Spitfire List Web site and blog of anti-fascist researcher and radio personality Dave Emory.

For The Record  

FTR#1410 The Covid-19 “Op,” Part 5: The Nazi Virus?

WFMU-FM is pod­cast­ing For The Record–You can sub­scribe to the pod­cast HERE.

Mr. Emory’s entire life’s work is avail­able on a 64GB flash dri­ve, avail­able for a con­tri­bu­tion of $65.00 or more (to KFJC). (This is a new feature–the old, 32GB flash­drive will not hold the new mate­r­i­al. Click Here to obtain Dav­e’s 46+ years’ work, com­plete through fall/early win­ter of 2024 .)

“Polit­i­cal language…is designed to make lies sound truth­ful and mur­der respectable, and to give an appear­ance of solid­i­ty to pure wind.”

Mr. Emory has launched a new Patre­on site. Vis­it at: Patreon.com/DaveEmory

FTR#1410 This pro­gram was record­ed in one, 60-minute seg­ment.

Intro­duc­tion: Mr. Emory has tak­en the remain­ing five of his arti­cles on the Covid-19 “Op” out from behind the pay­wall on his Patre­on site.

This sec­ond of those arti­cles details “accel­er­a­tionist” Nazis’ view of the Coro­n­avirus pan­dem­ic, set against the back­ground of Ser­pen­t’s Walk. After read­ing the arti­cle into the record, Mr. Emory rumi­nates on the Trump regime’s agen­da as accel­er­a­tionist in nature.

Both a paper writ­ten by a New York Fed­er­al Reserve econ­o­mist and an arti­cle in The Atlantic mag­a­zine view pan­demics as a key con­trib­u­tor to the rise of fas­cist sen­ti­ment.

The New York Fed­er­al Reserve paper writ­ten by Kris­t­ian Blick­le saw the 1918 Influen­za pan­dem­ic as a key fac­tor in the rise of Nazism in Ger­many.

The Atlantic arti­cle posits the pan­dem­ic as a key ele­ment in the rise of xeno­pho­bic, author­i­ty-fear­ing sen­ti­ment among young peo­ple. It sees the rise of Trump, the AfD in Ger­many and the ascent of oth­er fas­cist par­ties around the world as stem­ming, in large mea­sure from the effects of the pan­dem­ic on Gen Z.

Key Ele­ments of Analy­sis and Dis­cus­sion Include: The spread­ing of cross-vec­tored pan­dem­ic-induc­ing virus in Ser­pen­t’s Walk called “Pacov,” which caus­es fatal blood clot­ting; The appear­ance of a mys­te­ri­ous blood clot­ting symp­tom in Covid patients; Review of the episode in the Turn­er Diaries in which the Nazi gov­ern­ment of the U.S. launch­es a com­bined radi­o­log­i­cal, bio­log­i­cal and chem­i­cal attack on Chi­na, turn­ing all of Asia into an unin­hab­it­able con­ti­nent of mutants; Review of syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy and how it per­mits the syn­the­sis of the genome of any mam­malian virus and/or the lethal mod­i­fi­ca­tion of a com­mon microbe; Review of Oper­a­tion North­woods; Review of the fram­ing of Lee Har­vey Oswald as a Com­mu­nist, pri­or to pin­ning the blame for the JFK assas­si­na­tion on him and his sub­se­quent mur­der; Review of what Mr. Emory has termed “The Oswald Insti­tute of Virol­o­gy.”

The Covid-19 Op, Pt. 2: The Nazi Virus?

Although a scourge to most peo­ple, the Covid-19 pan­dem­ic was wel­comed by neo-fas­cist “accel­er­a­tionists” as some­thing of a boon toward their desired dis­in­te­gra­tion and ulti­mate col­lapse of soci­ety.

