Spitfire List Web site and blog of anti-fascist researcher and radio personality Dave Emory.

News & Supplemental  

Austerity, Up Close and Personal, Part 3: The Continuation of War by Other Means

The Ger­man con­cept of liquidity

 COMMENT: Pre­vi­ous posts have high­lighted the pro­found influ­ence of Pruss­ian mil­i­tary the­o­reti­cian  von Clause­witz on the evo­lu­tion, the­ory and prac­tice of Ger­man power struc­ture. We have also noted that the Ger­man insis­tence on aus­ter­ity has had the effect of dec­i­mat­ing the soci­eties sub­jected to that doc­trine and dri­ving their pop­u­la­tions in the direc­tion of totalitarianism.

Recall that it was Ger­man chan­cel­lor Hein­rich Bruning’s insis­tence on bud­getary aus­ter­ity that helped pave the way for the rise of Hitler.

As the Euro­pean deba­cle con­tin­ues, we are in a posi­tion to fur­ther eval­u­ate the depth and scope of the social destruc­tion stem­ming from it. 

A recent report notes that Europe faces sev­eral “lost gen­er­a­tions” as impov­er­ished young peo­ple incur the dam­age result­ing from “aus­ter­ity.” Inter­est­ingly and sig­nif­i­cantly, large num­bers of des­per­ate, unem­ployed youth are seek­ing work in Germany.

Ulti­mately, this fig­ures to have the effect of increas­ing the social stress and pres­sure on the Ger­man work­force, who will face increased and intense com­pe­ti­tion for avail­able jobs. “Anti-immigrant” sen­ti­ment has proved an effec­tive recruit­ing tool for the far right around the world.

The dire cir­cum­stances in Greece have fueled the rise of the Golden Dawn–a Greek neo-fascist party that suc­cess­fully exploits the social chaos in that coun­try to increase its ranks. Golden Dawn has begun actively recruit­ing among Greek expa­tri­ates who have moved to Ger­many in search of work.

 The National Action Party, a Turk­ish fascist/nationalist party estab­lished a pres­ence in the ’70’s and ’80’s among the “guest work­ers” in Ger­many. Golden Dawn may be attempt­ing to re-create the suc­cess of the NAP.

Numer­ous posts and pro­grams have dis­cussed the Euro­pean Mon­e­tary Union as the real­iza­tion of the Third Reich’s goal of a Ger­man dom­i­nated eco­nomic union as a vehi­cle for world conquest.

Will the “lost gen­er­a­tions” of Europe become the cadre for the suc­cess­ful rise of “Euro-fascism?” Is that pre­cisely the goal of the Under­ground Reich and its eco­nomic foun­da­tion, the Bor­mann cap­i­tal net­work? It would be fool­ish to over­look the possibility.

Recall­ing the the­o­ret­i­cal tenets of von Clause­witz, what we are see­ing is, quite lit­er­ally, the con­tin­u­a­tion of war by other means.

All Hon­or­able Men by James Stew­art Mar­tin; Lit­tle, Brown [HC]; Copy­right 1950 by James Stew­art Mar­tin; p. 235.

. . . . The end of bat­tle in 1945 had sig­naled the start of a new kind of war–a  post-war. Germany’s clas­si­cal  mil­i­tary the­o­rist, von Clause­witz, is famous for hav­ing declared that “war is the con­tin­u­a­tion of diplo­macy by other means.”  In deal­ing with a Ger­many which had gone to school with von Clause­witz for gen­er­a­tions, we knew that, con­versely, a post-war is the con­tin­u­a­tion of war by other means.  Since Bis­marck, wars and post-wars have formed a con­tin­u­ous series, chang­ing the qual­ity of the events only slightly from year to year, with no  such thing as a clear dis­tinc­tion between  heat of  bat­tle and calm of  peace.  This  post-war of  the Ger­man occu­pa­tion was  dif­fer­ent from the  “cold war”  between the United States and Rus­sia, which broke out at about  the same time. The lat­ter com­pli­cated  the  diag­no­sis, like a man get­ting typhoid fever and pneu­mo­nia at the same time. . . .

“Austerity’s Chil­dren Becom­ing Europe’s ‘Lost Gen­er­a­tion,’ Rais­ing Fears of New Cri­sis” by Claire Dav­en­port [Reuters]; Finan­cial Post; 2/14/2013.

EXCERPT: Chil­dren across Europe are being dri­ven into poverty by harsh gov­ern­ment aus­ter­ity and youth unem­ploy­ment is soar­ing, threat­en­ing to cre­ate “lost gen­er­a­tions” that could fire up a new con­ti­nen­tal crisis.

Global char­ity Car­i­tas said on Thurs­day that around three out of every 10 chil­dren in Greece, Ire­land, Por­tu­gal, Italy and Spain are in or have been pushed to the brink of poverty.

Greece said its youth unem­ploy­ment had now exceeded 60%. Spain’s is above 50% and Por­tu­gal has just topped 40%.

Think tank Bruegel said the prob­lem extended well beyond the debt-laden periph­eral euro­zone economies and could come back to reverse Europe’s slow recov­ery from finan­cial crisis.

In a report, Car­i­tas said euro­zone coun­tries that have received inter­na­tional loans — plus Italy, which hasn’t — are cre­at­ing a huge class of poorly-educated and poorly-fed young peo­ple with low morale and few job prospects.

“This could be a recipe not just for one lost gen­er­a­tion in Europe but for sev­eral lost gen­er­a­tions,” Car­i­tas said, cit­ing the Euro­pean Union’s own sta­tis­tics.
While these coun­tries’ future work­ers may suf­fer a loss of morale, qual­i­fi­ca­tions and prospects, those that strug­gle through are likely to take their tal­ents elsewhere.

Those with qual­i­fi­ca­tions are already leav­ing in droves to seek work else­where, par­tic­u­larly in Ger­many where the num­ber of Span­ish and Greek job­seek­ers almost dou­bled dur­ing the first half of 2012.

Bruegel econ­o­mist Zsolt Dar­vas said the relent­less rise in youth unem­ploy­ment not only destroyed morale at an impor­tant age of devel­op­ment but also threat­ened to reignite an eco­nomic cri­sis that appeared to be easing.

“This is not just a prob­lem for these (periph­eral) coun­tries. This is a Euro­pean prob­lem,” he said. Thir­teen of the Euro­pean Union’s 27 mem­ber states have youth unem­ploy­ment above 25%.

Since 2010, Greece, Ire­land, and Por­tu­gal have received bil­lions of euros in loans from the EU and the Inter­na­tional Mon­e­tary Fund in return for spend­ing cut­backs and tax rises. Spain has had its banks bailed out. . . .

... In 2010, 37.6% of chil­dren were at risk of poverty or exclu­sion in Ire­land and 28.9% in Italy. Fig­ures for 2011 are not available.

Chil­dren are defined as near­ing poverty and exclu­sion if they live in fam­i­lies with 60% or less the median income or have par­ents with lit­tle or no employ­ment or lack basic essen­tials such as protein-rich foods, heat­ing and clothes.

Car­i­tas said gov­ern­ments must ask them­selves what these trends will mean for chil­dren in the long run.

Stud­ies show chil­dren from poor house­holds are more likely to under­per­form at school and to strug­gle to find or keep a job.

“They are look­ing at a future where the prospect of unem­ploy­ment is stretch­ing out ahead of them,” de Burca said.

“Fears in Ger­many as Golden Dawn Moves in from Greece” by Kate Con­nolly and Helena Smith; The Guardian [UK]; 2/5/2013.

EXCERPT: Ger­man and Greek rightwing extrem­ists have been forg­ing close con­tacts in Ger­many in an attempt to strengthen their power base in Europe, accord­ing to Ger­man officials.

Mem­bers of the Greek neo-Nazi party Golden Dawn are believed to have set up a cell in the south­ern Ger­man city of Nurem­berg with the aim of recruit­ing young Greeks who have flocked to the coun­try in search of work.

Greek com­mu­nity lead­ers in Ger­many have con­demned the arrival of the party, also known as Chrysi Avgi, and called on author­i­ties to clamp down on a group that they said had shown its readi­ness to use vio­lence in Greece and could attempt to do the same in Germany.

Golden Dawn, which has close to 20 seats in the Greek par­lia­ment, has described the move on its web­site as the “answer of expat Greeks to the dirty hip­pies and the regime of demo­c­ra­tic dic­ta­tor­ship in our homeland”.

In a state­ment, the Bavar­ian office for the pro­tec­tion of the con­sti­tu­tion said: “We are keep­ing an eye on developments.”

It said Golden Dawn had “an inter­na­tional net­work of con­tacts, includ­ing con­tacts with neo-Nazis in Bavaria. These con­tacts are cul­ti­vated via mutual vis­its as well as at meet­ings at rightwing extrem­ist events in Europe.”

