Spitfire List Web site and blog of anti-fascist researcher and radio personality Dave Emory.

News & Supplemental  

Who and/or What is Behind the Fetullah Gulen Organization?

COMMENT: In FTR #739, we took a brief look at the pow­er­ful inter­na­tional orga­ni­za­tion of the Pennsylvania-based Turk­ish Mus­lim cleric and author Fetul­lah Gulen. Being inves­ti­gated by the FBI and exco­ri­ated by numer­ous sources for Machi­avel­lian gam­bits to destroy polit­i­cal oppo­nents, the orga­ni­za­tion has a sig­nif­i­cant pres­ence in 80 coun­tries, includ­ing spon­sor­ship of char­ter schools here in the United States.

Sus­pi­cions and reser­va­tions about the Gulen orga­ni­za­tion include: fears in Cen­tral Asian republics that the group is Islamist and/or pan-Turkic in nature; con­vic­tions among jour­nal­ists like the estimable Sibel Edmonds and intel­li­gence and mil­i­tary offi­cers in Turkey and else­where that the Gulenists are fronting for CIA agents; that the Gulenist cadre engage as a mat­ter of course in ille­gal acts to destroy their oppo­nents, includ­ing numer­ous inci­dents of forgery and per­jury, as well as libel and propaganda.

In Gulen’s native coun­try of Turkey, the orga­ni­za­tion has become a key ally of the sup­pos­edly “mod­er­ate” Islamist gov­ern­ment of Tayyip Erdo­gan. A sig­nif­i­cant and grow­ing body of doc­u­men­ta­tion sug­gests that the Gulenists have been instru­men­tal in forg­ing evi­dence used by the Erdo­gan gov­ern­ment to stage tri­als of mil­i­tary offi­cers allegdly involved in a coup plot against the government.

(His­tor­i­cally, the mil­i­tary has served as a bul­wark in mod­ern Turkey against Islamiza­tion, pre­serv­ing with the gun the sec­u­lar tra­di­tion estab­lished by Kemal Attaturk fol­low­ing the fall of the Ottoman Empire at the end of World War I. Far from being “mod­er­ate,” the Erdo­gan gov­ern­ment is, as we have seen in FTR #737, derived from the Islam­o­fas­cist al-Taqwa milieu.)

It is worth not­ing that the Erdo­gan government’s “mod­er­ate” Islamist nature is belied by the fact that Turkey cur­rently has more jour­nal­ists in prison than China and Iran com­bined! Hey, that is SOME mod­er­a­tion, no?!

Of even greater sig­nif­i­cance is the fact that the Erdo­gan gov­ern­ment is seen as an appro­pri­ate tem­plate for “mod­er­ate” Islamist regimes cur­rently tak­ing form in places like Egypt, where the clit-cutters of the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood are ascen­dant. The Broth­er­hood, of course, was allied with the Axis in World War II and has been used by numer­ous intel­li­gence ser­vices, includ­ing ele­ments of CIA, as a vehi­cle for covert action and repres­sion in the post­war period.

In addi­tion to sup­port­ing Mus­lim Broth­er­hood, ele­ments of CIA have also sup­ported the Pan-Turkist move­ment in the past. Pan-Turkists have also allied his­tor­i­cally with the Third Reich, as we have seen in FTR #720, among other pro­grams.

In con­nec­tion with the Fetul­lah Gullen orga­ni­za­tion, a num­ber of con­sid­er­a­tions sug­gest themselves:

