Spitfire List Web site and blog of anti-fascist researcher and radio personality Dave Emory.

For The Record  

FTR #1027 Send in The Clowns: Reflections on the Kavanaugh Circus

Dave Emory’s entire life­time of work is avail­able on a flash dri­ve that can be obtained HERE. The new dri­ve is a 32-giga­byte dri­ve that is cur­rent as of the pro­grams and arti­cles post­ed by the fall of 2017. The new dri­ve (avail­able for a tax-deductible con­tri­bu­tion of $65.00 or more.)

WFMU-FM is pod­cast­ing For The Record–You can sub­scribe to the pod­cast HERE.

You can sub­scribe to e‑mail alerts from Spitfirelist.com HERE.

You can sub­scribe to RSS feed from Spitfirelist.com HERE.

You can sub­scribe to the com­ments made on pro­grams and posts–an excel­lent source of infor­ma­tion in, and of, itself HERE.

This broad­cast was record­ed in one, 60-minute seg­ment.

“A friv­o­lous soci­ety can only achieve dra­mat­ic sig­nif­i­cance through what its friv­o­li­ty destroys.”–Edith Whar­ton.

Intro­duc­tion: The large­ly inept ques­tion­ing of Brett Kavanaugh about his youth­ful, drunk­en sex­u­al behav­ior eclipsed Kavanaugh­’s par­tic­i­pa­tion in far more seri­ous, and alto­geth­er lethal activ­i­ties dur­ing his piv­otal role with the Bush admin­is­tra­tions, pri­mar­i­ly that of George W. Bush: ” . . . . Kavanaugh, now Pres­i­dent Trump’s nom­i­nee to the Supreme Court, had an ordi­nary-sound­ing title: staff sec­re­tary. But he wield­ed extra­or­di­nary influ­ence as the advis­er respon­si­ble for screen­ing, review­ing and edit­ing doc­u­ments deliv­ered to Bush, inter­views and doc­u­ments show. . . . But no jus­tice in recent mem­o­ry has worked as intent­ly as Kavanaugh at the high­est lev­els of the nation’s polit­i­cal machin­ery, schol­ars said. . . . Doc­u­ments and inter­views show that while Kavanaugh was not a pol­i­cy­mak­er, he was direct­ly involved in help­ing the White House man­age a wide array of sen­si­tive mat­ters, includ­ing the war on ter­ror­ism . . . .  ‘It put Kavanaugh at the cen­ter of every polit­i­cal and pol­i­cy deci­sion at the Bush White House,’ said Peter Irons, pro­fes­sor emer­i­tus at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia at San Diego and author of sev­er­al books about the Supreme Court. ‘He is exact­ly the kind of per­son that the legal con­ser­v­a­tive move­ment wants on the court.’ . . . . Kavanaugh was respon­si­ble for man­ag­ing the process that helped shape the president’s think­ing and fueled the Bush admin­is­tra­tion agen­da. ‘He was every­where,’ said Michael Ger­son, a speech­writer in the Bush admin­is­tra­tion and now a syn­di­cat­ed colum­nist at The Post. . . . ‘Vir­tu­al­ly every piece of paper had to pass through the staff secretary’s hands,’ Rove said. . . .”

Kavanaugh­’s wife also had deep ties to the George W. Bush admin­is­tra­tion. ” . . . . Ash­ley Estes Kavanaugh worked as media rela­tions coor­di­na­tor for the George W. Bush Pres­i­den­tial Cen­ter from 2009–2010; worked as Direc­tor of Spe­cial Projects for the George W. Bush pres­i­den­tial Foun­da­tion from 2005 to 2009; was Pres­i­dent George W. Bush’s per­son­al sec­re­tary from 2001 to 2005; was an assis­tant in the White House from 2001 to 2005; and worked on the Bush-Cheney 2000 cam­paign from 1996 to 2000. Her time with Bush dates to his work in Texas as gov­er­nor there. She was assis­tant to Gov­er­nor George W. Bush from 1996 to 1999. She attend­ed the Uni­ver­si­ty of Texas at Austin from 1994 to 1997. . . .”

In the con­text of Kavanaugh­’s Sen­ate ques­tion­ing, Mr. Emory made a num­ber of points, includ­ing the fol­low­ing:

  1. Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gor­such attend­ed the same high school. Where­as there was a huge com­mo­tion over Brett Kavanaugh­’s drunk­en sex­u­al behav­ior (as there should have been), there was no atten­tion what­so­ev­er paid to Neil Gor­such’s boast­ing of par­tic­i­pa­tion in a social group of reac­tionary stu­dents who called them­selves “The Fas­cism For­ev­er Club.” (That such a social group exist­ed was cor­rob­o­rat­ed by the edi­tors of Gor­such’s high school year­book.)  This was cov­ered in FTR #945. A screen cap­ture of the high school year­book edi­tors’ mus­ings  on Gor­such’s Fas­cism For­ev­er social cir­cle is includ­ed in the writ­ten descrip­tion for the pro­gram.
  2. Absent on the Sen­ate Judi­cia­ry Com­mit­tee that queried and vet­ted Judge Kavanaugh was Al Franken, who was pro­fes­sion­al­ly destroyed in one of the most hys­ter­i­cal­ly fascis­tic, unde­mo­c­ra­t­ic events in recent mem­o­ry. (We dis­cussed this in FTR #998, and sup­ple­ment­ed it in FTR #999.) A lynch mob alto­geth­er rem­i­nis­cent of the young women fea­tured in Arthur Miller’s dra­mat­ic para­ble The Cru­cible, forced Franken’s res­ig­na­tion from the Sen­ate large­ly on the ado­les­cent, obvi­ous­ly joc­u­lar and libidi­nous events occur­ring dur­ing a USO tour. An obvi­ous gag pho­to of Franken pre­tend­ing to grope the breasts of an osten­si­bly sleep­ing LeAnn Twee­den (who was not asleep and was wear­ing a flak jack­et) fed the flames of a grotesque polit­i­cal immo­la­tion. On the same USO tour, Twee­den was pho­tographed grab­bing the butt of a male per­former, onstage.
  3. Franken said he wel­comed an inves­ti­ga­tion and vet­ting of the charges against him. There was NONE! The charges of right-wing flak Twee­den (a Birther accord­ing to her friend actor Tom Arnold) were then aug­ment­ed by an alle­ga­tion by a Trump backer that Franken groped her while she was hav­ing a pic­ture tak­en with him at the Min­neso­ta State Fair. Her Trump-back­ing hus­band and her father were present, and the pic­ture was tak­en by her fam­i­ly mem­bers.

The appar­ent assault of Chris­tine Blasey (Ford) by a drunk­en Kavanaugh, although rep­re­hen­si­ble, pales by com­par­i­son with the enor­mous destruc­tion of life that took place dur­ing the admin­is­tra­tions of George W. Bush, includ­ing:

  1. The Sep­tem­ber 11 attacks.
  2. The ongo­ing war in Afghanistan that stemmed from those attacks.
  3. The war in Iraq, which also stemmed from the 9/11 attacks.
  4. The blood­bath in the war against ISIS, also a result of the inva­sion of Iraq.
  5. The enor­mous destruc­tion of life stem­ming from the finan­cial col­lapse over­seen by Dubya’s admin­is­tra­tion. In FTR #412, record­ed in June of 2003, Mr. Emory fore­cast the eco­nom­ic col­lapse of 2008, not­ing that it was delib­er­ate­ly “engi­neered,” in order to serve as a pre­text for slash­ing fund­ing for domes­tic social wel­fare pro­grams.

The pro­gram fea­tures an excerpt from FTR #715. Not­ing that Kavanaugh­’s resume stretch­es back to the Pres­i­den­cy of George H.W. Bush and gath­ers momen­tum with the Pres­i­den­cy of his son (for whom Kavanaugh­’s wife also worked), it appears pru­dent to give some con­sid­er­a­tion of the trans-gen­er­a­tional nature of the Bush fam­i­ly and crim­i­nal activ­i­ties that are part and par­cel to that fam­i­ly’s involve­ment with fas­cism.

