Spitfire List Web site and blog of anti-fascist researcher and radio personality Dave Emory.

News & Supplemental  

David Duke Endorses Occupy Wall Street

”]

The Haz­ard of Dukes

COMMENT: Long­time KKK and white suprema­cist leader David Duke has added his voice to the fas­cist and Nazi ele­ments climb­ing on the Occupy Wall Street bandwagon.

A num­ber of thoughts come to mind in this con­text. First, there are indi­ca­tions that far-right/fascist ele­ments (cloaked as “pro­gres­sives”) may have gen­er­ated the impe­tus for the move­ment in the first place. (As I’ve said before, the vast major­ity of par­tic­i­pants do not appear to man­i­fest such sym­pa­thies.)

Note how the con­ser­v­a­tive source report­ing this lumps Duke and the Amer­i­can Nazi Party in with Obama!

This may well be an attempt at alien­at­ing Jew­ish voters–a tra­di­tional ele­ment of the Demo­c­ra­tic Party–from the Obama camp in antic­i­pa­tion of 2012.

Do not dis­count the pos­si­bil­ity that fas­cist ele­ments may either hijack the move­ment and/or dis­credit it, rather like the con­trolled demo­li­tion of the World Trade Cen­ter freaks hijacked and dis­cred­ited any notion of seri­ous inves­ti­ga­tion  into the 9/11 attacks.

Might this entire phe­nom­e­non be a well-designed trap or agent-provacateur oper­a­tion from the start?

Watch out for pos­si­ble ter­ror­ist inci­dents linked to  OWS and/or calls for a third party, that would serve the same pur­pose as the Naderoids  in 2000.

In this con­text, one should not over­look the pos­si­bil­ity that Duke is an intel­li­gence offi­cer. (See Mis­cel­la­neous Archive Show M52, “Is Duke a Spook?”)

“David Duke Releases Video Sup­port­ing Occupy Wall Street Protests” by Joe Newby; Spokane Con­ser­v­a­tive Exam­iner; 10/27/2011.

EXCERPT: For­mer KKK Grand Wiz­ard David Duke has joined Pres­i­dent Obama and the Amer­i­can Nazi Party in sup­port­ing the Occupy Wall Street protests.

“I cheer the men and women on the streets con­demn­ing the inter­na­tional banks that hold Amer­ica finan­cially hostage. These Wall Street banks are not the prod­uct of free enter­prise; they are the prod­uct of crime,” Duke said in a video sup­port­ing the protests.

CNS News reports that Duke “repeat­edly attacks what he refers to as “Zion­ist bankers” such as Ben “Shalom” Bernanke,” and claims that while many have lost up to half of their sav­ings, the “Zion­ist own­ers of the preda­tory banks made more shekels.”

Duke also decries what he calls the “Zion­ist media and their paid whores,” and attacks Rush Lim­baugh, Sean Han­nity and Bill O’Reilly.  He states his utter hatred for New York, call­ing it the “real cen­ter of Zion­ist globalism.” . . .



Discussion

3 comments for “David Duke Endorses Occupy Wall Street”

  1. Hello Dave. Well, I was afraid some­thing like this was going to hap­pen one of these days, given how enor­mously pop­u­lar O.W.S. has become. If you would like to hear my per­sonal take on this.......

    The research I have done on O.W.S. has seemed to indi­cate con­clu­sively, that this move­ment, was indeed a gen­uine grass­roots effort with noble aims.
    With that said, I have long feared & sus­pected that var­i­ous ele­ments of the extreme right-wing ser­vants of what I’d call the world crime network(such as the Under­ground Reich) would try des­per­ately to try to either infil­trate, destroy from within, and/or dis­credit the entire move­ment, as well as the Main­stream Media, either lying, obfus­cat­ing the truth, or doing just a plain poor job on report­ing. Unfor­tu­nately, all what of I have been to observe, aided in part by your research as well, has indi­cated that, sadly, much of this has already come to pass. And it doesn’t look like it’ll end any­time soon, either.
    How­ever, given how harshly many sup­port­ers seem to have reacted to the last anti-Semitic inci­dent, there is hope that peo­ple can wake up and look at what’s going on. Peo­ple are also already quite aware of past infil­tra­tors and agents provo­ca­teur, par­tic­u­larly one Patrick How­ley of The Amer­i­can Spec­ta­tor, and Mike Stack, the man who is most likely the one who caused the police crack­down in D.C. not too long ago.
    (p.s., con­cern­ing the ori­gins of Wall Street: as it turns out, AdBusters’ Schmalz & White may not have been quite as promi­nent in start­ing it up, either, as I once thought. Here, Mobius1ski talks about this here:
    http://mobius1ski.tumblr.com/post/11575039711/lies-damned-lies-antisemitism-at-occupy-wall-street
    BTW, the Mother Jones arti­cle he ref­er­enced is here:
    http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-international-origins
    http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-international-origins?page=2
    So, I guess that clears that up, huh? Schmalz & White may have helped, but it looks like had it not been for the NYC Gen­eral Assem­bly and cer­tain other groups, there might not be an OWS today, or at least not as we know it.)