  • If the alle­ga­tions con­cern­ing CIA involve­ment with the Gulenists are accu­rate, what might be the goal of the CIA/Gulen alliance?
  • Might the GOP/petroleum industry/Under­ground Reich ele­ment of CIA be aim­ing to use Islamists and/or Pan-Turkists against Rus­sia and/or China?
  • As pre­pos­ter­ous as it may seem at first glance, might that same ele­ment of CIA and other West­ern intel­li­gence ser­vices be pro­mot­ing a “neo-Ottoman Empire” as a vehi­cle for gain­ing con­trol of resource-rich parts of the “Earth Island,” petroleum-producing areas in particular?
  • Might such a “neo-Ottoman Empire” be a key ele­ment in the ongo­ing “Earth Island Boogie?”
  • The brand of Islam embraced by the Gulen orga­ni­za­tion is gen­er­ally rep­re­sented as mod­er­ate. Ms. Edmonds and, appar­ently, some of the group’s crit­ics in Cen­tral Asia allege that the group is, in fact, extrem­ist. If that is, in fact, the case, might the alleged CIA/Gulen alliance be part of the same polit­i­cal man­i­fes­ta­tion as the “Arab Spring” that we looked at in FTR #‘s 734 through 739?
  • The tac­tics appar­ently pur­sued by the Gulen orga­ni­za­tion sug­gest that its true nature is any­thing but moderate.
  • The Turk­ish for­eign min­is­ter is indeed pur­su­ing a “neo-Ottoman,” Pan-Turkist agenda.
  • What might be the agenda/goal of the con­sid­er­able Gulenist pres­ence in the United States?
  • Is the FBI inves­ti­ga­tion of the Gulenist activ­i­ties in the U.S. another exam­ple of the bureau cut­ting across an oper­a­tion by ele­ments of CIA?
  • Is the Under­ground Reich a player in this scenario?

Is the CIA Infil­trat­ing Cen­tral Asia Via Turk­ish Mus­lims?” by Joshua Kocera; eurasianet.org; 1/6/2011.

EXCERPT: That is appar­ently the claim of for­mer top Turk­ish intel­li­gence offi­cial Osman Nuri Gun­des, who has pub­lished a mem­oir alleg­ing that the Fethul­lah Gulen move­ment has been shel­ter­ing CIA agents in Cen­tral Asia since the 1990s. Accord­ing to the Wash­ing­ton Post’s SpyTalk blog, “in the 1990s, Gun­des alleges, the move­ment “shel­tered 130 CIA agents” at its schools in Kyr­gyzs­tan and Uzbek­istan alone.”

The Gulen move­ment already is a con­tro­ver­sial one in Cen­tral Asia, with gov­ern­ments crack­ing down to vary­ing degrees because of the group’s alleged Islamist or pan-Turkic bent. And that’s with­out alle­ga­tions of being a CIA stalk­ing horse. . . .

. . . . Any­way, Sibel Edmonds, the FBI-translator-turned-whistleblower, says that account doesn’t go far enough, and the Gulen move­ment is an extrem­ist Islamist one — and that the CIA is coop­er­at­ing with them nev­er­the­less: “. . . Based on what I per­son­ally know, US Islamiza­tion Oper­a­tions in Cen­tral Asia via Gulen started in late 1997, early 1998 . . .”

“A Moscow Show Trial on the Bosporus” by Dani Radrik; “Con­science of a Lib­eral” by Paul Krug­man [The New York Times]; 3/12/2012.

EXCERPT: In what is prob­a­bly the country’s most impor­tant court case in at least five decades, hun­dreds of Turk­ish mil­i­tary offi­cers are in jail and on trial for allegedly hav­ing plot­ted to over­throw the then newly-elected Jus­tice and Devel­op­ment Party back in 2003. The case also hap­pens to be one of the most absurd ever pros­e­cuted in an appar­ent democ­racy. The evi­dence against the defen­dants is such an obvi­ous forgery that even a child would rec­og­nize it as such. Imag­ine, if you can, some­thing that is a cross between the Moscow show tri­als and the Salem witch­craft hys­te­ria, and you will not be too far off.

The government’s case rests on a set of doc­u­ments (mostly Word files) that describe in gory detail prepa­ra­tions for the coup (code­named Sledge­ham­mer), includ­ing false-flag oper­a­tions to set the stage for the takeover and a list of cab­i­net mem­bers to be appointed. These are unsigned dig­i­tal doc­u­ments on elec­tronic media (CDs, a detached hard drive, a flash drive) that have never been traced to actual mil­i­tary com­put­ers or oth­er­wise authen­ti­cated. The mil­i­tary has vehe­mently denied that such plans ever existed.

