For The Record

FTR #548 Tibet or not Tibet

Recorded April 16, 2006
REALAUDIO

Con­tin­u­ing an exam­i­na­tion of the Dalai Lama and some of the polit­i­cal forces with which he col­lab­o­rates, this pro­gram focuses largely on the Tibet of old—before the Chi­nese inva­sion. Ide­al­ized as the ulti­mate man­i­fes­ta­tion of Bud­dhist wis­dom on earth, the pre-invasion Tibet was any­thing but the earthly par­adise the Dalai Lama and his asso­ciates claim that it was. In point of fact, Tibet was a bru­tal, theo­cratic feu­dal soci­ety, presided over by the Dalai Lama and other Tibetan Bud­dhist prelates. Much of the pop­u­la­tion were serfs—actually lit­tle more than slaves. They had no rights to speak of, and were bound to the land owned by the reli­gious lead­ers. Even the small­est of offenses was pun­ished with extreme brutality—grisly tor­ture was rou­tine. It is not hard to see why the SS felt affin­ity for the Tibetan elite. (This is dis­cussed at length in FTR#547.) The broad­cast also high­lights the bizarre sex­ual rit­ual that char­ac­ter­izes Tibetan Bud­dhism. This aspect of the Dalai Lama’s faith gen­er­ates seri­ous sex­ual abuse of both adults and chil­dren of both ages. The con­clud­ing part of the pro­gram reviews the Dalai Lama’s col­lab­o­ra­tion with Islamist and pan-Turkist sep­a­ratists in Xin­jiang province of China, as well as his long-standing asso­ci­a­tion with ele­ments of the CIA. The dis­cus­sion of the Dalai Lama should be viewed in the con­text of a broader inquiry into covert action in Cen­tral Asia and other parts of what the Nazis referred to as “the Earth Island.”

Pro­gram High­lights Include: The Dalai Lama’s close asso­ci­a­tion with Erkin Alptekin, a for­mer employee of Radio Free Europe/Radio Lib­erty and an appar­ent asset of ele­ments of U.S. intel­li­gence; the Dalai Lama’s con­nec­tions to the CIA; the Dalai Lama’s link to Uighur ele­ments asso­ci­ated with Al Qaeda; the Dalai Lama’s par­tic­i­pa­tion in the Unrep­re­sented Nations and Peo­ples Orga­ni­za­tion, headed up by Karl von Hab­s­burg, the heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire; the Dalai Lama’s recent trip to the U.S. in order to pro­mote “peace­ful under­stand­ing” of Islam.

1. The pro­gram begins with review of a rel­e­vant quote from Christo­pher Hitchens. Address­ing a cog­ni­tive con­sid­er­a­tion cen­tral to grasp­ing the enor­mous gap between the pub­lic per­cep­tion of the Dalai Lama and the unsa­vory real­ity of his polit­i­cal con­nec­tions and reli­gious prac­tices, the broad­cast opens with a telling, rel­e­vant quote from Christo­pher Hitchens. Indeed, the Dalai Lama has his words and actions judged by his rep­u­ta­tion, not the other way around. “ . . . The great­est tri­umph that mod­ern PR can offer is the tran­scen­dent suc­cess of hav­ing your words and actions judged by your rep­u­ta­tion, rather than the other way about. The ‘spir­i­tual leader’ of Tibet has enjoyed this unas­sail­able sta­tus for some time now, becom­ing a byword and syn­onym for saintly and ethe­real val­ues. Why this doesn’t put peo­ple on their guard I’ll never know. . . .”
(“His Mate­r­ial High­ness” by Christo­pher Hitchens; Salon.com; 7/13/1998.)

