Spitfire List Web site and blog of anti-fascist researcher and radio personality Dave Emory.

News & Supplemental  

Fitch downgrades Japan. Tsunamis and nuclear meltdowns take a back seat to austerity

Paul Krug­man had a piece from last week about the stark diver­gences in eco­nomic per­for­mance amongst some of the major indus­tri­al­ized economies in the first quar­ter of the year. The coun­tries that drank the aus­ter­ity kool-aid are, of course, in the bot­tom of the pack (aus­ter­ity kool-aid is the worst fla­vor around...not only does it kill you but it taste like shit too). Inter­est­ingly, at the front of the pack was Japan with a robust %4+ annu­al­ized growth rate. And why is that? Well, in part because Japan was so phys­i­cally dev­as­tated by the tsunami and Fukushima dis­as­ters last year that the clean up effort couldn’t help but pro­vide a large stim­u­lus to the econ­omy. As Krug­man puts it:

May 17, 2012, 7:35 am
Spend­ing and Growth
Paul Krugman


So Japan, which is spend­ing heav­ily for post-tsunami recon­struc­tion, is grow­ing quite fast, while Italy, which is impos­ing aus­ter­ity mea­sures, is shrink­ing almost equally fast.

There seems to be some kind of les­son here about macro­eco­nom­ics, but I can’t quite put my fin­ger on it ...

Yes, there does indeed seem to be a les­son here about macro­eco­nom­ics and the impor­tant role gov­ern­ment spend­ing can play on the ablity of coun­tries to with­stand and bounce back from major nat­ural and finan­cial shocks. After­all, the causes of the euro­zone crises are largely all in their heads — some of them dick heads — with a housing/financial bub­ble cou­pled with unad­dressed euro­zone structural/currency union issues at the core of the cri­sis. It’s not like the con­ti­nent expe­ri­enced a mas­sive nat­ural dis­as­ter and a mul­ti­ple nuclear melt­downs. Japan, on the other hand, is still fac­ing an ongo­ing melt­down sit­u­a­tion and yet it’s out­per­formed the rest of the devel­oped world. So there does indeed seem to be a les­son here and, unfor­tu­nately, that les­son appears to anger the finance gods. Sac­ri­fices must be made:

Fitch Down­grades Japan’s Sov­er­eign Rat­ing
Pub­lished: May 22, 2012

TOKYO — The rat­ings agency Fitch on Tues­day low­ered its assess­ment of Japan’s sov­er­eign credit to A+, an invest­ment grade just above the likes of Spain and Italy, and crit­i­cized Tokyo for not doing more to pare down its bur­geon­ing debt.

The down­grade, Fitch’s first for Japan since 2001, under­scores the sheer scale of the country’s debt bur­den, as well as polit­i­cal and demo­graphic chal­lenges that have ham­pered efforts to tackle it.

Japan’s pub­lic debt will hit almost 240 per­cent of its gross domes­tic prod­uct by the end of the year, Fitch warned.l

The new rat­ing also height­ens the pres­sure on Prime Min­is­ter Yoshi­hiko Noda to rein in spend­ing and raise taxes at a del­i­cate time, when the Japan­ese econ­omy is still recov­er­ing from nat­ural and nuclear dis­as­ters last year.

Mr. Noda has warned that Japan could even­tu­ally face a debt cri­sis akin to that afflict­ing Europe and is stak­ing his job on a plan to dou­ble the con­sump­tion tax rate to 10 per­cent by late 2015. That increase, he has argued, is nec­es­sary to pay for soar­ing wel­fare costs and pen­sion payments.


Fitch said that a lack of new poli­cies to sta­bi­lize pub­lic finances could lead to a fur­ther down­grade. But it also said that progress in fis­cal pol­icy beyond expec­ta­tions, or markedly stronger eco­nomic growth, could lead to bet­ter ratings.

In a report pub­lished Tues­day, the Orga­ni­za­tion for Eco­nomic Coop­er­a­tion and Devel­op­ment joined in the finger-wagging over Japan­ese debt, urg­ing Tokyo to stick to its plans for a tax increase.