Most tellingly, a tor­rent of evi­dence has come out since the doc­u­ments first emerged that points to their fraud­u­lent nature. The doc­u­ments con­tain hun­dreds of anachro­nisms – names of NGOs, mil­i­tary instal­la­tions, or firms that did not yet exist – that make clear beyond any rea­son­able doubt that they were pro­duced years later and back­dated to impli­cate the offi­cers on trial. Some of the defen­dants have shown that they were out­side the coun­try at the time they are alleged to have pre­pared these doc­u­ments or attended plan­ning meetings.

An Amer­i­can foren­sic spe­cial­ist has deter­mined that the “hand writ­ing” on the CDs was actu­ally pro­duced by mechan­i­cally repli­cat­ing indi­vid­ual let­ters from the note­books of one of the defen­dants. Devi­a­tions from mil­i­tary for­mat­ting sug­gest the doc­u­ments were pre­pared by indi­vid­u­als not fully famil­iar with the army’s style require­ments. As long-time Turkey ana­lyst Gareth Jenk­ins put it to the New Yorker: “It’s absolutely clear that these doc­u­ments have been forged.” . . . .

. . . . The Turk­ish mil­i­tary has a his­tory of polit­i­cal inter­ven­tion and has often clashed with the Islamists. So the alle­ga­tions have been a god­send for Prime Min­is­ter Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who has exploited the trial to gain con­trol over mil­i­tary pro­mo­tions and to break the army’s polit­i­cal power.

But the real mov­ing force behind this and a num­ber of other sim­i­lar tri­als is the Gülen move­ment, a key ally of the Erdoğan gov­ern­ment made up of the fol­low­ers of the Pennsylvania-based Turk­ish Mus­lim preacher Fethul­lah Gülen. Gülenists have a long track record of fram­ing their per­ceived oppo­nents and engag­ing in judi­cial dirty tricks. Their con­trol of key posi­tions in the national police and judi­ciary enables them to mount tar­geted oper­a­tions dis­guised as legal inves­ti­ga­tions. Pros­e­cu­tors scru­ti­niz­ing them, whistle­blow­ers reveal­ing their activ­i­ties, crit­i­cal jour­nal­ists, and even busi­ness­men have been among their vic­tims, in addi­tion to mil­i­tary offi­cers. As Ahmet Şık, a jour­nal­ist who wrote an expose about the move­ment and then found him­self fac­ing pre­pos­ter­ous charges of help­ing ter­ror­ists even before the book was pub­lished, exclaimed on his way to jail: “he who touches [them] burns.”

The police and pros­e­cu­tors who have staged the coup plot trial are known Gülen sym­pa­thiz­ers. And Gülenist media have worked over­time to shape pub­lic opin­ion, whip­ping up hys­te­ria against the defen­dants and pro­duc­ing a steady stream of dis­in­for­ma­tion about the case. The occa­sional judge who has ruled in favor of the offi­cers and com­men­ta­tors point­ing to prob­lems with the pros­e­cu­tors’ evi­dence (includ­ing me) have become tar­gets of Gülenist defamation. . . .

Discussion

15 comments for “Who and/or What is Behind the Fetullah Gulen Organization?”

  1. I fol­lowed that line of enquiry myself when I was a lis­tener of Ms Edmonds’ Boil­ing Frogs Show. I wrote an arti­cle in French about it, if you can read it, but all ref­er­ences are in Eng­lish, pub­lished on her web­site at BoilingFrogs.com. And espe­cially, there is an inter­view with Aland Mizell that you don’t want to miss. He has a strong accent (like me!) but the wit­ness account infor­ma­tion that he presents to Ms Edmonds and co-host Peter B. Collins is invalu­able. There is also a short doc­u­men­tary in French about Gulen. Check that out folks, it’s worth it!

    http://lys-dor.com/2012/02/19/le-reseau-scolaire-de-fethullah-gulen-lorsque-les-operations-de-renseignement-et-lislamisation-vont-de-pair/

    Posted by Claude | March 28, 2012, 10:36 am
  2. Great post Dave. This has been one of my per­sonal areas of research. I hope to find the time to post some more on the sub­ject. The Gulen org (not to be con­fused with the Gehlen org), really embod­ies what you have dealt with in FTRs 27 & 681 Spe­cial­ized Knowl­edge & Abil­i­ties. They arguably have their ten­drils reach­ing through all sec­tors of Turk­ish soci­ety, and are com­pletely deniable.

