Spitfire List Web site and blog of anti-fascist researcher and radio personality Dave Emory.

For The Record  

FTR #790 Now, About that Malaysian Airliner . . . .

Dave Emory’s entire life­time of work is avail­able on a flash dri­ve that can be obtained here. (The flash dri­ve includes the anti-fas­cist books avail­able on this site.)

Lis­ten: MP3

Side 1  Side 2

Intro­duc­tion: The pro­gram presents analy­sis of the “mys­tery” sur­round­ing the dis­ap­pear­ance of Malaysian Air­lines Flight 370.

Nev­er have we seen the news media–The Min­istry of Truth in the most lit­er­al, Orwellian sense–behave more shame­ful­ly. (We admit that their white­wash­ing of the out­right fas­cists and Nazi/OUN/B heirs in the Ukraine might equal the cov­er-up of the appar­ent­ly will­ful destruc­tion of Malaysian Air­lines Flight 370.)

The same Islamist/Muslim Broth­er­hood ele­ments fig­ure into this inves­ti­ga­tion as into 9/11 and–most recently–the Boston Marathon bomb­ing.

The pro­gram also takes a high­ly spec­u­la­tive look at the recent stow­away by a young Soma­li Mus­lim in the wheel well of a jet air­lin­er at San Jose Air­port. A strange sto­ry, the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood fig­ures promi­nent­ly in the back­ground of the event. (We empha­size that we are NOT cast­ing asper­sions on the young fel­low, but ask­ing if he may have been cyn­i­cal­ly manip­u­lat­ed by jihadist/Muslim Broth­er­hood ele­ments test­ing a “dry run” for a pos­si­ble attack.)

Pro­gram High­lights Include:

  • The Malaysian Air­lines plane was pilot­ed by Capt. Zaharie Ahmad Shah, a com­mit­ted fol­low­er and polit­i­cal asso­ciate of Anwar Ibrahim, a key Malaysian Mus­lim Broth­er.
  • The plane was almost cer­tain­ly divert­ed from with­in, by some­one with con­sid­er­able exper­tise.
  • The flight sim­u­la­tor in Shah’s home had data erased from it.
  • Anwar Ibrahim–Shah’s polit­i­cal idol–was a founder of the Inter­na­tion­al Insti­tute of Islam­ic Thought, a Mus­lim Broth­er­hood front that was inves­ti­gat­ed in con­nec­tion with the Oper­a­tion Green Quest raids of 3/20/2002.
  • Ibrahim is part of the polit­i­cal milieu of GOP big­wig Grover Norquist.
  • Key Bin Laden asso­ciate Tarik Ham­di was employed by IIIT.
  • The day the plane dis­ap­peared, pilot Shah’s men­tor and idol was sen­tenced to five years in prison for sodomy.
  • The New York Times, among oth­ers, has obfus­cat­ed the sin­is­ter polit­i­cal real­i­ty and con­nec­tions of Shah and Ibrahim.A
  • Among the pas­sen­gers was a Uighur pro­fes­sor who had tak­en flight train­ing and was work­ing in Turkey.
  • Links of Suhaib Webb–the for­mer Imam of the Mosque in San­ta Clara to which the Soma­li wheel well boy belonged–to the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood and Anwar al-Awla­ki.
  • Evi­den­tiary trib­u­taries link­ing Webb to the milieu of the Tsar­naevs and the Boston Marathon bomb­ing.
  • The role of CAIR–a Mus­lim Broth­er­hood front organization–in pub­lic rep­re­sen­ta­tion of the wheel well stoway and his fam­i­ly.
  • Review of the pos­i­tive view of the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood held  by mem­bers of the intel­li­gence and cor­po­rate com­mu­ni­ties.

1. The plane was pilot­ed by Capt. Zaharie Ahmad Shah, a com­mit­ted fol­low­er and polit­i­cal asso­ciate of Anwar Ibrahim, a key Malaysian Mus­lim Broth­er.

“Malaysian Oppo­si­tion Leader Calls Spec­u­la­tion About Pilot of Miss­ing Jet ‘Absurd’ ” by Robert Mack­ey [The Lede]; The New York Times; 3/21/2014.

Malaysia’s oppo­si­tion leader, Anwar Ibrahim, dis­missed spec­u­la­tion that the pilot of the miss­ing Malaysia Air­lines jet, a sup­port­er of his move­ment for demo­c­ra­t­ic change, might have hijacked the plane for polit­i­cal rea­sons, in an inter­view with Britain’s Chan­nel 4 News on Fri­day.

As The Lede explained on Wednes­day, the pilot, Capt. Zaharie Ahmad Shah, was report­ed­ly described by an unnamed gov­ern­ment offi­cial as a “fanat­i­cal” sup­port­er of Mr. Ibrahim, a remark that was wide­ly mis­in­ter­pret­ed by jour­nal­ists and blog­gers.

Speak­ing to the Chan­nel 4 cor­re­spon­dent Jonathan Rug­man, Mr. Ibrahim crit­i­cized the Malaysian government’s han­dling of the inves­ti­ga­tion into the miss­ing Flight 370 as “clear incom­pe­tence” and said that any attempt “to cast asper­sions on the pilot pure­ly on the basis of polit­i­cal lean­ings is absurd.” Cap­tain Zaharie was, accord­ing to Mr. Ibrahim, “very pas­sion­ate about free­dom and democ­ra­cy,” and “a good pro­fes­sion­al pilot,” who sim­ply did not fit the pro­file of an Islamist rad­i­cal. . . .

2a. The plane was almost cer­tainly divert­ed from with­in, by some­one with con­sid­er­able exper­tise.

“Malaysia Asks F.B.I. For Help in Plane Case” by Chris Buck­ley and Michael Schmidt; The New York Times; 3/20/2014.

. . . . As the pos­si­ble break in what had been a fruit­less search was being pur­sued, the Malaysian author­i­ties were seek­ing help from the F.B.I. to help retrieve delet­ed com­put­er data from a home­made flight sim­u­la­tor belong­ing to the cap­tain of the Malaysia Air­lines jet that van­ished 11 days ago, their first request for high-lev­el Amer­i­can assis­tance in solv­ing the mys­tery of the miss­ing plane. . . .

. . . . Inves­ti­ga­tors have said the plane’s extra­or­di­nary diver­sion from its intend­ed course was prob­a­bly car­ried out by some­one who had avi­a­tion expe­ri­ence. The Malaysian police, who found that Mr. Zaharie had built a flight sim­u­la­tor at his home, said Wednes­day that some data had been erased from the sim­u­la­tor on Feb. 3, more than a month before the ill-fat­ed flight.

Evi­dence sug­gests that who­ev­er divert­ed the plane knew how to dis­able its com­mu­ni­ca­tions sys­tems and pro­gram course changes, and the data record­ed in the pilot’s flight sim­u­la­tor may shed light on whether he was involved.[This can only be done from with­in the plane’s cockpit.–D.E.] . . .

2b. More about the delib­er­ate diver­sion of the plane from with­in the cock­pit:

“Chi­na Rules Out Ter­ror Ties Among Cit­i­zens on Jet” by Chris Buck­ley and Kei­th Brad­sh­er; The New York Times; 3/19/2014.

. . . . Amer­i­can offi­cials said on Mon­day that the sharp turn to the west that took the plane from its planned north­east­ward flight path was achieved using a com­put­er sys­tem on the plane, and that the turn was most like­ly pro­grammed into it by some­one in the cock­pit who was knowl­edge­able about air­plane sys­tems. . . .

3. Anwar Ibrahim–Shah’s polit­i­cal idol–was a founder of the Inter­na­tional Insti­tute of Islam­ic Thought, a Mus­lim Broth­er­hood front that was inves­ti­gated in con­nec­tion with the Oper­a­tion Green Quest raids of 3/20/2002.

Slate White­wash­es Mus­lim Broth­er­hood Ties of Malaysian Pol ‘Fanat­i­cal­ly’ Sup­port­ed by Pilot of Miss­ing Plane” by Robert Spencer; Jihad Watch; 3/17/2014.

Here is real­i­ty: “Anwar Ibrahim’s ties to the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood run deep. Ibrahim helped estab­lish the Inter­na­tion­al Insti­tute for Islam­ic Thought, or IIIT, a Mus­lim Broth­er­hood front group in the Unit­ed States. IIIT has come under fire for their con­nec­tions with ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tions.