2. Before pre­sent­ing infor­ma­tion about the sex­ual prac­tices of Tantric Bud­dhism, the pro­gram reviews the pro­fes­sional cre­den­tials of the Tri­mondis [Her­bert and Mar­i­ana Röttgen], whose work fea­tures promi­nently in the broad­casts deal­ing with the Dalai Lama. As we see, they were close pro­fes­sional, polit­i­cal and spir­i­tual sup­port­ers of the Dalai Lama and meta­mor­phosed into fierce crit­ics, once they learned more of the Dalai Lama’s his­tory and reli­gious beliefs. The Tri­mondis also note that the Dalai Lama goes out of his way to deceive about his actual beliefs and agenda. The pub­lic face of the Dalai Lama is one with which no one could take issue. The real­ity of the Dalai Lama is some­thing else, again. “ . . . STEPHENS: . . . How did you first come to know the Dalai Lama? TRIMONDI: We first met the XIV Dalai Lama in the eight­ies and became friends while pub­lish­ing his writ­ings in our pub­lish­ing house, Trikont-Dianus-Verlag. While orga­niz­ing inter­na­tional con­fer­ences with him and other famous speak­ers on inter­re­li­gious and inter­cul­tural top­ics and specif­i­cally secur­ing gov­ern­men­tal level invi­ta­tions to Ger­many and Aus­tria for him, we began to seri­ously explore Tibetan Bud­dhism. How­ever, after many years of exten­sive study and reflec­tion, we seri­ously ques­tioned some of the fun­da­men­tal tenets of the Tantric Bud­dhism the Dalai Lama pro­fessed and even­tu­ally became one of his sharpest crit­ics. . . Frankly speak­ing, the Dalai Lama has two faces. He makes his offi­cial con­tact with the West under the maxim of Mahayana Bud­dhism and then deftly assim­i­lates the high­est val­ues and ideals of west­ern cul­ture (Chris­t­ian, Jew­ish and human­ist). On his present trip to Amer­ica he has met with Mus­lims like Mohammed Ali, Jesuits at the Uni­ver­sity of San Fran­cisco, polit­i­cal lead­ers from Repub­li­can and Demo­c­ra­tic per­sua­sions, and then will com­fort­ably meet with ethi­cists and sci­en­tists at MIT and Har­vard. Through diplo­matic tol­er­ance he wins agnos­tics as well as the hearts of unsus­pect­ing Jews and Chris­tians, to whom he preaches in the tongue of ‘a man of peace’ and as a human rights activists relates pas­sages of ‘com­pas­sion, love, and non-violence’ from the ‘Ser­mon on the Mount.’ Nearly all of the speeches the Dalai Lama deliv­ers in pub­lic are extremely tol­er­ant, human and com­pas­sion­ate. You can only agree. And yet, there is another face that peeks out from behind the mask of good­ness, char­ity and kind­ness, which gives one pause to think more deeply about the shadow of this ‘man of peace’. . . .”
(An inter­view with Vic­tor and Vic­to­ria Tri­mondi by James C. Stephens; 9/11/2003.)

3. Next, the Tri­mondis describe the sex­ual rit­u­al­ism asso­ci­ated with Tantric Bud­dhism, and how it often leads to abuse. As noted here, the abuse is a direct, insti­tu­tional out­growth of this par­tic­u­lar brand of Bud­dhism. “TRIMONDI: The sex­ual prac­tices of Bud­dhist Tantrism are not to be con­fused with nor­mal sex­ual abuse by some Lamas. The lat­ter also has been a great prob­lem in the Bud­dhist com­mu­ni­ties, which were rocked by scan­dals caused by such promi­nent lead­ers as Chogyam Trungpa Rin­poche, founder of Colorado’s Naropa Uni­ver­sity, who was accused of hav­ing sex with his women stu­dents. In 1993, 21 West­ern Bud­dhist teach­ers met the Dalai Lama in India and issued an open let­ter that lamented var­i­ous teach­ers’ ‘sex­ual mis­con­duct with their stu­dents, abuse of alco­hol and drugs, mis­ap­pro­pri­a­tion of funds and mis­use of power.’ The group urged believ­ers to con­front teach­ers and pub­li­cize their mis­con­duct. Here in Europe, one of the most well known and dis­cussed cases involved the Scot­tish Bud­dhist June Camp­bell and the attempt of her teacher, the most hon­or­able eighty year old Lama Kalu Rin­poche, to mis­use her sex­u­ally. The 10. Feb­ru­ary 1999 head­line of the British news­pa­per The Inde­pen­dent read: ‘I was a Tantric sex slave.’ But Camp­bell shows also in her con­fes­sional book Trav­eller in Space that the sex­ual mis­use of women is not only a blame­able atti­tude but that it is a cen­tral part of the Lamaist Tantric reli­gion. The sex­ual magic prac­tice exer­cised by a Lama with a woman has the spe­cific goal to trans­mit the erotic and female energy into the spir­i­tual and worldly power of the male part­ner. Such sex­ual rit­u­als are the core of Tibetan Bud­dhism. Also in the secret higher ini­ti­a­tions of the Kalachakra Tantra sex­ual mag­i­cal rites take place. The rit­ual texts can be inter­preted sym­bol­i­cally or real (!). Both are pos­si­ble. The orig­i­nals say that eleven-year-old girls may be used as sex­ual part­ners.” (Idem.)

