News & Supplemental  

Ron Paul and the Nazis

COMMENT: It is not news that Ron Paul has expressed harsh, big­oted com­ments about gays, African-Americans and Jews in his newslet­ter although his sup­port­ers claim it “was not Ron Paul” who actu­ally authored the articles.

It is also not news that white suprema­cist and Nazi ele­ments have expressed sup­port for Ron Paul.

Nor is it news that the GOP is in bed with Nazis.

After hack­ing into fas­cist web­sites, the Anony­mous hack­ing group alleges that Paul has engaged the lead­ers of some of these groups in con­fer­ence calls. If true, that con­firms his active sup­port for such ele­ments at the same time that he is pub­licly dis­avow­ing them.

A cou­ple of points in pass­ing: although Paul is clearly racist/fascist in his ori­en­ta­tion, his anti-Federal Reserve stance and oppo­si­tion to for­eign aid to Israel has endeared him to ele­ments of the “Truther” movement–those peo­ple in the 9/11 inves­tiga­tive move­ment who espouse the con­trolled demo­li­tion of the World Trade Center/cruise mis­sile hit the Pen­ta­gon nonsense.

His oppo­si­tion to some of the surveillance/national secu­rity leg­is­la­tion passed in the wake of 9/11 has also endeared him to some of the Amer­i­can Mus­lim community.

Wouldn’t be inter­est­ing to get some of the Truthers and Mus­lims together with the folks from Storm­front and see how they get along?

“Anony­mous Claims Neo-Nazi Links with Ron Paul” by Gian­luca Mez­zofiore; Inter­na­tional Busi­ness Times; 1/31/2011.

EXCERPT: . . . Anony­mous also claims that the organ­i­sa­tion has links with Repub­li­can can­di­date Ron Paul. “We found a dis­turbingly high num­ber of mem­bers who are also involved in cam­paign­ing for Ron Paul,” the state­ment said, adding that Paul had reg­u­larly met with many party mem­bers and even engaged in con­fer­ence calls with its board of direc­tors. [Ital­ics are mine–D.E.] . . .

Discussion

16 comments for “Ron Paul and the Nazis”

  1. The tim­ing is per­fect for this. My friends and I are talk­ing about his “case” a lot. I have two arti­cles to sug­gest that sum things up. He really is a fas­cist, there is no debate, not for me anyway:

    http://www.parcbench.com/2011/04/26/tin-foil-returns-for-2012/

    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/12/ron-paul-on-iranian-tv-2009-defends-hamas-and-suicide-bombing-bashes-israel.html

    Posted by Claude | February 12, 2012, 12:31 am
  2. Dave, where you say “wouldn’t it be inter­est­ing to get truthers and extrem­ist Mus­lims together”;

    Too late. This is what we have been shout­ing about for ages. The ‘truth’ move­ment is essen­tially run by Ger­man intel and neo-nazis. The deeper you go into the beliefs of truthers, the closer you get to the old “Jew­ish conspiracy”.

    I have been to truth move­ment meet­ings where islamic extrem­ists were attend­ing in the past. The truth move­ment is the 5th col­umn of use­ful idiots. It turns peo­ple angry at the finan­cial sit­u­a­tion, into an anti-jewish, anti-capitalist, proxy neo-nazi.

    Why? When a west­ern gov­ern­ment falls or is under attack, via a sup­ported upris­ing, or even a war, the pro­pa­ganda chan­nels will ensure these peo­ple are fight­ing for the enemy. The whole time, they actu­ally believe they are fight­ing for our freedom.

    http://germanywatch.blogspot.com/2011/09/wmd-and-germanys-dirty-secret.html

    http://germanywatch.blogspot.com/2011/09/as-discussed-in-wmd-and-germanys-dirty.html

    Posted by G | February 12, 2012, 6:49 am
  3. @G: I’m afraid that is true to a point. Although, TBH, many of the truthers and even some of the spokes­men are indeed decent peo­ple, it is also quite true that we can­not ignore the seri­ous amounts of infil­tra­tion and sub­ver­sion that has occurred over the past decade. Peo­ple like Eric Huf­schmid, Michael ‘Pro­Think’ Delaney, Michael Collins Piper, etc. need to be exposed for the liars and pawns that they truly are.....some have woken up, but sadly, it may take a long time to make seri­ous head­way, but hope­fully it won’t be too late.....

    Posted by Steven L. | February 12, 2012, 1:51 pm
  4. Posted by terrafractyl | February 12, 2012, 6:05 pm
  5. Dave, we need more expo­sure of this. Please come back and do more broadcasts!!

    Posted by mike | February 12, 2012, 6:54 pm
  6. Ron Paul’s many links to the John Birch Soci­ety, his rela­tion­ship to Alex Jones who is closely linked to G.Edward Grif­fin[ a JBS offi­cer] and Anthony Hilder...linked to the Robert Kennedy assasination.

    Posted by mike | February 12, 2012, 7:04 pm
  7. @Mike–

    I’m still “here.”

    I will pro­duce more pro­grams some months down the line, when the day job permits.