In 2002, Anwar Ibrahim’s IIIT was includ­ed in a law­suit by vic­tims of 9/11 seek­ing dam­ages from orga­ni­za­tions linked to ‘ren­der­ing mate­r­i­al sup­port to rad­i­cal Islamism.’ In 2003, US gov­ern­ment pros­e­cu­tors ‘sub­mit­ted court doc­u­ments detail­ing finan­cial sup­port (PDF) from the IIIT for con­vict­ed Pales­tin­ian Islam­ic Jihad fundrais­er Sami al-Ari­an.’ They also found that Taha Jaber al-Alwani, the pres­i­dent of IIIT had once stat­ed via a fat­wa that ‘jihad is the only way to lib­er­ate Pales­tine.’ A US Cus­toms offi­cial said that the gov­ern­ment is also look­ing into the pos­si­bil­i­ty that IIIT was involved in ‘ter­ror­ism-relat­ed mon­ey laun­der­ing activ­i­ties.’” . . . .

4. The IIT employed Tarik Ham­di, an oper­a­tional asso­ciate of Osama bin Laden.

“Inter­na­tion­al Insti­tute of Islam­ic Thought”; Wikipedia.com.

. . . . Tarik Ham­di came to the Unit­ed States and applied for cit­i­zen­ship pro­vid­ing false information.[30][31] Ham­di worked for Sami Al-Ari­an, who con­fessed to pro­vid­ing assis­tance to the PIJ (Pales­tin­ian Islam­ic Jihad) and lat­er worked for IIIT.

In May 1998 ABC News in pur­suit of an inter­view with Bin Laden had com­mu­ni­cat­ed with Moham­mad Atef and were direct­ed to Tarik Ham­di as a per­son who could con­nect them to Osama Bin Laden. ABC con­nect­ed with Tarik Ham­di at his place of employ­ment at IIIT. ABC was able to get the inter­view. Ham­di was able to deliv­er a Satel­lite phone bat­tery pack that accord­ing to fed­er­al agents was used three months lat­er in the bomb­ing of Amer­i­can embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.[32]

It took until 2005 for Tarik A. Ham­di, who was employed as a pub­lish­er at IIIT, to be charged in a fed­er­al affi­davit of hav­ing been the “Amer­i­can con­tact” for one of Osama bin-Laden’s front organisations.[33][34] . . .

5. Ibrahim was jailed just hours before the plane “dis­ap­peared.”

” ‘Democ­ra­cy is Dead’: ‘Fanat­i­cal’ Miss­ing Air­lin­er Pilot Pic­tured Wear­ing Polit­i­cal Slo­gan T‑shirt” by Simon Par­ry, Aman­da Par­ry and Wills Robin­son; Dai­ly Mail; 3/16/2014.

. . . . Cap­tain Zaharie Ahmad Shah, a father-of-three, was said to be a ‘fanat­i­cal’ sup­port­er of the coun­try’s oppo­si­tion leader Anwar Ibrahim — jailed for homo­sex­u­al­i­ty just hours before the jet dis­ap­peared.

It has also been revealed that the pilot’s wife and three chil­dren moved out of the fam­i­ly home the day before the plane went miss­ing.

...Capt­ian Shah was an ‘obses­sive’ sup­port­er of Ibrahim. And hours before the doomed flight left Kuala Lumpur it is under­stood 53-year-old Shah attend­ed a con­tro­ver­sial tri­al in which Ibrahim was jailed for five years.

Cam­paign­ers say the politi­cian, the key chal­lenger to Malaysia’s rul­ing par­ty, was the vic­tim of a long-run­ning smear cam­paign and had faced trumped-up charges.

Police sources have con­firmed that Shah was a vocal polit­i­cal activist – and fear that the court deci­sion left him pro­found­ly upset. It was against this back­ground that, sev­en hours lat­er, he took con­trol of a Boe­ing 777–200 bound for Bei­jing and car­ry­ing 238 pas­sen­gers and crew.

...

Zaharie’s co-work­ers have told inves­ti­ga­tors the vet­er­an pilot was a social activist who was vocal and fer­vent in his sup­port of Ibrahim.
‘Col­leagues made it clear to us that he was some­one who held strong polit­i­cal beliefs and was stri­dent in his sup­port for Anwar Ibrahim,’ anoth­er inves­ti­ga­tion source said. ‘We were told by one col­league he was obsessed with pol­i­tics.’

In their inter­views, col­leagues said Zaharie told them he planned to attend the court case involv­ing Anwar on March 7, just hours before the Bei­jing flight, but inves­ti­ga­tors had not yet been able to con­firm if he was among the crowd of Anwar sup­port­ers at court.

...Malaysian offi­cials ini­tial­ly appeared keen not to direct any sus­pi­cion towards Zaharie or his co-pilot, 27-year-old Fariq Abdul Hamid, who was last week revealed to have invit­ed two women pas­sen­gers into the cock­pit and smoked on an ear­li­er flight to Phuket.

But evi­dence of the way the plane’s transpon­der and com­mu­ni­ca­tion sys­tems were dis­abled and the way the plane was expert­ly flown over the Indi­an Ocean appar­ent­ly using nav­i­ga­tion­al way­points meant only a skilled avi­a­tor could have been at the con­trols. Inves­ti­ga­tors were also baf­fled by why, if hijack­ers took over the plane, there was no May­day call or sig­nal from the two pilots to say the cock­pit had been breached. . . . .

6. Ibrahim was net­worked with Janus-Mer­ritt Strate­gies, found­ed by Grover Norquist, who found­ed the Islam­ic Free Mar­ket Insti­tute. Norquist’s milieu is inex­tri­ca­bly linked with the insti­tu­tions tar­get­ed by the Oper­a­tion Green Quest raids of 3/20/2002.

“Janus-Mer­ritt Strate­gies”; Wikipedia.com

. . . . Janus-Mer­ritt Strate­gies was a lob­by­ing firm found­ed in 1997 by con­ser­v­a­tive activist Grover Norquist and then-lawyer David Safa­vian, who lat­er became bet­ter known as the chief of staff in the Gen­er­al Ser­vices Admin­is­tra­tion and for his con­vic­tion in the Abramoff-Reed Indi­an lob­by­ing scan­dal. . . .

. . . . On Decem­ber 17, 2001, eleven months after Safa­vian’s depar­ture, Janus resub­mit­ted its dis­clo­sure forms. This time the name of [con­vict­ed ter­ror­ist Abdu­rah­man] Alam­ou­di had been replaced by the name of Dr. Jamal al Barz­in­ji, who is also notable as a vice pres­i­dent of the Inter­na­tion­al Insti­tute of Islam­ic Thought (IIIT).[citation need­ed] Norquist has refused to release tax records of the firm for the peri­od dur­ing which he and Safa­vian owned the company.[citation need­ed]

Safa­vian told the Sen­ate that al Barz­in­ji, not Alam­ou­di, was his client. “Al Barz­in­ji,” he said, “should have been list­ed as the client retain­ing the firm for work relat­ed to Malaysian polit­i­cal pris­on­er Anwar Ibrahim,” refer­ring to the deposed prime min­is­ter of Malaysia, who also was a co-founder of the IIIT. . . .

7. We’ve heard sus­pi­cions about pos­si­ble Uighur involv­ment in the plane’s dis­ap­pear­ance. With a recent knife attack on Han Chi­nese and the num­ber of Chi­nese onboard, a detail stands out. A Uighur who was a pro­fes­sor in Turkey AND took flight sim­u­la­tion cours­es is an inter­est­ing sus­pect, to say the least... Won­der if he was unin­ter­est­ed in the “how to take off and land” por­tions of the course? For more about the use of Uighurs as jihadist proxy-war­riors in the oil and min­er­al rich Xin­jiang province, see–among oth­er pro­grams–FTR #‘s 348, 550, 635, 636.

“Miss­ing Malaysia Air­lines Jet: Inves­ti­ga­tion Pay­ing ‘Spe­cial Atten­tion’ to Chi­nese Uighur Pas­sen­ger” by Lind­say Mur­doch; Syd­ney Morn­ing Her­ald; 3/13/2014.

Police inves­ti­gat­ing the back­grounds of all 239 peo­ple aboard the miss­ing Malaysia Air­lines flight are pay­ing “spe­cial atten­tion” to a 35 year-old Chi­nese Uighur man who under­took flight sim­u­la­tion train­ing, accord­ing to a report in a lead­ing Malay lan­guage news­pa­per in Kuala Lumpur.