4. Much of the pro­gram focuses on the nature of the theo­cratic soci­ety over which the Dalai Lamas presided before the Chi­nese inva­sion of that coun­try. Far from the ide­al­ized, Bud­dhist “par­adise” mar­keted by the Dalai Lama and his milieu, the Tibet of old was a bru­tal, feu­dal soci­ety. One should note that old Tibet was a theoc­racy, presided over by the prelates of the Bud­dhist hier­ar­chy and headed up by the Dalai Lama him­self. In FTR#547, we exam­ined the attrac­tion that Tibetan soci­ety had for the Nazi SS. In addi­tion to the philo­soph­i­cal attrac­tion they felt for the brand of Bud­dhism prac­ticed in Tibet, the SS found the daily expres­sions of polit­i­cal power in Tibet to be con­sis­tent with their atti­tudes and prac­tices. Exam­in­ing what fol­lows, one can see how the Tibetan nobil­ity “with their ‘impe­ri­ous, self-confident behav­ior’ and sharp cheek­bones” were viewed as kin­dred spir­its by the Nazis. The text pas­sages that fol­low speak for them­selves, and need no inter­pre­tive com­men­tary. “ . . . But what of the Dalai Lama and the Tibet he presided over before the Chi­nese crack­down in 1959? It is widely held by many devout Bud­dhists that Old Tibet was a spir­i­tu­ally ori­ented king­dom free from the ego­tis­ti­cal lifestyles, empty mate­ri­al­ism, and cor­rupt­ing vices that beset mod­ern indus­tri­al­ized soci­ety. West­ern news media, travel books, nov­els, and Hol­ly­wood films have por­trayed the Tibetan theoc­racy as a ver­i­ta­ble Shangri-La. The Dalai Lama him­self stated that ‘the per­va­sive influ­ence of Bud­dhism’ in Tibet, ‘amid the wide open spaces of an unspoiled envi­ron­ment resulted in a soci­ety ded­i­cated to peace and har­mony. We enjoyed free­dom and con­tent­ment.’ A read­ing of Tibet’s his­tory sug­gests a dif­fer­ent pic­ture. In the thir­teenth cen­tury, Emperor Kublai Khan cre­ated the first Grand Lama, who was to pre­side over all the other lamas, as might a pope over his bish­ops. Sev­eral cen­turies later, the Emperor of China sent an army into Tibet to sup­port the Grand Lama, an ambi­tious 25-year-old man, who then gave him­self the title of Dalai (Ocean) Lama, ruler of all Tibet. Here is quite a his­tor­i­cal irony: the first Dalai Lama was installed by a Chi­nese army. To ele­vate his author­ity beyond worldly chal­lenge, the first Dalai Lama seized monas­ter­ies that did not belong to his sect, and is believed to have destroyed Bud­dhist writ­ings that con­flicted with his claim to divin­ity. The Dalai Lama who suc­ceeded him pur­sued a sybaritic life, enjoy­ing many mis­tresses, par­ty­ing with friends, and act­ing in other ways deemed unfit­ting for an incar­nate deity. For this he was done in by his priests. Within 170 years, despite their rec­og­nized sta­tus as gods, five Dalai Lamas were mur­dered by their high priests or other courtiers.”
(“Friendly Feu­dal­ism: The Tibet Myth” by Michael Par­enti; 7/04.)