    Here is a sem­i­nal arti­cle on Gulen from the Mid­dle East Quar­terly, which doc­u­ments, among other things, that Gulen sits on top of slush fund val­ued at $25 billion.

    http://www.meforum.org/2045/fethullah-gulens-grand-ambition

    But don’t worry, Gulen doesn’t have to use his own money, because Bill Gates recently gave him more than $10.5 mil­lion to estab­lish Gulen Islamic schools in the USA.

    http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.6307/pub_detail.asp

    And more from Walmart’s Wal­ton Fam­ily foundation.

    http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.7149/pub_detail.asp

    Posted by Vanfield | March 28, 2012, 1:23 pm
  3. I appre­ci­ate inves­tiga­tive jour­nal­ists; they really work hard when they write a story. But this story has so many mis­takes. In addi­tion, many experts wrote about so called Gulen char­ter schools. Either he did not read them or he is not unbi­ased.
    This one, for exam­ple, argues that Islam­o­pho­bia is one rea­son to attack those char­ter schools: http://www.hizmetnews.com/index.php/columns/item/3...

    You may find more arti­cles here on the same mat­ter: http://www.hizmetnews.com/index.php/latest-news/itemlist/tag/Gulen%20charter%20schools

    I hope you check some of these sto­ries to reach the truth.

    Posted by Levent Koc | March 29, 2012, 11:10 am
  4. [...] Who and/or What is Behind the Fetul­lah Gulen Organization? [...]

    Posted by Miscellaneous articles for – Articles divers pour 03-29-2012 | Lys-d'Or | March 29, 2012, 11:35 am
  5. Sorry Lev­ent Koc,

    The arti­cles you link to are all Gulen pub­li­ca­tion. They offer no seri­ous rebut­tal to the infor­ma­tion presented.

    Islam­o­pho­bia is a rather lame, PC, red her­ring to bring up, when seri­ous con­cerns are presented.

    What con­nec­tions do you have Hizmet/Gulen?

    Posted by Vanfield | March 29, 2012, 3:18 pm
  6. Freed Turk­ish Jour­nal­ist at Euro­pean Parliament

    Thurs­day, 29 March 2012

    Jour­nal­ist Ahmet Şık sharply crit­i­cized Turkey’s anti-terrorism laws and the reli­gious Fethul­lah Gülen com­mu­nity while address­ing the Lib­eral Demo­c­rat Group in the Euro­pean Par­lia­ment in Brus­sels yes­ter­day, only 16 days after his release from prison.

    “Many a jour­nal­ist who assumed a crit­i­cal stance toward the AKP [Jus­tice and Devel­op­ment Party] and the Gülen com­mu­nity, the government’s invis­i­ble part­ner, [or] attempted to main­tain a dis­si­dent out­look toward their poli­cies either lost their job or had to keep quiet through auto-censure,” jour­nal­ist Şık told his audi­ence at the Euro­pean Parliament...

    ...An expla­na­tion is war­ranted as to why the Gülen com­mu­nity is so eager to orga­nize within the police and the mil­i­tary, Şık said, adding that he had also been tar­geted by the com­mu­nity because he asked such ques­tions. “This sys­tem has to dis­tort every­thing, as it has been enslaved by its own lies. It dis­torts the past. It dis­torts the present. It dis­torts the future,” Şık said,...

    ...The Gülen com­mu­nity is both aveng­ing the past and try­ing to destroy its polit­i­cal oppo­nents by orga­niz­ing within the judi­ciary and the police, accord­ing to Şık. “The Anti-Terrorism Law [depicts] every­one who is a dis­si­dent or exhibits unfa­vor­able behav­ior as a ‘ter­ror­ist,’ through a men­tal­ity that is based on pro­tect­ing not the inter­ests of cit­i­zens but of the state.