    Posted by Steven L. | October 30, 2011, 3:34 am
  2. Going out on a limb... I’d like to sug­gest that dur­ing the two years prior to OWS, some key U.S. cities were sub­jected to an “Oper­a­tion Gladio” par­a­digm — the same U.S. cities where cops are now exer­cis­ing vio­lent crackdowns.

    This “Amer­i­can Gladio” sce­nario works whether or not OWS was pre-planned as “ket­tling” an authen­tic back­lash movement.

    Some inter­est­ing sta­tis­tics jux­ta­posed with the 2009–2010 Gladio examples:

    Crime in 2010 dropped to its low­est rate since 1967 in Los Ange­les, Seat­tle, and St. Louis, as well as its low­est level in many years else­where:
    http://tinyurl.com/3plxbpt

    How­ever, police deaths in 2010 jumped nearly 40%:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/28/police-deaths-2010_n_801901.html

    More­over, many of these police deaths occurred in “single-massacre inci­dents”:
    4 killed in Oak­land (http://articles.sfgate.com/2009–03-23/bay-area/17215878_1_parole-officer-officers-families-swat-team);
    4 killed in Seat­tle (http://www.komonews.com/news/local/78088192.html)
    4 killed in Detroit (http://www.freep.com/article/20110123/NEWS05/110123016/Four-police-shot-Detroit-precinct-gunman-killed)
    3 killed in Pitts­burgh (http://www.wtae.com/news/19094064/detail.html)

    As another exam­ple of “stim­u­lus gen­er­al­iza­tion”, con­sider the case of Christo­pher Mon­fort of Seat­tle. Dur­ing the same week that 4 Seat­tle cops were ambushed in a cof­fee shop, Mon­fort also ambushed and killed a 5th cop. Mon­fort could be a movie stand-in for Obama: a U-W law stu­dent, scholar, com­mu­nity vol­un­teer, and poten­tial role-model, until he torched 4 cop cars & killed a cop:
    http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2009/11/christopher_monfort_suspect_in.php

    Out on a limb: [i]Was there a “local­ized” U.S. ver­sion of Gladio[/i], with cops as the “tar­get audi­ence” instead of a gen­eral pop­u­lace ter­ror­ized (as in Italy dur­ing the 1970s)? With cops, instead, as the “stim­u­lus gen­er­al­iza­tion” audi­ence, [b]intended to divide cops against com­mu­ni­ties they serve[/b]?

    Isn’t it fairly unusual for a single-incident “police mas­sacre” — let alone so many, dur­ing 2009–2010, which were simul­ta­ne­ously “Low­est Crime Rate” years?

    Instead of an Egypt­ian Upris­ing Sce­nario, where the civil­ians won over the mil­i­tary, U.S. cops are NOT being asked by OWS to sym­pa­thize and stand with OWS (except in a few rare exceptions).

    U.S. cops, in a siege men­tal­ity since 2009, espe­cially in Oak­land, Seat­tle, Detroit, Pitts­burgh and a few other cities (offi­cers killed in Fort Worth, Dal­las, Anchor­age, and else­where), are NOT being asked to “see them­selves” in OWS.

    In fact: OWS is a coun­ter­point to the Tahrir Square mythol­ogy, because the Egyp­tians main­tained a rule: Let The Out­siders & The Mil­i­tary See Them­selves In Your Movement.

    Is OWS more about expres­sions of self, and expres­sions of iden­tity, often defined AGAINST authority?

    Or is OWS mature enough to adopt the rule: Let The Cops & Mid­dle Amer­i­cans See Them­selves In You?

    Was the 2009–2010 Amer­i­can Gladio care­fully planned against U.S. cops, specifically?

