Listen:
MP3 One Segment
1. Further developing a line of inquiry pursued for the last couple of years, this broadcast examines the role of corporate Germany in controlling internet content.
2. The title of the program derives from a Third Reich organization of returned German émigrés. “The Kameradschaft’s main task was to help German nationals from America (the Ruckwanderers, or returnees) resettle in the Fatherland. It also served as a kind of shadow intelligence agency . . . The full extent of Kameradschaft activity will never be known, since a substantial part of the files concerning Ruckwanderers from around the world ‘was either destroyed or has never been recovered.’” (Dreamer of the Day: Francis Parker Yockey and the Postwar Fascist International, Autonomedia, copyright 1999, p. 114.)
3. This organization worked with the better-known German-American Bund and served as a “kind of shadow intelligence agency.” (Idem.)
4. The founder of the organization, Fritz Gissibl, was an SS officer and worked for a Nazi publishing house. “ ‘Upon his return to Germany, Gissibl was considered for a position at the DAI. Though never a full-time member of the staff, he worked with the leadership of the Institute and established the Kameradschaft-USA in 1938. He also held a position in the Tarnungsverlag (Stuttgart), a Nazi publishing house; in 1937, he was appointed SS Haupsturmfuhrer (captain), and after 1941 he was an SS Obersturmbannfuhrer [lieutenant colonel] (SS number 309, 051).’” (Ibid., p. 120.)
5. The broadcast’s title is an obvious pun, based on Gissibl’s organization. One should note that Gissibl’s background is not altogether dissimilar from that of Heinrich Mohn, the patriarch of the German Bertelsmann firm, a central element of the discussion in FTR-242.
6. Mohn was in the SS and the firm was the largest publisher of books for both the SS and the Wehrmacht during World War II (The Nation, 12/28/98).
7. Discussion begins with an article about a Bertelsmann high-tech venture capital arm called BV Capital. (Wall Street Journal, 7/5/2000, p. C19.)
8. Headed by Jan Buettner, the firm is linked to numerous American and German institutions, and is deeply involved with the financing of second and third generation internet technology. (Idem.)
9. Next, the program underscores the point that Bertelsmann is merging its e‑commerce activities into a single entity, emphasizing its shift in strategy toward providing internet content. (Financial Times, 6/5/2000, p.21.)
10. It has been noted that Amazon.com’s waning economic fortunes may render its on-line book sales division vulnerable to acquisition by Bertelsmann. Recent speculation by market analysts suggests that Amazon’s on-line music business may be similarly vulnerable. (Financial Times, 7/28/2000.)
11. Bertelsmann’s recent three-way deal with Spanish telecommunications giant Telefonica and internet company Lycos gives it “preferred content” status on two of the largest internet portals (AOL and Lycos.) (The New York Times, 5/16/2000, P. C1.)
12. The access of Bertelsmann content in Latin America, in particular, will be greatly enhanced by the Telefonica-Lycos deal. (Financial Times, 5/17/2000.)
13. Telefonica chairman Juan Villalonga predicted that Terra-Lycos would overtake Yahoo as the number two internet portal. (Financial Times, 6/9/2000, p. 23.)
14. Telefonica has also hired Martin Bangemann, a German, who had been employed as a European Commissioner. (The Financial Times, 5/20–21/2000, p. 7.)
15. Frequently overlooked is the EU’s capacity to block mergers by American companies. Recently, Microsoft abandoned its purchase of Telewest, a British telecommunications firm, as a result of a threat by the European Union to block the acquisition. (Wall Street Journal, 7/5/2000, p.A3; Wall Street Journal, 7/8/2000, p. C1.) In addition to representing a fundamental incursion on American sovereignty (the United States is not represented in the European Union), the EU’s influence on American corporate practice can serve as a vehicle for German economic hegemony. (Mr. Emory’s observations in this context should not be misinterpreted as an endorsement of economic globalization or concentration of economic power. Rather, they should be understood as analysis of the geo-political implications of undercurrents within these important, and on-going, economic phenomena.)
16. In addition to pressure from the U.S. Department of Justice over potential monopolistic overtones to the deal, the recent cancellation of the WorldCom-Sprint merger stemmed, in part, from opposition by the EU. This cancellation may facilitate the takeover of either WorldCom or Sprint by Deutsche Telekom, the former German telephone monopoly. Deutsche Telekom is looking to enter the American telecommunications market. (The New York Times, 6/27/2000, p. C2.) When considering German corporate policy, one should remember the relationship between corporate Germany and the deadly Bormann organization, the economic component of a Third Reich gone underground.
17. The hiring of Bangemann will no doubt enhance Telefonica. Lycos recently announced the formation of a 12-channel on-line TV capability, aimed largely at the children’s viewing market. (The San Jose Mercury News, 5/16/2000, p. 3C.)
18. German internet company T‑Online (a subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom) is looking to buy-out Walt Disney’s 25 percent stake in Infoseek Deutschland. (CBS MarketWatch.com, 7/7/2000.)
19. German publishers Von Holtzbrinck and Axel Springer Verlag (a Bertelsmann subsidiary) own a 25 percent stake in Infoseek Deutschland. (Idem.) If consummated, this deal will be the second recent example of “cuddling up” between Disney and corporate Germany.
20. In FTR 240, Mr. Emory discussed Random House (the largest English-language publishing company in the world, and a Bertelsmann property), and its acquisition of exclusive rights from the Disney corporation to publish books based on characters in Disney films. (The Wall Street Journal, 5/8/2000, p. B2.)
21. As noted by Mr. Emory in numerous programs, major German corporations are linked to each other, and controlled by the Bormann group. American corporations are driven by the profit motive, and coordinate policies on labor, environmental, marketing and taxation issues–they are otherwise apolitical. In contrast, German corporations (under control of the Bormann group) function as coordinated elements of international political control, not unlike the divisions in an army. In that context, one should note that German insurance giant Allianz is working on developing an “internet offensive,” developing technology with Cisco systems. (Financial Times, 5/20–21/2000, p. 24.)
22. Allianz is the sixth largest financial company in the world, was deeply involved with the Third Reich and has resisted the compensation of Holocaust victims. (The Los Angeles Times, 6/1/2000, p. C‑1.)
Discussion
No comments for “FTR #242 Dot.Kameradschaft USA: German Corporate Control Over the Internet”