It con­firmed that mem­bers of Golden Dawn and far-right Ger­man groups had organ­ised rec­i­p­ro­cal vis­its to each other’s coun­tries as well as meet­ing at rightwing extrem­ist meet­ings out­side Ger­many and Greece. . . .

... An esti­mated 380,000 Greeks live in Ger­many, mainly in the indus­trial Ruhr val­ley, though the actual fig­ure, as – many do not reg­is­ter with the author­i­ties – is believed to be nearer 900,000. Roughly-speaking in mod­ern times they have come in three waves – after the sec­ond world war and then dur­ing the Greek dic­ta­tor­ship, when many Greek com­mu­nists were given refuge, par­tic­u­larly in East Germany.

The third wave is occur­ring now as many, par­tic­u­larly young Greeks, come to Ger­many look­ing for work and to escape unem­ploy­ment at home.German neo-Nazi groups, such as the Bavarian-based Freies Netz Süd, have been fol­low­ing the polit­i­cal suc­cesses of Chrysi Avgi for some time, mak­ing open ref­er­ence to the Greek party on their websites.

The anti-Nazi organ­i­sa­tion Nurem­berg Union Nazi Stop said it would be mon­i­tor­ing Golden Dawn’s activ­i­ties in Germany.

Over the past months Golden Dawn, which is widely con­sid­ered to be racist and anti­se­mitic, has been held respon­si­ble for numer­ous attacks on for­eign­ers in Greece. The party, whose sym­bol resem­bles the swastika, won 18 par­lia­men­tary seats in last year’s elec­tion. Its pop­u­lar­ity cur­rently stands at around 12%. . . .

 

 

Discussion

9 comments for “Austerity, Up Close and Personal, Part 3: The Continuation of War by Other Means”

  1. And another coun­try fac­ing implod­ing banks and loom­ing aus­ter­ity nego­ti­a­tions appears to have decided that vot­ing for the right-winger is the way to go:

    AP
    Runoff called in Cyprus’ pres­i­den­tial election

    MENELAOS HADJICOSTIS | Feb­ru­ary 17, 2013 04:35 PM EST

    NICOSIA, Cyprus — Cyprus heads into a runoff pres­i­den­tial elec­tion next week­end, with vot­ers called on to select who will lead the coun­try through a severe finan­cial cri­sis after no can­di­date won an out­right major­ity in Sunday’s vote.

    Nicos Anas­tasi­ades, a right-winger who pre­sented him­self as the most capa­ble to nego­ti­ate a bailout with Cyprus’ Euro­pean part­ners and who went into the elec­tion a strong favorite, won the first round with just over 45 per­cent of the vote. But he fell short of the 50 per­cent plus one vote needed for an out­right victory.

    In the Feb. 24 runoff, he will face Stavros Malas, a left-winger who has advo­cated being more assertive in nego­ti­a­tions for bailout loans to limit the sever­ity of aus­ter­ity mea­sures they require

    Final results Sun­day night showed Anas­tasi­ades win­ning 45.46 per­cent, well ahead of Malas’ 26.91. Inde­pen­dent Gior­gos Lal­likas was a close third with 24.93 per­cent, and was elim­i­nated from the running.

    The change in lead­er­ship, after unpop­u­lar Pres­i­dent Dim­itris Christofias said he would not seek re-election, comes at a cru­cial junc­ture for Cyprus. The other 16 coun­tries that use the euro are expected to decide next month on a finan­cial life­line for the tiny coun­try of less than a mil­lion people.

    ...

    Cyprus is fast run­ning out of cash to pay its bills, and the new pres­i­dent faces the dif­fi­cult task of over­com­ing skep­ti­cism from some bailout-weary euro-area coun­tries to secure help.

    Cyprus got into trou­ble after its banks, whose assets are big­ger than the country’s entire econ­omy, took huge losses when Greece restruc­tured its debt. The coun­try has already reached a pre­lim­i­nary bailout agree­ment with its euro­zone part­ners and the Inter­na­tional Mon­e­tary Fund, and has enacted a raft of spend­ing cuts and tax increases.

    ...

    “Cyprus needs an adjust­ment pro­gram, a com­pre­hen­sive one,” Joerg Asmussen, a mem­ber of the Euro­pean Cen­tral Bank’s exec­u­tive board, told Germany’s ARD tele­vi­sion Sunday.

    ...

    In order to secure debt sus­tain­abil­ity, we will, for exam­ple, need far-reaching pri­va­ti­za­tion – the cur­rent pres­i­dent had rejected that. Now we will see whether we can nego­ti­ate such a pro­gram sen­si­bly by the end of March.”

    Malas rejects sell­ing state-owned companies.

    Anas­tasi­ades said he would resist out­right pri­va­ti­za­tions, opt­ing instead for sell­ing a minor­ity stake to a strate­gic investor.

    Both can­di­dates have said they would uti­lize the prospect of the nat­ural gas riches from new­found off­shore deposits to jump­start the econ­omy, but such poten­tial rev­enue is still years away.

    The finan­cial cri­sis has over­taken the country’s eth­nic divi­sion as the pri­mary cam­paign issue in some 40 years. Cyprus was split into an inter­na­tion­ally rec­og­nized Greek Cypriot south and a break­away Turk­ish Cypriot north in 1974, when Turk­ish invaded after a coup by sup­port­ers of union with Greece. The lat­est round of reuni­fi­ca­tion talks between Christofias and Turk­ish Cypriot leader Dervis Eroglu resulted in deadlock.

    Given that the ECB’s board mem­bers appear to be demand­ing state asset pri­va­ti­za­tions it’s also note­wor­thy that Anas­tasi­ades has been able to suc­cess­fully sell him­self as the can­di­date best able to nego­ti­ate bailout terms with Europe’s lead­ers. After all, he’s been endorsed by Merkel. That’s, uh, kind of a “red flag” when you’re select­ing a bailout nego­tia­tor:

    Finan­cial cri­sis dri­ves Cyprus pres­i­den­tial poll
    MENELAOS HADJICOSTIS
    — Feb. 15 4:43 AM EST

    NICOSIA, Cyprus (AP) — Cypri­ots vote Sun­day for a new pres­i­dent to guide them through a severe eco­nomic cri­sis as their coun­try becomes the lat­est finan­cially trou­bled Euro­pean nation seek­ing inter­na­tional res­cue money.

    For the first time in 40 years, the cri­sis has eclipsed efforts to reunify the eth­ni­cally divided coun­try as the pre­dom­i­nant pre-election issue. A shrink­ing econ­omy, nearly 15 per­cent unem­ploy­ment and salary cuts and tax increases demanded under a pre­lim­i­nary bailout deal with euro­zone coun­tries and the Inter­na­tional Mon­e­tary Fund have cracked a veneer of pros­per­ity partly built on Cyprus’ out­size bank­ing sector.

    The finan­cial woes have been com­pared to the eco­nomic cat­a­stro­phe that befell the coun­try in 1974, when a Turk­ish inva­sion fol­low­ing a coup by sup­port­ers of unit­ing the island with Greece split the coun­try into a break­away Turkish-speaking north and an inter­na­tion­ally rec­og­nized Greek-speaking south.

    Sunday’s vote will take place only in the south­ern part of the coun­try, which is the part need­ing a bailout.

    The win­ner will suc­ceed deeply unpop­u­lar communist-rooted Dim­itris Christofias, who is hon­or­ing a pledge not to seek a sec­ond five-year term if his nego­ti­a­tions with break­away Turk­ish Cypri­ots to reunify the coun­try failed.

    Opin­ion polls show Nicos Anas­tasi­ades, the 66-year-old head of the right-wing main oppo­si­tion Demo­c­ra­tic Rally (DISY) party, as the frontrunner.

    Seen by some as a polar­iz­ing fig­ure, Anas­tasi­ades has never enjoyed mass appeal, and his crit­ics have made much of his sup­port for a 2004 U.N.-backed reuni­fi­ca­tion plan that Greek Cypri­ots rejected. But he has mas­ter­fully tapped into pub­lic dis­con­tent with the out­go­ing government’s han­dling of the econ­omy as well as events that led to a mas­sive explo­sion of seized Iran­ian muni­tions in 2011 that killed 13 peo­ple and wrecked the country’s main power sta­tion.

    ...

    The vic­tor will jump into the bailout fray imme­di­ately. Euro-area lead­ers are expected to decide on res­cue pack­age for Cyprus in the lat­ter half of March and the coun­try is fast run­ning out of money to pay its bills. The new pres­i­dent will have to con­vince skep­ti­cal euro­zone part­ners — espe­cially bailout-weary Ger­many — that Cyprus is a cred­i­ble part­ner that deserves help and isn’t a tax haven where Russ­ian oli­garchs park their dodgy money.

    ...

    With Cyprus’ fate in the hands of other euro area coun­tries, cam­paign­ing has focused more on the can­di­dates’ lead­er­ship met­tle rather than flesh­ing out com­pli­cated eco­nomic issues.