5. “Reli­gions have had a close rela­tion­ship not only with vio­lence but with eco­nomic exploita­tion. Indeed, it is often the eco­nomic exploita­tion that neces­si­tates the vio­lence. Such was the case with the Tibetan theoc­racy. Until 1959, when the Dalai Lama last presided over Tibet, most of the arable land was still orga­nized into mano­r­ial estates worked by serfs. Even a writer sym­pa­thetic to the old order allows that ‘a great deal of real estate belonged to the monas­ter­ies, and most of them amassed great riches. . . . In addi­tion, indi­vid­ual monks and lamas were able to accu­mu­late great wealth through active par­tic­i­pa­tion in trade, com­merce, and money lend­ing.’ Drepung monastery was one of the biggest landown­ers in the world, with its 185 manors, 25,000 serfs, 300 great pas­tures, and 16,000 herds­men. The wealth of the monas­ter­ies went mostly to the higher-ranking lamas, many of them scions of aris­to­cratic fam­i­lies. Sec­u­lar lead­ers also did well. A notable exam­ple was the commander-in-chief of the Tibetan army, who owned 4,000 square kilo­me­ters of land and 3,500 serfs. He also was a mem­ber of the Dalai Lama’s lay Cab­i­net. Old Tibet has been mis­rep­re­sented by some of its West­ern admir­ers as ‘a nation that required no police force because its peo­ple vol­un­tar­ily observed the laws of karma.’ In fact. it had a pro­fes­sional army, albeit a small one, that served as a gen­darmerie for the land­lords to keep order and hunt down run­away serfs.” (Idem.)

6. “Young Tibetan boys were reg­u­larly taken from their fam­i­lies and brought into the monas­ter­ies to be trained as monks. Once there, they became bonded for life. Tashì-Tsering, a monk, reports that it was com­mon for peas­ant chil­dren to be sex­u­ally mis­treated in the monas­ter­ies. He him­self was a vic­tim of repeated rape, begin­ning at age nine. The monas­tic estates also con­scripted impov­er­ished peas­ant chil­dren for life­long servi­tude as domes­tics, dance per­form­ers, and sol­diers. In Old Tibet there were small num­bers of farm­ers who sub­sisted as a kind of free peas­antry, and per­haps an addi­tional 10,000 peo­ple who com­posed the ‘middle-class’ fam­i­lies of mer­chants, shop­keep­ers, and small traders. Thou­sands of oth­ers were beg­gars. A small minor­ity were slaves, usu­ally domes­tic ser­vants, who owned noth­ing. Their off­spring were born into slav­ery. The greater part of the rural population—some 700,000 of an esti­mated total of 1,250,000—were serfs. Serfs and other peas­ants gen­er­ally were lit­tle bet­ter than slaves. They went with­out school­ing or med­ical care. They spent most of their time labor­ing for high-ranking lamas or for the sec­u­lar landed aris­toc­racy. Their mas­ters told them what crops to grow and what ani­mals to raise. They could not get mar­ried with­out the con­sent of their lord or lama. And they might eas­ily be sep­a­rated from their fam­i­lies should their own­ers send them to work in a dis­tant loca­tion. One 22-year old woman, her­self a run­away serf, reports: ‘Pretty serf girls were usu­ally taken by the owner as house ser­vants and used as he wished.’ They ‘were just slaves with­out rights.’ Serfs needed per­mis­sion to go any­where. Landown­ers had legal author­ity to cap­ture those who tried to flee. One 24-year old run­away wel­comed the Chi­nese inter­ven­tion as a ‘lib­er­a­tion.’ He claimed that under serf­dom he was sub­jected to inces­sant toil, hunger, and cold. After his third failed escape, he was mer­ci­less beaten by the landlord’s men until blood poured from his nose and mouth. They then poured alco­hol and caus­tic soda on his wounds to increase the pain.” (Idem.)