Among the key items of dis­cus­sion is the opaque nature of Dubya’s Harken Ener­gy and the large, mys­te­ri­ous amounts of mon­ey flow­ing into, and out of, the firm. It may well have been a mon­ey laun­der­ing vehi­cle, with the pres­ence of Alan Quasha on the board of direc­tors being sug­ges­tive.

A native of the Philip­pines, Quasha is the son of William Quasha, head of the Philip­pine branch of the Nugan Hand Bank. Part of “Team Mar­cos,” William was inevitably in close prox­im­i­ty to, if not involved with, the recy­cling of the enor­mous gold deposits stashed in the Philip­pines by the Japan­ese dur­ing World War II. In the dis­cus­sion with Russ Bak­er, he sug­gests that Harken may (among oth­er things) have been used to laun­der some of the Gold­en Lily loot from Gen­er­al Yamashita’s trea­sure.

As not­ed in FTR #‘s 356 and 1006, among oth­er pro­grams, it was Talat Othman–a for­mer direc­tor of Harken Ener­gy, a polit­i­cal advis­er and per­son­al friend of both Georges Bush and the man­ag­ing direc­tor of Grover Norquist and Karl Rove’s Islam­ic Free Mar­ket Insti­tute who inter­ced­ed with then Trea­sury Sec­re­tary Paul O’Neill on behalf of the indi­vid­u­als and insti­tu­tions tar­get­ed by the 3/20/2002 Oper­a­tion Green Quest raids. O’Neill was fired months lat­er and then FBI Direc­tor Robert Mueller–that most spe­cial of prosecutors–helped derail the Green Quest inves­ti­ga­tion.

As high­light­ed in FTR #569, Rita Katz and John Lof­tus, who ini­ti­at­ed the Oper­a­tion Green Quest inves­ti­ga­tion and did much of the heavy lift­ing were sur­veilled by FBI and/or CIA. Robert Mueller’s FBI cov­ered up Green Quest.

The pro­gram con­cludes with dis­cus­sion of a hor­ror show that emerged in the after­math of the kid­nap­ping and mur­der of Pol­ly Klass (whose slay­ing led to the pas­sage of California’s “Three Strikes” law.) One can only imag­ine the extent to which con­nec­tions like this bear on the Sau­di spon­sor­ship of ter­ror­ism and the Unit­ed States’ reluc­tance (or inabil­i­ty) to do any­thing about it. What might sur­face if the U.S. were to tru­ly crack down on the Saud­is?

Although what was appar­ent­ly done to Dr. Ford is rep­re­hen­si­ble, it pales by com­par­i­son to oth­er hor­rors vis­it­ed on young women.

Mr. Emory notes that noth­ing has been done about this and noth­ing will be done–by ANY of the peo­ple and insti­tu­tions who weighed in on the Kavanaugh cir­cus.

For to inves­ti­gate these charges would be to cut across the U.S./Saudi pow­er axis. THAT is absolute­ly invi­o­lable, as no one knows bet­ter than Brett Kavanaugh!

” . . . . Jill saw broth­els [in Sau­di Ara­bia] where chil­dren were kept. The broth­els were plain look­ing build­ings in the cen­ter of the town, with yel­low doors. Men con­stant­ly came in and out, most­ly Arabs from the oil fields, but men from oth­er busi­ness­es as well. Jill peeked past the yel­low door into one of the broth­els and saw a room filled young girls, white-skinned, about twelve-years old. She learned lat­er that many of them were Amer­i­can, abduct­ed and shipped from the Unit­ed States. The lit­tle girls were wear­ing small, skimpy, see-through skirts. A cus­tomer would pick one of them, and take whomev­er he want­ed upstairs.

Lat­er, Jill saw some of the lit­tle girls get­ting air in the back of the broth­el, She could tell they were drugged by the way they walked. Although she nev­er learned who ran the broth­els, she found out that in two or three years the lit­tle girls were turned into the streets where they were left to die. I asked Jill if she ever report­ed what she saw, lit­tle girls who were drugged and forced into sex­u­al slav­ery. She admit­ted that she had – to some­one in the diplo­mat­ic corps. He said he would see what could be done about the abduct­ed Amer­i­can girls – but to her knowl­edge, noth­ing was ever done. . . .”

1. Brett Kavanaugh and his wife had exten­sive ties to George W. Bush. Kavanaugh also worked in the Solic­i­tor Gen­er­al’s office of George H.W. Bush. CORRECTION: Mr. Emory iden­ti­fied “ex” CIA offi­cer William Barr as George H.W. Bush’s Solic­i­tor  Gen­er­al. He was the elder George Bush’s Attor­ney Gen­er­al, not Solic­i­tor Gen­er­al.

“Brett Kavanaugh & George W. Bush: What Are the Ties?” by Jes­si­ca McBride; Heavy.com; 07/10/2018

Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump’s Supreme Court nom­i­nee to replace Antho­ny Kennedy, has long­stand­ing ties to for­mer Pres­i­dent George W. Bush, as does his wife, Ash­ley Estes Kavanaugh.

Both Brett and Ash­ley Kavanaugh served in the Bush admin­is­tra­tion and Bush nom­i­nat­ed Brett M. Kavanaugh to the posi­tion he cur­rent­ly holds on the U.S. Court of Appeals in Wash­ing­ton D.C. Trump revealed Kavanaugh as his pick for Supreme Court on July 9, 2018. Kavanaugh was one of four rumored final­ists, with Judges Amy Coney Bar­rett, Thomas Hardi­man, and Ray­mond Keth­ledge also among them. Because Trump and the Bush fam­i­ly have a pub­li­cized feud, some peo­ple thought Brett Kavanaugh’s Bush ties could hurt his chances with the pres­i­dent. How­ev­er, that didn’t stop the pres­i­dent from pick­ing him in the end, even though some con­ser­v­a­tive infight­ing broke out over the pick, with “whis­per cam­paigns” call­ing Brett Kavanaugh the “low-ener­gy Jeb Bush pick,” accord­ing to Nation­al Review..

Bush praised the selec­tion.

JUST IN: For­mer Pres. George W. Bush “Pres­i­dent Trump has made an out­stand­ing deci­sion in nom­i­nat­ing Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the; Supreme Court…He will make a superb Jus­tice of the Supreme Court of the Unit­ed States.” https://t.co/K7XhW1iSMbpic.twitter.com/T9brBFNQ1U— Evan McMur­ry (@evanmcmurry) July 10, 2018

Here’s what you need to know about Brett Kavanaugh’s Bush ties:

Brett Kavanaugh Served as the Staff Sec­re­tary to George W. Bush

Brett Kavanaugh is a judge serv­ing on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir­cuit Court. He is a grad­u­ate of Yale Law School who also spent time in pri­vate prac­tice.

A bio for Brett Kavanaugh also sketch­es out his Bush ties, say­ing, “From July 2003 until his appoint­ment to the court in 2006, he was Assis­tant to the Pres­i­dent and Staff Sec­re­tary to Pres­i­dent Bush.”

Kavanaugh, the for­mer staff sec­re­tary to George W. Bush, also played a role in draft­ing the Ken Starr report into the impeach­ment of for­mer Pres­i­dent Bill Clin­ton. When Kavanaugh was sworn in as a fed­er­al judge, Bush said, “for the past five years, he has served in the White House as Asso­ciate Coun­sel, a senior Asso­ciate Coun­sel, and as Staff Sec­re­tary.”

At the same event, Kavanaugh told Bush he had the “great­est respect” for him. “I also appre­ci­ate the oppor­tu­ni­ty to have served under the Vice Pres­i­dent and under Chiefs of Staff Andy Card and Josh Bolten. The White House staff are ded­i­cat­ed pub­lic ser­vants who have been good col­leagues and good friends, and I’ll miss work­ing with all of you very much,” Kavanaugh said at his swear­ing-in hear­ing.

