Spitfire List Web site and blog of anti-fascist researcher and radio personality Dave Emory.

For The Record  

FTR#‘s 1379 & 1380: Team Trump Takes the Field, Parts 5 and 6

WFMU-FM is pod­cast­ing For The Record–You can sub­scribe to the pod­cast HERE.

Mr. Emory’s entire life’s work is avail­able on a 64GB flash dri­ve, avail­able for a con­tri­bu­tion of $65.00 or more (to KFJC). (This is a new feature–the old, 32GB flash­drive will not hold the new mate­r­i­al. Click Here to obtain Dav­e’s 45+ years’ work, com­plete through fall/early win­ter of 2024 and con­tain­ing the Con­ver­sa­tions with Monte .)

“Polit­i­cal language…is designed to make lies sound truth­ful and mur­der respectable, and to give an appear­ance of solid­i­ty to pure wind.”

Mr. Emory has launched a new Patre­on site. Vis­it at: Patreon.com/DaveEmory

FTR#1379 This pro­gram was record­ed in one, 60-minute seg­ment.

FTR#1380 This pro­gram was record­ed in one, 60-minute seg­ment.

Intro­duc­tion: NB: This descrip­tion con­tains mate­r­i­al not avail­able in the orig­i­nal.

These pro­grams high­light a dis­turb­ing syn­the­sis of sub­stan­tive, fac­tu­al inquiries (the assas­si­na­tions of JFK, MLK and RFK, Sr.) with pro­to-fascis­tic ancient aliens built the pyra­mids, ancient astro­nauts, Eric von Daniken bs.

Holo­caust deniers have long hov­ered around the edges of the assas­si­na­tion research. Once one real­izes that, in fact, Lee Har­vey Oswald was a pat­sy in the JFK assas­si­na­tion, James Earl Ray was a pat­sy in the assas­si­na­tion of Mar­tin Luther King and Sirhan Sirhan was a [mind-con­trolled] pat­sy in the assas­si­na­tion of RFK, Sr. it leaves many in a rel­a­tivis­tic political/intellectual uni­verse. They won­der: “Maybe the Holo­caust did­n’t hap­pen?”

Dis­cus­sion and Analy­sis IncludesAmaryl­lis Fox’s role as intel­li­gence advis­er to the Office of Man­age­ment and Bud­get and the Pres­i­den­t’s For­eign Intel­li­gence Review Board; Tul­si Gab­bard’s sup­port for Indi­a’s attack on Pak­istan; Mod­i’s net­work­ing with the RSS; An inci­sive arti­cle not­ing the pos­si­bil­i­ty of U.S. and/or U.K involve­ment in the ter­ror­ist inci­dent in Kash­mir; Review of the rela­tion­ship between RFK, Jr. daugh­ter-in-law and cam­paign man­ag­er Amaryl­lis Fox and Tul­si Gab­bard; Tul­si Gab­bard’s pro­found rela­tion­ship with the Hin­dut­va fas­cist orga­ni­za­tion RSS (the orga­ni­za­tion that assas­si­nat­ed Mahat­ma Gand­hi); Review of the assas­si­na­tion of Mahat­ma Gand­hi; Review of Gab­bard’s mem­ber­ship in the Hare Krish­na Cult; Dis­cus­sion of the New Age, the UFO dis­in­for­ma­tion gam­bit; the fascist/Nazi roots of the alter­na­tive archaeology/“Our Broth­ers from Space” meme; The recent pre­sen­ta­tion of dis­in­for­ma­tion con­cern­ing “cham­bers beneath the Pyra­mids of Egypt” (prov­ing that Space Aliens built the Pyra­mids); the approval of that bs by numer­ous fig­ures in “Team Trump” includ­ing Anna Pauli­na Luna, head­ing up “inquiries” into the assas­si­na­tions of JFK, RFK, MLK, 9/11, UFO’s; Jef­frey Epstein.