    A recent list of 105 Turk­ish Jour­nal­ists cur­rently in prison for report­ing the news can be found here...

    http://www.theglobetimes.com/2012/03/07/list-of-journalists-in-jail-in-turkey/

    FBI & Dept of Labor Inves­ti­gat­ing Gulen Schools

    http://articles.philly.com/2011–03-20/news/29148147_1_gulen-schools-gulen-followers-charter-schools

    ...But fed­eral agen­cies — includ­ing the FBI and the Depart­ments of Labor and Edu­ca­tion — are inves­ti­gat­ing whether some char­ter school employ­ees are kick­ing back part of their salaries to a Mus­lim move­ment founded by Gulen known as Hizmet, or Ser­vice, accord­ing to knowl­edge­able sources...

    ...Gulen schools are among the nation’s largest users of the H1B visas. In 2009, the schools received gov­ern­ment approvals for 684 visas — more than Google Inc. (440) but fewer than a tech­nol­ogy pow­er­house such as Intel Corp. (1,203)...

    ...Ruth Hocker, for­mer pres­i­dent of the par­ents’ group at the Young Schol­ars of Cen­tral Penn­syl­va­nia Char­ter School in State Col­lege, began ask­ing ques­tions when pop­u­lar, cer­ti­fied Amer­i­can teach­ers were replaced by uncer­ti­fied Turk­ish men who often spoke lim­ited Eng­lish and were paid higher salaries. Most were placed in math and sci­ence classes...

    ...Other school par­ents described how uncer­ti­fied teach­ers on H1B visas were moved from one char­ter school to another when their “emer­gency” teach­ing cre­den­tials expired and told of a pat­tern of sud­den turnovers of Turk­ish busi­ness man­agers, admin­is­tra­tors, and board members...

    ...Fur­ther evi­dence of the ties comes from a dis­af­fected for­mer teacher from Turkey who told fed­eral inves­ti­ga­tors that the Gulen Move­ment had divided the United States into five regions, accord­ing to knowl­edge­able sources. A gen­eral man­ager in each coor­di­nates the activ­i­ties of the schools and related foun­da­tions and cul­tural cen­ters, he told author­i­ties. Ohio, Cal­i­for­nia, and Texas have the largest num­bers of Gulen-related schools. Ohio has 19, which are oper­ated by Con­cept Schools Inc., and most are known as Hori­zon Sci­ence Acad­e­mies. There are 14 in Cal­i­for­nia oper­ated by the Mag­no­lia Foun­da­tion. Texas has 33 known as Har­mony schools, run by the Cos­mos Foundation...

    Kick­backs

    ...And the dis­af­fected teacher who described the five regions gave author­i­ties a doc­u­ment called a tuzuk, which resem­bles a con­tract and pre­scribes how much money Turk­ish teach­ers are sup­posed to return to Hizmet...

    Note, Hizmet, which means “action” in Turk­ish, is also the name of a branch of the Gulen org. All pre­vi­ous poster Lev­ent Koc’s links are Hizmet websites.

    Posted by Vanfield | March 29, 2012, 4:10 pm
  7. @Vanfield: Inter­est­ing. Sad thing is, though, if this ‘Lev­ent Koc’ per­son really is con­nected to Hizmet and not just one of their biggest fans....then his state­ments might prove harm­ful to those expos­ing actual Islamophobia(Just as a reminder, it is indeed some­times used as a cover but real exam­ples do unforunately exist. Please don’t for­get that, espe­cially since there’s been a recent mur­der in Calif. in which an Iraqi immi­grant lady was mur­dered sim­ply for being of for­eign ori­gin. No offense meant, just wanted to point that out.)

    Posted by Steven L. | March 29, 2012, 5:09 pm
  8. @Steven L.: If I read you cor­rectly, your talk­ing about a ‘boy who cried wolf’ meme.

    Posted by Vanfield | March 29, 2012, 8:55 pm
  9. Here is a link that shows more infor­ma­tion on the Gulen Schools in Ari­zona. The Pima Counta IDA has given mil­lions in Az. tax dol­lars to sup­port these schools. They have donated money to Tom Horne to prtect them­selves from his wrath of audit­ing teach­ers with accents and his anti eth­nic stud­ies bill.

    http://azstarnet.com/search/?l=50&sd=desc&s=start_time&f=html&q=Gulen

    The Turk­ish Gulenists will often times as you can see on this thread pre­tend to be happy par­ents and attack those that post about Gulen and his objec­tives. It is there attempt to derail the conversation.