Although unfa­mil­iar to most peo­ple, accel­er­a­tionists are an impor­tant ele­ment and one that should be care­ful­ly scru­ti­nized in con­nec­tion with the pan­dem­ic and respons­es to it:

“ . . . . Over the past year, a fac­tion refer­ring to them­selves as ‘accel­er­a­tionists’ has gained strength with­in the move­ment, unit­ed in their belief that our cur­rent glob­al­ly con­nect­ed, plu­ral­is­tic soci­ety is irre­deemable and ‘degen­er­ate.’ Soci­ety, this fac­tion has argued, must be dis­man­tled by bring­ing about ‘sys­tem col­lapse’ – specif­i­cal­ly through acts of vio­lence that will accel­er­ate its down­fall. . . .” (1)

This group looks with rel­ish on the pos­si­bil­i­ties of the pan­dem­ic. Chaos itself is seen as ben­e­fi­cial to the accel­er­a­tionist cause: “ . . . . Accel­er­a­tionists hope the gov­ern­ment botch­es their response to the virus. They hope the chaos will dri­ve more peo­ple to become frus­trat­ed by the sta­tus quo and begin push­ing for more extreme polit­i­cal posi­tions, spark polit­i­cal unrest or even begin agi­tat­ing for more rev­o­lu­tion­ary mea­sures to upend the cur­rent polit­i­cal sys­tem. While they do hope to bring new peo­ple into their move­ment, they are also look­ing to fur­ther rad­i­cal­ize those already on the far right into accept­ing their more mil­i­tant tac­tics. . . .(2)

Endors­ing Trump’s rhetoric about the pan­dem­ic, this white-suprema­cist ele­ment feels pos­i­tive­ly about Trump’s scape­goat­ing of Chi­na for the virus: “ . . . . they have praised the president’s rhetoric – one white suprema­cist user on Telegram wrote that he was ‘fan­ning the flames of racial hatred by tripling down on call­ing it the Chi­nese Virus’. . . .” (3)

The issue of Chi­na and ele­ments of The Turn­er Diaries will be dis­cussed lat­er in this arti­cle.

It is impor­tant to reflect on the accler­a­tionist per­spec­tive against the back­ground of socio-polit­i­cal per­spec­tives and the Trump­ist agen­da: “ . . . . Extrem­ists look to cap­i­tal­ize on uncer­tain­ty – and his­tor­i­cal­ly, they have ben­e­fit­ed from moments of eco­nom­ic and polit­i­cal cri­sis. One study, con­duct­ed by three Ger­man econ­o­mists in 2015, found that far-right polit­i­cal par­ties ben­e­fit the most from finan­cial crash­es. These par­ties give vot­ers scape­goats to blame for eco­nom­ic pre­car­i­ty and hard­ships, includ­ing elites, immi­grants and peo­ple of col­or. . . .” (4)

More depth on the “pro-Coro­n­avirus” accel­er­a­tionist faction’s ide­ol­o­gy and its over­lap  with Trumpian ide­ol­o­gy can be gleaned from the fol­low­ing pas­sage about the “Great Replace­ment’ the­o­ry endorsed by Stephen Miller and oth­ers in Trump’s entourage. Accel­er­a­tionists feel that a fun­da­men­tal dis­rup­tion of soci­ety (such as the one pre­cip­i­tat­ed by the pan­dem­ic) is nec­es­sary to bring white peo­ple around to their point of view: “ . . . . Mem­bers of the extreme right believe that most white peo­ple are sim­ply being paci­fied by mod­ern con­ve­niences. Only after these are tak­en away will they wake up to what accel­er­a­tionists see as polit­i­cal truths. Among these is the idea that a ‘great replace­ment,’ or a ‘white geno­cide,’ is dis­plac­ing white peo­ple while immi­grants ‘invade’ West­ern coun­tries at the hands of ‘glob­al­ists’ and Jews. . . .” (5)

Peo­ple may be won­der­ing why the sow­ing of chaos would be con­sid­ered opti­mal to Nazi ele­ments. The Order’s David Lane set this out in stark terms.

“ . . . . Weak points in the infra­struc­ture of an indus­tri­al­ized soci­ety are pri­ma­ry tar­gets. What­ev­er and who­ev­er per­forms valu­able ser­vice for the sys­tem is [sic] tar­gets, human or oth­er­wise. . . . There are only those who are for our cause and those who are our ene­mies . . . the mass­es are self­ish, greedy ass­es. They have always been and they always will be.(6)

The 1918 Influen­za Pan­dem­ic

An aca­d­e­m­ic paper pro­duced by a Fed­er­al Reserve econ­o­mist posits the socio-polit­i­cal effects of the 1918 flu pan­dem­ic as a fac­tor con­tribut­ing to the rise of Nazism in Ger­many.

