Spitfire List Web site and blog of anti-fascist researcher and radio personality Dave Emory.

News & Supplemental  

Knauer Later? History Is Repeating Itself in Europe (“Austeritywitz” Health Care)

Nazi Eugenics Poster

Zyklon B: German generic drug for elderly patients

Dave Emory’s entire life­time of work is avail­able on a flash drive that can be obtained here. (The flash drive includes the anti-fascist books avail­able on this site.)

COMMENT: For decades, we have discussed the relationship between eugenics, euthanasia, the Nazi T-4 program and the genocide that grew out of these. 

Actualizing eugenics thinking that predominated in powerful elite circles in the West, the T-4 program began with the state-authorized killing of a badly deformed infant named Knauer. Economically and emotionally stressful for his parents, “baby Knauer” became the test case and prototype for the Third Reich’s extermination programs.

Baby Knauer’s parents and family petitioned Hitler for permission to have him eliminated and Hitler, in his beneficence, granted that permission. This test case became institutionalized. 

The professionals who staffed the T-4 killing centers graduated to staff the extermination camps such as Auschwitz.

Recent legislative proposals in Belgium and the Netherlands are disturbingly reminiscent of what happened in the 1930’s and thereafter.

In the Netherlands, authorities are considering the euthanasia of children to relieve the emotional suffering of their parents! This is unnervingly reminiscent of the Knauer case.

With austerity the order of the day in Europe and sure to be implemented in the United States when the Nazified GOP regains control of the White House and both houses of Congress (which will happen at some point), the economic pressure to accelerate the termination of inconvenient and economically burdensome individuals will surely accelerate.

It is beyond the scope of this post to fully delineate this dynamic. Please check the tags and access the information presented on this website.

The Knauer case is set forth in a number of shows, including FTR #32, Part I, side a.

For a lengthy, detailed discussion of the progression from “mercy killing” to genocide, we recommend Miscellaneous Archive Show M12: Part 1; Part 2; Part 3; Part 4; Part 5.

We also note that the so-called progressive sector is only too susceptible to “Knauer Hour” thinking. The Peak Oil crowd manifests just such ideology.

“Belgium and the Netherlands Consider Permitting Euthanasia for Children – Including to Relieve ‘Suffering for the Parents'” by Tim Stanley; The Telegraph; 6/19/2013.

EXCERPT: Of all the social/moral questions facing us, euthanasia is one of the toughest to draw a conclusion on. On the one hand, nobody likes to think of a patient being left to suffer. As individuals we have a right to control our own way of living and, by that logic, our own way of dying. On the other hand, there’s a worry that legalizing euthanasia encourages a culture of death. Sadly, the news coming out of Belgium and the Netherlands confirms the critics’ worst fears.

Belgium adopted euthanasia in 2002, one year after the Netherlands, and its laws were designed to help adults riddled with “unbearable physical or mental suffering”. Today, roughly one per cent of all deaths in Belgium are due to euthanasia – and the grounds on which it is carried out are becoming looser and looser. As the Telegraph recently reported, two deaf brothers opted to die after they started to go blind. They were young and their condition wasn’t terminal. They couldn’t bear the thought of living alone and in darkness, which is entirely understandable – but the case bends the spirit of the original law.

Now Belgium is weighing up some changes. One would allow patients diagnosed with Alzheimer’s and other diseases leading to dementia to sign an agreement permitting a doctor to allow them to die when the condition enters an advanced stage – even if they appear perfectly happy and physically stable. Another reform is to allow Belgians under 18 to choose euthanasia, too. This means that children who can’t drive, marry, vote or drink alcohol will be regarded as competent enough to decide whether or not they can die.

There’s an even more troubling development in the Netherlands. Since 2005, the Dutch have permitted doctors to euthanize minors so long as they act in accordance with a set of tight medical guidelines – 22 babies with spina bifida have been given lethal injections. But now the Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) is advising that a new test be established for euthanizing the newborn: if their suffering distresses the parents. In a recent policy document, the KNMG states that a lethal injection might be appropriate if “the period of gasping and dying persists and the inevitable death is prolonged, in spite of good preparation, and it causes severe suffering for the parents.” . . . .

. . . . This is killing justified not by relieving the suffering of the patient but by relieving the suffering of those around them. It is another step down that slippery slope towards making euthanasia far more common and easier to obtain than even many of its supporters would wish it to be. . . .

Discussion

3 comments for “Knauer Later? History Is Repeating Itself in Europe (“Austeritywitz” Health Care)”

  1. In the UK, they fudge the issue of getting rid of ‘useless feeders’ by inventing the Liverpool Care Pathway…this was ‘palliative care’ that was rolled out to the general wards, and basically consisted of having your food and fluids withdrawn as soon as the ‘doctor’ decided you were ‘in the last days of life’…which is whenever it suits them not to pay for any more treatment. They then do an ‘Anna Pou’- fill up a syringe of midazolam (versed) and morphine, and basically execute you. The many families who’ve had disabled kids and elderly relatives killed in this ‘surreptitious ‘ way wanted a full Public Inquiry, which is the only way you can get the government to give evidence on oath, but instead, they’ve appointed a woman who sits in our unelected upper chamber (with the titles baroness and rabbi- though she doesn’t have a congregation) to hold what they call an ‘impartial review’…trouble is, the terms of reference have been chosen so no one can even ASK QUESTIONS about the liverpool care pathway itself, and her panel are either connected to the ‘NHS end of life care’ strategy (the government costed up the number of ‘bed days’ they could save by euthanasing all the patients who cost the most money)…or worse still, a ‘journalist’ who specialises in ‘conspiracy theories’, who’s joined facebook victims groups under bogus names, despite sitting on an ‘impartial ‘ review panel!
    The Liverpool Care Pathway has been sold as a ‘brand’ to 22 EU countries…without a consent form (and there were 130,000 missing in the first year!!) its manslaughter…so the government are doing a ‘damage limitation’ exercise to avoid corporate manslaughter charges…by denying the victims families the chance of a human rights act case. I’ve joined this facebook site to try to prevent it happening to anyone else , but frankly, with the government refusing to answer Freedom Of Information Act requests on the matter, I seriously doubt we’ll get anywhere…Hitler would have dreamed of rolling out T4 across 22 countries….every NHS hospital is now a potential Hadamar if you’re elderly or disabled…and its become a great way for doctors to bury their mistakes too!

    Posted by Anon | June 20, 2013, 5:19 am
  2. Another nefarious thing to consider is how much the decision making process and definition of suffering or rather the interpretation of suffering of the parents is a manufactured construct of the post-Fordist corporate state and the “information bomb” automaton function of mass media.

    Posted by Flippery | June 27, 2013, 5:48 pm
  3. Thank you for publishing my comment: For Dave’s Eyes Only

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIus7lm_ZK0&feature=youtube_gdata_player

    Posted by Flippery | June 27, 2013, 9:35 pm

Post a comment