    Posted by Dave Emory | February 12, 2012, 7:44 pm
  8. ya Ron Paul sure is a Fas­cist
    we get mail­ing from him from time to time and his son Rand Paul

    the last mail­ing we go was anti-Roe v. Wade

    Well any­ways I have been research­ing the Ron Paul phe­nom­ena for a bit now
    Paul meet with French ‘The National Front’ party mem­ber Madame Le Pen
    http://www.thelocal.fr/1463/20111013/#

    there cer­tainly a John Birch air to him also didn’t Mus­solini put Italy back on the gold stan­dard, i can smell the Koch.
    Lib­er­tar­i­an­ism basic ide­ol­ogy of lim­ited gov­ern­ment is fas­cist ide­al­ism, for in a democ­racy the peo­ple are the gov­ern­ment.
    Are not cor­po­ra­tions ‘peo­ple’ in our cur­rent sys­tem?
    With less gov­ern­ment we are left with Cor­po­ra­tions .
    Besides, Ron Paul loves Ayn Rand and we all know where that goes, cap­i­tal­ist supermen

    mother jones is report­ing that the Paul out­fit is doing the duck and cover about the news let­ters
    http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/01/ron-paul-rand-racist-newsletter-debate-king

    this link is self explana­tory with pho­tos
    http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/top-10-racist-ron-paul-friends-supporters/

    Posted by leif | February 13, 2012, 7:59 am
  9. Yeah, there have been, with­out doubt, some nasty char­ac­ters in the 911 truth move­ment, and you can see where they’re try­ing to lead peo­ple.
    I per­son­ally think the oper­a­tion was very long planned, with a truth move­ment wait­ing off­stage for their cue. It surely has been a huge dis­trac­tion with small results.

    Posted by Dwight | February 13, 2012, 10:55 am
  10. @terrafractyl: Why am I not sur­prised? Thanks for the link, very informative. :)

    Posted by Steven L. | February 13, 2012, 4:23 pm
  11. Note, Ron Paul now has an offi­cial Sugar-Daddy: Peter Thiel wrote Ron a cou­ple of big checks last month.

    Posted by terrafractyl | February 20, 2012, 10:55 am
  12. @terrafractyl: Just more proof that Thiel is a tool and use­ful idiot of the world crime net­work. What does he think he can gain from an RP presidency?

    Posted by Steven L. | February 20, 2012, 4:06 pm
  13. That last arti­cle, ter­rafractyl, con­firms Dave’s doubts about Peter Thiel, which he expressed in FTR #718 and sub­se­quent. At this point, if Thiel finances Ron Paul, there is no doubt any­more about his polit­i­cal and ide­o­log­i­cal allegiances.

    Posted by Claude | February 20, 2012, 4:54 pm
  14. @Steven L.: I’m not sure what agenda Thiel has for the US pol­icy besides his generic uber-Libertarian agenda (which he would prob­a­bly get with any ran­dom GOPer in office any­ways). But there’s still the issue of get­ting his Seast­eading ini­tia­tive off the ground and you have to won­der how being a pres­i­den­tial Sugar Daddy helps with such an endeavor.

    @Claude: Yeah, I was a lit­tle sur­prised to see Paul get a Sugar Daddy because he huge small donor base. But accord­ing to this arti­cle, Theil’s $1.7 mil­lion in dona­tions account for 70% of Paul’s dona­tions in Jan­u­ary. It’s a sign of just how whacked out the US elec­tions have become in the post-Citizen’s United ere if even Ron Paul’s for­mi­da­ble grass roots base can’t keep up with money needed to run a mod­ern campaign.

    Here’s another inter­est­ing point regard­ing what Thiel might want in the long run from a Paul pres­i­dency (or any pres­i­dency): David Brin, the Sci-Fi author, is cur­rently writ­ing a novel based on a Seast­eading colony. He did an inter­view last year where he spec­u­lated on Thiel’s real agenda with the Seast­eading project and his the­ory was quite inter­est­ing. He claims that Thiel & Friends want to set up these off­shore colonies pretty much so they can obtain insti­tu­tion vot­ing right sta­tus in an expected refor­mu­la­tion of how the globe is gov­erned. The idea is that when this new global gov­ern­ing arrange­ment gets installed (sort of a UN with more teeth I guess), indi­vid­u­als will have no real vot­ing rights, only insti­tu­tions will count at that level. And exist­ing nations will get grand­fa­thered into the new arrange­ment with the pre­cious vot­ing rights, includ­ing micro-island nations and even the Seast­ead colonies. And each one of those votes will be worth so much that set­ting up an entire off­shore mini-nation is worth the price of admis­sion. Who knows how accu­rate Brin’s pre­dic­tions are (he’s friends with Thiel), but the whole inter­view is worth a read.

    Posted by terrafractyl | February 20, 2012, 8:13 pm
  15. @Terrafractyl: Inter­est­ing stuff....and a lit­tle eerie at the same time.

    Posted by Steven L. | February 21, 2012, 6:30 pm
  16. Mark Ames lat­est blog­ging, apro­pos. What’s this mys­te­ri­ous alliance with Paul and Rom­ney? Bemusing.

    Posted by GrumpusRex | February 29, 2012, 11:17 pm

Post a comment