- Spitfire List - http://spitfirelist.com -

FTR #925 Painting Oswald “Red,” Part 1

Dave Emory’s entire life­time of work is avail­able on a flash dri­ve that can be obtained HERE [1]. The new dri­ve is a 32-giga­byte dri­ve that is cur­rent as of the pro­grams and arti­cles post­ed by ear­ly win­ter of 2016. The new dri­ve (avail­able for a tax-deductible con­tri­bu­tion of $65.00 or more.) (The pre­vi­ous flash dri­ve was cur­rent through the end of May of 2012.)

WFMU-FM is pod­cast­ing For The Record–You can sub­scribe to the pod­cast HERE [2].

You can sub­scribe to e‑mail alerts from Spitfirelist.com HERE [3].

You can sub­scribe to RSS feed from Spitfirelist.com HERE [3].

You can sub­scribe to the com­ments made on pro­grams and posts–an excel­lent source of infor­ma­tion in, and of, itself HERE [4].

This broad­cast was record­ed in one, 60-minute seg­ment [5].

Lee Harvey Oswald: Ersatz Communist [6]

Lee Har­vey Oswald: Ersatz Com­mu­nist

Stephan Bandera, head of the OUN/B [7]

Stephan Ban­dera, head of the OUN/B

Intro­duc­tion: The first of a two-part series review­ing infor­ma­tion about what the bril­liant Berke­ley researcher Peter Dale Scott calls “lev­el one coverup” of the JFK assas­si­na­tion, this broad­cast presents part of the “paint­ing of Oswald Red,” by way of giv­ing us his­tor­i­cal per­spec­tive on the appar­ent fram­ing of
Rus­sia for the hack of the DNC and the “non-hack” of NSA cyber­weapons by the “Shad­ow Bro­kers.”

On Novem­ber 22, 1963, Pres­i­dent Kennedy’s assas­si­na­tion fun­da­men­tal­ly altered the Amer­i­can polit­i­cal land­scape, neu­tral­iz­ing JFK’s peace ini­tia­tives in Europe, South­east Asia and Cuba. Fur­ther­more, LBJ was manip­u­lat­ed into pur­su­ing the open-end­ed Viet­nam com­mit­ment JFK had stu­dious­ly avoid­ed.

In past dis­cus­sion of “Eddie the Friend­ly Spook,” we have char­ac­ter­ized him as “the Obverse Oswald.” With their exer­cise of “Tech­no­crat­ic Fas­cism,” “Team Snow­den” is destroy­ing Amer­i­can democ­ra­cy as defin­i­tive­ly and effec­tive­ly as the bul­lets in Dealy Plaza did on 11/22/1963.

Sup­ple­ment­ing and sum­ming up the exhaus­tive FTR series on “The Eddie the Friend­ly Spook” series, this pro­gram sets forth the Snow­den “psy-op” and the high-pro­file hacks against the back­ground of Lee Har­vey Oswald, the U.S. spy infil­trat­ed into the Sovi­et Union and then into left­ist orga­ni­za­tions in the Unit­ed States, Oswald was framed for JFK’s assas­si­na­tion and then killed before he could defend him­self.

Where­as Oswald was por­trayed as a vil­lain, Eddie the Friend­ly Spook’s oper­a­tion is the obverse, with Snow­den por­trayed as a hero, while decamp­ing first to Chi­na and then to Rus­sia.

We begin by review­ing and syn­op­siz­ing infor­ma­tion indi­cat­ing that Rus­sia has been framed for the “Shad­ow Bro­kers” alleged hack of the NSA, much as it appears to have been framed for the DNC hack. Indeed, with both the DNC hack and the “Shad­ow Bro­kers” non-hack of the NSA, the evi­dence points increas­ing­ly toward “Team Snow­den” and Eddie the Friend­ly Spook him­self.

Points of infor­ma­tion reviewed include:

Thomas J. Dodd [26]

Thomas J. Dodd

After syn­op­siz­ing the appar­ent fram­ing of Rus­sia for the DNC hack and the Shad­ow-Bro­kers’ non-hack of NSA, the broad­cast recaps two key episodes in the paint­ing of “Oswald Red.”

One of the results of the Snow­den “op” was the death of the Obama/Clinton State Department’s attempt­ed re-boot with Rus­sia. In this regard, the actions of the Obverse Oswald are sim­i­lar to the way that the paint­ing of Oswald Red served to exac­er­bate Cold War ten­sions.