    Posted by Parent | March 31, 2012, 7:41 am
  10. As a par­ent who’s daugh­ter attended one of these schools I can tell you first hand just how dan­ger­ous these schools really are. I would love to inter­view with you as I have done with other radio shows in the past about Fethul­lah and his objec­tives. I am also doing speak­ing engage­ments on the dan­gers of Gulen Char­ter Schools and to edu­cate par­ents and the com­mu­nity about this issue.

    Posted by Parent | March 31, 2012, 7:44 am
  11. Hey Steven L. weren’t you just on the Wash­ing­ton Post Blog story about your Hocae­fendi TRYING to post the SAME stu­pid story about the Iraqi woman who was killed. The only thing is, you posted under “Jason Tuff“
    Are you also hear­ing voices in your head, poor lit­tle Gulen Light­house school boy. They are so brain­washed, all this truth about Fetos is hard for them to process.
    So they make a fee­ble attempt to cre­ate straw man argu­ments while deflect­ing the glar­ing ques­tion about the 130+ char­ter schools in the USA that are owned, managed/operated by known fol­low­ers of the Gulen Move­ment (Hizmet)
    Lousy attempt, and the Gulen Move­ment has noth­ing to do with reli­gion as it is a CULT. One that is mixed with com­merce, social con­trols, edu­ca­tion, and pol­i­tics.
    Make no bones about it, they are not wanted in Turkey where their cow­ard leader fled after his famous anti-secular speech about “get­ting into the arter­ies of the sys­tem, until you reach all power cen­ters“
    We have heard it all:
    “We have no organic con­nec­tions“
    “Your chil­dren are get­ting a pri­vate edu­ca­tion for free“
    “Your chil­dren will be taught by Turk­ish Schol­ars“
    “Our teach­ers may be Gulen Inspired, but we are not a Gulen School<—-what the hell is that sup­pose to mean?

    I had sex but didn’t ejaculate?

    These Gulen Light­house boys are vir­gins. Taught to guard secrets like they guard their chastity. They are instructed to not marry until they reach 50 years of age.

    They have issues with women and treat them hor­ri­ble within their move­ment. Con­versely, the Amer­i­can females teach­ers have filed many EEOC dis­crim­i­na­tory law­suits against this group. The best one was Chesa­peake Char­ter where the Turk male prin­ci­pal for­bid them to use the Inter­net, was very con­trol­ling to the point the local police had to escort him off campus.

    With this group of Gulen Light­house boys there is always drama and scan­dals. It fol­lows them from school to school, coun­try to country.

    Enjoy read­ing some of them here:
    http://www.gulencharterschoolsusa.blogspot.com
    http://www.charterschoolscandals.blogspot.com

    http://www.charterschoolwatchdog.com
    (make sure you read the entry “teach­ers with guns”)

    Posted by Dr. Ahmet Kaz | March 31, 2012, 4:10 pm
  12. @Parent: I’m so sorry to hear about your expe­ri­ence with them. These Gulenist char­ter schools really need to be inves­ti­gated and I do won­der just how far down the prover­bial rab­bit holes go.

    Thank­fully, we have intre­pid researchers like Dave Emory blow­ing the whis­tles on stuff like this. =)

    @Dr. Kaz: I’m sorry, but what? I have no such alias as ‘Jason Tuff’. I didn’t even know that name existed until today, to be honest.

    BTW, the Iraqi woman I was refer­ring to, was one Shaima Alawadi, who was liv­ing El Cajon, Calif.
    http://utsandiego.com/news/2012/mar/24/el-cajon-woman-dies-after-beating-earlier-week
    The only rea­son I brought her up because I got the impres­sion that Van­field might have been think­ing that real Islam­o­pho­bia doesn’t exist, when in fact, it still does.

    In all hon­esty, Dr. Kaz, I never once argued against the con­tent put forth in this post, and I have my own sus­pi­cions about these peo­ple myself.