Cit­ed by numer­ous pub­li­ca­tions, includ­ing The New York Times, Bloomberg News and Politi­co, Kris­t­ian Blick­le’s analy­sis under­scores some of our asser­tions con­cern­ing the psy­cho­log­i­cal, soci­o­log­i­cal and socio-eco­nom­ic aspects of the Covid-19 out­break.

A new aca­d­e­m­ic paper pro­duced by the Fed­er­al Reserve Bank of New York con­cludes that deaths caused by the 1918 influen­za pan­dem­ic ‘pro­found­ly shaped Ger­man soci­ety’ in sub­se­quent years and con­tributed to the strength­en­ing of the Nazi Par­ty. . . The paper’s find­ings are like­ly due to ‘changes in soci­etal pref­er­ences’ fol­low­ing the 1918 out­break . . .  [which] may have ‘spurred resent­ment of for­eign­ers among the sur­vivors’ and dri­ven vot­ers to par­ties ‘whose plat­form matched such sen­ti­ments.’ . . .‘influen­za deaths of 1918 are cor­re­lat­ed with an increase in the share of votes won by right-wing extrem­ists, such as the Nation­al Social­ist Work­ers Par­ty’ in Germany’s 1932 and 1933 elec­tions. Togeth­er, the low­er spend­ing and flu-relat­ed deaths ‘had a strong effect on the share of votes won by extrem­ists, specif­i­cal­ly the extrem­ist nation­al social­ist par­ty’ — the Nazis — the paper posits.’. . . .” (7)

This study is inter­est­ing to con­tem­plate against the back­ground of Don­ald Trump’s elec­toral vic­to­ry of 2024.  Might his vic­to­ry have result­ed, in part, from the fas­cist and extreme right-wing ram­i­fi­ca­tions of the pan­dem­ic? Might the Coro­n­av­ius pan­dem­ic have served as—in effect—the Nazi Virus? That may well be the case.

The Trump/AfD Virus?

A reveal­ing arti­cle in The Atlantic and a study by the Lon­don School of Eco­nom­ics lend sup­port to the hypoth­e­sis that Covid may well have sig­nif­i­cant­ly influ­enced young peo­ple, and pushed then in a fas­cist direc­tion.

Not­ing the Covid-19 pan­dem­ic may under­lie the elec­toral suc­cess of Trump and the grow­ing pop­u­lar­i­ty of the AfD in Ger­many, the mag­a­zine notes: “ . . . . In one recent CBS poll, Amer­i­cans under 30 weren’t just even­ly split between the par­ties. They were even more pro-Trump than Boomers over 65. . . . But young people’s appar­ent lurch right is not an Amer­i­can-only trend. . . . In France, Ger­many, Fin­land, and beyond, young vot­ers are swing­ing their sup­port toward anti-estab­lish­ment far-right par­ties ‘in num­bers equal to and even exceed­ing old­er vot­ers.’ In Ger­many, a 2024 sur­vey of 2,000 peo­ple showed that young peo­ple have adopt­ed a rel­a­tive­ly new ‘gloomy out­look’ on the future. No sur­prise, then, that the far-right Alter­na­tive für Deutsch­land has become the most pop­u­lar par­ty among Ger­mans under 30. . . .” (7a)

Pres­ti­gious aca­d­e­m­ic insti­tu­tions have not­ed the right­ward drift of young peo­ple, dri­ven by their increased skep­ti­cism of sci­en­tif­ic author­i­ties: “ . . . . Young peo­ple who cast their first bal­lot in 2024 were ‘more jad­ed than ever about the state of Amer­i­can lead­er­ship,’ accord­ing to the Har­vard Polit­i­cal Review. A 2024 analy­sis of Amer­i­cans under 30 found the ‘low­est lev­els of con­fi­dence in most pub­lic insti­tu­tions since the sur­vey began.’ . . .” (7b)

One dri­ver of the insti­tu­tion­al­ized pes­simism and right­ward drift of young peo­ple may well be the pandemic’s ero­sion of con­fi­dence in sci­en­tif­ic author­i­ties. “ . . . . One cross-coun­try analy­sis pub­lished by the Sys­temic Risk Cen­ter at the Lon­don School of Eco­nom­ics found that peo­ple who expe­ri­ence epi­demics between the ages of 18 and 25 have less con­fi­dence in their sci­en­tif­ic and polit­i­cal lead­er­ship. This loss of trust per­sists for years, even decades, in part because polit­i­cal ide­ol­o­gy tends to solid­i­fy in a person’s 20s. . . .” (7c)