The Uighurs Mus­lim eth­nic minor­i­ty group from the north-west­ern Chi­nese province of Xin­jiang have been bat­tling for inde­pen­dence since they were brought under Chi­nese con­trol in 1949, claim­ing they are oppressed by China’s author­i­tar­i­an gov­ern­ment and face reli­gious restric­tions and wide­spread dis­crim­i­na­tion.

Ear­li­er this month the Uighurs, who make up 45 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion of Xin­jiang, were blamed for a vio­lent attack at a Chi­nese train sta­tion.
At least 100 peo­ple have been killed in the past year in vio­lent clash­es between Uighurs and Chi­nese secu­ri­ty forces.
The Har­i­an Metro news­pa­per quot­ed an unnamed source as say­ing the man is not a sus­pect over the plane’s dis­ap­pear­ance but that inves­ti­ga­tors were delv­ing into his back­ground.

Accord­ing to the source the man has a PHD from a uni­ver­si­ty in Britain was recent­ly worked as a lec­tur­er at a uni­ver­si­ty in Turkey.
The source said he under­took flight sim­u­la­tion train­ing in Swe­den in around 2006. . . .

8. A spec­u­la­tive ele­ment con­cerns a young Soma­li refugee who snuck into the wheel­well of a jet at San Jose Air­port. Pin­ing to return to his moth­er in a camp in Ethiopia, the young man is a Mus­lim who attends a Broth­er­hood-con­nect­ed mosque in San­ta Clara. Com­mu­ni­ca­tions on behalf of the fam­i­ly have been con­duct­ed by the Coun­cil on Amer­i­can-Islam­ic Rela­tions, revealed in court doc­u­ments as a Mus­lim Broth­er­hood front orga­ni­za­tion. Note: we are not nec­es­sar­i­ly impugn­ing the integri­ty of the boy–we are won­der­ing if this appar­ent­ly vul­ner­a­ble and impres­sion­able young fel­low was being manip­u­lat­ed by Islamists, per­haps doing “test­ing” for a future inci­dent. We won­der if the dis­ap­pear­ance of the Malaysian plane may also have been a “test” or a “dry run.”

  • There are a num­ber of strange aspects to the sto­ry: The boy was osten­si­bly try­ing to get to Ethiopia to vis­it his moth­er. Stow­ing away on a plane bound for Hawaii seems to be “the long way ’round” for such a jour­ney.
  • Many who have stowed away in a wheel well have died of cold and/or lack of oxy­gen. How did this young fel­low sur­vive?
  • Was he, per­haps, a “dry run” for a future inci­dent, in which a ter­ror­ist wear­ing an explo­sive belt might bring down an air­lin­er?

“Stoway: San­ta Clara Teen’s Dad Arrives in Hon­olu­lu” by Oskar Gar­cia; San­ta Cruz Sen­tinel; 4/29/2014.

. . . . A spokes­woman for the Coun­cil on Amer­i­can-Islam­ic Rela­tions in San Fran­cis­co who had been speak­ing for the fam­i­ly declined com­ment beyond reit­er­at­ing a state­ment ear­li­er this week that Yusuf want­ed to see his son soon.

Abdi sur­vived a 5½-hour flight from San Jose, Calif., to Maui after hop­ping an air­port fence and climb­ing into the wheel well of a Boe­ing 767. He has not spo­ken pub­licly about the ordeal that raised ques­tions about air­port secu­ri­ty and revealed the per­son­al fam­i­ly dra­ma of a Soma­li immi­grant strug­gling to adjust to life in the Unit­ed States.

Abdi, who lives in San­ta Clara, Calif., with his father, step­moth­er and sib­lings, had been unhap­py in Cal­i­for­nia and des­per­ate­ly missed his moth­er, accord­ing to those who know his fam­i­ly. . . . .

9. Abdi wor­shipped at  Mus­lim Com­mu­ni­ty Asso­ci­a­tion Islam­ic Cen­ter in San­ta Clara, the Imam of which was asso­ci­at­ed with the Islam­ic com­mu­ni­ty in Boston to which the Tsar­naev broth­ers belonged. Suhaib Webb was also an asso­ciate of Anwar al-Awla­ki, an al-Qae­da asso­ciate.

“Stow­away: Father of 15-Year-Old San­ta Clara Boy ‘Thanked God’ He Is Safe” by Julia Prodis Sulek, Robert Salon­ga, Mark Gomez and Josh Rich­man; San Jose Mer­cury News; 4/23/2014.

. . . . He said he saw his son Fri­day after­noon while the fam­i­ly prayed togeth­er. They wor­ship at the Mus­lim Com­mu­ni­ty Asso­ci­a­tion Islam­ic Cen­ter in San­ta Clara, which has been buzzing with the news of the stow­away. . . .

10. More about the Suhaib Webb/Anwar al-Awlak­i/T­sar­naev milieu:

“Boston Imam Shared Ties with Senior Al-Qai­da Oper­a­tive” by Patrick How­ley; The Dai­ly Caller; 6/27/2013.

. . . . Pri­or to the Boston Marathon attack, Dzhokhar Tsar­naev, who attend­ed the Islam­ic Soci­ety of Boston mosque in Cam­bridge, down­loaded rad­i­cal Islam­ic pro­pa­gan­da from the Inter­net, includ­ing mate­ri­als authored by Anwar al-Awla­ki, the senior al Qae­da oper­a­tive who was killed in a U.S. drone strike in Yemen on Sep­tem­ber 30, 2011. Tsar­naev also down­loaded a sum­mer 2010 edi­tion of the al Qae­da mag­a­zine “Inspire,” which includ­ed bomb-mak­ing instruc­tions and which is thought to have been the work of al-Awla­ki.

Al-Awla­ki lived in the Unit­ed States between 1990 and 2002, when he moved to the Unit­ed King­dom before even­tu­al­ly relo­cat­ing to Yemen, where he where worked for al-Qae­da and pro­duced pro­pa­gan­da tapes and oth­er mate­ri­als urg­ing Mus­lims to com­mit ter­ror­ist attacks against the Unit­ed States.

Suhaib Webb, imam of the Islam­ic Soci­ety of Boston Cul­tur­al Cen­ter in Rox­bury, spoke along­side al-Awla­ki at a Sep­tem­ber 9, 2001 fundrais­er at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia at Irvine, accord­ing to FBI sur­veil­lance doc­u­ments. The fundrais­er was intend­ed to raise mon­ey for the legal defense of H. Rap Brown, an Atlanta-based Islam­ic rad­i­cal who shot and killed two Geor­gia police offi­cers. Webb and al-Awla­ki helped raise $100,000 to defend Brown, who was even­tu­al­ly con­vict­ed for his crimes.

“Webb and Aula­ki may be asso­ci­at­ed with the Mus­lim Amer­i­can Soci­ety,” accord­ing to the sur­veil­lance doc­u­ments, which were pre­pared to inves­ti­gate the uncon­firmed pos­si­bil­i­ty that al-Awla­ki pur­chased plane tick­ets for some of the 9/11 hijack­ers. . . .

. . . . The Islam­ic Soci­ety of Boston (ISB) in Cam­bridge, which Tsar­naev attend­ed, and its 2009 expan­sion the Islam­ic Soci­ety of Boston Cul­tur­al Cen­ter (ISBCC) in Rox­bury, where Webb is imam, are both part of the same enti­ty under the same own­er­ship and deci­sion-mak­ing author­i­ties, accord­ing to close observers of the Boston Mus­lim com­mu­ni­ty and deeds obtained by TheDC.

“The deeds to both mosques are owned and held by the same exact group, the Islam­ic Soci­ety of Boston Trust, which is the offi­cial own­er of those mosques and has final say in the deci­sions of both. They try to put dif­fer­ence between the two, because when one gets in trou­ble they try to shield the oth­er one, but in real­i­ty they are both the same enti­ty,” said Ilya Feok­tis­tov, research direc­tor of Amer­i­cans for Peace and Tol­er­ance, which flagged the con­nec­tion between Webb and al-Awla­ki.

The ISBCC is run by the Mus­lim Amer­i­can Soci­ety, which counts ISB imam Sheikh Basy­ouny Nehela as a mem­ber of the board of direc­tors of its Boston chap­ter.