    And, I’m sorry if this ‘Jason Tuff’ char­ac­ter was par­tic­u­larly nox­ious to you but I had no knowl­edge of this person’s exis­tence until you brought him up, and quite frankly, I really didn’t appre­ci­ate being falsely con­flated with this per­son, nor your quite frankly semi-libelous com­ment call­ing me a ‘Gulen Light­house school boy’ and claim­ing I was hear­ing voices in my head(seriously?).

    This isn’t the place to be doing such things, Doc­tor. I will gladly study the links you have posted but will also request that you refrain from such unfounded accu­sa­tions in the future. This is seri­ous stuff, and we need not be fight­ing each other when we could be spread­ing the word and wak­ing peo­ple up.

    Best regards,

    –Steven L.

    Posted by Steven L. | March 31, 2012, 8:14 pm
  13. Adnan Oktar is a Turk­ish cult leader, who looks like the Devil, out of cen­tral cast­ing, sees him­self as a can­di­date for Madhi, rul­ing over a reformed Ottoman Empire. Old friend’s with Erdo­gan, he is try­ing to claw his way to the top, while run­ning a sex cult.

    Stand for Peace, an inter­faith group, as an inter­est­ing report on Oktar, which can be down­loaded at the site below.

    It’s well worth check­ing out.
    V.

    http://standforpeace.org.uk/adnan-oktar-and-the-islamist-sex-cult/

    Adnan Oktar and the Islamist sex cult
    Down­load Report Here

    Israeli politi­cians and Jew­ish media across the World have excit­edly embraced the efforts of Turk­ish tele­vi­sion chan­nel A9 to effect and encour­age inter­faith dia­logue – or, as the chan­nel itself puts it, pro­mote “peace and love” between all peoples.

    The pro­gramme is part of a hard­line group run by Turk­ish Islamist Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya), an extrem­ist with a his­tory of pro­mot­ing Holo­caust Denial and who fuses Ataturk nation­al­ism with Turk­ish Islamism in his attacks upon Jews, Dar­win­ists and Athe­ists. His group of fol­low­ers is best described as a cult; one accused by a num­ber of crit­ics of using sex­ual abuse and black­mail to achieve polit­i­cal leverage.

    A9 is falsely per­ceived by a num­ber of media out­lets as an exam­ple of a mod­er­ate Islamic voice that is work­ing to bring Jews and Mus­lims closer together. While this is indeed the declared pur­pose of A9, it is a facade that shrouds a hos­tile Islamist agenda. Just as democ­racy was a use­ful means for Turk­ish Islamists to prop­a­gate their anti-democratic views, so too is A9’s declared devo­tion to inter­faith dia­logue a sani­tis­ing veneer that dis­tracts from its more sin­is­ter ideas.

    Jew­ish media out­lets, from the Los Ange­les Jew­ish Jour­nal to Arutz Sheva and the Jerusalem Post, have pub­lished opin­ion pieces by Oktar and a num­ber of his dis­ci­ples. Israeli politi­cians, includ­ing for­mer cab­i­net min­is­ters, have appeared on Oktar’s tele­vi­sion show. By embrac­ing Oktar, they risk bury­ing the truth about Oktar’s anti-Semitism and will legit­imise Oktar and his group as a respectable organisation.

    Sum­mary

    Adnan Oktar (aka Harun Yahya), a Turk­ish author, fuses Ataturk nation­al­ism with Turk­ish Islamism in his attacks upon Jews, Dar­win­ists and Athe­ists. His group of fol­low­ers is best described as a cult; one accused of using sex­ual abuse and black­mail to achieve polit­i­cal lever­age.
    Oktar’s claim, after 2001, to abhor anti-Semitism and to be a voice of peace and mod­er­a­tion is, in our opin­ion, a cha­rade designed to bring him greater influ­ence and respectabil­ity. His web­sites are replete with anti-Semitic ideas and ref­er­ences to anti-Semitic works that Oktar claims he did not write.
    Like­wise, the A9 tele­vi­sion channel’s inter­faith pro­gramme is a front for Oktar’s hard­line Islamist ide­ol­ogy, designed to earn Oktar legit­i­macy.
    Jew­ish media and Israeli politi­cians have mis­tak­enly latched on to Oktar as a mod­er­ate; with­out grasp­ing the truth about Oktar’s ide­ol­ogy. By engag­ing with him and his cult, Jew­ish lead­ers run the risk of betray­ing bona fide lib­eral Mus­lim groups and legit­imis­ing Oktar as a pro-peace and anti-terror voice.
    Oktar’s group is typ­i­cal of Turk­ish Islamism, which increas­ingly seeks to adopt and exploit West­ern processes in order to prop­a­gate its ide­o­log­i­cal val­ues. Just as the AKP has used demo­c­ra­tic meth­ods to pro­mote anti-democratic ideas, so too is Oktar using inter­faith dialoue to both san­i­tize him­self and prop­a­gate anti-Western and anti-Semitic tropes.