Social media’s bifur­ca­tion into gen­der-spe­cif­ic forums is also an appar­ent con­trib­u­tor to the trend: “ . . . . The Nor­we­gian researcher Ruben B. Mathisen has writ­ten that ‘social media [cre­ates] sep­a­rate online spheres for men and women.’ By trad­ing gen­der-blend­ed hang­outs in base­ments and restau­rants for gen­der-seg­re­gat­ed online spaces, young men’s pol­i­tics became more dis­tinct­ly pro-male—and, more to the point, anti-fem­i­nist, accord­ing to Mathisen. . . . Although Mathisen focused on Nordic youth, he not­ed that his research built on a body of sur­vey lit­er­a­ture show­ing that ‘the ide­o­log­i­cal dis­tance between young men and women has accel­er­at­ed across sev­er­al coun­tries.’. . .” (7d)

The over­lap­ping effects of the pan­dem­ic and social media may well have mint­ed a fas­cist youth move­ment: “ . . . . But in a few years, what we’ve grown accus­tomed to call­ing Gen­er­a­tion Z may reveal itself to con­tain a sub­group: Gen­er­a­tion C, COVID-affect­ed and, for now, strik­ing­ly con­ser­v­a­tive. For this micro-gen­er­a­tion of young peo­ple in the Unit­ed States and through­out the West, social media has served as a cru­cible where sev­er­al trends have fused togeth­er: declin­ing trust in polit­i­cal and sci­en­tif­ic author­i­ties, anger about the excess­es of fem­i­nism and social jus­tice, and a pref­er­ence for right­ward pol­i­tics. . . .” (7e)

Of par­tic­u­lar sig­nif­i­cance is the con­trol over social media of peo­ple like Elon Musk (“X”, nee “Twit­ter”) and Mark Zucker­berg (“Meta,” nee “Face­book”) whose hyper-mas­cu­line, anti-fem­i­nist ide­ol­o­gy might very well be infect­ing male users of their net­works.

The takeover of the “Opin­ion-form­ing media” by the descen­dants of the SS is a key ele­ment of the Nazi tract Serpent’s Walk.

Serpent’s Walk and the Pacov Bio­log­i­cal War­fare Attack

The Nazi Tract Serpent’s Walk is believed to be a blue­print or man­i­festo for an impend­ing Nazi takeover of the U.S., not unlike The Turn­er Diaries (also pub­lished by Nation­al Van­guard Books). (8)

In Serpent’s Walk, the Nazi SS go under­ground and build up their eco­nom­ic mus­cle. (Exten­sive mate­r­i­al avail­able on Mr. Emory’s web­site cor­rob­o­rates the truth of this sce­nario.)

After gain­ing con­trol of the opin­ion-form­ing media, the SS infil­trate the mil­i­tary and, when mar­tial law is declared, they take over the coun­try.

For our pur­pos­es, the event pre­cip­i­tat­ing the mar­tial law dec­la­ra­tion and the sub­se­quent Nazi takeover is a dead­ly pan­dem­ic, pro­duced by a genet­i­cal­ly-engi­neered virus called “Pacov.”

Although the nature of the infec­tion is dif­fer­ent, the over­all par­a­digm is chill­ing­ly sim­i­lar.

We repro­duce an excerpt of the book, con­sist­ing of a con­ver­sa­tion between two of the Nazi faith­ful:

“ . . . . ‘Yes. Well. ‘Pacov’ stands for ‘Pan­dem­ic Com­mu­ni­ca­ble Virus,’ one of the ugli­er results of mil­i­tary exper­i­men­ta­tion with recom­bi­nant DNA. Do you know what that is?’ . . . . ‘Very well, let me tell you in layman’s terms.’ . . . . ‘Pacov con­sists of two sep­a­rate re-work­ings of two DNA chains of exist­ing virus­es. It’s a pig­gy-back weapon, a two-stage oper­a­tion. You send in the first stage. The vec­tors . . . agents of trans­mis­sion . . . for Pacov‑1 are exten­sive. It trav­els through the air, the water, or direct­ly from per­son-to-per­son and is high­ly con­ta­gious. It spreads for hun­dreds of miles, if con­di­tions are opti­mal.  Pacov‑1 pro­duces only a mild, flu-like infec­tion that dis­ap­pears with­in a day or two. Pub­lic health author­i­ties would over­look it, nev­er con­sid­er it a seri­ous epi­dem­ic, and even if they did they’d have to look care­ful­ly to iso­late it. Once a vic­tim is over the ‘flu,’ Pacov‑1 becomes dor­mant and almost unde­tectable. A month or two lat­er, you send in the sec­ond stage: Pacov‑2 is also a virus, just as con­ta­gious as the first, and just as harm­less by itself. It reacts with Pacov‑1 to pro­duce a pow­er­ful coag­u­lant. . . . you die with­in three min­utes. No warn­ing, no vac­cine, no cure. Those not exposed to both stages remain unharmed. . . . Pacov‑2 goes inert, like Pacov‑1 with­in a week or two. Then you get your victim’s coun­try, all his prop­er­ty, in undam­aged con­di­tion. . . . and a lot of corpses to bury.’ . . . .”   (9)

“Pacov” might be under­stood in a con­tem­po­rary con­text as stand­ing for “Pan­dem­ic Coro­na Virus.”

The Clot Thick­ens

The Covid pan­dem­ic has seen many vari­ants, which have been doc­u­ment­ed as attack­ing mul­ti­ple sys­tems of the body, pro­duc­ing a broad spec­trum of symp­toms.

We present a spec­u­la­tive note. Although the Pacov virus in Serpent’s Walk is fic­tion­al, unusu­al blood clot­ting is among the symp­toms that emerged in the pan­dem­ic.

“ . . . . Though nov­el coro­n­avirus symp­toms thus far have pre­sent­ed chiefly with­in the res­pi­ra­to­ry sys­tem, the infec­tion is swift­ly show­ing to be an all-out, sys­tem-wide assault that reach­es far past the lungs. Doc­tors in hot spots across the globe have begun to report an unex­pect­ed preva­lence of blood clot­ting among COVID cas­es, in what could pose a per­fect storm of poten­tial­ly fatal risk fac­tors. . . . It’s grow­ing so com­mon with severe COVID cas­es, doc­tors are rec­og­niz­ing it as a new pat­tern of clot­ting called COVID-19-asso­ci­at­ed coag­u­lopa­thy, or CAC, which is notably asso­ci­at­ed with high inflam­ma­to­ry mark­ers in the blood, like D‑dimer and fib­rino­gen. . . . ‘In the begin­ning of the out­break, we start­ed only giv­ing them med­i­cine to pre­vent clots. We saw that it was­n’t enough,’ Dr. Cristi­na Abad, an anes­the­si­ol­o­gist at Hos­pi­tal Clínicos San Car­los in Madrid, told ABC News. ‘They start­ed hav­ing pul­monary embolisms, so we start­ed [full] anti­co­ag­u­la­tion on every­one.’ . . .”  (10)

We leave it to the read­er to pon­der this unnerv­ing devel­op­ment and its pos­si­ble impli­ca­tions.

Chi­na and “The North­woods Virus”

In our first essay on the Covid-19 “op,” we framed the Covid-19 pan­dem­ic as—in effect—“The North­woods Virus.”

The nick­name derives from Oper­a­tion North­woods, a pro­gram of false-flag ter­ror­ist inci­dents designed to inflame pub­lic opin­ion against the alleged per­pe­tra­tor. (In the orig­i­nal North­woods par­a­digm, Cuba was the intend­ed tar­get.)

The effect of the coro­n­avirus on pub­lic opin­ion is pre­cise­ly what would be expect­ed from a North­woods-style oper­a­tion. The atten­dant pro­pa­gan­da blitzkrieg about the unten­able “Lab-Leak Hypoth­e­sis” is ampli­fy­ing that effect.

The avail­able evi­dence chron­i­cled in this arti­cle points to the Covid-19 pan­dem­ic as a bio­log­i­cal war­fare false flag oper­a­tion and provo­ca­tion.