He has held oth­er gov­ern­ment jobs, and served in George H.W. Bush’s admin­is­tra­tion too in the solic­i­tor general’s office. “Kavanaugh was a pro­tegé of Ken­neth Starr,” reports Vox. “He was a prin­ci­pal author of the Starr Report.”

The Dai­ly Caller, a con­ser­v­a­tive web­site, report­ed on the snip­ing against Brett Kavanaugh, quot­ing one anony­mous source as say­ing, “Kavanaugh is Jeb Bush’s pick for the Supreme Court. This is the low-ener­gy Jeb Bush pick. No one in the base will be ani­mat­ed by [Kavanaugh] — espe­cial­ly Trump sup­port­ers who reject­ed the Bush lega­cy.”

George W. Bush Called Brett Kavanaugh a ‘Good Man’ & Joked That He Arranged His Mar­riage

Bush nom­i­nat­ed Brett Kavanaugh to the Court of Appeals, and he spoke at the swear­ing-in cer­e­mo­ny in 2006. Accord­ing to a sto­ry post­ed by the White House, Bush praised Brett Kavanaugh, say­ing, “the sec­ond-high­est in our land gains a bril­liant and tal­ent­ed new mem­ber. The staff of the White House cel­e­brates a friend they admire and a col­league they will miss. I con­grat­u­late a good man and a fine pub­lic ser­vant on a job well done.” Bush then quipped, “I’m espe­cial­ly pleased to be with Brett’s wife, Ash­ley, whose face I know well and whose mar­riage was the first life­time appoint­ment I arranged for Brett.”

The for­mer pres­i­dent added, “I chose Brett because of the force of his mind, his breadth of expe­ri­ence, and the strength of his char­ac­ter.”

Bush also men­tioned Kavanaugh’s then new daugh­ter. “Wel­come the star of Brett’s most recent tele­vised hear­ing, Mar­garet Mur­phy Kavanaugh,” Bush said to laugh­ter from the crowd. “Mar­garet has his mother’s — has her mother’s good looks, and her dad’s pref­er­ence for hear­ings that do not last too long.”

At the same hear­ing, Brett Kavanaugh called Mar­garet, his only child at the time, a “dai­ly inspi­ra­tion.”

“Ash­ley and our lit­tle girl Mar­garet are a dai­ly inspi­ra­tion. Ash­ley, as the Pres­i­dent not­ed, is from Abi­lene, Texas. For those of you who don’t know much about Texas geog­ra­phy, it’s about halfway between Dal­las and Mid­land,” he said. “Ashley’s par­ents are here, and I thank them for com­ing. Ash­ley likes to remind me that true love, true love is a Texas girl who is will­ing to mar­ry a guy with a life­time appoint­ment in Wash­ing­ton, D.C.”

Accord­ing to The Wash­ing­ton Exam­in­er, “In 2004, Kavanaugh mar­ried pres­i­den­tial assis­tant Ash­ley Estes, who gave birth to their daugh­ter, Mar­garet, 13 months lat­er. The fam­i­ly lives in Chevy Chase, direct­ly across the street from White House Coun­sel Dan Bartlett.”

Kavanaugh’s Wife Has Deep Ties to the Bush Admin­is­tra­tion

Ash­ley Estes Kavanaugh, the spouse of Brett Kavanaugh, has deep ties to the admin­is­tra­tion of George W. Bush as well. Her links to Bush go back to his days as Texas gov­er­nor.

Accord­ing to her LinkedIn page, Ash­ley Estes Kavanaugh worked as media rela­tions coor­di­na­tor for the George W. Bush Pres­i­den­tial Cen­ter from 2009–2010; worked as Direc­tor of Spe­cial Projects for the George W. Bush pres­i­den­tial Foun­da­tion from 2005 to 2009; was Pres­i­dent George W. Bush’s per­son­al sec­re­tary from 2001 to 2005; was an assis­tant in the White House from 2001 to 2005; and worked on the Bush-Cheney 2000 cam­paign from 1996 to 2000.

Her time with Bush dates to his work in Texas as gov­er­nor there. She was assis­tant to Gov­er­nor George W. Bush from 1996 to 1999. She attend­ed the Uni­ver­si­ty of Texas at Austin from 1994 to 1997.

Her LinkedIn page says she is Town Man­ag­er, Sec­tion 5 of the Vil­lage of Chevy Chase, Mary­land. A newslet­ter for the town reports, “She has lived in Sec­tion 5 on Under­wood Street for the last ten years along with her hus­band, Brett, and their two daugh­ters, Mar­garet and Liza.”

2. More depth on the degree of influ­ence of Kavanaugh in the Bush White House is con­tained in the arti­cle below:

” . . . . Kavanaugh, now Pres­i­dent Trump’s nom­i­nee to the Supreme Court, had an ordi­nary-sound­ing title: staff sec­re­tary. But he wield­ed extra­or­di­nary influ­ence as the advis­er respon­si­ble for screen­ing, review­ing and edit­ing doc­u­ments deliv­ered to Bush, inter­views and doc­u­ments show. . . . But no jus­tice in recent mem­o­ry has worked as intent­ly as Kavanaugh at the high­est lev­els of the nation’s polit­i­cal machin­ery, schol­ars said. . . . Doc­u­ments and inter­views show that while Kavanaugh was not a pol­i­cy­mak­er, he was direct­ly involved in help­ing the White House man­age a wide array of sen­si­tive mat­ters, includ­ing the war on ter­ror­ism . . . .  ‘It put Kavanaugh at the cen­ter of every polit­i­cal and pol­i­cy deci­sion at the Bush White House,’ said Peter Irons, pro­fes­sor emer­i­tus at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia at San Diego and author of sev­er­al books about the Supreme Court. ‘He is exact­ly the kind of per­son that the legal con­ser­v­a­tive move­ment wants on the court.’ . . . . Kavanaugh was respon­si­ble for man­ag­ing the process that helped shape the president’s think­ing and fueled the Bush admin­is­tra­tion agen­da. ‘He was every­where,’ said Michael Ger­son, a speech­writer in the Bush admin­is­tra­tion and now a syn­di­cat­ed colum­nist at The Post. . . . ‘Vir­tu­al­ly every piece of paper had to pass through the staff secretary’s hands,’ Rove said. . . .”

“Brett Kavanaugh: Bush’s Intel­lec­tu­al Body Man” by Robert O’Harrow Jr.; The Wash­ing­ton Post; 08/24/2018

It was the apogee of Brett Kavanaugh’s rise through the ranks of the con­ser­v­a­tive move­ment, a job that put him in dai­ly prox­im­i­ty to Pres­i­dent George W. Bush and made him an intel­lec­tu­al “umpire” for a wel­ter of polit­i­cal and pol­i­cy aides who were aim­ing to shape the Repub­li­can agen­da.Kavanaugh, now Pres­i­dent Trump’s nom­i­nee to the Supreme Court, had an ordi­nary-sound­ing title: staff sec­re­tary. But he wield­ed extra­or­di­nary influ­ence as the advis­er respon­si­ble for screen­ing, review­ing and edit­ing doc­u­ments deliv­ered to Bush, inter­views and doc­u­ments show.

“Ulti­mate­ly, the umpire was Brett,” said Karl Rove, a Bush advis­er and one of the peo­ple Kavanaugh worked with close­ly as staff sec­re­tary.

Many Supreme Court jus­tices over the decades have held strong polit­i­cal views or been active in lib­er­al or con­ser­v­a­tive caus­es. Jus­tice Ele­na Kagan, a law pro­fes­sor, served as an asso­ciate coun­sel and advis­er in the Clin­ton White House. For­mer Jus­tice Abe For­t­as pri­vate­ly advised Pres­i­dent Lyn­don B. John­son on polit­i­cal mat­ters. William Rehn­quist was ­active in the Repub­li­can Par­ty in Ari­zona before he became a ­jus­tice.