7. “The serfs were under a life­time bond to work the lord’s land—or the monastery’s land—without pay, to repair the lord’s houses, trans­port his crops, and col­lect his fire­wood. They were also expected to pro­vide car­ry­ing ani­mals and trans­porta­tion on demand. They were taxed upon get­ting mar­ried, taxed for the birth of each child, and for every death in the fam­ily. They were taxed for plant­ing a tree in their yard and for keep­ing ani­mals. There were taxes for reli­gious fes­ti­vals, for singing, danc­ing, drum­ming, and bell ring­ing. Peo­ple were taxed for being sent to prison and upon being released. Those who could not find work were taxed for being unem­ployed, and if they trav­eled to another vil­lage in search of work, they paid a pas­sage tax. When peo­ple could not pay, the monas­ter­ies lent them money at 20 to 50 per­cent inter­est. Some debts were handed down from father to son to grand­son. Debtors who could not meet their oblig­a­tions risked being placed into slav­ery some­times for the rest of their lives. The theocracy’s reli­gious teach­ings but­tressed its class order. The poor and afflicted were taught that they had brought their trou­bles upon them­selves because of their wicked ways in pre­vi­ous lives. Hence they had to accept the mis­ery of their present exis­tence as a karmic atone­ment and in antic­i­pa­tion that their lot would improve upon being reborn. The rich and pow­er­ful of course treated their good for­tune as a reward for, and tan­gi­ble evi­dence of, virtue in past and present lives.” (Idem.)

8. “In the Dalai Lama’s Tibet, tor­ture and mutilation—including eye goug­ing, the pulling out of tongues, ham­string­ing, and amputation–were favored pun­ish­ments inflicted upon run­away serfs and thieves. Jour­ney­ing through Tibet in the 1960s, Stu­art and Roma Gelder inter­viewed a for­mer serf, Tsereh Wang Tuei, who had stolen two sheep belong­ing to a monastery. For this he had both his eyes gouged out and his hand muti­lated beyond use. He explains that he no longer is a Bud­dhist: ‘When a holy lama told them to blind me I thought there was no good in reli­gion.’ Since it was against Bud­dhist teach­ings to take human life, some offend­ers were severely lashed and then ‘left to God’ in the freez­ing night to die. ‘The par­al­lels between Tibet and medieval Europe are strik­ing,’ con­cludes Tom Grun­feld in his book on Tibet. In 1959, Anna Louise Strong vis­ited an exhi­bi­tion of tor­ture equip­ment that had been used by the Tibetan over­lords. There were hand­cuffs of all sizes, includ­ing small ones for chil­dren, and instru­ments for cut­ting off noses and ears, goug­ing out eyes, and break­ing off hands. There were instru­ments for slic­ing off kneecaps and heels, or ham­string­ing legs. There were hot brands, whips, and spe­cial imple­ments for dis­em­bow­el­ing. The exhi­bi­tion pre­sented pho­tographs and tes­ti­monies of vic­tims who had been blinded or crip­pled or suf­fered ampu­ta­tions for thiev­ery. There was the shep­herd whose mas­ter owed him a reim­burse­ment in yuan and wheat but refused to pay. So he took one of the master’s cows; for this he had his hands sev­ered. Another herds­man, who opposed hav­ing his wife taken from him by his lord, had his hands bro­ken off. There were pic­tures of Com­mu­nist activists with noses and upper lips cut off, and a woman who was raped and then had her nose sliced away.” (Idem.)