The killing of the attempt­ed diplo­mat­ic rap­proche­ment with Rus­sia was, in turn, cen­tral to the real­iza­tion of the desta­bi­liza­tion of the Yanukovich gov­ern­ment in Ukraine and the instal­la­tion of the heirs to Stephan Bandera’s OUN/B in the Maid­an coup.

(Recall that the Maid­an coup was financed, in part, by Pierre Omid­yar [27], whose First Look Media were not only recip­i­ents of Snowden’s pur­loined files, but served as the jour­nal­is­tic plat­form for Glenn Green­wald [28], Snowden’s leak­ing jour­nal­ist of choice.)

This pro­gram details the assas­si­na­tion of OUN/B leader Stephan Ban­dera [29]–a key part of the paint­ing of Oswald Red.

Blamed on the KGB, the killing was–in all likelihood–performed by BND (Ger­man for­eign intel­li­gence and the suc­ces­sor to the Rein­hard Gehlen “org”) or oth­er Under­ground Reich-con­nect­ed ele­ments, pos­si­bly ele­ments of CIA.

The broad­cast cen­ters on dis­in­for­ma­tion point­ing to Lee Har­vey Oswald as a KGB-trained assas­sin. (The dis­in­for­ma­tion was spread by the World Anti-Com­mu­nist Con­gress for Free­dom and Liberation–the fore­run­ner of the World Anti-Com­mu­nist League [30].)

Attempt­ing to pin the assas­si­na­tion on the Sovi­ets and/or Cubans, these ele­ments spurred many lib­er­als to endorse the “Oswald as lone-nut” hypoth­e­sis. They were afraid that the assas­si­na­tion could lead to nuclear war, if the per­cep­tion gained trac­tion that Oswald was a com­mu­nist. A cen­tral ele­ment in this dis­in­for­ma­tion ploy was an attempt to con­nect the JFK assas­si­na­tion to the death of Stephan Ban­dera, alleged­ly per­formed by an KGB assas­sin named Bog­dan Stashyn­sky.

Mur­dered on the same day that Lee Har­vey Oswald “defect­ed” to the Sovi­et Union, Bandera’s killing was linked to Oswald’s alleged killing of JFK by ele­ments asso­ci­at­ed with the W.A.C.C.F.L.

W.A.C.C.F.L. ele­ments dis­sem­i­nated the lie that Oswald was trained at the same facil­ity as Stashyn­sky, and that the JFK hit was part of a Sovi­et pro­gram of assas­si­na­tion of West­ern polit­i­cal lead­ers. It should be not­ed that W.A.C.C.F.L.-related ele­ments also fig­ured promi­nently in the “han­dling” of Oswald in New Orleans, Dal­las and (pos­si­bly) the Sovi­et Union.

Those W.A.C.C.F.L. ele­ments were close­ly asso­ci­at­ed with the OUN/B and the Anti-Bol­she­vik Bloc of Nations, a con­sor­tium of East­ern Euro­pean fas­cist groups inex­tri­ca­bly linked with the Gehlen orga­ni­za­tion, the BND, the CIA and the Under­ground Reich.

The dis­in­for­ma­tion that Oswald was a KGB assas­sin was insert­ed into a Sen­ate Sub­com­mit­tee report by Sen. Thomas Dodd, with assis­tance from ele­ments of CIA.

Carlos Bringuier (left) and Ed Butler. [31]

Car­los Bringuier (left) and Ed But­ler.

Anoth­er episode in the paint­ing of Oswald Red con­cerns an inter­view set up on WDSU in New Orleans. Arranged by Ed But­ler, whose Infor­ma­tion Coun­cil of the Amer­i­c­as served as a front for ele­ments of the U.S. intel­li­gence com­mit­tee, the inter­view fea­tured Oswald pro­claim­ing his Marx­ist, pro-Cas­tro sym­pa­thies, as well as dis­cussing his so-called “defec­tion” to Rus­sia. One of the par­tic­i­pants in the inter­view was Car­los Bringuier, an anti-Cas­tro Cuban and key mem­ber of the DRE, one of the anti-Cas­tro Cuban groups man­aged by the CIA.