But no jus­tice in recent mem­o­ry has worked as intent­ly as Kavanaugh at the high­est lev­els of the nation’s polit­i­cal machin­ery, schol­ars said. His time as staff sec­re­tary, from 2003 to 2006, was the cul­mi­na­tion of a polit­i­cal and legal appren­tice­ship that last­ed more than a decade, enabling him to demon­strate his zeal for con­ser­v­a­tive prin­ci­ples and putting him on a path to the Supreme Court.

Doc­u­ments and inter­views show that while Kavanaugh was not a pol­i­cy­mak­er, he was direct­ly involved in help­ing the White House man­age a wide array of sen­si­tive mat­ters, includ­ing the war on ter­ror­ism, the treat­ment of ene­my com­bat­ants and war­rant­less wire­tap­ping.

“It put Kavanaugh at the cen­ter of every polit­i­cal and pol­i­cy deci­sion at the Bush White House,” said Peter Irons, pro­fes­sor emer­i­tus at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia at San Diego and author of sev­er­al books about the Supreme Court.“He is exact­ly the kind of per­son that the legal con­ser­v­a­tive move­ment wants on the court.”

His tenure is now a source of con­tro­ver­sy, because much of his work in the White House has been cloaked by pres­i­den­tial priv­i­lege. Repub­li­cans have declined to request records from that era, sug­gest­ing that they would not be rev­e­la­to­ry.

“He was more or less a traf­fic cop,” Sen­ate Major­i­ty Whip John Cornyn (R‑Tex.) said last month.

Ques­tions about Kavanaugh’s work in the polit­i­cal realm sur­faced in 2004, after he was nom­i­nat­ed by Bush to be a cir­cuit court judge. Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D‑N.Y.) alleged that the “nom­i­na­tion appears to be judi­cial pay­ment for polit­i­cal ser­vices ren­dered.”

“In fact, Mr. Kavanaugh would prob­a­bly win first prize as the hard-right’s polit­i­cal lawyer,” Schumer said, accord­ing to a tran­script of the nom­i­na­tion hear­ing.

Kavanaugh defend­ed him­self vig­or­ous­ly, say­ing that pri­or polit­i­cal affil­i­a­tions did not nec­es­sar­i­ly impede a good judge’s per­for­mance.

“There is one kind of judge,” he said dur­ing the hear­ing. “There is an inde­pen­dent judge under our Con­sti­tu­tion. And the fact that they may have been a Repub­li­can or Demo­c­rat … in a past life is com­plete­ly irrel­e­vant to how they con­duct them­selves as judges.”

As the Sen­ate Judi­cia­ry Com­mit­tee pre­pares for con­fir­ma­tion hear­ings start­ing Sept. 4, much remains unknown about that sig­nif­i­cant stretch of Kavanaugh’s career.

Most of the mil­lions of doc­u­ments relat­ing to his White House ser­vice will not be avail­able for review before his con­fir­ma­tion. The com­mit­tee has received batch­es of records from the George W. Bush library, releas­ing tens of thou­sands of doc­u­ments in recent weeks. But most relate to Kavanaugh’s years in the White House Counsel’s Office, before he became staff sec­re­tary, and have been devoid of telling detail. Democ­rats have com­plained they can’t prop­er­ly take stock of ­Kavanaugh.

“We asked for doc­u­ments from Kavanaugh’s time as staff sec­re­tary because he admit­ted those years shaped his views as a judge, par­tic­u­lar­ly with regard to issues of exec­u­tive pow­er,” Sen. Dianne Fein­stein (D‑Calif.) said in a ­state­ment.

“We also need to know more about his involve­ment with con­tro­ver­sial issues like tor­ture, war­rant­less wire­tap­ping and pres­i­den­tial sign­ing state­ments,” Fein­stein said. “He has a far more exten­sive record in pol­i­tics than pre­vi­ous nom­i­nees. It’s crit­i­cal that sen­a­tors see the full pic­ture to under­stand how those polit­i­cal posi­tions influ­enced his cur­rent views.”

White House spokesman Raj Shah said Kavanaugh has demon­strat­ed his com­mit­ment to tak­ing a judi­cious and fair-mind­ed approach to the Supreme Court.

“What will tell you most about the type of Supreme Court Jus­tice he will make are the 307 opin­ions he wrote as a Judge on the D.C. Cir­cuit Court of Appeals, a dozen of which were affirmed by the Supreme Court, over the last 12 years,” Shah said in a state­ment. “His opin­ions are wide­ly cit­ed by judges, appoint­ed by pres­i­dents of both par­ties, in courts across the coun­try. They demon­strate inde­pen­dence and a fideli­ty to our laws and con­sti­tu­tion.”

To find clues about Kavanaugh’s role as staff sec­re­tary, The Wash­ing­ton Post exam­ined more than 2,000 pages of emails and oth­er doc­u­ments pre­vi­ous­ly released by the Bush library, along with scores of emails con­tained in 191 pages of doc­u­ments released last week by the Jus­tice Depart­ment in response to a Free­dom of Infor­ma­tion Act request by Fix the Court, a group advo­cat­ing for more trans­paren­cy in the fed­er­al court sys­tem.

The Bush library and Jus­tice Depart­ment emails have been heav­i­ly redact­ed, with most of the con­tent removed, as part of the government’s nor­mal appli­ca­tion of exemp­tions under the fed­er­al Free­dom of Infor­ma­tion Act or the Pres­i­den­tial Records Act. But com­bined with Kavanaugh’s pub­lic state­ments and writ­ings, the email address­es and sub­ject lines pro­vide gran­u­lar­i­ty to a com­pos­ite por­trait of him in the years he was staff sec­re­tary and before.

Kavanaugh was respon­si­ble for man­ag­ing the process that helped shape the president’s think­ing and fueled the Bush admin­is­tra­tion agen­da. “He was every­where,” said Michael Ger­son, a speech­writer in the Bush admin­is­tra­tion and now a syn­di­cat­ed colum­nist at The Post.

Ger­son, Rove and oth­ers said Kavanaugh was an hon­est bro­ker, even as he con­veyed com­pet­ing ideas to the pres­i­dent.

“Vir­tu­al­ly every piece of paper had to pass through the staff secretary’s hands,” Rove said.

Kavanaugh, now 53, has described the White House jobs — end­ing in 2006 when he was con­firmed as a fed­er­al judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir­cuit — as an unre­lent­ing mix of demands that required him to con­stant­ly con­sid­er the legal, pol­i­cy, leg­isla­tive, polit­i­cal, inter­na­tion­al and pub­lic rela­tions impli­ca­tions of White House actions.

“I spent a good deal of time on Capi­tol Hill, some­times in the mid­dle of the night, work­ing on leg­is­la­tion — it’s not a pure or pris­tine process,” Kavanaugh wrote in an essay for Mar­quette Lawyer Mag­a­zine in the fall of 2016.

“I worked on draft­ing and revis­ing exec­u­tive orders, as well as dis­putes over exec­u­tive branch records,” he wrote. “I saw reg­u­la­to­ry agen­cies screw up … I saw the good and the bad sides of a president’s try­ing to run for reelec­tion and to raise mon­ey while still being pres­i­dent. I was involved in the process for lots of pres­i­den­tial speech­es. I trav­eled almost every­where with the pres­i­dent for about three years. I ­most­ly recall the mas­sive deci­sions that had to be made on short notice.”

Kavanaugh’s roots in the con­ser­v­a­tive legal world date to at least 1988. While attend­ing Yale Law School, he joined the con­ser­v­a­tive-lib­er­tar­i­an Fed­er­al­ist Soci­ety for Law and Pub­lic Pol­i­cy Stud­ies, and has since spo­ken at dozens of the group’s events.

In the ear­ly 1990s, he worked under Ken­neth Starr in the Solic­i­tor General’s Office in the admin­is­tra­tion of Pres­i­dent George H.W. Bush. He served as clerk to Supreme Court Jus­tice Antho­ny M. Kennedy and worked under Starr again in the inde­pen­dent counsel’s office that inves­ti­gat­ed Pres­i­dent Bill Clin­ton.

