies.” (Idem.)

38. “Al-Husseini opened a North African Bureau in Ger­many, whose goal was to recruit 500,000 Arab sol­diers from Morocco, Tunisia and Alge­ria. The plan failed when the Ger­man forces were forced to with­draw from much of North Africa after a suc­cess­ful British oper­a­tion.” (Idem.)

39. “How­ever, an Arab Legion was founded and fought under the Ger­man flag. The Arab sol­diers had hoped to fight in the Mid­dle East, but were instead sent to the Russ­ian front, where they were com­pletely wiped out while fight­ing in the Cau­ca­sus region. Some time later, in response to the British deci­sion to cre­ate a Jew­ish Brigade made up of some of the 26,000 Pales­tin­ian Jews who had fought under the United Kingdom’s flag, the Mufti con­vinced the Ger­mans to cre­ate an Arab Brigade. The unit, how­ever, either did not fight or was not very effi­cient because very lit­tle is known about it.” (Idem.)

40. The Mufti recruited from among Soviet Mus­lims. For more about this con­nec­tion, see—among other questions—FTR#’s 414, 51

8.) “The Mufti also made a par­tic­u­larly strong effort to recruit Soviet Mus­lims. ‘It was largely due to Haj Amin’s pro­pa­ganda that on the arrival of Ger­man armies in the north­ern Cau­ca­sus in 1942, five indige­nous tribes — the Chechens, the Ingushes, the Balkars, the Karachais, and the Kabar­dines –wel­comed them with bread and salt,’ wrote Joseph Schecht­man in The Mufti and the Fuhrer. Stalin’s response was deadly. Cau­casian Mus­lims, includ­ing nearly all Chechens and Ingush, were exiled from their land, with up to a third dying as a result of inhu­mane treat­ment by Soviet author­i­ties.” (Idem.)

41. “The Mufti was sim­i­larly instru­men­tal in the recruit­ment of the Azer­bai­jani bat­tal­ion, which ‘proved their valor, were included in Ger­man Storm Troops and dec­o­rated by the Ger­man Army,’ accord­ing to a Novem­ber 1943 broad­cast by DNB. The Mufti’s rep­re­sen­ta­tives in Cen­tral Asia recruited some Mus­lim fight­ers for Nazi Ger­many there as well, despite the wide­spread sup­port of the major­ity of Cen­tral Asian Mus­lims for the plight of the Jews dur­ing the Holo­caust.” (Ibid.; pp. 5–6.)

42. The pro­gram high­lights the Grand Mufti’s role in pre­cip­i­tat­ing the Holo­caust: “The Mufti’s hatred of the West was matched only by his hate of the Jews. It is not a coin­ci­dence that Ger­many sud­denly aban­doned the pol­icy of expelling Jews and adopted far harsher meth­ods a short time after the Mufti arrived in Ger­many. When Haj Amin came to Ger­many again, the Nazis decided to exe­cute the Final Solu­tion to the Jew­ish Prob­lem — the Holo­caust. ‘The Mufti was one of the ini­tia­tors of the sys­tem­atic exter­mi­na­tion of Euro­pean Jewry,’ reported Eichmann’s deputy. Dieter Wis­li­ceny. ‘[He had] played a role in the deci­sion to exter­mi­nate the Euro­pean Jews. The impor­tance of this role must not be dis­re­garded.... The Mufti was one of the ini­tia­tors of the sys­tem­atic exter­mi­na­tion of Euro­pean Jewry.’ We do not know if al-Husseini played a major role in shap­ing the Final Solu­tion. ‘There is, how­ever, abun­dant first-hand evi­dence of the part the Mufti played in mak­ing fool­proof the ban on emi­gra­tion (of Jews out of Ger­many),’ wrote Joseph Schecht­man.” (Ibid.; p. 6.)

43. Al-Husseini escaped from Ger­many to Pales­tine at the end of the war, and was received as a hero. Note that his escape was aided by Abwehr agent Youssef Nada, a Nazi intel­li­gence agent and the head of Bank Al Taqwa. (For more about this see FTR#’s 416, 456. In FTR#513, we saw that Nada is a cousin of Yasser Arafat, who is al-Husseini’s nephew.) Note also that the Grand Mufti was the first leader of the Pales­tin­ian national move­ment. This is impor­tant to remem­ber when assess­ing Israeli atti­tudes toward the Pales­tini­ans. “When the war ended, al-Husseini returned to the Mid­dle East as a hero. On Octo­ber 1, 1948, he was pro­claimed the Pres­i­dent of the gov­ern­ment of All-Palestine. The gov­ern­ment was, how­ever, fic­tional because it did not con­trol any land and was rec­og­nized by only a hand­ful of Arab nations. In 1959, the ‘gov­ern­ment’ was dis­banded by its spon­sor, Egypt.” (Idem.)

44. Note that the Islam­o­fas­cist allies of the Nazis such as the Grand Mufti and the Mus­lim Brotherhood’s Has­san al-Banna trav­eled in the com­pany of sec­u­lar Arab fas­cist groups. The Baath par­ties of both Syria and Iraq were pro­foundly influ­enced by the sec­u­lar Arab fas­cists. In the pas­sage that fol­lows, it is inter­est­ing (and per­haps sig­nif­i­cant) that Sami al-Joundi was one of the founders of the Baath party in Syria. The fam­ily of Jamal Daniel was among the Baath founders in both Syria and Iraq. Daniel is a busi­ness part­ner of Neil Bush. (For more about the Bush/Daniel con­nec­tion, see FTR#’s 438 and 508.) “Sup­port for Nazism was not lim­ited to the for­mer Mufti. ‘We admired the Nazis. We were immersed in read­ing Nazi lit­er­a­ture and books.... We were the first who thought of a trans­la­tion of Mein Kampf. Any­one who lived in Dam­as­cus at that time was wit­ness to the Arab incli­na­tion toward Nazism,’ recalled Sami al-Joundi, one of the founders of Syria’s rul­ing Ba’ath Party. Indeed, a pop­u­lar WWII song was heard in the Mid­dle East fea­tur­ing words: ‘Bis­sama Allah, oria alard Hitler’ – ‘In heaven Allah, on earth Hitler.’ Pick­ing up the theme of the book, posters were put up in Arab mar­kets and else­where pro­claim­ing, ‘In heaven Allah is thy ruler; on earth Adolph Hitler.’ John Gun­ther of Inside Asia reported: ‘The great­est con­tem­po­rary Arab hero is prob­a­bly Hitler’ . . . .” (Idem.)

45. For a visual per­spec­tive on the fascist/Islamist con­nec­tion, check out the pho­to­graph above. It is a pic­ture of a Pales­tin­ian Islamic Jihad rally on 4/15/2005. PIJ is an off­shoot of the Mus­lim Brotherhood—a link dis­cussed in, among other pro­grams, FTR#’s 473, 514. Do the par­tic­i­pants in this rally appear to be mak­ing an Islamic gesture?!

Discussion

No comments for “FTR #519 More on the History of the Islamic Fascist Axis”

Post a comment