    Anas­tasi­ades has close ties to Euro­pean lead­ers on whose good­will the coun­try is count­ing, an image encap­su­lated in his ubiq­ui­tous slo­gan, “The Cri­sis Needs a Leader.” The idea has gained trac­tion among Cypri­ots, most of whom favor a bailout.

    Last month, Anas­tasi­ades bur­nished his cre­den­tials with an endorse­ment from Ger­man Chan­cel­lor Angela Merkel dur­ing a meet­ing of Euro­pean center-right par­ties. If he wins, he would enjoy the advan­tage of hav­ing the back­ing of par­lia­ment where DISY and its ally, center-right DIKO, hold a slim majority.

    “I ask from you a strong, clear man­date in order to imme­di­ately get to work cov­er­ing lost ground, restor­ing our homeland’s cred­i­bil­ity and safe­guard­ing our national inter­ests within Europe’s decision-making cen­ters,” Anas­tasi­ades told a cam­paign rally in the cap­i­tal Nicosia this week.

    ...

    An endorse­ment by Merkel may seem like an unlikely badge of honor in a coun­try fac­ing bailout terms, but it was Nicas Anastasiades’s dad that recently received an even more unlikely badge of honor. Chrysan­thos Anas­tasi­ades, it turns out, was one of the lead­ers of the 1974 coup that trig­ger the Turk­ish inva­sion and divided the island. He was also given an award from the “Friends of Police” for a life­time of ser­vice. This is an exam­ple of why reuni­fi­ca­tion is nor­mally the big issue of the day when the econ­omy isn’t melt­ing down: Coups can cre­ate com­pli­cated his­tor­i­cal mem­o­ries:

    AKEL blasts hon­our for DISY leader’s dad
    Author:
    George Psyllides

    AKEL yes­ter­day crit­i­cised the deci­sion of the Friends of Police to hon­our oppo­si­tion leader Nicos Anas­tasi­ades’ father, a police offi­cer who accord­ing to the rul­ing party, had taken part in the 1974 coup to over­throw pres­i­dent Makar­ios.

    “A man who par­tic­i­pated in the coup; a man who assumed lead­er­ship of the Limas­sol police admin­is­tra­tion after the coup and who effec­tively under­mined and fought the Repub­lic of Cyprus,” AKEL leader Andros Kypri­anou said.

    Anas­tasi­ades, who is run­ning for pres­i­dent in next year’s elec­tions, had been hon­oured as the scion of a police offi­cer for his father Chrysan­thos’ ser­vices to the force.

    Kypri­anou said Cyprus was a unique global phe­nom­e­non: the Friends of Police hon­our peo­ple who under­mined democ­racy and fought against their country.

    “All other coun­tries hon­our their heroes, the peo­ple who defend democ­racy, the peo­ple who defend their coun­try,” Kypri­anou said. “It’s a shame. I do not know what else to say.”

    The first reac­tion to the award came on Fri­day from the asso­ci­a­tion of resis­tance fight­ers who expressed their indig­na­tion and ques­tioned the rea­son­ing behind the award.

    The asso­ci­a­tion said Chrysan­thos Anas­tasi­ades assumed the posi­tion of Limas­sol police direc­tor on July 16, one day after the coup had been launched.

    “This proves the very close rela­tions he had with those who abol­ished democ­racy while at the same time opened the back door to the Turk­ish invader (five days later),” the asso­ci­a­tion said.

    The friends of police attrib­uted Kyprianou’s reac­tion to the expe­di­en­cies of the pres­i­den­tial elec­tion but also added that Chrysan­thos had never been con­victed for any related offenses.

    Neo­phy­tos Papamil­ti­adous, chair­man of the Friends of Police, said they knew there would be a mis­un­der­stand­ing and had already announced they were also hon­our­ing the other pres­i­den­tial can­di­dates – AKEL-backed Stavros Malas and Yior­gos Lil­likas – whose fathers fought against Turk­ish Cypriot para­mil­i­taries as spe­cial con­sta­bles in 1963–64.

    The events of that period, espe­cially the Greek junta-inspired coup, are highly emo­tive issues for Cypriot soci­ety espe­cially since no one – except the man who assumed the pres­i­dency briefly — has been brought to justice.

    Only Nicos Samp­son, installed as pres­i­dent by the coupists and lasted eight days, stood trial and was sen­tenced to 20 years in prison.
    ...

    So Cyprus is about to elect the son of a coup-leader that’s been backed by Angela Merkel in order to extract favor­able bailout terms aus­ter­ity. And Cyprus just hap­pens to have recently dis­cov­ered per­haps hun­dreds of bil­lions of dol­lars in nat­ural gas reserves sit­ting off of its coast but the ques­tion who gets the rights to those reserves still needs to be worked out. Good luck with those aus­ter­ity nego­ti­a­tions!

    Cyprus elec­tions: pro-bailout can­di­date takes 45.4% of vote

    Con­ser­v­a­tive Nicos Anas­tasi­ades will face left­wing inde­pen­dent in runoff after fail­ing to secure enough sup­port for out­right win

    Helena Smith in Nicosia
    The Guardian, Sun­day 17 Feb­ru­ary 2013 14.01 EST

    Their country’s future as a euro­zone mem­ber hang­ing in the bal­ance, Cypri­ots voted on Sun­day to elect a new pres­i­dent, with the pro-bailout con­ser­v­a­tive leader, Nicos Anas­tasi­ades, secur­ing the biggest back­ing with 45.4% of the vote.

    Anas­tasi­ades is set to face a runoff next week after fail­ing to gain enough sup­port for an out­right win. How­ever, he is seen as the over­whelm­ing favourite in that con­test, against the communist-backed inde­pen­dent, Stavros Malas, who took 26.9% of the vote.

    The vote for Anas­tasi­ades and his DISY party is an endorse­ment of the pro-bailout poli­cies advo­cated by a man who will face the ardu­ous task of final­is­ing a €17bn (£14.6bn) res­cue pack­age with the Euro­pean Union and the Inter­na­tional Mon­e­tary Fund to keep the country’s econ­omy afloat. Last year Cyprus became the fifth euro­zone state to ask for a bailout.

    On Sun­day 545,000 cit­i­zens filed into polling sta­tions to cast bal­lots in what was seen as the country’s most cru­cial elec­tion in recent times.

    “Who­ever wins will pre­side over five very dif­fi­cult years, first nego­ti­at­ing a res­cue pro­gramme then pos­si­bly hav­ing to enforce new aus­ter­ity mea­sures,” said Hubert Faust­mann, asso­ciate pro­fes­sor of his­tory and polit­i­cal sci­ence at the Uni­ver­sity of Nicosia.

    No Cypriot elec­tion had been as closely watched by the inter­na­tional com­mu­nity. The divided island’s eco­nomic dif­fi­cul­ties – trig­gered by losses its bank­ing sys­tem suf­fered when Greece restruc­tured its debt – have spurred con­cerns of a re-eruption of the euro­zone cri­sis just when many had hoped progress in the bloc’s frag­ile periph­ery had been achieved.

    Brus­sels had not hid­den its hope that Anas­tasi­ades would win. An advo­cate of neo-liberal poli­cies who believes in break­ing the power of trade unions, the 66-year-old lawyer has promised to reach a speedy agree­ment with would-be cred­i­tors at the EU, the IMF and the Euro­pean Cen­tral Bank.

    “Above all else, we must unite forces to counter this eco­nomic cri­sis which unfor­tu­nately our home­land has never expe­ri­enced before,” he said after cast­ing his ballot.

    The out­go­ing pres­i­dent, Demetris Christofias, a vet­eran com­mu­nist, had balked at the idea of meet­ing the tough terms for­eign lenders had attached to a bailout, includ­ing calls to pri­va­tise state assets.

    ...

    The Mediter­ranean island has enough funds to get by until April after stream­lin­ing the econ­omy and announc­ing pay, pen­sion and ben­e­fit cuts worth about €1bn last year.

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | February 17, 2013, 8:32 pm
  2. Aus­ter­ity: “There is no way back, there is no alternative...”

    Feb­ru­ary 27, 2013, 4:11 p.m. ET
    The Wall Street Jour­nal
    Elec­tions, Euro-Zone Style
    There are no angels avail­able to gov­ern, even in Brussels.

    The incon­clu­sive result in Italy’s elec­tion this week has sent bond yields higher and equity mar­kets tum­bling, as investors try to sort out the risk to the euro zone of Ital­ian gridlock.

    The outcome—with Pier Luigi Bersani’s center-left party slightly ahead, but lack­ing the votes to form a government—also has the EU doing what it does almost any time there’s an elec­tion in the euro zone these days. Euro­pean Coun­cil Pres­i­dent Her­man van Rompuy made the oblig­a­tory noises about respect­ing voter choice, just before mak­ing it clear that he would do no such thing.