    Posted by Vanfield | April 27, 2013, 11:29 pm
  14. @Vanfield and Pterrafractyl–

    Kudos to both of you. Please do check out the extent to which your recent posts (3 in all, two by Van­field) com­ple­ment and sup­ple­ment one another.

    Turns out the Marathon bombers’ uncle is mar­ried to Gra­ham Fuller’s daughter.

    Fuller was for­mer sta­tion chief for CIA in Kabul, was a strong advo­cate of alliance between the U.S. and the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood and also runs inter­fer­ence for the Fetul­lah Gulen organization!

    Brings the Earth Island pol­i­tics about which I’ve been spec­u­lat­ing for so long, into focus.

    THIS is what I’ve been try­ing to get across to people.

    It is NOT that these guys are doing this at behest of CIA to estab­lish a “police state”–the stan­dard “Truther” line. (Though a police state cer­tainly lies ahead and will be wel­comed by sig­nif­i­cant ele­ments of the power elite.)

    The point is that the transna­tional cor­po­ra­tions, the GOP and the Under­ground Reich that con­trols both of them have tabbed the Islamists as foot­sol­diers to: drive a wedge into the Earth Island, get­ting hold of the Russ­ian and Chi­nese mineral-rich, Muslim-inhabited lands; fin­ish off Israel and the Jews; harass and/or attack/subjugate the United States and residua of the British Com­mon­wealth as needed; tar Obama with the “ter­ror brush,” thereby assur­ing GOP ascen­dance in the next election.

    In this con­text, recall my obser­va­tions about Michael Morell and the Petraeus scan­dal.

    I STRONGLY sus­pect we’re look­ing at a com­plex sit­u­a­tion involv­ing dou­ble or triple agents.

    It will be inter­est­ing to see if Obama’s reboot of rela­tions with Rus­sia is dam­aged by the fallout.

    It is obvi­ous that the alleged perps were on the radar screens of var­i­ous intel­li­gence and law-enforcement agencies.

    The fact that these ele­ments have been tabbed as “cor­po­rate combatants”–to coin a term–assures that the tracks of their han­dlers will remain obscured, past a point.

    Think of this as an exten­sion of World War II, which it is, to an extent.

    Allied sol­diers, sailors and air­men fought a very real and bloody, stress­ful con­flict against an enemy whose anti-communist, anti-labor and racist/anti-Semitic ide­ol­ogy endeared it to the pow­er­ful U.S. eco­nomic and polit­i­cal inter­ests who financed it in the first place.

    As doc­u­mented in so many of the books, inter­views and posts avail­able here, de-Nazification failed as a mat­ter of pol­icy, as the fas­cist were returned to power in the coun­tries occu­pied by the West­ern allies as a bul­wark against communism.

    What we are look­ing at here is a sim­i­larly janus-faced entity.

    Best,

    Dave Emory

    Posted by Dave Emory | April 28, 2013, 3:53 pm
  15. Inter­est­ing note re: Gra­ham Fuller. I’m sur­prised Mr. Emory doesn’t ref­er­ence “America’s Nazi Secret” by for­mer State Depart­ment lawyer John Lof­tus, as it fills in the back­ground to a story that includes such char­ac­ters as Rein­hard Gehlen, who Mr. Emory was speak­ing about way back when his “Hard Rain” show played on KALX radio in Berkeley.

    Posted by Mark Tea | April 28, 2013, 11:09 pm

Post a comment