“ . . . . in the Unit­ed States and oth­er wealthy democ­ra­cies, the pan­dem­ic has dri­ven neg­a­tive views of Chi­na to new heights, a sur­vey pub­lished on Tues­day showed. The ill­ness, deaths and dis­rup­tion caused by the coro­n­avirus in those coun­tries have inten­si­fied already strong pub­lic dis­trust of Chi­na, where the virus emerged late last year, the results from the Pew Research Center’s sur­vey indi­cat­ed. ‘Unfa­vor­able opin­ion has soared over the past year,’ said the sur­vey on views of Chi­na . . . .” (11)

The prob­a­ble sce­nario behind the gen­er­a­tion of “The North­woods Virus” will be dis­cussed below.

What Hap­pened: The “Oswald Insti­tute of Virol­o­gy”

Against the back­ground of the “Full-Court Press” desta­bi­liza­tion of Chi­na, the fun­da­men­tal nation­al secu­ri­ty foun­da­tion of the research that appears to have devel­oped SARS CoV‑2 and the tech­niques of con­tem­po­rary syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy, we are in a posi­tion to posit what prob­a­bly hap­pened.

We have dubbed this “The Oswald Insti­tute of Virol­o­gy,” named after Lee Har­vey Oswald.

The mas­sive sub­ject of the JFK assas­si­na­tion is beyond the present frame­work to present in the depth and detail required. Suf­fice it to say that the event itself was a coup d’etat, masked by pin­ning the crime on a left-cov­er U.S. intel­li­gence agent (Lee Har­vey Oswald) who was giv­en a “left cov­er,” infil­trat­ed into the for­mer Sovi­et Union, framed for the assas­si­na­tion, and then mur­dered before he could defend him­self.

Cen­tral play­ers in that coup were the senior mil­i­tary com­man­ders who com­posed the North­woods pro­pos­al.

For pur­pos­es of the present dis­cus­sion, a trun­cat­ed account of the frame­work of “Oswald’s” self-incrim­i­nat­ing appear­ances in Mex­i­co City informs us of the par­a­digm appar­ent­ly at work in the fram­ing of the Wuhan Insti­tute of Virol­o­gy for the devel­op­ment of the virus.

“ . . . . The CIA’s case scape­goat­ed Cuba and U.S.S.R. through Oswald for the president’s assas­si­na­tion and steered the Unit­ed States toward an inva­sion of Cuba and a nuclear attack on the U.S.S.R. . . . One must give the CIA (and the assas­si­na­tion spon­sors that were even fur­ther in the shad­ows) their due for hav­ing devised and exe­cut­ed a bril­liant set­up . . . . that pres­sured oth­er gov­ern­ment author­i­ties to choose among three major options: a war of vengeance against Cuba and the Sovi­et Union based on the CIA’s false Mex­i­co City doc­u­men­ta­tion of a Com­mu­nist assas­si­na­tion plot; a domes­tic polit­i­cal war based on the same doc­u­ments seen tru­ly, but a war the CIA would fight with every covert weapon at its com­mand; or a com­plete cov­er-up of any con­spir­a­cy evi­dence and a silent coup d’etat that would reverse Kennedy’s efforts to end the Cold War. . . .” (12)

Eco­Health Alliance (fund­ed by the Pen­ta­gon, USAID and advised by David Franz of the USAMRIID), financed the dis­cov­ery and gain-of-func­tion manip­u­la­tion of bat virus­es at the Wuhan Insti­tute of Virol­o­gy.

These research projects led to the pub­li­ca­tion of sci­en­tif­ic papers with the genom­ic sequences of the virus­es con­tained there­in. The data­bas­es of the Wuhan Insti­tute of Virol­o­gy would also have con­tained these viral genomes.

Hav­ing set up the WIV to take the blame for the cre­ation of the virus­es, the virus­es were then syn­the­sized using con­tem­po­rary syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy.

By way of review and elu­ci­da­tion, those syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy tech­niques were pre­sent­ed in an arti­cle in The Guardian: “ . . . . Advances in the area mean that sci­en­tists now have the capa­bil­i­ty to recre­ate dan­ger­ous virus­es from scratch; make harm­ful bac­te­ria more dead­ly; and mod­i­fy com­mon microbes so that they churn out lethal tox­ins once they enter the body. . . In the report, the sci­en­tists describe how syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy, which gives researchers pre­ci­sion tools to manip­u­late liv­ing organ­isms, ‘enhances and expands’ oppor­tu­ni­ties to cre­ate bioweapons. . . . Today, the genet­ic code of almost any mam­malian virus can be found online and syn­the­sised. ‘The tech­nol­o­gy to do this is avail­able now,’ said [Michael] Impe­ri­ale. “It requires some exper­tise, but it’s some­thing that’s rel­a­tive­ly easy to do, and that is why it tops the list. . . .” (13)

After syn­the­siz­ing the virus­es, pop­u­la­tions in the U.S. and around the world were then vec­tored and the blame pinned on Chi­na and the Wuhan Insti­tute of Virol­o­gy or, as we have termed it, “the Oswald Insti­tute of Virol­o­gy.”

