Dave Emory’s entire lifetime of work is available on a flash drive that can be obtained HERE . The new drive is a 32-gigabyte drive that is current as of the programs and articles posted by the fall of 2019. The new drive (available for a tax-deductible contribution of $65.00 or more.)
WFMU-FM is podcasting For The Record–You can subscribe to the podcast HERE .
You can subscribe to e‑mail alerts from Spitfirelist.com HERE .
You can subscribe to RSS feed from Spitfirelist.com HERE .
Please consider supporting THE WORK DAVE EMORY DOES .
COMMENT: In FTR #1126 , we examined the Trump administration and GOP’s exploitation of the Covid-19 outbreak as a campaign tactic and right-wing hints that the virus escaped from a Chinese biological warfare laboratory.
Now, Germany, France and Britain are joining with the Trump administration and the GOP in hinting that the coronavirus escaped from a Chinese biological warfare laboratory.
American media voices from (predictably) Fox News  to (also predictably) The New York Times  are orgiastically disseminating  the Fresh Fertilizer, acting in conjunction with intelligence officers.
Note that the linked story about Fox News describes statements by right-wing journalists, acting in concert with elements of the intelligence community, intimating that officials of the Democratic Party are in bed with Chinese intelligence.
This reeks of McCarthyism and may well hand Trump victory in the fall and, eventually, lead to war.
In fact, there is a high-security biological research facility in Wuhan at which Chinese scientists, along with American peers, have been studying coronaviruses–a source of intermittent disease transmission in China. This facility involves joint research  funded, in part, by the Pentagon.
As the German Foreign Policy  article notes, the tone of both American and German rhetoric concerning Covid-19 is reminiscent of the deliberate disinformation that led to the American invasion of Iraq in 2002.
” . . . . Last weekend, US President Donald Trump warned the People’s Republic that it should face consequences if it was ‘knowingly responsible’ for the spread of the pandemic. Washington is simultaneously spreading deliberate rumors that the virus could have originated in a Chinese laboratory. Whereas, scientists vehemently refute the allegations, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas declared, he ‘does not want to exclude’ that the WHO will have to deal with these issues. On Monday, Chancellor Angela Merkel called on Beijing to show ‘transparency’ on the issue. . . .”
” . . . . At the same time deliberate rumors are being spread in the United States that the Covid-19 virus could have originated in a Chinese laboratory — possibly in bioweapons lab. The US government indicated that it does not rule out this possibility; US intelligence services are currently investigating the issue. Particularly given the lie about Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction, such an allegation must be perceived as a threat to lend legitimacy to new aggressions. . . .”
” . . . . Already last week, German media organs have increasingly been calling China the ‘culprit’ behind the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak. Under the headline ‘what China already owes us,’ Germany’s Springer press even called for ‘reparations.’ (german-foreign-policy.com reported.) Leading British and French politicians have expressed similar views. British Foreign Minister Dominic Raab has repeatedly declared that China will be held responsible for the Covid-19 pandemic. French President Emmanuel Macron has now joined the campaign. Regarding the pandemic’s alleged origin, he declared, ‘there are clearly things that have happened’ in China ‘that we don’t know about.’ It is not clear how Macron can know something exists that he does not know about. It is however clear that he seeks to implicate Beijing. . . .”
Suggestions that the virus could have originated in a Chinese bioweapons lab are curiously blind to events in the United States. In early August of 2019 , shortly before the recorded start of the outbreak in Wuhan, China, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at that facility was closed down by the CDC due to multiple safety violations. “All research at a Fort Detrick laboratory that handles high-level disease-causing material, such as Ebola, is on hold indefinitely after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found the organization failed to meet biosafety standards. . . . The CDC sent a cease and desist order in July. After USAMRIID received the order from the CDC, its registration with the Federal Select Agent Program, which oversees disease-causing material use and possession, was suspended. That suspension effectively halted all biological select agents and toxin research at USAMRIID . . . .”