    It is up to lead­ing politi­cians to nego­ti­ate to form a gov­ern­ment with a sta­ble sit­u­a­tion so that reforms and con­sol­i­da­tion of the bud­get can con­tinue. There is no way back, there is no alter­na­tive,” Mr. van Rompuy said.

    Ger­man For­eign Min­is­ter Guido West­er­welle echoed the sen­ti­ment, insist­ing that the next gov­ern­ment con­tinue the poli­cies of the pre­vi­ous one, led by the unelected Prime Min­is­ter Mario Monti, who raked in all of 10% of the vote this weekend.

    In other words, Italy—or Greece, or Ireland—can have all the democ­racy it wants, as long as the win­ners take their orders not from vot­ers, but from Brus­sels or Berlin. That might seem an inflam­ma­tory way of putting it, but it’s hard to see what other inter­pre­ta­tion is pos­si­ble from these kinds of comments.

    Berlin and Brus­sels won’t put it so baldly. But their view is essen­tially this: We have decided on a course to save the euro from dis­in­te­gra­tion. Any devi­a­tion from that course is irre­spon­si­ble. And they are count­ing on the polit­i­cal elites in Italy, Spain, Greece and else­where to hew to that course, come what may.

    There are at least two prob­lems with this view. The most obvi­ous is that it makes a mock­ery of democ­racy. If poli­cies can’t be changed, regard­less of the out­come of elec­tions, then the elec­tions them­selves are a farce. They are the veneer of pop­u­lar sov­er­eignty with­out the substance.

    But even if you accept that this moment is too treach­er­ous for demo­c­ra­tic accountability—to accept that respon­si­ble lead­ers have no choice but to go along with the deci­sions made by the enlight­ened lead­er­ship of Europe—this course is already prov­ing self-defeating.
    ...

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | February 27, 2013, 3:38 pm
  3. Merkel’s cab­i­net just low­ered bar­ri­ers to the hir­ing of for­eign work­ers. There appears to be a par­tic­u­lar inter­est in for­eign labor for tech­ni­cal jobs rang­ing from those requir­ing voca­tional train­ing to engi­neers so it looks like trickle-up aus­ter­ity is migrat­ing to Germany’s tech sec­tor. One of the inter­est­ing socioe­co­nomic exper­i­ments that we get to see unfold with the euro­zone is the emer­gence of middle-income-guest-worker-nomics in a large union of nations that all have their own ver­sions of long-term healthcare/retirement/social wel­fare sys­tems. How all of those sys­tems of han­dling long-term lia­bil­i­ties man­age to func­tion in future decades remains to be seen now that an entire gen­er­a­tion of young skilled work­ers from the ail­ing economies are going to be spend­ing a sig­nif­i­cant part of their careers work­ing (and spend­ing) in Ger­many. In the euro­zone, eco­nomic “har­mo­niza­tion” requires a brain drain:

    Ger­many relaxes immi­gra­tion rules to attract skilled labour

    By Stephen Brown and Hol­ger Hansen

    BERLIN | Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:08am EST

    Feb 27 (Reuters) — Ger­many sought on Wednes­day to make it eas­ier for skilled work­ers from out­side the Euro­pean Union to take a job in the coun­try, try­ing to alle­vi­ate chronic short­ages in areas such as engi­neer­ing, train dri­ving and plumb­ing.

    Chan­cel­lor Angela Merkel’s cab­i­net passed new immi­gra­tion rules which, pend­ing approval by parliament’s upper house, aim to cut red tape for peo­ple in tar­get indus­tries, allow­ing them to get their qual­i­fi­ca­tions recog­nised in Ger­many more easily.

    The rules would come into effect in July.

    With this new decree we are jet­ti­son­ing 40 per­cent of the old rules and leav­ing the door wide open for the skilled labour that can help our coun­try progress,” said Labour Min­is­ter Ursula von der Leyen in a statement.

    Ger­many has already intro­duced a “blue card” sys­tem mak­ing it eas­ier to hire for­eign aca­d­e­mics and has also made it eas­ier for for­eign nurses to work here. But it now needs more train dri­vers, plumbers and waste-disposal work­ers, the min­is­ter said.

    In con­trast to most of the EU, where job­less­ness has risen as a con­se­quence of a global eco­nomic down­turn and the euro zone debt cri­sis, Germany’s employ­ment rate is at its high­est since reuni­fi­ca­tion in 1990.

    But an age­ing pop­u­la­tion and rel­a­tively low immi­gra­tion has cre­ated a lack of work­ers in cer­tain pro­fes­sions and sec­tors, which free move­ment of labour in the EU has failed to resolve.

    The gov­ern­ment has already intro­duced mea­sures to cut bureau­cracy and encour­age com­pa­nies to recog­nise qual­i­fi­ca­tions from abroad, but crit­ics say it is not enough.

    Immi­gra­tion to Ger­many is grow­ing as its econ­omy out­per­forms most of Europe. Net immi­gra­tion grew to 340,000 last year from 128,000 two years ear­lier, with many more arrivals from south­ern Euro­pean coun­tries hit by the debt cri­sis.

    But this month the Organ­i­sa­tion for Eco­nomic Coop­er­a­tion and Devel­op­ment (OECD) said Ger­many must lib­er­alise the recruit­ment of for­eign­ers to fill a pro­jected short­fall of 5.4 mil­lion work­ers with voca­tional or ter­tiary qual­i­fi­ca­tions by 2025.

    Ger­man busi­ness wel­comed the new rules. The BDA employ­ers’ fed­er­a­tion said it would “facil­i­tate the tar­geted immi­gra­tion of badly-needed skilled labour also in non-academic areas”, cit­ing a par­tic­u­lar short­age of skills in engi­neer­ing and elec­tron­ics.

    ...

    Let’s hope the euro­zone fig­ures out how to main­tain social-welfare sys­tems that can pro­vide for a decent long-term social con­tract in a “free move­ment of labor” world soon or later because these were press­ing ques­tions for a grow­ing num­ber of guest work­ers in the euro­zone for a while:

    Chris­t­ian Sci­ence Mon­i­tor
    Europe’s guest work­ers ask, ‘Where are our pensions?’

    As the US and EU eye new guest-worker ini­tia­tives, returned Span­ish labor­ers try to col­lect retire­ment money.

    By Daniela Ger­son, Con­trib­u­tor to The Chris­t­ian Sci­ence Mon­i­tor / April 10, 2007
    GRANADA, SPAIN

    Enrique Aviles Ruiz is ready to col­lect his due – from four coun­tries. After labor­ing as a farmer in his native Spain and as a guest worker in Ger­many, France, and Bel­gium, he’s now nav­i­gat­ing the labyrinth of inter­na­tional bureau­cratic and legal sys­tems to receive the pen­sions he is due.

    “I worked hard and I’m get­ting noth­ing,” he says rue­fully in a strong Andalu­sian dialect.

    Known in Spain as retor­na­dos, these labor­ers planned to return to their native towns and cities after work­ing abroad for years, even decades, and live out the rest of their lives in peace. Instead, many are find­ing the finan­cial dif­fi­cul­ties of return­ing greater than they could have imagined.

    While the excep­tional num­ber of coun­tries where Mr. Ruiz worked com­pli­cates his case, mil­lions of for­mer guest work­ers, in Spain and around the world, are in a sim­i­lar sit­u­a­tion. Now hit­ting retire­ment age, they are being haunted by miss­ing paystubs they unwit­tingly dis­carded 30 years ago, the over­lap of mul­ti­ple legal sys­tems, and – in some cases – gov­ern­ments that wrongly refuse to pay up.

    With both Wash­ing­ton and Brus­sels con­sid­er­ing new guest-worker ini­tia­tives, the sit­u­a­tion of these retor­na­dos is a reminder that the chal­lenges of such pro­grams do not end with return­ing the work­ers home. Read­just­ment issues have rever­ber­ated from Turkey to Por­tu­gal among the coun­tries that were main sup­pli­ers of Euro­pean guest work­ers in the 1950s and ‘60s. Across the Atlantic in Mex­ico, more than 40 years after the bracero guest worker pro­gram with the United States was can­celed, for­mer labor­ers there are still fight­ing to col­lect their pensions.

    Dif­fi­culty obtain­ing pen­sions is a recur­ring struc­tural issue, and inher­ent to the com­pli­ca­tions of transna­tional bureau­cracy, says Philip Mar­tin, an agri­cul­tural econ­o­mist at the Uni­ver­sity of Cal­i­for­nia at Davis who’s stud­ied migrant labor.

    Even for an Amer­i­can liv­ing in the US, he says, it’s com­mon to have to make mul­ti­ple trips to Social Secu­rity to clear up prob­lems. Thus, it’s not sur­pris­ing that some­one who has worked abroad will face even more difficulties.

    “For almost all pen­sions sys­tems there’s no check­ing on the wage records of Social Secu­rity sys­tems until you apply for ben­e­fits, and many sys­tems do not allow pen­sion checks to be sent abroad,” says Dr. Martin.

