News & Supplemental  

Insight: Western banks face SWF backlash

by Gillian Tett
FINANCIAL TIMES

Pub­lished: Feb­ru­ary 7 2008 19:21 | Last updated: Feb­ru­ary 7 2008 19:21

Ear­lier this week, I chat­ted with a jet-lagged senior US financier. Like many of his ilk, he is flit­ting around the Mid­dle East and Asia try­ing to extract finance from sov­er­eign wealth funds and other invest­ment groups.

His lat­est trav­els have deliv­ered a sur­prise: some funds are qui­etly get­ting cold feet about the idea of putting more cap­i­tal directly into west­ern banks, he says.

“There is a back­lash build­ing,” he mut­tered into a crack­ling cell phone.

This is strik­ing stuff. In recent months, many equity investors have taken com­fort from the idea that sov­er­eign wealth funds could ride to the res­cue of Wall Street, if not the City of Lon­don too.

For as the sub­prime scourge has spread, US pol­i­cy­mak­ers have leant on the largest US banks to raise cap­i­tal, almost at any cost. Con­se­quently, they have passed the beg­ging bowl around the sov­er­eign wealth funds, with con­sid­er­able suc­cess. Thus far some $40bn to 60bn worth of injec­tions have been promised to groups such as Mer­rill Lynch and Citi, depend­ing on how you mea­sure the promises.

But hav­ing stepped into the breach so vis­i­bly late last year, some funds are now get­ting jit­ters. In China, for exam­ple, there are ris­ing com­plaints that funds are fool­ish to shovel cash directly into risk-laden US banks when they could be using it in bet­ter ways, such as pur­chas­ing west­ern com­mod­ity or man­u­fac­tur­ing groups.

“The Chi­nese are wor­ried they are turn­ing into [the source of] dumb money,” says one well-placed Asian financier, who partly blames the trend on the Black­stone saga, which pro­duced sig­nif­i­cant paper losses for the Chi­nese investors.

Mean­while, in the Mid­dle East, the lat­est round of Fed­eral Reserve inter­est rate cuts has cre­ated unease. For sure, some pow­er­ful Gulf investors have been heart­ened to see that the US author­i­ties are act­ing in a res­olute way. They are dou­bly relieved that the dol­lar has held up so well so far. But the dra­matic scale of Fed cuts has prompted con­cern that Wall Street is still sit­ting on a putrid mess – con­trary to what the US banks told the sov­er­eign wealth funds late last year.

Unsur­pris­ingly, this leaves Gulf investors cyn­i­cal about promises from Wall Street banks. It also has some Asian and Gulf funds con­clud­ing that if they are going to invest to take advan­tage of the sub­prime mess, they are fool­ish to do so directly or alone. Hence some are now turn­ing to pri­vate equity funds such as JC Flow­ers which are at least trained to analyse the sub­prime mess.

Now, it would be nice to think this sen­ti­ment shift does not mat­ter too much for the US banks. After all, the recent infu­sion of funds means the largest Wall Street groups are look­ing pretty well cap­i­talised on paper. It also means they should be able to absorb sub­prime losses, which banks such as Gold­man Sachs think could reach $200bn for the banks soon.

How­ever, the prob­lem is that sub­prime is just one of sev­eral poten­tial loom­ing shocks. Defaults on other forms of con­sumer debt and com­mer­cial prop­erty could rise this year. So could defaults on cor­po­rate lever­aged loans from 2009 on.

Mean­while, the mono­lines insur­ers are threat­en­ing to blast another hole in banks’ bal­ance sheets. Indeed, if you tot up all the hits that could emerge in the next cou­ple of years, it is easy to reach a sum of $500bn, or far more. This is size­able, given that Gold­man Sachs cal­cu­lates that the banks’ cap­i­tal is around $1,600bn.

I would bet that in the com­ing weeks large west­ern banks will once again start pass­ing the beg­ging bowl around the Mid­dle East and Asia. But I would also bet that these banks will find the going increas­ingly tough.

Yes, US polit­i­cal pres­sure might pro­duce a bit more money for banks. The Gulf and Asia remain flush with cash. But if the sov­er­eign wealth fund money is now flow­ing to pri­vate equity funds instead of west­ern banks, this gives this tale a whole new twist.

Stand by to see a new chap­ter unfold in this finan­cial crunch.

Discussion

No comments for “Insight: Western banks face SWF backlash”

Post a comment

ESSENTIAL BACKGROUND

Martin BormannMartin Borman, Nazi in Exile by Paul Manning. German corporate capital flight program in the waning years of WWII.
Available for download. Read more about the Bormann Organizaton »