The Mus­lim Amer­i­can Soci­ety was found­ed in 1993 after secret region­al meet­ings of under­ground Mus­lim Broth­er­hood mem­bers across the Unit­ed States. The U.S. Mus­lim Broth­er­hood report­ed­ly “oper­at­ed under the name Mus­lim Amer­i­can Soci­ety.”

Mus­lim Amer­i­can Soci­ety lead­ers were instruct­ed to state, if asked about the group’s views on ter­ror­ism, that the Soci­ety was anti-ter­ror­ism but that jihad was one of a Muslim’s “divine legal rights” for both self-defense and for the spread­ing of Islam. . . .

11. In FTR #773, we looked at the rela­tion­ship between “ex” CIA offi­cer Gra­ham E. Fuller and the Tsar­naev fam­i­ly, as well as “ex” CIA offi­cer Bri­an Glyn Williams and Dzokhar Tsar­naev. It appears that the Tsar­naevs may well have been involved with a West­ern intel­li­gence oper­a­tion in the Cau­ca­sus.

12. In addi­tion to the appar­ent use of Mus­lim Brotherhood/Islamist ele­ments as proxy war­riors against Rus­sia and Chi­na, the Broth­er­hood’s cor­po­ratist eco­nom­ics are beloved to Gra­ham Fuller, as well as cor­po­rate ele­ments cdham­pi­oned by Grover Norquist.

“Chech­nyan Pow­er” by Mark Ames; nsfwcorp.com; 6/5/2013.

. . . Fuller comes from that fac­tion of CIA Cold War­riors who believed (and still appar­ently believe) that fun­da­men­tal­ist Islam, even in its rad­i­cal jiha­di form, does not pose a threat to the West, for the sim­ple rea­son that fun­da­men­tal­ist Islam is con­ser­v­a­tive, against social jus­tice, against social­ism and redis­tri­b­u­tion of wealth, and in favor of hier­ar­chi­cal socio-eco­nom­ic struc­tures. Social­ism is the com­mon ene­my to both cap­i­tal­ist Amer­ica and to Wah­habi Islam, accord­ing to Fuller.

Accord­ing to jour­nal­ist Robert Drey­fuss’ book “Devil’s Game,” Fuller explained his attrac­tion to rad­i­cal Islam in neoliberal/libertarian terms:

“There is no main­stream Islam­ic organization...with rad­i­cal social views,” he wrote. “Clas­si­cal Islam­ic the­ory envis­ages the role of the state as lim­ited to facil­i­tat­ing the well-being of mar­kets and mer­chants rather than con­trol­ling them. Islamists have always pow­er­fully object­ed to social­ism and communism....Islam has nev­er had prob­lems with the idea that wealth is uneven­ly dis­trib­uted.” . . . .

13. Fuller has long been an advo­cate of a “turn to the Broth­er­hood.”

“In Search of Friends Among the Foes: U.S. Hopes to Work with Diverse Group” by John Mintz and Dou­glas Farah; The Wash­ing­ton Post; 9/11/2004; p. A01.

. . . Some fed­er­al agents wor­ry that the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood has dan­ger­ous links to ter­ror­ism. But some U.S. diplo­mats and intel­li­gence offi­cials believe its influ­ence offers an oppor­tu­ni­ty for polit­i­cal engage­ment that could help iso­late vio­lent jihadists. ‘It is the pre­em­i­nent move­ment in the Mus­lim world,’ said Gra­ham E. Fuller, a for­mer CIA offi­cial spe­cial­iz­ing in the Mid­dle East. ‘It’s some­thing we can work with.’ Demo­niz­ing the Broth­er­hood ‘would be fool­hardy in the extreme’ he warned.” . . .

14. More about the cor­po­ratist eco­nom­ic phi­los­o­phy of the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood fol­lows. Note that Khairat el-Shater was alleged by Egypt­ian intel­li­gence to have been run­ning Mohamed Mor­si. (We cov­ered this in FTR #787.) In turn, he was report­ed to be serv­ing as a liai­son between Mor­si and Mohamed Zawahiri, the broth­er of Al-Qae­da leader Ayman Zawahiri. Shater was also net­worked with: Anne Pat­ter­son, U.S. ambas­sador to Egypt, GOP Sen­a­tor John McCain and GOP Sen­a­tor Lid­say Gra­ham. In turn, Shater was alleged to have trans­ferred $50 mil­lion from the Egypt­ian Mus­lim Broth­er­hood to Al-Qae­da at the time that he was net­work­ing with the Amer­i­cans and Mor­si. Hey, what’s $50 mil­lion between friends.

“The GOP Broth­er­hood of Egypt” by Avi Ash­er-Schapiro; Salon.com; 1/25/2012.

While West­ern alarmists often depict Egypt’s Mus­lim Broth­er­hood as a shad­owy orga­ni­za­tion with ter­ror­ist ties, the Brotherhood’s ide­ol­o­gy actu­al­ly has more in com­mon with America’s Repub­li­can Par­ty than with al-Qai­da. Few Amer­i­cans know it but the Broth­er­hood is a free-mar­ket par­ty led by wealthy busi­ness­men whose eco­nom­ic agen­da embraces pri­va­ti­za­tion and for­eign invest­ment while spurn­ing labor unions and the redis­tri­b­u­tion of wealth. Like the Repub­li­cans in the U.S., the finan­cial inter­ests of the party’s lead­er­ship of busi­ness­men and pro­fes­sion­als diverge sharply from those of its poor, social­ly con­ser­v­a­tive fol­low­ers.

The Broth­er­hood, which did not ini­tial­ly sup­port the rev­o­lu­tion that began a year ago, reaped its ben­e­fits, cap­tur­ing near­ly half the seats in the new par­lia­ment, which was seat­ed this week, and vault­ing its top lead­ers into posi­tions of pow­er.

Arguably the most pow­er­ful man in the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood is Khairat Al-Shater, a mul­ti­mil­lion­aire tycoon whose finan­cial inter­ests extend into elec­tron­ics, man­u­fac­tur­ing and retail. A strong advo­cate of pri­va­ti­za­tion, Al-Shater is one of a cadre of Mus­lim Broth­er­hood busi­ness­men who helped finance the Brotherhood’s Free­dom and Jus­tice Party’s impres­sive elec­toral vic­to­ry this win­ter and is now craft­ing the FJP’s eco­nom­ic agen­da.

At Al-Shater’s lux­u­ry fur­ni­ture out­let Istak­bal, a new couch costs about 6,000 Egypt­ian pounds, about $1,000 in U.S. cur­ren­cy. In a coun­try where 40 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion lives on less than $2 a day, Istakbal’s clien­tele is large­ly lim­it­ed to Egypt’s upper class­es.

Although the Broth­ers do draw sig­nif­i­cant sup­port from Egypt’s poor and work­ing class, “the Broth­er­hood is a firm­ly upper-mid­dle-class orga­ni­za­tion in its lead­er­ship,” says Sha­di Hamid, a lead­ing Mus­lim Broth­er­hood expert at the Brook­ings Insti­tu­tion in Wash­ing­ton.

Not sur­pris­ing­ly, these well-to-do Egyp­tians are eager to safe­guard their eco­nom­ic posi­tion in the post-Mubarak Egypt. Despite ris­ing eco­nom­ic inequal­i­ty and pover­ty, the Broth­er­hood does not back rad­i­cal changes in Egypt’s econ­o­my.

The FJP’s eco­nom­ic plat­form is a tame doc­u­ment, rife with promis­es to root out cor­rup­tion and tweak Egypt’s tax and sub­si­dies sys­tems, with occa­sion­al allu­sions to an unspe­cif­ic com­mit­ment to “social jus­tice.” The plat­form prais­es the mech­a­nisms of the free mar­ket and promis­es that the par­ty will work for “bal­anced, sus­tain­able and com­pre­hen­sive eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment.” It is a pro­gram that any Euro­pean con­ser­v­a­tive par­ty could get behind. . . .

 

 

 

Discussion

4 comments for “FTR #790 Now, About that Malaysian Airliner . . . .”