- ” . . . . the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA), began spending millions on such research in 2018 and some of those Pentagon-funded studies were conducted at known U.S. military bioweapons labs bordering China and resulted in the discovery of dozens of new coronavirus strains as recently as last April. Furthermore, the ties of the Pentagon’s main biodefense lab to a virology institute in Wuhan, China — where the current outbreak is believed to have begun — have been unreported in English language media thus far. . . . For instance, DARPA spent $10 million on one project  in 2018 ‘to unravel the complex causes of bat-borne viruses that have recently made the jump to humans, causing concern among global health officials.’ Another research project backed by both DARPA and NIH  saw researchers at Colorado State University examine the coronavirus that causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in bats and camels ‘to understand the role of these hosts in transmitting disease to humans.’ . . . For instance, one study conducted in Southern China in 2018  resulted in the discovery of 89 new ‘novel bat coronavirus’ strains that use the same receptor as the coronavirus known as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS). That study was jointly funded by the Chinese government’s Ministry of Science and Technology, USAID — an organization long alleged to be a front for U.S. intelligence , and the U.S. National Institute of Health — which has collaborated with both the CIA and the Pentagon on infectious disease and bioweapons research.. . . .”
- DARPA is doing this work, in part, at biological research facilities ringing both China and Russia. ” . . . . One of those studies  focused on ‘Bat-Borne Zoonotic Disease Emergence in Western Asia’ and involved the Lugar Center in Georgia, identified by former Georgian government officials , the Russian government and independent, investigative journalist Dilyana Gaytandzhieva  as a covert U.S. bioweapons lab. . . . Another U.S. government-funded study that discovered still more new strains of ‘novel bat coronavirus’ was published just last year. Titled ‘Discovery and Characterization of Novel Bat Coronavirus Lineages from Kazakhstan ,’ focused on ‘the bat fauna of central Asia, which link China to eastern Europe’ and the novel bat coronavirus lineages discovered during the study were found to be ‘closely related to bat coronaviruses from China, France, Spain, and South Africa, suggesting that co-circulation of coronaviruses is common in multiple bat species with overlapping geographical distributions.’ In other words, the coronaviruses discovered in this study were identified in bat populations that migrate between China and Kazakhstan, among other countries, and is closely related to bat coronaviruses in several countries, including China. . . .”
The German government is joining the US campaign of allegations against China regarding the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak. Last weekend, US President Donald Trump warned the People’s Republic that it should face consequences if it was “knowingly responsible” for the spread of the pandemic. Washington is simultaneously spreading deliberate rumors that the virus could have originated in a Chinese laboratory. Whereas, scientists vehemently refute the allegations, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas declared, he “does not want to exclude” that the WHO will have to deal with these issues. On Monday, Chancellor Angela Merkel called on Beijing to show “transparency” on the issue. Senior German military officials have recently been demanding that the EU adopt “a joint political-strategic response” to China’s growing strength, because in the Corona crisis, Beijing is gaining considerable influence. According to a recent poll, more than half of the Italian population sees China as a “friend,” while nearly half see Germany as an “enemy.”
The German government is joining the Trump administration’s new campaign against China, albeit attenuated. On the weekend, President Trump claimed that the virus “could have been stopped in China” and warned that the People’s Republic “should face consequences” if it was “knowingly responsible” for the spread. At the same time deliberate rumors are being spread in the United States that the Covid-19 virus could have originated in a Chinese laboratory — possibly in bioweapons lab. The US government indicated that it does not rule out this possibility; US intelligence services are currently investigating the issue. Particularly given the lie about Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction, such an allegation must be perceived as a threat to lend legitimacy to new aggressions. There is no proof that the virus originated in a laboratory. Scientific studies clearly conclude that it was transmitted from wild animals to humans.
Open to Suspicion
Berlin is open to entirely unfounded suspicions. Foreign Minister Heiko Maas is quoted saying he “doesn’t want to exclude” that “the WHO will have to deal with these issues.” The Minister of Development Gerd Müller declared that the People’s Republic must display “complete openness” — “particularly regarding the origin of the virus.” Already last week, German media organs have increasingly been calling China the “culprit” behind the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak. Under the headline “what China already owes us,” Germany’s Springer press even called for “reparations.” (german-foreign-policy.com reported.) Leading British and French politicians have expressed similar views. British Foreign Minister Dominic Raab has repeatedly declared that China will be held responsible for the Covid-19 pandemic. French President Emmanuel Macron has now joined the campaign. Regarding the pandemic’s alleged origin, he declared, “there are clearly things that have happened” in China “that we don’t know about.” It is not clear how Macron can know something exists that he does not know about. It is however clear that he seeks to implicate Beijing.