9. “Early vis­i­tors to Tibet com­ment about the theo­cratic despo­tism. In 1895, an Eng­lish­man, A. L. Wad­dell [sic, actual name: Wad­dell, L. A. (Lau­rence Aus­tine)], wrote that the pop­u­lace was under the ‘intol­er­a­ble tyranny of monks’ and the devil super­sti­tions they had fash­ioned to ter­ror­ize the peo­ple. In 1904 Perce­val Lan­don described the Dalai Lama’s rule as ‘an engine of oppres­sion.’ At about that time, another Eng­lish trav­eler, Cap­tain W.F.T. O’Connor, observed that ‘the great landown­ers and the priests . . . exer­cise each in their own domin­ion a despotic power from which there is no appeal,’ while the peo­ple are ‘oppressed by the most mon­strous growth of monas­ti­cism and priest-craft.’ Tibetan rulers ‘invented degrad­ing leg­ends and stim­u­lated a spirit of super­sti­tion’ among the com­mon peo­ple. In 1937, another vis­i­tor, [F.] Spencer Chap­man, wrote, ‘The Lamaist monk does not spend his time in min­is­ter­ing to the peo­ple or edu­cat­ing them. . . . The beg­gar beside the road is noth­ing to the monk. Knowl­edge is the jeal­ously guarded pre­rog­a­tive of the monas­ter­ies and is used to increase their influ­ence and wealth.’ . . .” (Idem.)

10. The pro­gram reviews the links of the Dalai Lama and his milieu to var­i­ous intel­li­gence agen­cies and some of the groups that they spon­sor. Review­ing infor­ma­tion pre­sented in FTR#547, we note that the Dalai Lama him­self is no stranger to ele­ments of U.S. intel­li­gence, specif­i­cally the CIA. “ . . .How­ever, through­out the 1960’s, the Tibetan exile com­mu­nity was secretly pock­et­ing $1.7 mil­lion from the CIA, accord­ing to doc­u­ments released by the State Depart­ment in 1998. Once this fact was pub­li­cized, the Dalai Lama’s orga­ni­za­tion itself issued a state­ment admit­ting that it had received mil­lions of dol­lars from the CIA dur­ing the 1960’s to send armed squads of exiles into Tibet to under­mine the Maoist rev­o­lu­tion. The Dalai Llama’s annual pay­ment from the CIA was $186,000. Indian intel­li­gence also financed both him and other Tibetan exiles. He has refused to say whether he or his broth­ers worked for the CIA. The agency has also declined to com­ment. . . .” (Idem.)

11. Gain­ing a broader view of the polit­i­cal milieu of which the Dalai Lama is a part, the broad­cast notes that the Dalai Lama has col­lab­o­rated with Islamists from among the Uighur pop­u­la­tion of Xin­jiang province of China. The Uighurs–a largely Mus­lim pop­u­la­tion who speak a Tur­kic language—have been agi­tat­ing for inde­pen­dence from China. (The Uighurs refer to Xin­jiang as East or East­ern Turkestan.) With Xin­jiang province being rich in petro­leum, the Uighurs have had lit­tle trou­ble obtain­ing sup­port from for­eign intel­li­gence ser­vices. For addi­tional infor­ma­tion about Uighur involve­ment with the Mus­lim Brotherhood/Al Qaeda milieu, see FTR#348. It should be noted that we are a long way from deal­ing with “Bud­dhists” here!! The Dalai Lama’s milieu is part of a larger Under­ground Reich vir­tual state. It is also impor­tant to bear in mind that the milieu of which the Dalai Lama is a part appears to focus on Cen­tral Asia—that part of the “Earth Island” seen by geopoliti­cians as key to con­trol­ling that land mass and, as a con­se­quence, the world. “India should have rea­sons to be con­cerned over the Dalai Lama’s hob­nob­bing with the pan– Islamic ele­ments in Xin­jiang. One can­not avoid sus­pect­ing that the influ­ence of these ele­ments must have been behind his par­tic­i­pa­tion in a con­fer­ence orga­nized in Chen­nai last year by some ele­ments, which have been act­ing as apol­o­gists for Gen. Per­vez Mushar­raf, the Pak­istani mil­i­tary dic­ta­tor, which was attended by a rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the Huryiat of J&K and a large num­ber of Pak­ista­nis, some of them retired Pak­istani mil­i­tary offi­cers. The Dalai Lama’s set-up sub­se­quently denied or played down some of the con­tro­ver­sial remarks attrib­uted to him at the con­fer­ence. The Gov­ern­ment of India should con­sider con­vey­ing to the Dalai Lama its unhap­pi­ness and con­cern over his asso­ci­a­tion with pan-Islamic ele­ments in Xin­jiang.”
(“US & Ter­ror­ism in Xin­jiang” by B. Raman; From the web­site of the South Asia Analy­sis Group [an Indian intelligence/national secu­rity think tank]; 7/02.)