  1. For­mer Malaysian leader Mahathir Mohamad appears to be adding his author­i­tar­i­an voice to the “peo­ple’s pow­er” move­ment that’s try­ing to top­ple his for­mer pro­teges and Malaysi­a’s cur­rent Prime Min­is­ter, Najib Razak, over a grow­ing cor­rup­tion scan­dal:

    Reuters
    Malaysi­a’s Mahathir calls for ‘peo­ple pow­er’ move­ment to top­ple PM
    KUALA LUMPUR | By Trin­na Leong and Al-Zaquan Amer Hamzah

    Sun Aug 30, 2015 12:12pm EDT
    Relat­ed: World

    For­mer Malaysian leader Mahathir Mohamad, join­ing anti-gov­ern­ment pro­test­ers for a sec­ond day on Sun­day, called for a “peo­ple’s pow­er” move­ment to top­ple Prime Min­is­ter Najib Razak over a finan­cial scan­dal.

    “The only way for the peo­ple to get back to the old sys­tem is for them to remove this prime min­is­ter,” said Mahathir, a deeply respect­ed 90-year-old who was once Najib’s patron and is now his fiercest crit­ic.

    “And to remove him, the peo­ple must show peo­ple’s pow­er. The peo­ple as a whole do not want this kind of cor­rupt leader,” he told media before head­ing to the ral­ly, whose num­bers police esti­mat­ed at 25,000.

    The two-day protest brought onto the streets a polit­i­cal cri­sis trig­gered by reports of a mys­te­ri­ous trans­fer worth more than $600 mil­lion into an account under Najib’s name.

    Najib, who denies wrong­do­ing, has weath­ered the storm and ana­lysts say the protest is unlike­ly to inspire broad pub­lic sup­port for him to quit because it lacks a strong leader.

    The ral­ly, unlike the last one in 2012, also lacks the sup­port of a par­ty iden­ti­fied with the Malay major­i­ty: most pro­test­ers were from the minor­i­ty eth­nic Chi­nese and Indi­an com­mu­ni­ties.

    How­ev­er, Mahathir — the coun­try’s longest-serv­ing leader — was a leader of the rul­ing Unit­ed Malays Nation­al Organ­i­sa­tion (UMNO), which rep­re­sents Malays.

    UMNO Vice-Pres­i­dent Hisham­mud­din Hus­sein said that by turn­ing up unex­pect­ed­ly at the anti-gov­ern­ment ral­ly on Sat­ur­day, Mahathir had “crossed over the line”.

    Anoth­er UMNO leader, Jamal Yunos, told Reuters that 1 mil­lion gov­ern­ment sup­port­ers would stage a ral­ly on Oct. 10 that would trump the protests of the past two days.

    Mahathir’s sid­ing with pro­test­ers sits odd­ly with the often-author­i­tar­i­an style of his own 22-year rule until 2003, dur­ing which Malaysia became a pow­er­house of eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment but also won a rep­u­ta­tion for crony­ism and dubi­ous “mega-projects”.

    Najib was once a pro­tégé of Mahathir, just as the now-jailed Anwar Ibrahim – once wide­ly viewed as Mahathir’s heir appar­ent – was before him. Anwar fell from favor when he began a pop­u­lar “refor­masi” (reform) move­ment against the graft and nepo­tism he said marked Malaysia’s busi­ness and polit­i­cal worlds.

    Mahathir sacked him from his posts, and charges of sodomy and cor­rup­tion fol­lowed. Mahathir has always main­tained that the sodomy charges were gen­uine and made Anwar unfit to be leader.

    RIOT TRUCKS

    On Sun­day, secu­ri­ty remained tight and anti-riot trucks stood ready, but there were no reports of vio­lence.

    City author­i­ties reject­ed an appli­ca­tion by pro-democ­ra­cy group Bersih for a protest per­mit, which had raised fears of a repeat of the 2012 ral­ly when police used water can­non and tear­gas to dis­perse pro­test­ers.

    In a sign the gov­ern­ment was los­ing patience, Deputy Prime Min­is­ter Ahmad Zahid Hami­di warned orga­niz­ers they could face legal action. “They must face the con­se­quences if they dare to break the law,” he said, the New Straits Times report­ed online.

    ...

    Najib said in a speech lat­er that demon­stra­tions were “not the right chan­nel to voice views in a demo­c­ra­t­ic coun­try”, and cit­ed the reli­gious leader of an Islam­ic par­ty-ruled Malaysian state as say­ing the protests were ille­gal in the eyes of Islam.

    Malaysia has been gripped since July by reports that inves­ti­ga­tors prob­ing alle­ga­tions of mis­man­age­ment and cor­rup­tion at the debt-laden state fund 1Malaysia Devel­op­ment Berhad had dis­cov­ered the trans­fer into Najib’s account.

    The coun­try’s anti-cor­rup­tion agency has said the funds were a dona­tion from an uniden­ti­fied Mid­dle East donor.

    Najib, who says he did not take any mon­ey for per­son­al gain, sacked his deputy and min­is­ters who had ques­tioned him as he sought to con­tain the scan­dal. The attor­ney-gen­er­al who had been inves­ti­gat­ing 1MDB was also replaced.

    Author­i­ties also sus­pend­ed two news­pa­pers and blocked access to a web­site that had report­ed exten­sive­ly on 1MDB.

    Najib retains sig­nif­i­cant sup­port from the long-rul­ing Barisan Nasion­al coali­tion and his par­ty, UMNO. The coali­tion, in pow­er since 1957, lost the pop­u­lar vote for the first time in 2013 to an oppo­si­tion alliance that split ear­li­er this year.

    How­ev­er, he is under pres­sure over his han­dling of the econ­o­my, which has been hit by a slump in ener­gy prices that threat­en oil and gas rev­enues, and Malaysi­a’s cur­ren­cy plum­met­ed this month to 17-year lows against the dol­lar.

    Najib said in his speech at a con­ven­tion cen­ter that some peo­ple with an agen­da had tried to spread lies that “Malaysia would become bank­rupt like Greece”.

    “It is clear­ly proven that Malaysia is not a failed state, as claimed by some,” he said. “It is far from a bank­rupt nation. We are still in a sta­ble con­di­tion, with sol­id fun­da­men­tals, and remain com­pet­i­tive.”

    If you read this part...

    ...
    Mahathir’s sid­ing with pro­test­ers sits odd­ly with the often-author­i­tar­i­an style of his own 22-year rule until 2003, dur­ing which Malaysia became a pow­er­house of eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment but also won a rep­u­ta­tion for crony­ism and dubi­ous “mega-projects”.

    Najib was once a pro­tégé of Mahathir, just as the now-jailed Anwar Ibrahim – once wide­ly viewed as Mahathir’s heir appar­ent – was before him. Anwar fell from favor when he began a pop­u­lar “refor­masi” (reform) move­ment against the graft and nepo­tism he said marked Malaysia’s busi­ness and polit­i­cal worlds.

    Mahathir sacked him from his posts, and charges of sodomy and cor­rup­tion fol­lowed. Mahathir has always main­tained that the sodomy charges were gen­uine and made Anwar unfit to be leader.
    ...

    and think “uh oh, I bet­ter stay out of Malaysian air­planes with Mus­lim Broth­er­hood pilots until this blows over”, note that there prob­a­bly aren’t too many Mus­lim Broth­er­hood sup­port­ers with par­tic­u­lar­ly fond feel­ings towards Prime Min­is­ter Najib Razak.

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | August 31, 2015, 5:46 pm
  2. Here’s some­thing the should prob­a­bly give the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood an elec­toral boost in Malaysian pol­i­tics:
    As For­rest Gump opined, “Mama always said life was like a box of choco­lates. You nev­er know what you’re gonna get.” Of course, that implies many aspects of life are also like box­es of choco­late since life is full of sur­pris­es. So life is like a box of choco­lates that con­tain many small­er box­es of choco­late. For exam­ple, cor­rup­tion probes, like Malaysi­a’s grow­ing (1MBD) probe, are a part of life. And they are def­i­nite­ly like a box of choco­lates:

    The Guardian
    Malaysian prime min­is­ter cleared of cor­rup­tion over $681m Sau­di ‘gift’

    Attor­ney gen­er­al says huge sum in Najib Razak’s per­son­al bank account was dona­tion from Sau­di roy­al fam­i­ly and not linked to trou­bled state fund 1MDB

    Oliv­er Holmes in Bangkok and agen­cies
    Tues­day 26 Jan­u­ary 2016 07.12 EST

    Malaysia’s attor­ney gen­er­al said on Tues­day that $681m trans­ferred into prime min­is­ter Najib Razak’s per­son­al bank account was a gift from the roy­al fam­i­ly in Sau­di Ara­bia, and there were no crim­i­nal offences or cor­rup­tion involved.

