The O.J. Simp­son case as a “Psy-Op” had many facets. It not only polar­ized the races but it served to embed into the pub­lic con­scious­ness the con­cept of “junk sci­ence” which had not, up until that time, received much atten­tion. Through­out the tri­al the defense and pros­e­cu­tion would put forth expert wit­ness­es with impec­ca­ble cre­den­tials on both sides who cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly stat­ed the exact oppo­site con­cern­ing the same issue. This made peo­ple believe sci­ence was sim­ply a mat­ter of opin­ion. Where­as pre­vi­ous­ly a sci­en­tif­ic fact was syn­ony­mous with “the truth”, dur­ing the O.J. Simp­son tri­al, mil­lions of peo­ple around the world saw how sci­en­tists and so called expert wit­ness­es would say what­ev­er they were paid to say and this made sci­ence as a whole “untrust­wor­thy”.

Like a snow­ball rolling down the moun­tain the seed of doubt has gain strength and momen­tum with the years lead­ing towards a new Dark Age, as Mr. Emory has men­tioned in sev­er­al of his broad­casts. When you erode peo­ple’s abil­i­ty for ratio­nal think­ing, log­ic and sci­en­tif­ic rea­son­ing you end up with a mass of men who are will­ing to believe just about any­thing hence the resur­gence of super­sti­tion, UFOs, New Age reli­gions and cre­ation­ism as a sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly valid the­o­ry.

Igno­rant and super­sti­tious peo­ple are easy to manip­u­late and I’m not say­ing the O.J. Simp­son tri­al accom­plished this all by itself but it was cer­tain­ly anoth­er brick in the wall.

I think OJ Simp­son is inno­cent. Ron Gold­man had a huge bruise on his hand from strik­ing a blow on an assailant. OJ was not struck. Con­nie Dial worked for narcotics–why was she at the crime scene.