1.Amaryl­lis Fox Kennedy — Wikipedia

. . . . Amaryl­lis Fox Kennedy (born Amaryl­lis Damerell Thorn­ber; Sep­tem­ber 22, 1980)[1][2] is an Amer­i­can for­mer Cen­tral Intel­li­gence Agency (CIA) offi­cer and writer serv­ing since 2025 as the Asso­ciate Direc­tor for Intel­li­gence and Inter­na­tion­al Affairs at the Office of Man­age­ment and Bud­get (OMB) and as a mem­ber of Don­ald Trump’s Intel­li­gence Advi­so­ry Board.[3][4] She served in the CIA from 2002 to 2010. . . .

2a.“With You As You Hunt Down...”: US Spy Chief To PM Modi On Kash­mir Attack

The US spy chief extend­ed Wash­ing­ton’s full sup­port to New Del­hi and told Prime Min­is­ter Modi that “We are with you and sup­port you as you hunt down those respon­si­ble for this heinous attack.”

 

2b.India should tread war­i­ly on bat­tle­field — Indi­an Punch­line

. . . . Lat­er in the evening yes­ter­day, Modi also received Rashtriya Swayam­se­vak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhag­wat at his res­i­dence in a ges­ture “empha­sis­ing nation­al inter­est over pro­to­col,” as a nation­al dai­ly not­ed. How­ev­er, there should be no mis­con­cep­tions over how Bhagwat’s mind is work­ing. Five days back, he had remarked, “We hope for a strong response (to Pahal­gam attack.)” . . . .

 2c.Did West­ern Intel­li­gence Play a Role in the Lat­est Ter­ror­ist Attack in Kash­mir?

India and Pak­istan are tee­ter­ing on the precipice of war fol­low­ing the April 22 ter­ror­ist attack in Pahal­gam, which sits in the Indi­an-con­trolled region of Kash­mir, that left 22 tourists dead. The tim­ing of this attack — com­ing on the heels of Vice Pres­i­dent J.D. Vance’s vis­it to India — rais­es some uncom­fort­able ques­tions that mer­it an answer… Were West­ern intel­li­gence agen­cies involved? For what pur­pose? Let me pro­pose a cou­ple of plau­si­ble motives… spark ten­sions with Chi­na and cre­ate tur­moil with­in BRICS.

While many unin­formed West­ern­ers might scoff at the idea, Pakistan’s Defense Min­is­ter, Khawa­ja Muham­mad Asif, accused India of stag­ing a false flag. But Asif didn’t stop there. Dur­ing an inter­view with Sky News, Asif admit­ted that Pak­istan has been sup­port­ing and fund­ing ter­ror­ist groups for about three decades, describ­ing this as “doing the dirty work for the Unit­ed States and the West, includ­ing Britain.” He acknowl­edged that this was a “mis­take” and said Pak­istan has suf­fered great­ly as a result, espe­cial­ly by align­ing with the West dur­ing the Sovi­et-Afghan war and the post‑9/11 US-led war on ter­ror. Asif stat­ed that if Pak­istan had not joined these efforts, its inter­na­tion­al record would have been “unim­peach­able.”

Asif empha­sized three key points:

Col­lab­o­ra­tion with West­ern Pow­ers: Asif stat­ed, “We have been doing this dirty work for the Unit­ed States for about three decades, you know, the West, includ­ing Britain.” This com­ment was made in the con­text of dis­cussing Pakistan’s his­tor­i­cal role in sup­port­ing West­ern-led ini­tia­tives, which he sug­gests have con­tributed to the cur­rent chal­lenges with ter­ror­ism.

Train­ing of Mujahideen: Reflect­ing on Pakistan’s past deci­sions, Asif acknowl­edged that the coun­try had trained Mujahideen fight­ers dur­ing the Afghan-Sovi­et war, stat­ing, “We pre­pared them and now they have become ter­ror­ists.” He empha­sized that Pak­istan should not have engaged in such activ­i­ties at the behest of oth­er nations.