    Manuel Rojas Cas­tro, a lawyer based in Ger­many who for 31 years worked for the Span­ish embassy there as a legal coun­selor to immi­grants, goes fur­ther, main­tain­ing that Euro­pean coun­tries are often biased against guest work­ers, deny­ing them their rights.

    “The emi­grants lose rights because of lack of knowl­edge from below, and dis­crim­i­na­tion from above,” says Mr. Cas­tro. “The pen­sion sys­tem for emi­grants in Europe is very com­pli­cated because you need to know the law of each coun­try and the com­mu­nal law, which is enor­mous.

    In the case of Spain, for exam­ple, three types of law can hold juris­dic­tion: Span­ish law, the laws of the host coun­try where the emi­grant worked, and either Euro­pean com­mu­nal law or a bilat­eral agree­ment. “There is a com­mu­nal cur­rency, the euro, but there does not exist a stan­dard euro pen­sion,” Cas­tro notes.

    ...

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | March 3, 2013, 8:26 pm
  4. Well here’s some poten­tially good news com­ing out the euro­zone for a change: Angela Merkel is cit­ing Germany’s reuni­fi­ca­tion as an expe­ri­ence the euro­zone can learn from while try­ing to craft a pol­icy to deal with the still-ailing economies:

    Bloomberg
    Merkel Cites East Ger­man Lessons for EU’s Prob­lem States
    By Joseph de Weck — Feb 19, 2013 2:34 AM CT

    Chan­cel­lor Angela Merkel said that Euro­pean coun­tries bur­dened by the fall­out of the euro-area debt cri­sis can learn from East Germany’s expe­ri­ences of eco­nomic over­haul after the fall of the Berlin Wall.

    Merkel, Germany’s first chan­cel­lor from the for­mer ccom­mu­nist east, said in a speech to regional pro­fes­sion­als and trade-chambers rep­re­sen­ta­tives yes­ter­day that her East Ger­man back­ground had taught her there is no way around enact­ing reforms to become more competitive.

    “When we became part of the Fed­eral Repub­lic of Ger­many we had to carry out mas­sive reforms to restruc­ture our econ­omy, also with great upheaval,” Merkel said in the west­ern city of Mainz. “But this was nec­es­sary to cre­ate a solid basis of small and medium-sized com­pa­nies in the new states.” While the east­ern Ger­man regions have since been eli­gi­ble for spe­cial Euro­pean Union funds and sub­si­dies, “at the end of a struc­tural reform there must be a com­pet­i­tive com­pany,” she said.

    ...

    Yes, it’s not a sur­prise that Merkel would draw lessons from the Ger­man reuni­fi­ca­tion given the num­ber of par­al­lels between what a newly reuni­fied Ger­many faced and what the euro­zone faces. For instances, East Ger­many from forced to sud­denly tran­si­tion away from a com­mu­nist bas­ket­case and into a merger with a much stronger neigh­bor and an arti­fi­cially strong cur­rency. As Merkel indi­cated, many struc­tural reforms were inevitable and East Ger­many come out of it stronger than before. The $1.9 tril­lion in state sub­si­dies prob­a­bly helped too:

    Wash­ing­ton Post
    Is Ger­man reuni­fi­ca­tion a model for Europe?
    Posted by Brad Plumer at 05:36 PM ET, 12/01/2011

    Amer­i­can com­men­tary on the euro zone cri­sis often insin­u­ates that Ger­man lead­ers are being wildly unrea­son­able in hold­ing up many of the pro­posed solu­tions favored by econ­o­mists. Why won’t Angela Merkel just let the Euro­pean Cen­tral Bank back­stop Span­ish and Ital­ian debt? And what’s wrong with eurobonds? Sure, they could entail a German-financed bailout of irre­spon­si­ble neigh­bors, but a bailout would still be cheaper than the con­se­quences of hav­ing Greece — or even Ger­many — leave the euro. So why are they being so stubborn?

    Tyler Cowen has a thought­ful post at Mar­ginal Rev­o­lu­tion try­ing to see things from the Ger­man per­spec­tive. Among other points, he notes that Ger­many has some expe­ri­ence in stand­ing firm in the face of expert carp­ing after the fall of the Berlin Wall. “We” — mean­ing the Ger­mans — “did a deal with East Ger­many, and the terms of that deal vio­lated a lot of pre­cepts of eco­nomic the­ory,” Cowen writes. “It even included an over­val­ued cur­rency for the poorer region and a long period of adjust­ment. Yet we insisted up front that all deal­ings be done on the terms of the more suc­cess­ful region and cul­ture, with very lit­tle com­pro­mise. This tran­si­tion, for all of its short-term flaws, will go down in the his­tory books as a great long-run success.”

    Fair enough. But it’s worth think­ing through whether Ger­man reuni­fi­ca­tion is really such a good model for Euro­pean integration.

    When East Ger­many rejoined the West in 1990, it was indeed linked to an “over­val­ued” deutschemark. As a result, unem­ploy­ment in East Ger­many exploded (the region lost 4 mil­lion jobs in the first five years alone, and the job­less rate peaked at 20 per­cent), as less-productive work­ers in the East sud­denly found them­selves being paid inflated wages. This is much like the sit­u­a­tion that Greece and Ire­land find them­selves in now. Greece would ben­e­fit from being able to devalue its cur­rency to improve its eco­nomic com­pet­i­tive­ness, but it can’t, because it’s yoked to the euro.

    So what even­tu­ally hap­pened in Ger­many? The answer involved lots of sub­si­dies and wrench­ing trans­fers of wealth. West Ger­mans paid about $1.9 tril­lion over 20 years, partly via a “sol­i­dar­ity sur­charge” on their income taxes, to help mod­ern­ize the East. That’s roughly two-thirds of Germany’s GDP last year. The sub­si­dies helped cover East Germany’s bud­get short­falls and poured money into its pen­sion and social secu­rity sys­tems. At the same time, nearly 2 mil­lion East Ger­mans — a full one-eighth of the pop­u­la­tion — moved west to seek work.

    ...

    So does this mean that we can expect a new path for the eurozone’s “struc­tural reforms”? One that involves things like a tax a new pan-eurozone “sol­i­dar­ity sur­charge” income tax to finance sus­tained sub­si­dies for the austerity-stricken mem­bers? Eh, well, judg­ing by his­tory, prob­a­bly not:

    Bloomberg
    Merkel Calls on Italy’s Politi­cians to Stick to Reform Path
    By Brian Parkin — Mar 1, 2013 2:06 PM CT

    Ger­man Chan­cel­lor Angela Merkel urged Italy to stick to the path of reform after the suc­cess of anti-austerity par­ties in February’s election.

    “Now in Europe after the Ital­ian elec­tions it seems to be a case of either aus­ter­ity and sav­ings pro­grams or growth, but that’s a com­pletely false premise,” Merkel said today in a speech to an event in north­east­ern Ger­many hosted by her Chris­t­ian Demo­c­ra­tic Union party.

    Her stance on cut­ting deficits is “not about lik­ing to whip peo­ple,” Merkel told CDU mem­bers in Greif­swald, in her elec­toral dis­trict. Bud­get cuts are not incom­pat­i­ble with growth, rather growth depends on sound finances, she said.

    ...

    As Angela says, it’s “not about lik­ing to whip peo­ple”. And that’s prob­a­bly the best reform we can we can for at this point: aus­ter­ity will con­tinue, but it might ease up a bit to avoid com­plete col­lapse and austerity-advocates lead­ers will no longer derive enjoy­ment from it. It’ll be purely util­i­tar­ian whip­ping from here on out.

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | March 4, 2013, 9:38 pm
  5. Huh, so it looks like the offi­cial idea of “har­mo­niz­ing” the euro­zone economies via man­dated aus­ter­ity so that they all reach a sim­i­lar level of eco­nomic “com­pet­i­tive­ness” that we keep hear­ing as the jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for the eurozone’s sui­cide pact is get­ting replaced with a new vision: An end­less race to the bot­tom:

    Analy­sis: Ger­man reform angst sets in a decade after “Agenda 2010″

    By Noah Barkin

    BERLIN | Fri Mar 8, 2013 6:33am EST

    (Reuters) — With its record low unem­ploy­ment, thriv­ing “Mit­tel­stand” com­pa­nies and consensus-seeking unions, Ger­many has been held up as a model of eco­nomic man­age­ment at a time when many of its Euro­pean part­ners are mired in crisis.

    But as the 10th anniver­sary of the reforms cred­ited with fuelling Germany’s suc­cess approaches, a small but vocal group of politi­cians, busi­ness­men and econ­o­mists is sound­ing alarm bells over what they see as a dan­ger­ous pol­icy com­pla­cency in Berlin that is putting the gains of past years at risk.

    Some warn that Ger­many could even return to being the “sick man of Europe” within a decade unless Chan­cel­lor Angela Merkel takes bolder action to build on the “Agenda 2010″ reforms her pre­de­ces­sor Ger­hard Schroeder unveiled in a speech in par­lia­ment on March 14, 2003.