    The involve­ment of the Sau­di roy­al fam­i­ly is an unex­pect­ed twist in a scan­dal over the mys­te­ri­ous funds trans­fer and the trou­bles of indebt­ed state fund 1Malaysia Devel­op­ment Berhad (1MDB), whose advi­so­ry board Najib chairs.

    “I am sat­is­fied with the find­ings that the funds were not a form of graft or bribery,” attor­ney gen­er­al Mohamed Apan­di Ali told a hasti­ly called news con­fer­ence, where a state­ment was issued that said Najib had returned $620m to the Sau­di roy­al fam­i­ly because it had not been utilised.

    “There was no rea­son giv­en as to why the dona­tion was made to PM Najib – that is between him and the Sau­di fam­i­ly,” Apan­di said.

    He said no crim­i­nal offence was com­mit­ted by Najib in rela­tion to three inves­ti­ga­tions sub­mit­ted by Malaysia’s anti-graft agency and that no fur­ther action would be tak­en.

    The Malaysian anti-cor­rup­tion com­mis­sion (MACC) had ear­li­er said the funds were a polit­i­cal dona­tion from an uniden­ti­fied Mid­dle East­ern bene­fac­tor.

    The attor­ney gen­er­al said in a state­ment he would return to the MACC papers per­tain­ing to the three sep­a­rate inves­ti­ga­tions with instruc­tions to close all three cas­es.

    Najib, who has weath­ered months of calls from oppo­si­tion lead­ers and estab­lish­ment fig­ures to resign, has denied any wrong­do­ing and says he did not take any mon­ey for per­son­al gain.

    In a state­ment sent to the Guardian, Najib said he wel­comed the attor­ney general’s com­ments that “con­firmed what I have main­tained all along: that no crime was com­mit­ted.”

    “This issue has been an unnec­es­sary dis­trac­tion for the coun­try. Now that the mat­ter has been com­pre­hen­sive­ly put to rest, it is time for us to unite and move on,” he added.

    Malaysian oppo­si­tion par­lia­men­tar­i­an Tony Pua told the Guardian the “basis to absolve the prime min­is­ter of any wrong­do­ing is utter­ly with­out mer­it because the ‘per­son­al affair’ does not pre­clude cor­rupt motives or trans­ac­tions”.

    He added: “The attor­ney gen­er­al has pro­vid­ed no new or con­vinc­ing infor­ma­tion or argu­ments on whether the mas­sive funds were bona fide, which leads to the ques­tion whether the new­ly appoint­ed attor­ney gen­er­al is mere­ly cov­er­ing up for the prime min­is­ter.”

    In July last year, Najib sacked the country’s pre­vi­ous attor­ney gen­er­al, who had led the inves­ti­ga­tion into the scan­dal, for “health rea­sons” in a gov­ern­ment reshuf­fle that also saw the dis­missal of sev­er­al offi­cials crit­i­cal of the pre­mier.

    The scan­dal has shak­en investors in south-east Asia’s third-biggest econ­o­my and rocked pub­lic con­fi­dence in the coali­tion led by Najib’s Unit­ed Malays Nation­al Organ­i­sa­tion (UMNO) par­ty, which has held pow­er since inde­pen­dence in 1957.

    ...

    “The involve­ment of the Sau­di roy­al fam­i­ly is an unex­pect­ed twist in a scan­dal over the mys­te­ri­ous funds trans­fer and the trou­bles of indebt­ed state fund 1Malaysia Devel­op­ment Berhad (1MDB), whose advi­so­ry board Najib chairs.”
    That’s the fun of a open­ing a cor­rup­tion probe box of choco­late: You nev­er know what you’ll get! Like a pre­vi­ous­ly undis­closed $681 mil­lion direct trans­fer from the Sau­di roy­al fam­i­ly to Malaysi­a’s cur­rent prime min­is­ter. And what was that ‘gift’ for? Well, accord­ing to Malaysi­a’s attor­ney gen­er­al, that rea­son is between Prime Min­is­ter Najib and the Sau­di roy­al fam­i­ly and it’s not real­ly for the pub­lic to know:

    ...
    “I am sat­is­fied with the find­ings that the funds were not a form of graft or bribery,” attor­ney gen­er­al Mohamed Apan­di Ali told a hasti­ly called news con­fer­ence, where a state­ment was issued that said Najib had returned $620m to the Sau­di roy­al fam­i­ly because it had not been utilised.

    “There was no rea­son giv­en as to why the dona­tion was made to PM Najib – that is between him and the Sau­di fam­i­ly,” Apan­di said.
    ...

    You nev­er know what you’re going to get! Although the BBC reports that, accord­ing to Sau­di sources, the Sau­di ‘gift’ was actu­al­ly to ensure Najib’s polit­i­cal vic­to­ry over the Mus­lim Broth­er­hood. Note that this trans­fer was in 2013, before the Sau­di roy­als’ move to reestab­lish the old Saudi/MB offi­cial alliance after their pub­lic falling out in recent years.

    And giv­en that the ‘1MDB fund’ probe has already uncov­ered one super secret for­eign polit­i­cal mega-dona­tion, you have imag­ine that there are plen­ty of oth­er choco­lates of that nature still sit­ting in the larg­er ‘1MDB probe’ box of choco­lates.

    And that’s just one box of choco­lates. Giv­en this rev­e­la­tion of the Sau­di roy­als’ will­ing­ness to hand over entire for­tunes to their polit­i­cal allies in oth­er coun­tries, who knows how many oth­er box­es of choco­late around the globe con­tain such Sau­di delights? The Saud­is clear­ly have a lot of ‘choco­late’ to ‘gift’ to their ‘friends’ and there’s no short­age of ‘box­es’ around the globe that would love some of that ‘choco­late’. So if your coun­try’s polit­i­cal sys­tem devel­ops a case of polit­i­cal dia­betes, you might want to check for undis­closed box­es of choco­late. Hope­ful­ly it’s an option. In some nations, like the US, rogue box­es of polit­i­cal choco­late are black box­es too.

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | January 27, 2016, 11:38 am
  3. The Wall Street Jour­nal is report­ing Gold­man Sachs is now part of a US probe into poten­tial mon­ey-laun­der­ing charges relat­ed to the giant 1Malaysi Devel­op­ment Bhd (1MDB) devel­op­ment fund that’s blown up into a major Malaysian polit­i­cal scan­dal fol­low­ing rev­e­la­tions that it may have been turned into a giant polit­i­cal slush fund for Prime Min­is­ter Najib Razak. So it will be inter­est­ing to see what, if any­thing they find, espe­cial­ly relat­ed to the over $680 mil­lion in ‘gifts’ that the Sau­di Roy­al fam­i­ly gave to Razak that he asserts were in no way a form of graft or bribery. And espe­cial­ly after Raza­k’s par­ty shocked the coun­try recent­ly by back­ing an Islam­ic law penal code that includes ampu­ta­tions and ston­ing:

    Reuters

    Out­rage in mul­ti-eth­nic Malaysia as gov­ern­ment backs Islam­ic law

    KUALA LUMPUR | By Praveen Menon
    Sat May 28, 2016 1:32am EDT

    Prime Min­is­ter Najib Raza­k’s gov­ern­ment threw its sup­port in par­lia­ment this week behind an Islam­ic penal code that includes ampu­ta­tions and ston­ing, shock­ing some of his allies and stok­ing fears of fur­ther strains in the mul­ti-eth­nic coun­try.

    Crit­ics believe the scan­dal-taint­ed prime min­is­ter is using ‘hudud’, the Islam­ic law, to shore up the back­ing of Mus­lim Malay vot­ers and fend off attacks on his lead­er­ship ahead of crit­i­cal by-elec­tions next month and a gen­er­al elec­tion in 2018.

    The gov­ern­ment on Thurs­day unex­pect­ed­ly sub­mit­ted to par­lia­ment a hudud bill that had been pro­posed by the Islamist group Par­ti Islam se-Malaysi­a’s (PAS).

    Although debate on the law was deferred to Octo­ber by PAS leader Abdul Hadi Awang, its sub­mis­sion to par­lia­ment brought crit­i­cism from lead­ers across the polit­i­cal spec­trum, includ­ing allies of the rul­ing Barisan Nasion­al coali­tion, who rep­re­sent the eth­nic Chi­nese and Indi­an com­mu­ni­ties.

    Najib sought to ease ten­sions with his allies on Fri­day, say­ing the bill was “mis­un­der­stood”.