Some of the emails released by the Bush library come from Kavanaugh’s days in the White House Counsel’s Office, which he joined in 2001.

On Octo­ber 10, 2002, Kavanaugh received or was copied on emails relat­ing to ene­my com­bat­ants and the Guan­tanamo prison. The sub­ject line of one email read: “If you get asked about detainees at Quan­tanamo.” The email con­tained a set of Defense Depart­ment talk­ing points from Jan. 17, 2002, titled “The War Against Ter­ror­ism.”

“Karen — here are some on the GITMO folks. I am work­ing with Jus­tice on the domes­tic peo­ple we are hold­ing. Stay turned for more talk­ers.”

The emails also show that Kavanaugh worked with oth­ers on up to 22 drafts to refine Bush’s speech­es, while also edit­ing radio address­es and rou­tine state­ments. Peo­ple famil­iar with his work said he was effec­tive­ly an intel­lec­tu­al body man for the pres­i­dent, one who con­stant­ly asked ques­tions of his col­leagues and kept in mind the impli­ca­tions of the president’s state­ments and poli­cies.

Kavanaugh was often at Bush’s side, here and abroad. On June 5, 2004, the day that for­mer pres­i­dent Ronald Rea­gan died, Kavanaugh had to wake up Bush in the Amer­i­can Embassy dur­ing a trip to France to make a state­ment.

On Sept. 3, 2005, Kavanaugh received a call that Rehn­quist had died. He need­ed to meet with Bush and White House speech­writ­ers ear­ly the next morn­ing to pre­pare remarks.

In Decem­ber 2005, not long before he left the White House, Kavanaugh joined in an admin­is­tra­tive scram­ble to respond to bomb­shell rev­e­la­tions in the New York Times of a war­rant­less wire­tap­ping pro­gram that was launched after Sept. 11, 2001, accord­ing to the Jus­tice Depart­ment emails.

Kavanaugh and oth­ers weighed in on talk­ing points from the Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Agency that spelled out the legal autho­riza­tion for the sur­veil­lance pro­gram. On Dec. 20, 2005, Kavanaugh rec­om­mend­ed that amend­ed talk­ing points be shared with the NSA before their release.

“I think we should make sure Gen­er­al Hay­den sees these before they go,” Kavanaugh wrote.

3. The pro­gram fea­tures an excerpt from FTR #715. Not­ing that Kavanaugh­’s resume stretch­es back to the Pres­i­den­cy of George H.W. Bush and gath­ers momen­tum with the Pres­i­den­cy of his son (for whom Kavanaugh­’s wife also worked), it appears pru­dent to give some con­sid­er­a­tion of the trans-gen­er­a­tional nature of the Bush fam­i­ly and crim­i­nal activ­i­ties that are part and par­cel to that fam­i­ly’s involve­ment with fas­cism.

Among the key items of dis­cus­sion is the opaque nature of Dubya’s Harken Ener­gy and the large, mys­te­ri­ous amounts of mon­ey flow­ing into, and out of, the firm. It may well have been a mon­ey laun­der­ing vehi­cle, with the pres­ence of Alan Quasha on the board of direc­tors being sug­ges­tive.

A native of the Philip­pines, Quasha is the son of William Quasha, head of the Philip­pine branch of the Nugan Hand Bank. Part of “Team Mar­cos,” William was inevitably in close prox­im­i­ty to, if not involved with, the recy­cling of the enor­mous gold deposits stashed in the Philip­pines by the Japan­ese dur­ing World War II. In the dis­cus­sion with Russ Bak­er, he sug­gests that Harken may (among oth­er things) have been used to laun­der some of the Gold­en Lily loot from Gen­er­al Yamashita’s trea­sure.

As not­ed in FTR #‘s 356 and 1006, among oth­er pro­grams, it was Talat Othman–a for­mer direc­tor of Harken Ener­gy, a polit­i­cal advis­er and per­son­al friend of both Georges Bush and the man­ag­ing direc­tor of Grover Norquist and Karl Rove’s Islam­ic Free Mar­ket Insti­tute who inter­ced­ed with then Trea­sury Sec­re­tary Paul O’Neill on behalf of the indi­vid­u­als and insti­tu­tions tar­get­ed by the 3/20/2002 Oper­a­tion Green Quest raids. O’Neill was fired months lat­er and then FBI Direc­tor Robert Mueller–that most spe­cial of prosecutors–helped derail the Green Quest inves­ti­ga­tion.

4. The pro­gram con­cludes with dis­cus­sion of a hor­ror show that emerged in the after­math of the kid­nap­ping and mur­der of Pol­ly Klass (whose slay­ing led to the pas­sage of California’s “Three Strikes” law.) One can only imag­ine the extent to which con­nec­tions like this bear on the Sau­di spon­sor­ship of ter­ror­ism and the Unit­ed States’ reluc­tance (or inabil­i­ty) to do any­thing about it. What might sur­face if the U.S. were to tru­ly crack down on the Saud­is?

Mr. Emory notes that noth­ing has been done about this and noth­ing will be done–by ANY of the peo­ple and insti­tu­tions who weighed in on the Kavanaugh cir­cus.

For to inves­ti­gate these charges would be to cut across the U.S./Saudi pow­er axis. THAT is absolute­ly invi­o­lable, as no one knows bet­ter than Brett Kavanaugh!

Who Killed Pol­ly?; by Frank Spier­ing; Copy­right 1995 [SC]; Mon­terey Bay Press; ISBN 0–964761‑2–0‑3; p9. 215, 216.

…To reit­er­ate Ernie Allen’s state­ment, three hun­dred girls, Polly’s and Katie’s age, are dis­ap­pear­ing year­ly through­out the Unit­ed States. It is a grow­ing epi­dem­ic, a con­spir­a­cy that threat­ens every fam­i­ly in Amer­i­ca. No lit­tle girl is safe. The worst part was told to the author by a wit­ness named Jill Mur­ray, who had vis­it­ed Sau­di Ara­bia. Jill’s father, since deceased, was there on a covert mil­i­tary oper­a­tion. She said she could not men­tion the actu­al towns as she still has friends liv­ing there and ‘they would be killed.’ I asked her, who would kill them? She answered ‘The Saud­is.’ . . .

. . . . Jill saw broth­els where chil­dren were kept. The broth­els were plain look­ing build­ings in the cen­ter of the town, with yel­low doors. Men con­stant­ly came in and out, most­ly Arabs from the oil fields, but men from oth­er busi­ness­es as well. Jill peeked past the yel­low door into one of the broth­els and saw a room filled with young girls, white-skinned, about twelve-years old. She learned lat­er that many of them were Amer­i­can, abduct­ed and shipped from the Unit­ed States. The lit­tle girls were wear­ing small, skimpy, see-through skirts. A cus­tomer would pick one of them, and take whomev­er he want­ed upstairs.

Lat­er, Jill saw some of the lit­tle girls get­ting air in the back of the broth­el, She could tell they were drugged by the way they walked. Although she nev­er learned who ran the broth­els, she found out that in two or three years the lit­tle girls were turned into the streets where they were left to die. I asked Jill if she ever report­ed what she saw, lit­tle girls who were drugged and forced into sex­u­al slav­ery. She admit­ted that she had – to some­one in the diplo­mat­ic corps. He said he would see what could be done about the abduct­ed Amer­i­can girls – but to her knowl­edge, noth­ing was ever done.

Why weren’t the ques­tions sur­round­ing Polly’s kid­nap­ping answered? One has the feel­ing there is a dev­as­tat­ing secret behind all of the them. . . .

8. Mr. Emory’s feel­ings about Cir­cus Kavanaugh and much of what goes on today is encap­su­lat­ed in a poem he fre­quent­ly reads on the air.

“Be Angry at the Sun” by Robin­son Jef­fers

That pub­lic men pub­lish false­hoods
Is noth­ing new. That Amer­i­ca must accept
Like the his­tor­i­cal republics cor­rup­tion and empire
Has been known for years.