Alleg­ing that the Chi­nese allowed the lethal virus­es that they had cre­at­ed to “leak,” the vast pro­pa­gan­da appa­ra­tus of the U.S. nation­al secu­ri­ty and media estab­lish­ments trum­pet­ed and dis­sem­i­nat­ed the “Lab-Leak Hypoth­e­sis.”

The resul­tant “psy-op” mobi­lized U.S. and world opin­ion for an esca­lat­ing cas­cade of anti-Chi­na measures—in effect, a “North­woods Virus” gam­bit.

Chi­na, Bio­log­i­cal War­fare and The Turn­er Diaries

We close with yet anoth­er spec­u­la­tive note.

Like Serpent’s Walk, The Turn­er Diaries is intend­ed as a blue­print for a Nazi takeover of gov­ern­ment.

Hav­ing been framed as the orig­i­na­tor of Covid, Chi­na has been the focal point of much crit­i­cism (much of it vit­ri­olic).

Inter­est­ing­ly, and per­haps sig­nif­i­cant­ly, in The Turn­er Diaries, Chi­na suc­cumbs to an attack by WMD’s, includ­ing bio­log­i­cal war­fare. The attack by the Nazi takeover gov­ern­ment “The Orga­ni­za­tion.”

“ . . . . the Orga­ni­za­tion attacks it [Chi­na] with nuclear, chem­i­calradi­o­log­i­cal and bio­log­i­cal weapons which ren­der the entire con­ti­nent of Asia unin­hab­it­able and rife with ‘mutants’. . . .” (14)

 Notes

1.– “White Suprema­cists See Coro­n­avirus as an Oppor­tu­ni­ty” by Cassie Miller; South­ern Pover­ty Law Cen­ter; 03/26/2020.

2.—Idem.

3.—Idem.

4.—Idem.

5.—Idem.

6.– Gods of the Blood: The Pagan Revival and White Sep­a­ratism by Mat­tias Gardell; Duke Uni­ver­si­ty Press [SC]; Copy­right 2003 by Duke Uni­ver­si­ty Press; ISBN 0–8223-3071–7; pp. 200–201.

7.– “Fed Study Ties 1918 Flu Pan­dem­ic to Nazi Par­ty Gains” by Quint Forgey; Politi­co; 5/05/2020.

7a.– “How COVID Pushed a Gen­er­a­tion of Young Peo­ple to the Right” by Derek Thomp­son; The Atlantic; Feb. 18, 2025.

7b.—Idem.

7c.—Idem.

7d.—Idem.

7e.—Idem.

8.– Ser­pen­t’s Walk by “Ran­dolph D. Calver­hall;” Copy­right 1991 [SC]; Nation­al Van­guard Books; 0–937944-05‑X; p. 89.

9.—Idem.

10.– “Why Are So Many Covid-19 Patients Also See­ing Blood Clots?” by Sasha Pezenik and Dr. L. Ned­da Dast­malchi; Good Morn­ing Amer­i­ca; 4/20/2020.

11.– “Dis­trust of Chi­na Jumps to New Highs in Demo­c­ra­t­ic Nations” by Chris Buck­ley; The New York Times; 10/06/2020.

12.– JFK and the Unspeak­able: Why He Died and Why It Mat­ters by James W. Dou­glass; Touch­stone Books [SC]; Copy­right 2008 by James W. Dou­glass; ISBN 978–1‑4391–9388‑4; pp. 75–81.

13.– “Syn­thet­ic biol­o­gy rais­es risk of new bioweapons, US report warns” by Ian Sam­ple; The Guardian; 06/19/2018.

14.– “The Turn­er Diaries;” Wikipedia.com

Discussion

No comments for “FTR#1410 The Covid-19 “Op,” Part 5: The Nazi Virus?”

Post a comment