    As south­ern Euro­pean coun­tries enact deep struc­tural reforms of their own in response to the euro cri­sis, the worry is that Germany’s com­pet­i­tive edge will be eroded by ris­ing wages, soar­ing energy costs and what some see as a grow­ing state role in the econ­omy that is dis­cour­ag­ing investment.

    Crit­ics also fault Merkel, in power since 2005, for fail­ing to mean­ing­fully tackle a loom­ing demo­graphic crunch that could hit the econ­omy hard from 2020, and for not mov­ing more aggres­sively to over­haul a com­plex tax regime and anti­quated edu­ca­tion sys­tem that is pro­duc­ing too few skilled workers.

    “No one knows what will hap­pen in five to ten years, but it is likely that Ger­many will run into trou­ble again if new reforms are not put in place quickly,” Roland Berger, founder and hon­orary chair­man of the busi­ness con­sul­tancy that car­ries his name, told Reuters.

    “We are run­ning the risk of los­ing com­pet­i­tive­ness. Next to noth­ing has changed in the labor mar­ket over the past five years. This gov­ern­ment and the one before it have prof­ited from the Schroeder reforms and become complacent.”

    ...

    Some econ­o­mists argue that Ger­many is so far ahead of its part­ners on the reform front that it can afford to relax and pay its work­ers higher salaries after a decade of wage stagnation.

    But oth­ers point to hard data and anec­do­tal evi­dence that sug­gests Ger­many is los­ing com­pet­i­tive­ness as a busi­ness loca­tion just as painful reforms and falling wages in coun­tries like Spain are begin­ning to make them look more attractive.

    ...

    Hanns-Eberhard Schleyer, a mem­ber of the Hartz Com­mis­sion that drafted Schroeder’s labor mar­ket reforms, sees par­al­lels between the cur­rent envi­ron­ment and the period when Germany’s post-war “Wirtschaftswun­der”, or eco­nomic mir­a­cle, came to an end amid bumper wage gains and a rise in regulation.

    “My big worry is that we row back on reforms that were impor­tant and nec­es­sary, that we lull our­selves into think­ing we’ve done enough,” said Schleyer.

    The bit­ter irony is that Schroeder, a Social Demo­c­rat (SPD), was booted out of office in 2005 because of voter unhap­pi­ness with his shake-up of the wel­fare state, which ini­tially led to a spike in unemployment.

    Merkel has been the chief ben­e­fi­ciary ever since and is favored to win a third term in Sep­tem­ber thanks in part to the resilience of the Ger­man econ­omy dur­ing the euro crisis.

    Wolf­gang Clement, who as econ­omy min­is­ter under Schroeder played a key role in push­ing through “Agenda 2010″, also fears Ger­many is squan­der­ing the eco­nomic div­i­dends from the reforms. He believes Ger­many needs a new “Agenda 2020″, with invest­ment in edu­ca­tion and research as a top priority.

    “We are at risk of unwind­ing what we so painstak­ingly pushed through at the start of the cen­tury,” he told Reuters. “What is hap­pen­ing in south­ern Europe is impres­sive. We shouldn’t try to con­vince our­selves we’ve done enough.”

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | March 8, 2013, 10:57 am
  6. And we have a new record! This is a desired achieve­ment, right? I mean, why else would the eurozone’s lead­ers con­tinue to insist on self-reinforcing aus­ter­ity if these record results were not what they desired?

    Bloomberg
    Euro-Area Unem­ploy­ment Rises to Record 12% Amid Slump
    By Ange­line Benoit & Jen­nifer Ryan — Apr 2, 2013 5:03 AM CT

    The euro-area job­less rate rose to a record 12 per­cent in early 2013, adding to signs that the cur­rency bloc’s reces­sion extended into the first quarter.

    Unem­ploy­ment in the 17-nation euro area was 12 per­cent in Feb­ru­ary and the Jan­u­ary fig­ure was revised up to the same level from 11.9 per­cent esti­mated ear­lier, the Euro­pean Union’s sta­tis­tics office in Lux­em­bourg said today. That is the high­est since the data series started in 1995 and matches the median esti­mate of 31 econ­o­mists in a Bloomberg News survey.

    The euro-zone econ­omy has con­tracted for five straight quar­ters and that trend is fore­cast to con­tinue in the first three months of this year, a sep­a­rate Bloomberg sur­vey shows. The Euro­pean Cen­tral Bank, which holds a rate-setting meet­ing this week, fore­casts the econ­omy will shrink 0.5 per­cent in 2013. The ECB has held its key rate at 0.75 per­cent since July.

    “An end to the euro zone’s labor-market down­turn is not yet in sight,” Mar­tin van Vliet, econ­o­mist at ING Bank NV, said in a research note. “We can­not fully rule out a sur­prise rate cut or new uncon­ven­tional sup­port on Thursday.”

    The euro was down 0.1 per­cent from yes­ter­day and traded at $1.2836 at 10:37 a.m. in London.

    Today’s report showed that 19.1 mil­lion peo­ple were unem­ployed in the euro area in Feb­ru­ary, up 33,000 from the pre­vi­ous month.

    The Euro­pean Com­mis­sion pre­dicts unem­ploy­ment rates of 12.2 per­cent this year and 12.1 per­cent in 2014. ECB Pres­i­dent Mario Draghi said on March 7 that “it is of par­tic­u­lar impor­tance at this junc­ture to address the cur­rent high long-term and youth unemployment.”

    Shed­ding Jobs

    Busi­nesses rang­ing from banks to car­mak­ers and air­lines are try­ing to cut costs by shed­ding jobs. Spain’s Caix­a­Bank (CABK) last week reached an accord with its unions to cut 2,600 jobs. Danone (BN), the owner of Evian bottled-water and Activia yogurt, plans to shed 900 jobs in Europe as demand weakens.

    Fiat SpA (F) Chief Exec­u­tive Offi­cer Ser­gio Mar­chionne last month spoke out against deeper bud­get cuts. “I under­stand aus­ter­ity, but we can lose weight until we die,” he said.

    Renault SA (RNO) CEO Car­los Ghosn urged gov­ern­ment spend­ing to revive the region’s ane­mic car sales, which he fore­cast won’t recover for another three years.

    The strains in the region have spread to the U.K., where a mea­sure of man­u­fac­tur­ing con­tracted for a sec­ond month amid weak demand in Europe for British exports. A gauge of fac­tory activ­ity was 48.3 in March, the sec­ond month of con­trac­tion, Markit Eco­nom­ics said today.

    ...

    It’s always nice when you see a plan work.

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | April 2, 2013, 11:43 am
  7. Har­vard econ­o­mist and promi­nent aus­ter­ity advo­cate Niall Fer­gu­son just stepped in it: He made an off-the-cuff remark assert­ing that John May­nard Keynes was gay and there­fore didn’t care about the future because he had no kids. The impli­ca­tion of the com­ment is that Keyn­sian eco­nom­ics is unsus­tain­able and will inevitably lead to our grand­chil­dren liv­ing in some sort of Weimar-like hellscape, so only some­one with­out chil­dren could pos­si­bly jus­tify such an abom­inable idea like stim­u­lus spend­ing in an eco­nomic down­turn. Peo­ple with­out chil­dren, obvi­ously, must not care about the next gen­er­a­tion because all sane peo­ple care only about them­selves or direct fam­ily because fam­ily car­ries lots of their per­sonal mag­i­cal DNA that god thinks is extra special.

    Fer­gu­son has since apol­o­gized and retracted his com­ments but it’s great exam­ple of one of the inher­ent pit­fall is using finance to guide your soci­ety. If you screw up the imple­men­ta­tion of that finan­cial regime — whether it’s flawed eco­nomic the­o­ries or some ide­o­log­i­cal man­date — you just might end up advo­cat­ing poli­cies that destroy the lives of your grand­chil­dren. And you might look like an ass­hole while you’re doing it:

    New York Mag­a­zine
    5/4/2013 at 10:45 AM
    Niall Fer­gu­son Doesn’t Trust Gay Econ­o­mists [Updated]

    By Car­o­line Bankoff

    Har­vard his­to­rian Niall Fer­gu­son has an inter­est­ing new cri­tique of Key­ne­sian eco­nom­ics (which calls for gov­ern­ment stim­u­lus spend­ing and larger deficits when the econ­omy is weak.) At a Thurs­day con­fer­ence in Cal­i­for­nia, Fer­gu­son — an aus­ter­ity advo­cate — told a crowd of 500 finan­cial advis­ers and investors that John May­nard Keynes’s ideas should be dis­missed because he was gay and child­less, and there­fore did not worry about about his philosophy’s effect on future generations.

