News & Supplemental  

Bertelsmann’s Revisionist

by Her­sch Fis­chler & John Fried­man
THE NATION

On Octo­ber 30 in Atlanta, the Anti-Defamation League, self-described as the world’s lead­ing orga­ni­za­tion against anti-Semitism, will honor the Ber­tels­mann Foun­da­tion. The foun­da­tion, which is closely linked to Ber­tels­mann AG, the global media empire and owner of Ran­dom House, Ban­tam Dou­ble­day Dell and oth­ers, will receive an award from the ADL’s Inter­na­tional A World of Dif­fer­ence Institute.

The award will specif­i­cally rec­og­nize Rein­hard Mohn, the founder of the foun­da­tion as well as a mem­ber of the found­ing fam­ily of the Ber­tels­mann firm. It is sur­pris­ing that the ADL should so honor Ber­tels­mann at this time. Con­trary to the company’s offi­cial his­tory, Ber­tels­mann coop­er­ated with the Nazis in the late thir­ties and early for­ties, pub­lish­ing a range of Hit­ler­ian pro­pa­ganda [see Her­sch Fis­chler and John Fried­man, “Bertelsmann’s Nazi Past,” Decem­ber 28, 1998]. Cur­rent Ber­tels­mann activ­i­ties raise more dis­turb­ing questions.

In 1980 Bertelsmann’s Stern mag­a­zine pub­lished poems and illus­tra­tions sup­pos­edly writ­ten and drawn by Hitler dur­ing World War I under the title “Rhymes by Pri­vate First Class H” (“Gereimtes vom Gefre­iten H”). Dirk Baven­damm, a 61-year-old Ger­man his­to­rian who had been instru­men­tal in help­ing Stern obtain the mate­r­ial, wrote an accom­pa­ny­ing arti­cle not­ing that the poems and draw­ings show Hitler as an ordi­nary sol­dier. In one illus­tra­tion a Ger­man sol­dier gen­tly holds a baby; in another, a sol­dier helps a mother lying in bed while a baby nes­tles in a cra­dle. Sub­se­quently the poems and draw­ings were deter­mined to be forg­eries. (Later, Mohn gave the green light to a Ber­tels­mann divi­sion to pur­chase the Hitler diaries, by the same forger, which also showed a milder Hitler. They were pub­lished in Stern in 1983.)

Bavendamm’s career was not affected. His book Roosevelt’s Way to War (Roo­sevelts Weg zum Krieg) was pub­lished in 1983. Rewrit­ing his­tory, he stated that Roo­sevelt, not Hitler, had caused World War II. He also wrote that Amer­i­can Jews “con­trolled most of the media,” and he claimed they gave a false pic­ture of Hitler.

Did the book impress Mohn, then the major­ity share­holder of Ber­tels­mann? The firm hired Baven­damm as its house his­to­rian, and in 1984 he com­pleted a his­tor­i­cal study, 150 Years of Ber­tels­mann: The Founders and Their Time–with a fore­word by Mohn. A year later, Baven­damm edited the firm’s offi­cial his­tory, which set forth the untrue story that the firm had resisted the Nazis and had been closed down by them. Mohn also asked Baven­damm to write the autho­rized his­tory of the Mohn fam­ily, pub­lished in 1986 under the title Ber­tels­mann, Mohn, Scip­pel: Three Families–One Company.

In a sec­ond book, Roosevelt’s War (pub­lished in 1993, reis­sued in 1998), Baven­damm accuses the US Pres­i­dent of enact­ing a plan to start World War II. In the same book he sug­gests that Hitler’s threats in early 1939 against Euro­pean Jewry were a reac­tion to Roosevelt’s strat­egy against Germany.

After the rev­e­la­tions about Bertelsmann’s Nazi past appeared, the com­pany announced that it had asked “the his­to­rian and pub­li­cist Dr. Dirk Baven­damm to look at the new infor­ma­tion and begin to rein­ves­ti­gate the role the pub­lish­ing house played in those days” and defended his work. It also set up an inde­pen­dent com­mis­sion to inves­ti­gate Bertelsmann’s World War II activities.

The com­mis­sion, chaired by Saul Friedlän­der, a his­tory pro­fes­sor at UCLA, insisted that it could not con­tinue unless Baven­damm departed. Pro­fes­sor Friedlän­der said that he had read some of Bavendamm’s work, but he declined to cat­e­go­rize it. He noted that his objec­tion was pro­ce­dural rather than based on con­tent. “We asked very firmly that we should be the only research entity, and Ber­tels­mann accepted our request imme­di­ately,” he said.

Baven­damm said in an inter­view that he could not “remem­ber exactly” what his role had been in the pub­li­ca­tion of the fake Hitler poems and draw­ings. Dis­cussing Roo­sevelt and Hitler, he described his views as “non­con­formist and inde­pen­dent.” He added, “All the world is under the impres­sion that Hitler was in the main respon­si­ble for the out­break of World War II. But I see it in a big­ger frame­work of the United States mov­ing to the sta­tus of a superpower.”

A spokesper­son for Ber­tels­mann said Baven­damm is not now employed by Ber­tels­mann or any related entity and that his affil­i­a­tion with the firm “ended with for­ma­tion of the Inde­pen­dent His­tor­i­cal Com­mis­sion.” The spokesper­son described the cor­po­rate his­tory Baven­damm wrote as “never intended to be a defin­i­tive schol­arly cor­po­rate his­tory of the company.”

Caryl Stern-LaRosa, head of the ADL’s A World of Dif­fer­ence Insti­tute, admit­ted there was “soul-searching” about the award. Although the Ber­tels­mann Foun­da­tion donated about $1 mil­lion to the ADL for projects in Ger­many to pro­mote democ­racy, human rights and tol­er­ance, she noted, “it is their moral com­mit­ment we are hon­or­ing.” She also pointed out that the award rec­og­nizes the cur­rent pro­grams and lead­er­ship of the Ber­tels­mann Foun­da­tion and not the past activ­i­ties of the company.

Yet it is highly ironic that at the same ADL con­fer­ence where the Ber­tels­mann Foun­da­tion is sched­uled to receive its award, Emory Uni­ver­sity pro­fes­sor Deb­o­rah Lip­stadt will address the group on “the ever-growing dan­ger of Holo­caust revi­sion­ism.” In any case, the Friedlän­der com­mis­sion should widen the scope of its inves­ti­ga­tion of Ber­tels­mann to bring it closer to the present, and Ber­tels­mann should imme­di­ately per­mit inde­pen­dent researchers into the company’s archives.

Discussion

No comments for “Bertelsmann’s Revisionist”

Post a comment

Recommended Reading

Family of Secrets Family of Secrets The Bush Dynasty, the Powerful Forces That Put It in the White House, and What Their Influence Means for America Read more »