George Joan­nides, who served as some­thing of a case offi­cer for the DRE, was the liai­son [32] between the House Select Com­mit­tee on Assas­si­na­tions and the CIA. Joan­nides was also report­ed [33] by the BBC to have been present at the Ambas­sador Hotel in Los Ange­les on the night Robert F. Kennedy was assas­si­nat­ed.

The myth of “Lee Har­vey Oswald the Com­mu­nist” was suc­cess­ful­ly dis­played and stem­ming from that fic­tion led many lib­er­als to opt for the “Oswald the lone nut” sce­nario because they feared a Third World War might result from the pub­lic per­cep­tion that a “com­mie” had killed the Pres­i­dent. The sec­ond  pro­gram fea­tures a re-broad­cast of the inter­view that Oswald gave on WDSU in New Orleans in August of 1963. In this inter­view, Oswald express­es sym­pa­thy for Castro’s Cuba and dis­cuss­es his sojourn in the Sovi­et Union.

To all out­ward appear­ances, Oswald looked like a com­mu­nist sym­pa­thiz­er in the inter­view. Oswald was the sole mem­ber of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee’s New Orleans chap­ter, which shared an address with Guy Bannister’s detec­tive agency, a front for var­i­ous right-wing activ­i­ties, includ­ing the [then] ongo­ing para­mil­i­tary efforts to oust Cas­tro. (Ban­nis­ter is pic­tured at right.) In addi­tion to the WDSU inter­view, the sec­ond side fea­tures discussion—excerpted from the Guns of Novem­ber, Part I [34] from 11/1/1983—of the intel­li­gence con­nec­tions of Ed But­ler, whose Infor­ma­tion Coun­cil of the Amer­i­c­as arranged the Oswald inter­view. Again, Butler’s INCA was lit­tle more than an intel­li­gence front, with close ties to Bannister’s detec­tive agency.

Pro­gram High­lights Include:

1. We begin by review­ing and syn­op­siz­ing infor­ma­tion indi­cat­ing that Rus­sia has been framed for the “Shad­ow Bro­kers” alleged hack of the NSA, much as it appears to have been framed for the DNC hack. Indeed, with both the DNC hack and the “Shad­ow Bro­kers” non-hack of the NSA, the evi­dence points increas­ing­ly toward “Team Snow­den” and Eddie the Friend­ly Spook him­self.

Points of infor­ma­tion reviewed include:

2. After syn­op­siz­ing the appar­ent fram­ing of Rus­sia for the DNC hack and the Shad­ow-Bro­kers’ non-hack of NSA, the broad­cast recaps two key episodes in the paint­ing of “Oswald Red.”

One of the results of the Snow­den “op” was the death of the Obama/Clinton State Department’s attempt­ed re-boot with Rus­sia. In this regard, the actions of the Obverse Oswald are sim­i­lar to the way that the paint­ing of Oswald Red served to exac­er­bate Cold War ten­sions.

The killing of the attempt­ed diplo­mat­ic rap­proche­ment with Rus­sia was, in turn, cen­tral to the real­iza­tion of the desta­bi­liza­tion of the Yanukovich gov­ern­ment in Ukraine and the instal­la­tion of the heirs to Stephan Bandera’s OUN/B in the Maid­an coup.

(Recall that the Maid­an coup was financed, in part, by Pierre Omid­yar [27], whose First Look Media were not only recip­i­ents of Snowden’s pur­loined files, but served as the jour­nal­is­tic plat­form for Glenn Green­wald [28], Snowden’s leak­ing jour­nal­ist of choice.)

This pro­gram details the assas­si­na­tion of OUN/B leader Stephan Ban­dera [29]–a key part of the paint­ing of Oswald Red.

Blamed on the KGB, the killing was–in all likelihood–performed by BND (Ger­man for­eign intel­li­gence and the suc­ces­sor to the Rein­hard Gehlen “org”) or oth­er Under­ground Reich-con­nect­ed ele­ments, pos­si­bly ele­ments of CIA.

The broad­cast cen­ters on dis­in­for­ma­tion point­ing to Lee Har­vey Oswald as a KGB-trained assas­sin. (The dis­in­for­ma­tion was spread by the World Anti-Com­mu­nist Con­gress for Free­dom and Liberation–the fore­run­ner of the World Anti-Com­mu­nist League [30].)