Be angry at the sun for set­ting
If these things anger you. Watch the wheel slope and turn,
They are all bound on the wheel, these peo­ple, those war­riors.
This repub­lic, Europe, Asia.

Observe them ges­tic­u­lat­ing,
Observe them going down. The gang serves lies, the pas­sion­ate
Man plays his part; the cold pas­sion for truth
Hunts in no pack.

You are not Cat­ul­lus, you know,
To lam­poon these crude sketch­es of Cae­sar. You are far
From Dan­te’s feet, but even far­ther from his dirty
Polit­i­cal hatreds.

Let boys want plea­sure, and men
Strug­gle for pow­er, and women per­haps for fame,
And the servile to serve a Leader and the dupes to be duped.
Yours is not theirs.

 

 

 

Discussion

3 comments for “FTR #1027 Send in The Clowns: Reflections on the Kavanaugh Circus”

  1. This arti­cle shows how the neo-Nazis are ener­gized by Brett Kavanaughs con­fir­ma­tion. The racist “alt-right,” views Kavanaugh’s con­fir­ma­tion as a vic­to­ry in part of a larg­er cul­ture — and race — war in Amer­i­ca, with the alt-right and white peo­ple on one side against minori­ties, women and Jew­ish peo­ple.

    Andrew Angline who writes the Dai­ley Stormer web­site post­ed a list of rea­sons rape would become legal soon and how it would work. The web­site con­tends that not only is being raped sex­u­al­ly ful­fill­ing for many wom­yn, but in our exist­ing soci­etal order, wom­yn who are raped are show­ered with addi­tion­al atten­tion,” Anglin, in a post stud­ded with pic­tures of women with duct-taped mouths and bound hands and feet, laid out five things peo­ple need to know for “The Upcom­ing Legal­iza­tion of Rape in Amer­i­ca.”

    The Dai­ly Stormer has also aggres­sive­ly pushed an anti-Jew­ish sto­ry line about the Kavanaugh accu­sa­tions, alleg­ing they appeared as part of a plot orches­trat­ed by Jew­ish sen­a­tors and Hun­gar­i­an Amer­i­can phil­an­thropist George Soros. (The Soros con­spir­a­cy has even been echoed in the main­stream by GOP law­mak­ers and pun­dits on Fox News).

    Fur­ther­more, a a for­mer Louisiana State Con­gress­man who was also a for­mer KKK Grand Wiz­ard, David Duke, sup­port­ed the anti-Semit­ic posi­tion by tweet­ing “Jus­tice Kavanaugh. Thank God you are now on the Supreme Court. Because of the vicious, hate­ful media Cabal and the polit­i­cal ziog­a­rchy” (Note: Ziog­a­rchy is his belief that a Zion­ist cabal that alleged­ly con­trols the media and US pol­i­tics.

    Richard Spencer, anoth­er alt-right leader views the Kavanaugh con­fir­ma­tion con­tro­ver­sy as part of an ongo­ing race-war in Amer­i­ca.

    Note how these themes of a Jew­ish Cabal and a race-war is con­sis­tent with a con­flict out­lined in the Nazi Nov­el Serpent’s Walk.

    https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/10/09/far-right-neo-nazis-racists-hail-brett-kavanaughs-elevation-supreme-court-open-season-women

    On the far right, neo-Nazis, racists hail Brett Kavanaugh­’s ele­va­tion to Supreme Court as open sea­son on women, minor­i­ty rights in Amer­i­ca | South­ern Pover­ty Law Cen­ter

    Octo­ber 09, 2018
     Brett Bar­rou­quere

    To neo-Nazi-in-hid­ing Andrew Anglin, the ele­va­tion of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court is a mile­stone, one that he hopes will result in an end to women’s rights across the coun­try.

    Anglin, who has been known to post crude hyper­bole to draw a reac­tion, post­ed a list of rea­sons rape would become legal soon and how it would work.

    “In many cas­es, this will be as sim­ple as dri­ving up next to a woman jog­ging, wrap­ping her with duct tape, toss­ing her in the trunk and tak­ing her to your home’s rape room,” Anglin wrote.

    The reac­tion on the far right to Kavanaugh’s con­tentious con­fir­ma­tion — which was marked by alle­ga­tions of sex­u­al assault, Kavanaugh’s behav­ior dur­ing the hear­ing and his atti­tude toward women and drink­ing when he was younger — was harsh, ugly, misog­y­nis­tic and anti­se­mit­ic.

    The con­fir­ma­tion, final­ized Sat­ur­day in a 50–48 vote in the U.S. Sen­ate, also tilts the U.S. Supreme Court in a more con­ser­v­a­tive direc­tion. Kavanaugh, a one­time polit­i­cal oper­a­tive and attor­ney in the George W. Bush admin­is­tra­tion, replaces retired Jus­tice Antho­ny M. Kennedy, who was often a swing vote in favor of LGBTQ rights and women’s repro­duc­tive rights.
    In its ban­ner, the neo-Nazi web­site the Dai­ly Stormer fea­tured a pho­to of bound and gagged women, includ­ing one being tossed over the shoul­der of a man, with an explod­ing Planned Par­ent­hood clin­ic in the back­ground.

    The ban­ner also fea­tures a pho­to of Elliot Rodger, who mur­dered six peo­ple and injured 14 in Isla Vista, Cal­i­for­nia, an act he said was ret­ri­bu­tion for sex­u­al rejec­tion by women. Rodger has become an icon among the incel (invol­un­tar­i­ly celi­bate) com­mu­ni­ty, male suprema­cists and the far right.

    “The log­i­cal con­clu­sion to this is that they secret­ly desire to be raped. Not only is being raped sex­u­al­ly ful­fill­ing for many wom­yn, but in our exist­ing soci­etal order, wom­yn who are raped are show­ered with addi­tion­al atten­tion,” Dai­ly Stormer con­trib­u­tor Lee Rogers wrote. “So in essence, these wom­yn want to ful­fill their rape fan­tasies while simul­ta­ne­ous­ly hav­ing access to extra atten­tion that this ‘vic­tim’ sta­tus pro­vides them.”

    Anglin, in a post stud­ded with pic­tures of women with duct-taped mouths and bound hands and feet, laid out five things peo­ple need to know for “The Upcom­ing Legal­iza­tion of Rape in Amer­i­ca.”

    Anglin’s the­atrics aside, he’s riff­ing on very real con­cerns about the future of women’s and LGBTQ rights. For some on the racist “alt-right,” Kavanaugh’s ascen­sion is seen as part of a larg­er cul­ture — and race — war in Amer­i­ca, with the alt-right and white peo­ple on one side against minori­ties, women and Jew­ish peo­ple. And with Kavanaugh in office, the alt-right thinks it’s win­ning.

    While he writes these over-the-top satires to draw a reac­tion, Anglin fre­quent­ly fol­lows up these posts with calls for the vio­lent exter­mi­na­tion of entire groups of peo­ple. Anglin’s writ­ings on Kavanaugh reflect the atti­tude on the far right toward Kavanaugh and women.
    The Dai­ly Stormer has also aggres­sive­ly pushed an anti-Jew­ish sto­ry line about the Kavanaugh accu­sa­tions, alleg­ing they appeared as part of a plot orches­trat­ed by Jew­ish sen­a­tors and Hun­gar­i­an Amer­i­can phil­an­thropist George Soros. (The Soros con­spir­a­cy has even been echoed in the main­stream by GOP law­mak­ers and pun­dits on Fox News).

    Career racist and anti­semite David Duke also picked up the anti-Jew­ish sto­ry­line, tweet­ing Sun­day:
    Jus­tice Kavanaugh. Thank God you are now on the Supreme Court. Because of the vicious, hate­ful media Cabal and the polit­i­cal ziog­a­rchy, no mat­ter how nobly and bril­liant­ly you serve on the Court, their stain on U and fam­i­ly will nev­er be erased. Nev­er for­get who did this to you!”