    Accord­ing to a report from finan­cial writer Tom Kosti­gen, Fer­gu­son explained that the “effete” Keynes pre­ferred talk­ing about “poetry” to hav­ing sex with his bal­le­rina wife, and went on to sug­gest that peo­ple with­out chil­dren have no rea­son or abil­ity to care about what hap­pens to the world after they die. Hope­fully, this will attract as much crit­i­cism as his Newsweek take-down of Pres­i­dent Obama’s first term, though it should be much eas­ier to pick apart.

    Update: Fer­gu­son has apol­o­gized for his “stu­pid, “insen­si­tive,” and “off-the-cuff” remarks. How­ever, Cambridge’s Michael Kit­son claims that Fer­gu­son made sim­i­lar com­ments dur­ing a sem­i­nar twenty years ago. Mean­while, Fer­gu­son neme­sis Paul Krug­man has taken the deba­cle as an oppor­tu­nity to sug­gest that Fer­gu­son has “for­feited any right to be taken seri­ously” because his offen­sive argu­ment was based on a mis­in­ter­pre­ta­tion of Keynes’s asser­tion that, “In the long run we are all dead.”

    The orig­i­nal Finan­cial Advi­sor report on this inci­dent fleshes outs Ferguson’s happy com­ments:

    Har­vard Pro­fes­sor Trashes Keynes For Homosexuality

    May 3, 2013 • Tom Kostigen

    Har­vard Pro­fes­sor and author Niall Fer­gu­son says John May­nard Keynes’ eco­nomic phi­los­o­phy was flawed and he didn’t care about future gen­er­a­tions because he was gay and didn’t have children.

    [Editor’s Note: 10:21 pm, May 4. Ear­lier today, two days after he spoke, Pro­fes­sor Fer­gu­son issued an “unqual­i­fied apol­ogy” for what he termed his “taste­less” and “stu­pid” remarks.]

    Speak­ing at the Tenth Annual Alte­gris Con­fer­ence in Carls­bad, Calif., in front of a group of more than 500 finan­cial advi­sors and investors, Fer­gu­son responded to a ques­tion about Keynes’ famous phi­los­o­phy of self-interest ver­sus the eco­nomic phi­los­o­phy of Edmund Burke, who believed there was a social con­tract among the liv­ing, as well as the dead. Fer­gu­son asked the audi­ence how many chil­dren Keynes had. He explained that Keynes had none because he was a homo­sex­ual and was mar­ried to a bal­le­rina, with whom he likely talked of “poetry” rather than pro­cre­ated. The audi­ence went quiet at the remark. Some atten­dees later said they found the remarks offensive.

    It gets worse.

    Fer­gu­son, who is the Lau­rence A. Tisch Pro­fes­sor of His­tory at Har­vard Uni­ver­sity, and author of The Great Degen­er­a­tion: How Insti­tu­tions Decay and Economies Die, says it’s only log­i­cal that Keynes would take this self­ish world­view because he was an “effete” mem­ber of soci­ety. Appar­ently, in Ferguson’s world, if you are gay or child­less, you can­not care about future gen­er­a­tions nor soci­ety.

    ...

    Since our indi­vid­ual DNA con­tri­bu­tion gets cut in half for each suc­ces­sive gen­er­a­tion (e.g. your kids have half your DNA, grand­kids get a quar­ter, great-grandkids an eighth, etc), you have to won­der where the cut­off point is for peo­ple that care about the future only if it’s a future involv­ing peo­ple with bits of their own spe­cial DNA. Would they still care about their great-great-great grand­kids? After­all, even if there are a lot of them scam­per­ing about each one will only have 1/32nd of their unique DNA spe­cial­ness. Maybe he only cares about the “fittest” descen­dents that man­age to have the have kids and pass on an ever-shrinking bit of that Niall Ferguson-specialness for one more round? One thing is clear, Niall cares about the future.

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | May 5, 2013, 7:29 pm
  8. Per­haps there’s an austerity-related les­son in this research:

    He stud­ies where morals come from
    By Kelly Mur­ray, CNN
    updated 10:25 AM EDT, Tue May 7, 2013

    (CNN) — Being nice to oth­ers and coop­er­at­ing with them aren’t uniquely human traits. Frans de Waal, direc­tor of Emory University’s Liv­ing Links Cen­ter at the Yerkes National Pri­mate Research Cen­ter in Lawrenceville, Geor­gia, stud­ies how our close pri­mate rel­a­tives also demon­strate behav­iors sug­ges­tive of a sense of morality.

    De Waal recently pub­lished a book called “The Bonobo and the Athe­ist: In Search of Human­ism Among the Pri­mates,” which syn­the­sizes evi­dence that there are bio­log­i­cal roots in human fair­ness, and explores what that means for the role of reli­gion in human soci­eties. CNN’s Kelly Mur­ray recently spoke with De Waal about the book.

    CNN’s Kelly Mur­ray: Tell us about the title of your book.

    Frans de Waal: Well, the rea­son I chose that title is, when I bring up the ori­gins of moral­ity, it revolves around God, or comes from reli­gion, and I want to address the issue that I think moral­ity is actu­ally older than reli­gion. So I’m get­ting into the reli­gion ques­tion, and how impor­tant is reli­gion for moral­ity. I think it plays a role, but it’s a sec­ondary role. Instead of being the source of moral­ity, reli­gion came later, maybe to for­tify morality.

    CNN: How would you say that ethics or moral­ity is sep­a­rate from religion?

    De Waal: Well, I think that moral­ity is older. In the sense that I find it very hard to believe that 100,000 or 200,000 years ago, our ances­tors did not believe in right and wrong, and did not pun­ish bad behav­ior, did not care about fair­ness. Very long ago our ances­tors had moral sys­tems. Our cur­rent insti­tu­tions are only a cou­ple of thou­sand years old, which is really not old in the eyes of a biol­o­gist. So I think reli­gion came after moral­ity. Reli­gion may have become a cod­i­fi­ca­tion of moral­ity, and it may for­tify it, but it’s not the ori­gin of it.

    CNN: Why do peo­ple need religion?

    De Waal: Well, that’s a good ques­tion. I’m strug­gling with that. I’m per­son­ally a non­be­liever, so I’m strug­gling with if we really need reli­gion. ... I’m from the Nether­lands, where 60% of the peo­ple are non­be­liev­ers. So in north­ern Europe, there are actu­ally exper­i­ments going on now with soci­eties that are more sec­u­lar, to see if we can main­tain a moral soci­ety that way, and for the moment I would say that exper­i­ment is going pretty well. ... Per­son­ally I think it is pos­si­ble to build a soci­ety that is moral on a non­re­li­gious basis, but the jury is still out on that.

    CNN: So do you believe that peo­ple are gen­er­ally good?

    De Waal: Yeah, my view is that you have two (kinds of) peo­ple in the world. You have peo­ple who think that we are inher­ently bad and evil and self­ish, but with a lot of hard work we can be good, and you have other peo­ple like myself who believe that we are inher­ently good. There’s a lot of evi­dence on the pri­mates that I can use to sup­port that idea that we are inher­ently good, but on occa­sion when we get too com­pet­i­tive or frus­trated, we turn bad.

    CNN: So when the stakes are higher for sur­vival, we’re more indi­vid­u­al­is­tic than group-oriented?

    De Waal: Oh no, we very much sur­vive by group life. Humans are not able to sur­vive alone. For exam­ple, soli­tary con­fine­ment is one of the worst pun­ish­ments we can give. We are not really made to live alone, we would not sur­vive, and so when things get tough we would actu­ally come together more and be more social when things get tough.

    ...

    Instead of look­ing at human moral­ity as some­thing we design in our heads — the philoso­phers want us to believe that by logic and rea­son­ing we arrive at moral prin­ci­ples — I think it works very dif­fer­ently. We have a lot of feel­ings and ten­den­cies that drive us to moral solu­tions, and yes, we often then later try to jus­tify these solu­tions and come up with rea­sons for them, but that’s often secondarily.

    In pri­mate behav­ior we can see they have a sense of fair­ness. They have empa­thy: they enforce rules among them­selves, they can delay grat­i­fi­ca­tion and they can con­trol their impulses. So many of these ten­den­cies that go into our moral­i­ties can be found in other ani­mals, but instead of them com­ing from logic and rea­son­ing, they actu­ally come from our pri­mate psy­chol­ogy most of the time.

    So research sug­gests that pri­mates tend to be inher­ently except when they get too com­pet­i­tive and frus­trated and their bad sides come out. And when times get tough they tend to band together. And these moral or immoral responses appear to be deeply wired into our evo­lu­tionar pri­mate psy­chol­ogy. So basi­cally, we should expect aus­ter­ity poli­cies to sub­con­sciously turn us into ass­hole chim­panzees:

    Golden Dawn MP ‘swung at mayor of Athens but hit 12-year-old girl instead’

    Mem­ber of par­lia­ment for Greek extreme-right party also accused of try­ing to pull out gun dur­ing inci­dent at char­ity event

    Asso­ci­ated Press in Athens
    guardian.co.uk, Thurs­day 2 May 2013 13.40 EDT

    A mem­ber of par­lia­ment from Greece’s extreme-right Golden Dawn party allegedly tried to punch the mayor of Athens on Thurs­day, swing­ing at him but report­edly miss­ing and hit­ting a 12-year-old girl instead.