12. More on the Uighur involve­ment with Al Qaeda: “10. The Islamic Move­ment of Uzbek­istan and the Abu Sayyaf of the south­ern Philip­pines have been des­ig­nated as For­eign Ter­ror­ist Orga­ni­za­tions under the US law of 1996, but not the East­ern Turkestan Islamic Party, though all the three are mem­bers of Osama bin Laden’s Inter­na­tional Islamic Front For Jehad Against the USA and Israel. In ini­ti­at­ing action, either for des­ig­na­tion as a For­eign Ter­ror­ist Orga­ni­za­tion or for action under the UN Secu­rity Coun­cil Res­o­lu­tion No, 1373 in respect of bank accounts, the US and the Euro­pean Union have focused essen­tially on ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tions, which are per­ceived by them as inter­na­tional in nature or which are seen as pos­ing a threat to their nation­als and inter­ests. Ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tions viewed by them as purely indige­nous have been excluded. These mul­ti­ple yard­sticks have been used vis-a-vis China as well as India.” (Idem.)

13. Note that both the Islamist ele­ment of the Uighur inde­pen­dence move­ment and its sec­u­lar allies have col­lab­o­rated with the Dalai Lama. “7. Uighurs were found fight­ing with al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. We are aware of cred­i­ble reports that some Uighurs who were trained by al-Qaeda have returned to China. . . .24. The sec­ond sim­i­lar­ity relates to the exter­nal causes of aggra­va­tion of the ter­ror­ist vio­lence in Xin­jiang. Just as in J & K, in Xin­jiang too, there are two dis­tinct terrorist/extremist move­ments– –one resort­ing to vio­lence on eth­nic grounds to assert the Uighur eth­nic iden­tity against the per­ceived Han Chi­nese dom­i­na­tion and the other using reli­gious and pan-Islamic argu­ments to jus­tify vio­lence for the estab­lish­ment of an inde­pen­dent Islamic State. While the eth­nic sep­a­ratist ele­ments have been the ben­e­fi­cia­ries of sym­pa­thy and sup­port from the Dalai Lama’s set-up and the Tibetan dias­pora abroad, and the US, Tai­wanese and Turk­ish intel­li­gence agen­cies, the reli­gious fun­da­men­tal­ist ele­ments have been in receipt of sup­port from the Inter-Services Intel­li­gence (ISI)-backed jehadi orga­ni­za­tions in Pak­istan, the Tal­iban and bin Laden’s Inter­na­tional Islamic Front For Jehad Against the USA and Israel.” (Idem.)

14. Accord­ing to the Raman paper, the CIA had close con­nec­tions to Erkin Alptekin, a mem­ber of the board of the Dalai Lama foun­da­tion and a func­tionary of the move­ment to estab­lish Xin­jiang province of China as an inde­pen­dent (Mus­lim) Uighur state—East Turkestan. It should be noted that Alptekin is an oper­a­tive of the Pan-Turkist move­ment, which is dis­tinct from the Islamist ele­ment in the Uighur inde­pen­dence move­ment. The Pan-Turkist move­ment is dis­cussed at length in RFA#’s 14 and 21, avail­able from Spit­fire. “25. In the 1970s and the 1980s, the Cen­tral Intel­li­gence Agency (CIA) of the USA had built up a net­work of con­tacts with the Uighur sep­a­ratist ele­ments and some of those, who had in the past worked for the Munich-based Radio Lib­erty of the CIA such as Erkin Alptekin, chair­man of the Europe-based East­ern Turkestani Union and a close Uighur asso­ciate of the Dalai Lama, are now in the fore­front of the eth­nic sep­a­ratist move­ment. . . .” (Idem.)