    “It’s not hudud, but what we refer to as enhanced pun­ish­ment,” he told a news con­fer­ence after meet­ing lead­ers of his rul­ing Unit­ed Malays Nation­al Organ­i­sa­tion (UMNO) par­ty.

    “It applies only to cer­tain offences and this comes under the juris­dic­tion of the Syari­ah court and is only applic­a­ble to the Mus­lims. It has noth­ing to do with non-Mus­lims.”

    He added that the pun­ish­ments would be lim­it­ed and can­ings met­ed out under the law would not injure or draw blood.

    Ear­li­er in the day, the Malaysian Chi­nese Asso­ci­a­tion (MCA), a key par­ty in the BN coali­tion, called the sub­mis­sion of the hudud bill to par­lia­ment “uncon­sti­tu­tion­al”.

    “As we repeat­ed­ly point­ed out, the imple­men­ta­tion of Hudud law is against the spir­it of the Fed­er­al Con­sti­tu­tion, and would ruin the inter-eth­nic rela­tion­ship in the coun­try,” MCA Pres­i­dent Liow Tiong Lai said.

    Argu­ments for and against the intro­duc­tion of hudud have divid­ed Malaysia for years. Most of the South­east Asian coun­try’s states imple­ment sharia, the Islam­ic legal sys­tem, but its reach is restrict­ed by fed­er­al law.

    Still, the hudud bill appears doomed as the UMNO-led coali­tion lacks the two-thirds major­i­ty need­ed to pass it into law.

    The Islamist par­ty PAS is push­ing for a con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ment that would allow hudud to be imple­ment­ed in Kelan­tan, a north­ern state where night­clubs are banned and there are sep­a­rate pub­lic bench­es for men and women.

    Many fear such a move would open doors for oth­er states to bring in the Islam­ic penal code. Hudud stip­u­lates ancient reli­gious pun­ish­ments for Mus­lims who vio­late the law.

    EYEING POLLS

    Crit­ics say that Najib, with an eye on by-elec­tions for two par­lia­men­tary seats on June 18, is seek­ing to appease the major­i­ty Mus­lim vote­bank with his stand on hudud and to deflect atten­tion from a mul­ti-bil­lion-dol­lar scan­dal at the state fund 1Malaysia Devel­op­ment Berhad (1MDB).

    They allege Najib was a ben­e­fi­cia­ry of 1MDB’s funds, after about $680 mil­lion was deposit­ed in his bank account before a 2013 elec­tion. Najib has denied any wrong­do­ing.

    ...

    “He added that the pun­ish­ments would be lim­it­ed and can­ings met­ed out under the law would not injure or draw blood.”
    The ampu­ta­tion and ston­ings will be lim­it­ed. Noth­ing to wor­ry about folks!

    And note the spec­u­la­tive ratio­nale behind Raza­k’s sud­den back­ing of the new penal code:

    ...
    Crit­ics say that Najib, with an eye on by-elec­tions for two par­lia­men­tary seats on June 18, is seek­ing to appease the major­i­ty Mus­lim vote­bank with his stand on hudud and to deflect atten­tion from a mul­ti-bil­lion-dol­lar scan­dal at the state fund 1Malaysia Devel­op­ment Berhad (1MDB).

    They allege Najib was a ben­e­fi­cia­ry of 1MDB’s funds, after about $680 mil­lion was deposit­ed in his bank account before a 2013 elec­tion. Najib has denied any wrong­do­ing.
    ...

    That’s right, in an appar­ent effort to dis­tract from pub­lic con­cerns over the $680 mil­lion gift from the Sau­di Roy­als that mys­te­ri­ous­ly appeared in Raza­k’s bank account, Raza­k’s par­ty shocked the coun­try by back­ing legal ston­ings and ampu­ta­tions. It’s a pret­ty bizarre strat­e­gy. But what’s even more bizarre is that it just might work

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | June 7, 2016, 5:25 pm
  4. Aus­trali­a’s ver­sion of “60 Min­utes” assem­bled a team of ana­lysts team to look over all the avail­able infor­ma­tion on what caused the dis­ap­pear­ance of Flight 370: Much of what they con­clud­ed has already been sug­gest­ed by pre­vi­ous teams of ana­lysts. For exam­ple, they appear to be con­fi­dent that it was an inten­tion­al act by Cap­tain Ahmad Shah. They’ve also deduced cer­tain turns in the flight path near the island of Penang were due to Shah tilt­ing the air­craft to get a final look at the island (Shah was born there). These weren’t new find­ings.

    And they arrived at a the­o­ry on how it was that Shah could have pulled this off with­out oth­er peo­ple on the plane inter­fer­ing: he depres­sur­ized the plane, knock­ing out any­one who was­n’t wear­ing an oxy­gen mask. This is seen as an expla­na­tion for the lack of dis­tress calls and no final good­bye texts or attempt­ed emer­gency calls that failed to con­nect. The inten­tion­al depres­sur­iza­tion the­o­ry has been sug­gest­ed before, so it’s not unique to this team of ana­lysts, but this adds to the num­ber of experts lean­ing in that direc­tion.

    They also have a the­o­ry on why the plane seemed to just dis­ap­pear off of radar with­out air traf­fic con­trollers get­ting alarmed over the behav­ior of the plane: Shah delib­er­ate­ly chart­ed a path designed to trav­eled near the bor­der of Malaysia and Thai­land. And he took the plane in and out of each coun­try’s air­space, so the air traf­fic con­trollers would­n’t pay too much atten­tion to the plane because it would quick­ly veer out of their ter­ri­to­ry and into neigh­bor­ing air­space. In oth­er words, Shah’s flight path like­ly pro­duced a “not my prob­lem” response from air traf­fic con­trollers.

    So accord­ing to this lat­est set of the­o­ries, Shah delib­er­ate­ly knocked almost every­one out be depres­sur­iz­ing the cab­in and then took the flight along a path seem­ing­ly designed to make it less notice­able to the peo­ple on the ground who might sound an alarm:

    The Wash­ing­ton Post

    MH370 experts think they’ve final­ly solved the mys­tery of the doomed Malaysia Air­lines flight

    by Cleve R. Woot­son Jr.
    May 14, 2018 at 2:11 PM

    All but one of the 239 peo­ple on the doomed Malaysia Air­lines Flight 370 had prob­a­bly been uncon­scious — inca­pac­i­tat­ed by the sud­den depres­sur­iza­tion of the Boe­ing 777 — and had no way of know­ing they were on an hours-long, mean­der­ing path to their deaths.

    Along that path, a pan­el of avi­a­tion experts said Sun­day, was a brief but telling detour near Penang, Malaysia, the home town of Cap­tain Zaharie Ahmad Shah.

    On two occa­sions, who­ev­er was in con­trol of the plane — and was prob­a­bly the only one awake — tipped the craft to the left.

    The experts believe Zaharie, the plane’s pilot, was tak­ing a final look.

    That is the chill­ing the­o­ry that the team of ana­lysts assem­bled by Aus­trali­a’s “60 Min­utes” have posit­ed about the final hours of MH370.

    They sus­pect that the plane’s 2014 dis­ap­pear­ance and appar­ent crash were a sui­cide by the 53-year-0ld Zaharie — and a pre­med­i­tat­ed act of mass mur­der.

    But first, the experts said, they believe that Zaharie depres­sur­ized the plane, knock­ing out any­one aboard who was­n’t wear­ing an oxy­gen mask. That would explain the silence from the plane as it veered wild­ly off course: no may­day from the craft’s radio, no final good­bye texts, no attempt­ed emer­gency calls that failed to con­nect.

    That would also explain how who­ev­er was in con­trol had time to maneu­ver the plane to its final loca­tion.

    The wreck­age has not been found, though hun­dreds of mil­lions of dol­lars have gone into the four-year search. The secret of what hap­pened in the final moments of the ill-fat­ed flight — and the motive behind it all — prob­a­bly died with its pas­sen­gers and pilot.

    But the “60 Min­utes” team — which includ­ed avi­a­tion spe­cial­ists, the for­mer Aus­tralian Trans­port Safe­ty Bureau chief in charge of inves­ti­gat­ing MH370’s crash and an oceanog­ra­ph­er — put forth what they believe is the most like­ly the­o­ry.