“A Devastating Impression”
Insight into the German-European involvement in the Trump administration’s new campaign against China is provided by German military officials’ recent statements. A new working paper by the Federal Academy for Security Policy (BAKS), for example, examines the Covid-19 pandemic’s potential global political ramifications. The author, Ret. Brig.Gen. Armin Staigis, BAKS Vice-President (2013 — 2015) today’s Chair of BAKS “Association of Friends” points out that the USA, “up to now the EU’s most important partner” is “eroding in the global context.” China, on the other hand, is emerging more and more “on the world stage.” “With its economic power, it is reaching the European continent and is thus ... also becoming a political rival.” The EU should “not become a pawn” in the hands of states like Russia (“revanchists”), the USA (“off course egocentrics”) or China (“hungry up-starts”). The EU “still has to formulate a joint political strategic answer” particularly to the People’s Republic’s growing strength. This is all the more important in light of the political development in the Corona crisis: “There is a public perception that China is providing faster and more helpful support in Europe than the EU and its member states among themselves.” This, however, is a “devastating impression.”
Race between the Global Economic Powers
Late last week, General Staff Officer Col. Matthias Rogg, a member of the board of the German Institute for Defense and Strategic Studies (GIDS), a Bundeswehr think tank (founded in 2018) made a similar observation. Rogg assumes that in the course of the Corona crisis, China will significantly enhance its international influence. “That pertains to the economic development in countries, for example in the Middle East or even in Africa, which are not visibly affected by the epidemic, but will surely also be seriously affected by Corona, either directly or indirectly.” There, the People’s Republic of China will be able to secure new influence “through financial, and material assistance.” It should “not be forgotten” that it is completely uncertain “how the USA will economically evolve from this crisis.” “That means that in the race between the global economic powers, one can assume that China ... will have a head start and wind up among the winners of the crisis.” That is grave — after all, with China, which, for example, has “offered immediate assistance” to Italy, we are “de facto dealing with a country from a rival system.”
Enemy Number One
A current survey made in Italy shows the problems German power strategists are confronting. The Italian survey suggests that the suspicion campaign against China is also aimed at affecting Europe. In mid-March it had indicated that around two-thirds of the Italians felt EU membership was disadvantageous to their country. Only four percent felt that the Union was providing sufficient support to Italy during the Corona crisis. Now, since China’s most recent Covid-19 assistance delivery, 52 percent of the Italian population see China as a “friend” of Italy; 32 percent consider Russia, who is also providing assistance, a “friend,” and only 17 percent place the United States in this category. Among the countries in the survey considered an “enemy” of Italy, first place, with an impressive 45 percent, went to Germany.
 Trump droht China mit “Konsequenzen”. tagesschau.de 19.04.2020.
 Vgl. etwa: Kristian G. Andersen, Andrew Rambaut, W. Ian Lipkin, Edward C. Holmes, Robert F. Garry: The proximal origin of SARS-CoV‑2. Nature Medicine 26 (2020). S. 450–452.
 Nils Metzger: Neue Argumente für Labor-Theorie? zdf.de 17.04.2020.
 Darum nimmt die Kritik an Pekings Umgang mit der Coronavirus-Krise zu. tagesspiegel.de 20.04.2020.
 See also Battle of Narratives .
 Victor Mallet, Roula Khalaf: FT Interview: Emmanuel Macron says it is time to think the unthinkable. ft.com 16.04.2020.
 Armin Staigis: Ernstfall Europa — Jetzt! Bundesakademie für Sicherheitspolitik: Arbeitspapier 2/20. Berlin, April 2020.
 “China dürfte am Ende zu den Krisengewinnern gehören”. cicero.de 17.04.2020.
 See also Germany First (II) .
 Massimiliano Lenzi: Libertà superflua per 2 italiani su 3. iltempo.it 18.04.2020.