A detailed and cred­i­ble fis­cal con­sol­i­da­tion plan, includ­ing both rev­enue increases and spend­ing cuts, is essen­tial to main­tain con­fi­dence in Japan’s fis­cal sit­u­a­tion,” the O.E.C.D. said. “A top pri­or­ity is to imple­ment the government’s pro­posal to hike the con­sump­tion tax rate.”

On dear, with the IMF and the O.E.C.D. sneez­ing aus­te­ri­ons all over the place and Japan’s Prime Min­is­ter call­ing to dou­ble the con­sump­tion tax from 5% to 10% it looks like even Japan is catch­ing austerity-itis too. Yes, Japan, time for aus­ter­ity. Dou­ble that con­sump­tion tax while inter­est rates are at record lows. Because that worked really well the first time:

Finan­cial Times
Feb­ru­ary 12, 2012 7:37 pm
Europe can learn from Japan’s aus­ter­ity endgame

By Peter Tasker

The road to fis­cal hell is some­times paved with the best inten­tions. As Europe’s politi­cians seek to win elec­torates round to bru­tal bud­get cuts, they would do well to look to the expe­ri­ence of Japan, which shows how counter-productive aus­ter­ity can be in a post-bubble recession.

When Japan’s bub­ble econ­omy imploded in the early 1990s, pub­lic finances were in sur­plus and gov­ern­ment debt was a mere 20 per cent of gross domes­tic prod­uct. Twenty years on, the gov­ern­ment is run­ning a yawn­ing deficit and gross pub­lic debt has swollen to a sumo-sized 200 per cent of GDP.

How did it get from there to here? Not by lav­ish pub­lic spend­ing, as is some­times assumed. Japan’s exper­i­ment with Keynesian-style pub­lic works pro­grammes ended in 1997. True, they had failed to trig­ger durable eco­nomic recov­ery. But the alter­na­tive hypoth­e­sis — that fis­cal and mon­e­tary virtue would be enough — proved woe­fully mis­taken. Eco­nomic growth had been pos­i­tive in the first half of the “lost decade”, but after the gov­ern­ment raised con­sump­tion tax in 1998 any momen­tum van­ished. Today Japan’s nom­i­nal GDP is lower than in 1992.

The real cause of fis­cal dete­ri­o­ra­tion was the dam­age done to tax rev­enues by this pro­tracted slump. Cen­tral gov­ern­ment out­lays as a per­cent­age of GDP are no higher now than in the early 1980s, but the tax take has fallen by 5 per cent of GDP since 1989, the year that con­sump­tion taxes were introduced.


One final note:
Really? You can’t be seri­ous.


2 comments for “Fitch downgrades Japan. Tsunamis and nuclear meltdowns take a back seat to austerity”

  1. Out­lays for pub­lic works, and I define that as actu­ally build­ing phys­i­cal things, have sev­eral goals. They teach or rein­tro­duce job skills, they give peo­ple, young peo­ple espe­cially. direc­tion and hope and pride. Ide­ally they should show a pub­lic profit in mak­ing trans­porta­tion and hous­ing cheaper and eas­ier or facil­i­tate other busi­ness processes in other ways. Lastly, they get the money flow­ing in a slug­gish econ­omy. It’s all win-win to stim­u­late an econ­omy from the ground up, instead of hand­ing cash, no ques­tions asked, to big thiev­ing banks and mil­i­tary con­trac­tors. Maryland’s bril­liant (not) governor’s plan is more gam­bling casi­nos.
    Con­trary to Fox’x scape­goat­ing of the poor as par­a­sites, peo­ple would rather work than not. The tax base will grow fast enough to cover the loans if the project are not delib­er­ately designed to be boon­dog­gles and so dis­prove the con­cept.
    In one way or another the good solu­tions all reverse the flow of wealth to the top. They’re going to try to kill a bunch of us before they let that happen.

    Posted by Dwight | May 25, 2012, 7:52 pm
  2. Well, that’s one “fis­cal cliff” averted. Phew!

    Oh look, up ahead...there’s a chasm. Jump­ing into it sounds like a good idea.

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | November 15, 2012, 11:06 pm

Post a comment