- Spitfire List - http://spitfirelist.com -

Anonymous vs. The Muslim Brotherhood: Hacktivists Deploy against Islamic Fascists

[1]

Bat­tling the Broth­er­hood

COMMENT: A fas­ci­nat­ing sto­ry comes to us from the  vig­i­lant “Pter­rafractyl.” The Anony­mous hack­ing milieu has declared war on the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood in Egypt. I don’t know how tech-savvy the Ikhwan is, or how vul­ner­a­ble their 0perations are to the sorts of gam­bits that can be employed by Anony­mous, but this is a remark­able devel­op­ment.

Among the best inves­tiga­tive sources for infor­ma­tion about the Broth­er­hood is the Glob­al Mus­lim Broth­er­hood Dai­ly Report, which feeds along the bot­tom of the front page of this web­site. There is a wealth of infor­ma­tion about the Broth­er­hood and its his­tor­i­cal and ide­o­log­i­cal affil­i­a­tions with inter­na­tion­al fas­cism in oth­er parts of this web­site as well.

Good luck to the folks at Anony­mous!

An edu­cat­ed guess is that the Broth­er­hood may well blame any dif­fi­cul­ties they expe­ri­ence on Israel/Mossad/“the Jews”.

“Hack­tivists Anony­mous to Take Down Egyp­t’s Mus­lim Broth­er­hood” by Joseph May­ton; Bikya­masr; 11/09/2011. [2]

EXCERPT: he Anony­mous orga­ni­za­tion of hack­ivists has lev­eled a new threat against Egypt’s largest polit­i­cal group, the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood, say­ing it would take down the group’s online capac­i­ty.

The announce­ment is titled “Oper­a­tion Broth­er­hood Take­down.” And they said it was “engaged.”

In a Youtube.com video, Anony­mous said that the Broth­er­hood is a “threat to Egypt­ian sover­ieg­n­ty” and must not be allowed to work against the rev­o­lu­tion that oust­ed for­mer Pres­i­dent Hos­ni Mubarak in Feb­ru­ary.

The video stat­ed that the Islam­ic group was not part of the rev­o­lu­tion and is attempt­ing to co-opt the Egypt­ian pop­u­la­tion.

“Ever since its rev­o­lu­tion that shook the world, Egypt has had its fate unde­cid­ed. Preda­tors who seek to con­trol are wait­ing to strike at the right moment. They are wait­ing to take over the coun­try and make it so that anoth­er rev­o­lu­tion is impos­si­ble. We can­not allow this,” said the group. . . .