    The con­fronta­tion came hours after police used pep­per spray to pre­vent the nation­al­ist party from dis­trib­ut­ing free food to Greek cit­i­zens only in the city’s main Syn­tagma Square in defi­ance of a munic­i­pal ban the mayor had vowed to uphold.

    Once a mar­ginal group, Golden Dawn saw a mete­oric rise in the polls in recent years, becom­ing the third most pop­u­lar party as the coun­try slid fur­ther into finan­cial cri­sis and unem­ploy­ment rock­eted. Its mem­bers have been repeat­edly accused of involve­ment in vio­lent attacks against immi­grants and others.

    “The only thing these peo­ple know is the lan­guage of vio­lence,” said the mayor, Gior­gos Kaminis, after the inci­dent, in which he said MP Gior­gos Ger­me­nis also tried to pull out a gun before being restrained by the mayor’s bodyguards.

    Ger­me­nis turned up at a char­ity event where Kaminis was hand­ing out gifts to chil­dren of unem­ployed par­ents ahead of Sunday’s Ortho­dox Easter.

    “This man sneaked in, we didn’t notice him … and he tried to hit me,” Kaminis told Vima FM radio. “At the last minute my per­sonal guards stopped him.” The mayor said Ger­me­nis had a gun tucked into the back of his waist band, and attempted to pull the weapon out.

    Tele­vi­sion footage showed the mayor’s body­guards strug­gling with Ger­me­nis as a woman car­ry­ing a baby scur­ried out of the room. The secu­rity guards pinned the MP against a wall before march­ing him out of the building.

    Greek media said the blow intended for Kaminis ended up hit­ting a girl, leav­ing her with a bruised fore­head but no seri­ous injuries. “Extreme actions, espe­cially when their vic­tims are inno­cent 12-year-old chil­dren, do not befit our democ­racy,” said gov­ern­ment spokesman Simos Kedikoglou.

    Golden Dawn issued a state­ment deny­ing a girl had been hit and vow­ing to sue Kaminis and his secu­rity guards. For his part, Kaminis intends to sue Ger­me­nis for the attempted attack, the municipality’s press office said. Police said they were inves­ti­gat­ing com­plaints against the MP for threats and bran­dish­ing a weapon.

    Golden Dawn had announced it would hand out free Easter food to Greeks only on Thurs­day. Kaminis had banned any such events in the city’s main square, and vowed Wednes­day not to allow the “soup kitchen of hate” to take place.

    ...

    Though Golden Dawn rejects the neo-Nazi label, its web­site shows great fond­ness for Nazi lit­er­a­ture and symbols.

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | May 8, 2013, 12:07 pm
  9. Remem­ber, every eco­nomic con­trac­tion is an oppor­tu­nity boom (if you hap­pen to have lots of cash or credit lying around). And falling wages just means ris­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties and higher qual­ity! Down is up, pain is plea­sure, and bad is good in the Par­adise of the Elites:

    Reces­sion is a good time to exploit cheap labour, says Cameron aide

    Lord Young says low-wage con­di­tions are a bonus for busi­ness, draw­ing a furi­ous response from the TUC

    Daniel Bof­fey, pol­icy edi­tor
    The Observer, Sat­ur­day 11 May 2013 16.02 EDT

    The prime minister’s adviser on enter­prise has told the cab­i­net that the eco­nomic down­turn is an excel­lent time for new busi­nesses to boost prof­its and grow because labour is cheap, the Observer can reveal.

    Lord Young, a cab­i­net min­is­ter under the late Baroness Thatcher, who is the only aide with his own office in Down­ing Street, told min­is­ters that the low wage lev­els in a reces­sion made larger finan­cial returns eas­ier to achieve. His com­ments are con­tained in a report to be pub­lished this week, on which the cab­i­net was briefed last Tuesday.

    Young, who has already been forced to resign from his posi­tion once before for down­play­ing the impact of the reces­sion on peo­ple, writes: “The rise in the num­ber of busi­nesses in recent years shows that a reces­sion can be an excel­lent time to start a business.

    Com­peti­tors who fall by the way­side enable well-run firms to expand and increase mar­ket share. Fac­tors of pro­duc­tion such as premises and labour can be cheaper and higher qual­ity, mean­ing that return on invest­ment can be greater.

    A Down­ing Street spokesman said Young was merely stat­ing a “fac­tual point and noth­ing else”. But the com­ments were described as “appalling and ill-timed” by union lead­ers, with job-market fig­ures due out next week expected to show that the ini­tial resilience of employ­ment has faded while wages are being severely tightened.

    UK employ­ees’ aver­age hourly earn­ings have fallen by 8.5% since 2009 in real terms, adjust­ing for infla­tion, accord­ing to the Office for National Sta­tis­tics (ONS).

    ...

    Young was forced to quit just months into the gov­ern­ment in 2010, after he was over­whelmed by con­dem­na­tion of his claim that vot­ers had never had it so good dur­ing the “so-called reces­sion” due to low inter­est rates.

    The for­mer trade and indus­try sec­re­tary also dis­missed the 100,000 job cuts expected each year in the pub­lic sec­tor as being “within the mar­gin of error” in the con­text of a work­force of 30 mil­lion. He added that com­plaints about spend­ing cuts came from “peo­ple who think they have a right for the state to sup­port them”.

    Young quit but was qui­etly reap­pointed 11 months later.

    ...

    This is a moment when it might be use­ful to point out that even Hoover’s Trea­sury Sec­re­tary Andrew Mel­lon, known for his “Liq­ui­date labor, liq­ui­date stocks, liq­ui­date farm­ers, liq­ui­date real estate ... it will purge the rot­ten­ness out of the system.”-mentality, even­tu­ally rejected this kind of destruc­tive and preda­tory men­tal­ity:

    Bloomberg
    Father Cox, Andrew Mel­lon and a Huge March on Wash­ing­ton: Echoes
    By Philip Scran­ton Jan 10, 2012 9:28 AM CT

    The Depres­sion hit Pitts­burgh hard. As 1932 began, the steel indus­try in the city was oper­at­ing at 12 per­cent of capac­ity and unem­ploy­ment had reached 31 per­cent for white work­ers, 48 per­cent for black workers.

    Father James Cox — a for­mer steel­worker and the pas­tor at Old St. Patrick’s Church in Pitts­burgh since 1923 — had run a soup kitchen for two years and helped build a Shan­ty­town to house the fore­closed and the evicted. Late in 1931, Cox decided a march on Wash­ing­ton was the next log­i­cal step, recall­ing an 1894 trek from Ohio by Jacob Coxey’s “Army” of the unem­ployed dur­ing another depres­sion. (Iron­i­cally, as Pitts­burghers assem­bled on Jan. 5, 1932, Coxey had just become the Repub­li­can mayor of Mas­sil­lon, Ohio.)

    ...

    Hoover ini­tially planned to ignore the demon­stra­tors, and had Cox inves­ti­gated as a pos­si­ble rad­i­cal (he was not). But on learn­ing that about 30 per­cent of the marchers were mil­i­tary vet­er­ans, Hoover met with Cox and a few oth­ers for about 20 minutes.

    The polit­i­cal impact of the protest was siz­able — not in cre­at­ing new pub­lic works for the unem­ployed, but in forc­ing a Cab­i­net reshuf­fle. Trea­sury Sec­re­tary Andrew Mel­lon, a Pitts­burgher, thor­oughly sup­ported the march. When hun­dreds of Cox’s marchers missed their caravan’s depar­ture home, Mel­lon paid $1,242 to cover their train fares.

    When peo­ple began ask­ing how thou­sands of unem­ployed men could afford to drive the all the way to Wash­ing­ton, word trick­led out that Mel­lon had “qui­etly ordered” the ser­vice sta­tions of his Gulf Oil Co. “to dis­pense gaso­line with­out charge,” as Ken­neth J. Heine­man notes in “A Catholic New Deal.”

    Once famed for his tough-minded Depres­sion poli­cies (“Liq­ui­date labor, liq­ui­date stocks, liq­ui­date farm­ers, liq­ui­date real estate ... it will purge the rot­ten­ness out of the sys­tem.”), Mel­lon now rejected Hoover’s rel­a­tive inac­tiv­ity and his trust that mar­ket recov­er­ies and char­ity would heal the dam­age. Within days of the march, Mel­lon and the pres­i­dent stopped speak­ing. Hoover secured Mellon’s res­ig­na­tion and arranged to ship him over­seas as the ambas­sador to the U.K.

    A very bad year for the pres­i­dent had commenced.

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | May 11, 2013, 5:51 pm

Post a comment