    Was the 2009–2010 Amer­i­can Gladio part of a care­fully planned over­all tra­jec­tory of events? A strat­egy to “ket­tle” a nascent move­ment that threat­ens to snow­ball into some­thing much more main­stream, at the very moment that Europe “col­lapses” and takes down the entire world­wide economy?

    After all, cops are part of the 99%.

    The final chap­ter of Howard Zinn’s flawed but well-intentioned “People’s His­tory of the United States” is a chap­ter called “Revolt of the Guards” — the key tip­ping point of the “suc­cess” of any OWS-type move­ment is whether or not the police’s sym­pa­thies are won over to the “99%” side.

    Will OWS attempt­ing to win them over as such? Or did Amer­i­can Gladio do its job upon the psy­ches of U.S. police? And is OWS too self-centered, too nar­cis­sis­tic, to win converts?

    Posted by R. Wilson | November 18, 2011, 9:05 pm
  3. http://www.algemeiner.com/2014/02/13/former-kkk-grand-wizard-david-duke-and-irans-press-tv-praise-presbytarian-church-usas-anti-israel-report/

    For­mer KKK Grand Wiz­ard David Duke and Iran’s Press TV Praise Pres­by­tar­ian Church USA’s Anti-Israel Report
    Feb­ru­ary 13, 2014 11:33 am 1 com­ment
    Author: Joshua Levitt

    David Duke, a for­mer Grand Wiz­ard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan and Louisiana State Rep­re­sen­ta­tive, joined with Press TV, a semi-official Iran­ian gov­ern­ment news agency, in prais­ing a report con­demn­ing Israel that was pub­lished by Pres­by­tar­ian Church USA.

    The church made head­lines in 2012 for a pro­posal, that was ulti­mately voted down by its mem­bers, to divest from Cater­pil­lar Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co. and Motorola because of their activ­i­ties in Israel. Duke has also recently been in the news after being expelled from Italy “for his racist and anti-Semitic views” by an Ital­ian judge, and from Ger­many, as “unde­sir­able for­eigner” on the eve of a planned lec­ture for a group of a hun­dred neo-Nazis.

    On his blog, the for­mer KKK leader said, “In a major break­through in the world­wide strug­gle against Zion­ist extrem­ism, the largest Pres­by­ter­ian church in the United States, the PC(USA), has issued a for­mal state­ment call­ing Zion­ism ‘Jew­ish Suprema­cism’ — a term first coined and made pop­u­lar by Dr. David Duke.”

    In Duke’s blog post, he wrote that the guide, titled ‘Zion­ism Unset­tled,’ was released ahead of the church’s bien­nial Gen­eral Assem­bly, sched­uled for June, in Detroit, where a sim­i­lar rec­om­men­da­tion to divest from com­pa­nies that work with Israel will be pre­sented. Duke noted the 2012 attempt was only nar­rowly defeated, with a tally of 333–331, with two abstentions.

    Duke wrote,“’Zionism Unset­tled’ is not only an attack on Israel and its Jew­ish sup­port­ers. It crit­i­cizes the Catholic Church’s land­mark 1965 Nos­tra Aetate, which opened the door for a new rela­tion­ship between Jews and Catholics, say­ing that the dec­la­ra­tion ‘raises as many ques­tions as it answers.” It also “fea­tures an entire chap­ter pan­ning Evan­gel­i­cal Chris­t­ian sup­port for Israel,” he said.

    Iran’s Press TV wrote, “A Pres­by­ter­ian Church group has described Zion­ism as the sin­gle rea­son behind the Israeli-Palestinian con­flict, say­ing it is destroy­ing the lives of both Pales­tini­ans and Jew­ish com­mu­ni­ties across the world.”

    “The study guide, dubbed Zion­ism Unset­tled, also argues that most Jews reject Zion­ism and choose to live out­side the Israeli-occupied Pales­tin­ian lands, depict­ing Jew­ish life inside the Islamic Repub­lic of Iran as ‘alive and well,’” Iran’s Press TV said.

    The pam­phlet was pro­duced by “The Israel Pales­tine Net­work of the Pres­by­ter­ian Church (U.S.A.),” with the Rev­erend Walt Davis, its edu­ca­tion co-chair, listed as the point of con­tact, but he pro­vided no response to an emailed query from The Alge­meiner on Thursday.

    Posted by Vanfield | February 13, 2014, 9:49 am

Post a comment