    “The thing that gets dis­cussed the most is that at the point where the pilot turned the transpon­der off, that he depres­sur­ized the air­plane, which would dis­able the pas­sen­gers,” said Lar­ry Vance, a vet­er­an air­craft inves­ti­ga­tor from Cana­da. “He was killing him­self. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, he was killing every­one else onboard. And he did it delib­er­ate­ly.”

    Zaharie’s sus­pect­ed sui­cide might explain an odd­i­ty about the plane’s final flight path: that unex­pect­ed turn to the left.

    “Cap­tain Zaharie dipped his wing to see Penang, his home town,” Simon Hardy, a Boe­ing 777 senior pilot and instruc­tor, said on “60 Min­utes.”

    “If you look very care­ful­ly, you can see it’s actu­al­ly a turn to the left, and then start a long turn to the right. And then [he does] anoth­er left turn. So I spent a long time think­ing about what this could be, what tech­ni­cal rea­son is there for this, and, after two months, three months think­ing about this, I final­ly got the answer: Some­one was look­ing out the win­dow.”

    “It might be a long, emo­tion­al good­bye,” Hardy added. “Or a short, emo­tion­al good­bye to his home town.”

    Flight 370 dis­ap­peared March 8, 2014, short­ly after leav­ing Kuala Lumpur, bound for Bei­jing.

    The craft is thought to have crashed in the far south­ern Indi­an Ocean.

    The gov­ern­ments of Malaysia, Chi­na and Aus­tralia called off the offi­cial search in Jan­u­ary 2017. The Aus­tralian Trans­port Safe­ty Bureau’s final report said author­i­ties were no clos­er to know­ing the rea­sons for the plane’s dis­ap­pear­ance or the exact loca­tion of its wreck­age.

    But the “60 Min­utes” experts tried to answer one of the biggest ques­tions sur­round­ing the flight: How could a mod­ern air­craft tracked by radar and satel­lites sim­ply dis­ap­pear?

    Because, they say, Zaharie want­ed it to. And the vet­er­an pilot, who had near­ly 20,000 hours of flight expe­ri­ence and had built a flight sim­u­la­tor in his home, knew exact­ly how to do it.

    For exam­ple, at one point, he flew near the bor­der of Malaysia and Thai­land, criss­cross­ing into the air­space of both, Hardy said. But nei­ther coun­try was like­ly to see the plane as a threat because it was on the edge of their air­space.

    “Both of the con­trollers aren’t both­ered about this mys­te­ri­ous air­craft because, oh, it’s gone, it’s not in our space any­more,” Hardy said. “If you were com­mis­sion­ing me to do this oper­a­tion and try to make a 777 dis­ap­pear, I would do the same thing. As far as I’m con­cerned, it’s very accu­rate fly­ing, and it did the job.”

    Still, as News.com.au wrote, the experts’ hypothe­ses are just the­o­ries — and not entire­ly new ones.

    Zaharie and co-pilot Fariq Abdul Hamid were prime sus­pects in the plane’s dis­ap­pear­ance from the begin­ning. There were rumors that Zaharie’s mar­riage was end­ing and that he downed the plane after learn­ing that his wife was about to leave, the news site said.

    Anoth­er the­o­ry was that he hijacked the plane in protest of the jail­ing of Anwar Ibrahim, who was then the oppo­si­tion leader in Malaysia.

    A group called the Chi­nese Mar­tyrs’ Brigade claimed respon­si­bil­i­ty for the down­ing, although skep­ti­cal offi­cials called this a hoax.

    Two men on the plane were fly­ing with pho­ny pass­ports, but one was appar­ent­ly an asy­lum seek­er, and nei­ther had ter­ror­ism links.

    The wreck­age, of course, might pro­vide some insight about what caused the air­plane to crash, and crews were still look­ing for it as recent­ly as this year.

    ...

    ———-

    “MH370 experts think they’ve final­ly solved the mys­tery of the doomed Malaysia Air­lines flight” by Cleve R. Woot­son Jr.; The Wash­ing­ton Post; 05/14/2018

    “They sus­pect that the plane’s 2014 dis­ap­pear­ance and appar­ent crash were a sui­cide by the 53-year-0ld Zaharie — and a pre­med­i­tat­ed act of mass mur­der.”

    A pre­med­i­tat­ed act of mass mur­der. That’s the con­clu­sion this team of experts arrived at. And part of that spec­u­la­tion includes spec­u­la­tion that Shah knocked vir­tu­al­ly every­one out by depres­sur­iz­ing the plane:

    ...
    But first, the experts said, they believe that Zaharie depres­sur­ized the plane, knock­ing out any­one aboard who was­n’t wear­ing an oxy­gen mask. That would explain the silence from the plane as it veered wild­ly off course: no may­day from the craft’s radio, no final good­bye texts, no attempt­ed emer­gency calls that failed to con­nect.

    That would also explain how who­ev­er was in con­trol had time to maneu­ver the plane to its final loca­tion.

    ...

    “The thing that gets dis­cussed the most is that at the point where the pilot turned the transpon­der off, that he depres­sur­ized the air­plane, which would dis­able the pas­sen­gers,” said Lar­ry Vance, a vet­er­an air­craft inves­ti­ga­tor from Cana­da. “He was killing him­self. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, he was killing every­one else onboard. And he did it delib­er­ate­ly.”
    ...

    Then Shah does a ‘good bye’ flight around Penang, where he was born:

    ...
    Zaharie’s sus­pect­ed sui­cide might explain an odd­i­ty about the plane’s final flight path: that unex­pect­ed turn to the left.

    “Cap­tain Zaharie dipped his wing to see Penang, his home town,” Simon Hardy, a Boe­ing 777 senior pilot and instruc­tor, said on “60 Min­utes.”

    “If you look very care­ful­ly, you can see it’s actu­al­ly a turn to the left, and then start a long turn to the right. And then [he does] anoth­er left turn. So I spent a long time think­ing about what this could be, what tech­ni­cal rea­son is there for this, and, after two months, three months think­ing about this, I final­ly got the answer: Some­one was look­ing out the win­dow.”

    “It might be a long, emo­tion­al good­bye,” Hardy added. “Or a short, emo­tion­al good­bye to his home town.”

    Flight 370 dis­ap­peared March 8, 2014, short­ly after leav­ing Kuala Lumpur, bound for Bei­jing.

    The craft is thought to have crashed in the far south­ern Indi­an Ocean.

    The gov­ern­ments of Malaysia, Chi­na and Aus­tralia called off the offi­cial search in Jan­u­ary 2017. The Aus­tralian Trans­port Safe­ty Bureau’s final report said author­i­ties were no clos­er to know­ing the rea­sons for the plane’s dis­ap­pear­ance or the exact loca­tion of its wreck­age.
    ...

    And in order to pre­vent ground oper­a­tors from track­ing the plane, Shah flew a path near the bor­der of Malaysia and Thai­land, criss­cross­ing into the air­space of both, thus mak­ing the plane appear to be on the edge of the ground oper­a­tors’ respon­si­bil­i­ties:

    ...
    But the “60 Min­utes” experts tried to answer one of the biggest ques­tions sur­round­ing the flight: How could a mod­ern air­craft tracked by radar and satel­lites sim­ply dis­ap­pear?

    Because, they say, Zaharie want­ed it to. And the vet­er­an pilot, who had near­ly 20,000 hours of flight expe­ri­ence and had built a flight sim­u­la­tor in his home, knew exact­ly how to do it.

    For exam­ple, at one point, he flew near the bor­der of Malaysia and Thai­land, criss­cross­ing into the air­space of both, Hardy said. But nei­ther coun­try was like­ly to see the plane as a threat because it was on the edge of their air­space.

    “Both of the con­trollers aren’t both­ered about this mys­te­ri­ous air­craft because, oh, it’s gone, it’s not in our space any­more,” Hardy said. “If you were com­mis­sion­ing me to do this oper­a­tion and try to make a 777 dis­ap­pear, I would do the same thing. As far as I’m con­cerned, it’s very accu­rate fly­ing, and it did the job.”
    ...

    So, if that spec­u­la­tion is cor­rect and Shah was delib­er­ate­ly try­ing to keep his plane ‘off the radar’ and unno­ticed by ground con­trollers, that would point towards a desire to keep the ulti­mate fate of the plane a mys­tery. Why? Well, that’s still a mys­tery too.

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | May 14, 2018, 1:24 pm

Post a comment

Recommended Reading

Family of Secrets Family of Secrets The Bush Dynasty, the Powerful Forces That Put It in the White House, and What Their Influence Means for America Read more »