    The self-described intel­lec­tu­al force behind the alt-right, Richard Spencer, views Kavanaugh’s con­fir­ma­tion as the lat­est shot in an ongo­ing bat­tle in Amer­i­ca.

    “Under­ly­ing it all is sim­ply an attack on Kavanaugh as a White male,” Spencer tweet­ed Sat­ur­day. “The ‘cul­ture war’ isn’t about ‘hot but­ton’ issues like abor­tion or the death penal­ty. It is a ‘race war,’ which is most­ly non-vio­lent but extreme­ly impact­ful.”

    On the pod­cast “Fash the Nation,” co-host “Jaz­zhands McFeels” claimed that non-white men want to remove white men from pow­er because of their race and gen­der. The fight against Kavanaugh’s nom­i­na­tion was just the lat­est rep­re­sen­ta­tion of that, McFeels said.

    “We’ve been say­ing for the past cou­ple of weeks that the fight against Brett Kavanaugh has been a proxy war on white men,” McFeels said. “White het­ero­sex­u­al men in Amer­i­ca and now it is piv­ot­ing into a war on white women.”

    Not all were thrilled with Kavanaugh after one day on the court.

    On his first day, Kavanaugh hired an all-female crew of law clerks, a slight­ly sur­pris­ing devel­op­ment giv­en his recent his­to­ry with women and sex­u­al-assault alle­ga­tions.

    “Brett Kavanaugh just hired the Supreme Court’s first all-women law clerk team What a fuck­ing fag­got. Already cucked on day one,” GAB user stripe_tobor wrote Mon­day.

    On the most extreme end of the spec­trum sits Gads­den at “The Green Pilled Per­spec­tive” on Radio Wehrwolf. The main issue, Gads­den said in a pod­cast, is Kavanaugh’s tenure in the Bush admin­is­tra­tion.

    “He’s a piece of shit because he was a Bush lawyer. He also wrote the Patri­ot Act and he pret­ty much sup­ports any­thing the Repub­li­can Par­ty sup­ports,” Gads­den said. “That’s enough in itself to say that he’s a piece of crap. That he sup­ports the neo­con GOP. Well, both par­ties are neo­con. It’s Coke ver­sus Pep­si. Either way you’re get­ting poi­soned.”

    GAB user Lawrence Blair saw the law clerks as the first hint that Kavanaugh will not work out as a jus­tice.

    “This is not a good sign,” Blair post­ed Mon­day on the alt-right social media site. “The first day into the office, he caves. As I feared from the begin­ning this man was raised in the Bush’s barn and will behave in like man­ner as the Bush’s.”

    Com­ments, sug­ges­tions or tips? Send them to HWeditor@splcenter.org and fol­low us on Twit­ter @Hatewatch.

    Posted by Mary Benton | October 23, 2018, 4:18 pm
  2. These two Guardian, UK arti­cles talk about how Supreme Court Jus­tice Nom­i­nee, Amy Coney Bar­rett, was a mem­ber of a Secre­tive Chris­t­ian Faith Group that has been crit­i­cized for dom­i­nat­ing the lives of its mem­bers and sub­ju­gat­ing women. The group was char­ac­ter­ized as poten­tial­ly more dan­ger­ous and much more sophis­ti­cat­ed [than a cult],” he said. “It is not the kind of group where sub­mis­sion of women to men means that they have to stay bare­foot and preg­nant. Instead, they have to be lawyers and judges and sub­mis­sive to men at the same time. They have to be able to have a career and sev­en kids at the same time.”

    The con­cerns are that a secre­tive orga­ni­za­tion is the oppo­site of trans­par­ent and it rais­es the ques­tion why do they need to be secre­tive – what are they hid­ing? The sec­ond ques­tion is that if woman are sub­mis­sive in this sect, would she make legal deci­sions that com­pro­mise wom­ens rights that deceased Jus­tice Ruth Bad­er Gins­burg fought for? A third ques­tion is will her reli­gious views dom­i­nate her legal doc­trine. He last ques­tion is her per­spec­tive rep­re­sent the val­ues and wills of the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion? The last ques­tion is more dif­fi­cult to answer, is this type of orga­ni­za­tion that the Under­ground Reich would sup­port due to their sup­port of a sub­mis­sive woman phi­los­o­phy and the fascis­tic Chris­t­ian per­spec­tive?

    The first Guardian, UK arti­cle was writ­ten by Mar­tin Pen­gael­ly Octo­ber, 7 2020 titled “McConnell hits out at Guardian and oth­er media over Amy Coney Bar­rett scruti­ny”

    Revealed: Amy Coney Bar­rett lived in home of secre­tive Chris­t­ian group’s co-founder
    Among McConnell’s tar­gets was a Guardian report which said Bar­rett “lived in the home of one of the founders of the Peo­ple of Praise while she was a law stu­dent, rais­ing new ques­tions about the supreme court nominee’s involve­ment with the secre­tive Chris­t­ian faith group that has been crit­i­cized for dom­i­nat­ing the lives of its mem­bers and sub­ju­gat­ing women”.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/07/mitch-mcconnell-amy-coney-barrett-media?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

    The sec­ond arti­cle “‘It instilled such prob­lems’: ex-mem­ber of Amy Coney Bar­ret­t’s faith group speaks out” sub­ti­tled “For­mer insid­ers and reli­gious schol­ars say scruti­ny of Barrett’s con­nec­tion to Peo­ple of Praise is entire­ly legit­i­mate” by Stephanie Kirch­gaess­ner Octo­ber, 10, 2020 states:

    The 41-year-old had a rebel­lious spir­it and left Peo­ple of Praise when she turned 18. It has tak­en decades of ther­a­py and hard work to over­come the intense feel­ings of shame and fear of damna­tion that she said marked her child­hood. The Chris­t­ian faith group, based in South Bend, Indi­ana, dom­i­nat­ed every aspect of her ear­ly life, she said.

    Democ­rats have already stat­ed that nei­ther Barrett’s Catholic faith nor her mem­ber­ship in the Peo­ple of Praise – which has nev­er pub­licly been dis­cussed or dis­closed, but has been exam­ined in press reports – will be raised in their ques­tion­ing of the nom­i­nee.

    [S]ome reli­gious schol­ars who have stud­ied charis­mat­ic Chris­t­ian com­mu­ni­ties, say Barrett’s mem­ber­ship in this spe­cif­ic reli­gious com­mu­ni­ty does raise legit­i­mate ques­tions. They want to exam­ine how views that are inte­gral to the group’s core beliefs – from its treat­ment of women to the sep­a­ra­tion of church and state – might influ­ence her. They are also dis­tinct from most main­stream Catholic faith.

    In the bi-week­ly and hours-long meet­ings that defined Pow­ers’ child­hood, intense prayer and dis­cus­sions cen­tered on obe­di­ence and dri­ving out sin. Pow­ers, who does not know Bar­rett, fre­quent­ly wit­nessed peo­ple speak­ing in tongues and fren­zied calls for evil spir­its to be expelled, episodes that usu­al­ly led to exor­cisms. 

    “We were Catholic, but the Catholi­cism was on the side. Our life, all of our friends, all of the ran­doms who were liv­ing in our house­hold, were the [Peo­ple of Praise] com­mu­ni­ty. It was God,” she said. “The brain­wash­ing and the group­think, the female sub­ju­ga­tion of being there to serve and lis­ten to your spir­i­tu­al head. It was so devalu­ing. To me, it instilled such prob­lems.”

    Pow­ers’ expe­ri­ences are in line with a hand­book called The Spir­it and Pur­pose of the Peo­ple of Praise, which was obtained by the Guardian and con­firms that peo­ple who seek to be mem­bers of the group are prayed with for the release of “charis­mat­ic gifts” – specif­i­cal­ly, speak­ing in tongues and the gift of “prophe­cy”. It also states: “Obe­di­ence to author­i­ty and sub­mis­sion to head­ship are active respons­es to the gifts of God.”