15. In addi­tion to his back­ground with Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty—both closely con­nected to U.S. intelligence—Erkin Alptekin is a founder and key mem­ber of the UNPO, about which we will have more to say in weeks to come. “ERKIN ALPTEKIN is one of the fore­most human rights advo­cates for the Uighur peo­ple of East­ern Turkestan, also known as the Xin­jiang Autonomous Region of the People’s Repub­lic of China. Mr. Alptekin was employed by Radio Free Europe/Radio Lib­erty from 1971 to 1994. He is one of the founders of the Unrep­re­sented Nations and People’s Orga­ni­za­tion (UNPO), and cur­rently serves as its gen­eral sec­re­tary.”
(Excerpt from the list of the board of the Dalai Lama Foundation.)

16. Look­ing ahead to future dis­cus­sions of the milieu to which the Dalai Lama belongs, the pro­gram high­lights the head of the UNPO—Karl von Hab­s­burg, the heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. (For more about the Hab­s­burgs and their fas­cist con­nec­tions, see—among other programs—FTR#536.) Again, we are a long, long way from deal­ing with “Bud­dhists” here! With the Dalai Lama and his milieu, we appear to be look­ing at man­i­fes­ta­tions of the Under­ground Reich as a “vir­tual state”—a state with­out for­mal geo­graph­i­cal bor­ders. We should also note that Cen­tral Asia—the area that is the focal point of the Dalai Lama’s and UNPO’s sup­port for Uighur sep­a­ratist ele­ments was viewed by geopoliti­cians as crit­i­cal for main­tain­ing con­trol of the Earth Island. “The eldest son and heir of the dynasty is Karl (Karl’s web­site), who lives in Aus­tria and has served in the Aus­trian army and was a mem­ber of the Euro­pean Par­lia­ment, like his father, from 1996–1999. [Ital­ics are Mr. Emory’s.] He has worked hard to keep the fam­ily in the pub­lic lime­light, even host­ing a pop­u­lar tele­vi­sion game show. He works qui­etly to change the Aus­trian laws of 1919 that for­bid the Hab­s­burgs from hold­ing any polit­i­cal office and has often been men­tioned as a pos­si­ble Chan­cel­lor of the Aus­trian Repub­lic. At this time he is the Gen­eraldirek­tor of the UNPO (Unrep­re­sented Nations and Peo­ples Orga­ni­za­tion). In 1993 Karl mar­ried Francesca Thyssen-Bornemisza who is well known in Euro­pean high soci­ety.”
(Entry for Karl von Habsburg.)

17. Recently, the Dalai Lama vis­ited the United States in order to, in part, “pro­mote under­stand­ing” of Islam on the part of Amer­i­cans. An alto­gether laud­able under­tak­ing on the sur­face, this effort raises some ques­tions. Is the Dalai Lama actu­ally run­ning inter­fer­ence for some of the Islamist ele­ments with which he is asso­ci­ated? In this con­text, one should recall the advi­sory given by the Tri­mondis in para­graph #2. They warn that the Dalai Lama goes out of his way to be less than forth­com­ing about his true beliefs and agenda. “The Dalai Lama, a pow­er­ful icon for peace world­wide, will gather influ­en­tial Amer­i­can Mus­lim lead­ers in San Fran­cisco today to help refash­ion Islam’s image in the United States. Con­cerned that Mus­lims are unfairly demo­nized in Amer­i­can pop­u­lar con­scious­ness, the world-renowned Bud­dhist leader hopes to help show Islam in what he sees as its truest form, one of peace. . . .”
(“Dalai Lama Seeks to Improve image of Islam in U.S.” by Matthai Chakko Kuruvila; San Fran­cisco Chron­i­cle; 4/15/2006.)

Discussion

No comments for “FTR #548 Tibet or not Tibet”

Post a comment