Attempt­ing to pin the assas­si­na­tion on the Sovi­ets and/or Cubans, these ele­ments spurred many lib­er­als to endorse the “Oswald as lone-nut” hypoth­e­sis. They were afraid that the assas­si­na­tion could lead to nuclear war, if the per­cep­tion gained trac­tion that Oswald was a com­mu­nist. A cen­tral ele­ment in this dis­in­for­ma­tion ploy was an attempt to con­nect the JFK assas­si­na­tion to the death of Stephan Ban­dera, alleged­ly per­formed by an KGB assas­sin named Bog­dan Stashyn­sky.

Mur­dered on the same day that Lee Har­vey Oswald “defect­ed” to the Sovi­et Union, Bandera’s killing was linked to Oswald’s alleged killing of JFK by ele­ments asso­ci­at­ed with the W.A.C.C.F.L.

W.A.C.C.F.L. ele­ments dis­sem­i­nated the lie that Oswald was trained at the same facil­ity as Stashyn­sky, and that the JFK hit was part of a Sovi­et pro­gram of assas­si­na­tion of West­ern polit­i­cal lead­ers. It should be not­ed that W.A.C.C.F.L.-related ele­ments also fig­ured promi­nently in the “han­dling” of Oswald in New Orleans, Dal­las and (pos­si­bly) the Sovi­et Union.

Those W.A.C.C.F.L. ele­ments were close­ly asso­ci­at­ed with the OUN/B and the Anti-Bol­she­vik Bloc of Nations, a con­sor­tium of East­ern Euro­pean fas­cist groups inex­tri­ca­bly linked with the Gehlen orga­ni­za­tion, the BND, the CIA and the Under­ground Reich.

The dis­in­for­ma­tion that Oswald was a KGB assas­sin was insert­ed into a Sen­ate Sub­com­mit­tee report by Sen. Thomas Dodd, with assis­tance from ele­ments of CIA.

(We went into this at greater length in FTR #876 [35].)

3. Anoth­er episode in the paint­ing of Oswald Red con­cerns an inter­view set up on WDSU in New Orleans. Arranged by Ed But­ler, whose Infor­ma­tion Coun­cil of the Amer­i­c­as served as a front for ele­ments of the U.S. intel­li­gence com­mit­tee, the inter­view fea­tured Oswald pro­claim­ing his Marx­ist, pro-Cas­tro sym­pa­thies, as well as dis­cussing his so-called “defec­tion” to Rus­sia. One of the par­tic­i­pants in the inter­view was Car­los Bringuier, an anti-Cas­tro Cuban and key mem­ber of the DRE, one of the anti-Cas­tro Cuban groups man­aged by the CIA.

George Joan­nides, who served as some­thing of a case offi­cer for the DRE, was the liai­son [32] between the House Select Com­mit­tee on Assas­si­na­tions and the CIA. Joan­nides was also report­ed [33] by the BBC to have been present at the Ambas­sador Hotel in Los Ange­les on the night Robert F. Kennedy was assas­si­nat­ed.

The myth of “Lee Har­vey Oswald the Com­mu­nist” was suc­cess­ful­ly dis­played and stem­ming from that fic­tion led many lib­er­als to opt for the “Oswald the lone nut” sce­nario because they feared a Third World War might result from the pub­lic per­cep­tion that a “com­mie” had killed the Pres­i­dent. The sec­ond  pro­gram fea­tures a re-broad­cast of the inter­view that Oswald gave on WDSU in New Orleans in August of 1963. In this inter­view, Oswald express­es sym­pa­thy for Castro’s Cuba and dis­cuss­es his sojourn in the Sovi­et Union.

To all out­ward appear­ances, Oswald looked like a com­mu­nist sym­pa­thiz­er in the inter­view. Oswald was the sole mem­ber of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee’s New Orleans chap­ter, which shared an address with Guy Bannister’s detec­tive agency, a front for var­i­ous right-wing activ­i­ties, includ­ing the [then] ongo­ing para­mil­i­tary efforts to oust Cas­tro. (Ban­nis­ter is pic­tured at right.) In addi­tion to the WDSU inter­view, the sec­ond side fea­tures discussion—excerpted from the Guns of Novem­ber, Part I [34] from 11/1/1983—of the intel­li­gence con­nec­tions of Ed But­ler, whose Infor­ma­tion Coun­cil of the Amer­i­c­as arranged the Oswald inter­view. Again, Butler’s INCA was lit­tle more than an intel­li­gence front, with close ties to Bannister’s detec­tive agency.