    Although Bar­rett has not dis­cussed the issue, there is evi­dence that the for­mer Notre Dame law pro­fes­sor served as a trustee for a school affil­i­at­ed with the group; lived in the home of a promi­nent co-founder when she was in law school; and announced the birth of her chil­dren in Peo­ple of Praise’s mag­a­zine, which has removed ref­er­ences to Bar­rett and her fam­i­ly since she joined the fed­er­al bench in 2017.

    The Wash­ing­ton Post report­ed this week that Bar­rett served as a “hand­maid” as late as 2010, a lead­er­ship posi­tion for women in the com­mu­ni­ty, accord­ing to a direc­to­ry.

    Barrett’s father, Mike Coney, who has served in a lead­er­ship posi­tion in the Peo­ple of Praise, described his own deci­sion to join the group in a 2018 tes­ti­mo­ni­al at his Catholic church, describ­ing how he had ini­tial­ly unwill­ing­ly attend­ed a charis­mat­ic sem­i­nar as a young man. “When prayed with for a greater out­pour­ing of the Holy Spir­it, noth­ing hap­pened. Then lat­er that night I began to speak in tongues. More impor­tant­ly, I was filled with an insa­tiable appetite for read­ing scrip­ture and spir­i­tu­al books,” he wrote.

    “I think they’re poten­tial­ly more dan­ger­ous and much more sophis­ti­cat­ed [than a cult],” he said. “It is not the kind of group where sub­mis­sion of women to men means that they have to stay bare­foot and preg­nant. Instead, they have to be lawyers and judges and sub­mis­sive to men at the same time. They have to be able to have a career and sev­en kids at the same time.”

    Far from tak­ing her cues from the Peo­ple of Praise, Csor­das said, Barrett’s biog­ra­phy showed she was not a “mind­less devo­tee” of a cult, but rather part of the elite of the inten­tion­al charis­mat­ic covenant com­mu­ni­ty, reflect­ing her pre­vi­ous sta­tus as a hand­maid­en and trustee of the school, and her father’s lead­er­ship role.

    They want to change a cer­tain under­stand­ing of the lib­er­al order of indi­vid­ual rights, and that is com­ing from the reli­gious world­view of Catholic groups,” he said.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/10/people-of-praise-amy-coney-barrett-faith-group?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

    Posted by Mary Benton | October 10, 2020, 12:56 pm
  3. Some notes on Supreme Court nom­i­nee Amy Coney Bar­rett.

    1. She worked for Scalia and Lawrence Sil­ber­man, who a) sank the Iraq WMD intel inves­ti­ga­tion b) Iran-Con­tra inves­ti­ga­tion and c) was involved with Octo­ber Sur­prise. Like that crowd, she is part of the Fed­er­al­ist Soci­ety. She also worked for Bak­er Botts dur­ing the 2000 Flori­da recount. She would bring to three the num­ber of Bush lawyers on THAT spe­cif­ic issue that serve on the Court: Coney Bar­rett, Roberts, and Kavanagh. That’s f@*#ing incred­i­ble. One-third of the Supreme Court will be Bush lawyers. Let that one sink in...

    2. Her father William Coney is REAL inter­est­ing to me. He was (is?) a long­time Shell Oil lawyer from Metairie, LA, ( home of Car­los Mar­cel­lo), whose entire career seems to be ori­ent­ed towards get­ting big gub­mint to leave them poor oil com­pa­nies alone.

    http://www.lawyerdb.org/Lawyer/Michael-Coney/

    “Michael E. Coney’s col­lege edu­ca­tion includes Uni­ver­si­ty of New Orleans, B.A., 1968, law school degree was from Loy­ola Uni­ver­si­ty, J.D., 1972, Louisiana State Uni­ver­si­ty Law Cen­ter, M.C.L., 1977; Tulane Uni­ver­si­ty, LL.M., Energy/Environmental Law, with dis­tinc­tion, 1995, oth­er bio­graph­i­cal back­ground includes Mem­ber, Loy­ola Law Review, 1972. Law clerk to Hon­or­able James A. Comesky, U.S.D.C. E.D. La. 1972–1975. Guest Speak­er: Louisiana Min­er­al Law Insti­tute; the Hous­ton Bar Asso­ci­a­tion; the Rocky Moun­tain Min­er­al Law Foun­da­tion (“RMMLF”) Insti­tute on Fed­er­al and Indi­an Roy­al­ty Val­u­a­tion and Man­age­ment. Speak­er and Co-Chair: RMMLF Fed­er­al Off­shore Oil & Gas Leas­ing & Devel­op­ment Short Course. Mem­ber: the Amer­i­can Petro­le­um Insti­tute Sub­com­mit­tee of Explo­ration and Pro­duc­tion Law, 1987–2007. Chair­man, Off­shore Oper­a­tions Com­mit­tee Legal Sub­com­mit­tee, 1987–2007. Appoint­ed Indus­try Rep­re­sen­ta­tive by Sec­re­tary of the inte­ri­or to Min­er­als Man­age­ment Ser­vice Roy­al­ty Pol­i­cy Com­mit­tee, 2004–2007. For­mer Trustee, Rocky Moun­tain Min­er­al Law Foun­da­tion. For­mer Attor­ney, Shell Oil Com­pa­ny, 1978–2007..”

    Coney was a law clerk for James A. Comiskey (mis­spelled above in that bio), who was a major play­er in New Orleans through the 60s and beyond. Incred­i­bly well-con­nect­ed indi­vid­ual. Anoth­er con­ser­v­a­tive Catholic who was not only a lawyer and judge, but a banker with ties to mul­ti­ple Louisiana banks. He was also on the City Coun­cil in the ear­ly 60s and ran for May­or in ’62. As judge, he a) sealed Marcello’s 1970 indict­ment for immi­gra­tion fraud and b) was the judge who required Gor­don Nov­el to return to Louisiana to pur­sue his civ­il case against Gar­ri­son, which would cause him to be arrest­ed for his raid on the muni­tion depot in Houma.

    https://www.laed.uscourts.gov/court-history/judges/comiskey

    Comiskey’s father was a boot­leg­ger in the 30s and then became a NOLA tax asses­sor for the last 38 years of his life! It is very “Noo Awl­ins” to have an orga­nized crime fig­ure go on to run a tax office and have his son go on to be a fed­er­al judge (appoint­ed by LBJ in ear­ly ’67). This arti­cle is amaz­ing. Click on mag­ni­fy­ing glass to bet­ter read the pages.

    ROUS­ES_NovDec2019_­Mag­a­zine-Pages

    https://yourgms.cld.bz/ROUSES-NovDec2019-Magazine-Pages2/49/

    The younger Comiskey also was put on a three-judge pan­el to hear Clay Shaw’s effort to get his tri­al moved to Fed­er­al court. I was unable to find what his opin­ions or votes were on these mat­ters. He was also the judge that sealed Mar­cel­lo’s 1970 indict­ment when the gov­ern­ment was try­ing to deport him.

    http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/White%20%20Files/Garrison/Garrison-Chronology/Garrison-Dates.pdf

    To sum it up:

    Coney Bar­ret­t’s father, a right-wing Catholic, worked as a law clerk in New Orleans from 1972–75 for a right-wing Catholic judge who made rul­ings in cas­es involv­ing both Gor­don Nov­el and Car­los Mar­cel­lo in pre­vi­ous years. This same judge was born to a father who ran a sig­nif­i­cant chunk of the New Orleans boot­leg under­world of the 20s and 30s, then ran a tax asses­sor dis­trict for the final 38 years of his life.

    Michael Coney then goes into the oil biz for decades, and his daugh­ter grows up to work for Scalia, Sil­ber­man, GWB, Bak­er Botts and then, onto the Supreme Court. Small world, right?

    Posted by CinqueAnon | November 29, 2020, 4:54 pm

Post a comment

ESSENTIAL BACKGROUND

Martin BormannMartin Borman, Nazi in Exile by Paul Manning. German corporate capital flight program in the waning years of WWII.
Available for download. Read more about the Bormann Organizaton »