Cri­tique of U.S. Mil­i­tary Actions: Asif has crit­i­cized the Unit­ed States for its mil­i­tary inter­ven­tions, not­ing that Pak­istan has suf­fered due to its alliance with the U.S. He point­ed out that the U.S. left behind high-tech weapons in Afghanistan, which have con­tributed to the rise in ter­ror­ism with­in Pak­istan.

The attack in Pahal­gam, at a min­i­mum, was designed to dis­rupt fur­ther devel­op­ment of the area as a tourist des­ti­na­tion. Still, in light of Asif’s remark­able con­fes­sion, I can­not rule out some­thing more nefar­i­ous by my for­mer out­fit or by Britain’s MI‑6.

The con­flict between Pak­istan and India heat­ed up quick­ly on Tues­day, with India hit­ting alleged ter­ror­ist camps in Pak­istan and Pak­istan retal­i­at­ing with artillery and mis­sile strikes. Fol­low­ing this spike in vio­lence, things appear to have calmed down. Iran’s For­eign Min­is­ter Aragchi is in the region, try­ing to medi­ate. I sus­pect that he is doing this with the full back­ing and sup­port of both Rus­sia and Chi­na. . . .

3.Did you hear the incred­i­ble news? Earth-shat­ter­ing news. Or, rather, his­to­ry-shat­ter­ing news: A pair of researchers has uncov­ered evi­dence of a vast under­ground city beneath the pyra­mids of Giza. A pre­vi­ous­ly undis­cov­ered sub­ter­ranean com­plex that is many times deep­er than the height of the pyra­mids. So vast that it has observers point­ing to the dis­cov­ery as pow­er­ful evi­dence of a civ­i­liza­tion with advanced capa­bil­i­ties that has been lost to his­to­ry. Or even aliens.

It’s that sig­nif­i­cant a dis­cov­ery. Or at least it would have been that sig­nif­i­cant a dis­cov­ery had it been based on ver­i­fi­able sci­en­tif­ic meth­ods and with­stood peer review. Instead, as we’re going to see, the study is based on claims that experts say sim­ply aren’t fea­si­ble giv­en the tech­nol­o­gy used by the two researchers to map out the under­ground struc­tures. The two researchers – Cor­ra­do Malan­ga, from Italy’s Uni­ver­si­ty of Pisa, and Fil­ip­po Bion­di with the Uni­ver­si­ty of Strath­clyde in Scot­land – had already pub­lished a sep­a­rate peer-reviewed paper in Octo­ber 2022 in the sci­en­tif­ic jour­nal Remote Sens­ing which found hid­den rooms and ramps inside the Khafre pyra­mid. But this lat­est non-peer-reviewed paper pur­ports to reveal under­ground struc­tures on a much larg­er scale. Malan­ga is a UFOl­o­gist and has appeared on YouTube shows about aliens. Bion­di is a spe­cial­ist in radar tech­nol­o­gy. Accord­ing to Pro­fes­sor Lawrence Cony­ers, a radar expert at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Den­ver who focus­es on archae­ol­o­gy, any claims based on the radar tech­nol­o­gy they used are ‘a huge exag­ger­a­tion’ since it’s not pos­si­ble for the tech­nol­o­gy to pen­e­trate as deeply into the ground to back up the claims they are mak­ing.

And yet, as we’re going to see, the report­ing on these ‘find­ings’ includes breath­less reports in The Dai­ly Mail with quotes from ‘experts’ about how the whole his­to­ry of Egypt­ian his­to­ry has been rewrit­ten and evi­dence of advance pre-flood civ­i­liza­tions is about to be revealed. Or maybe it’s evi­dence of an alien ori­gin for the pyra­mids. Per­haps the pyra­mids real­ly are ancient pow­er plants! Yep, that’s the spin this sto­ry has been get­ting from the Dai­ly Mail, includ­ing quotes from Joe Rogan about how ‘mind-blow­ing’ a devel­op­ment this all is or quotes from ‘researcher Jay Ander­son’ who has con­clud­ed that “The pyra­mid itself was already a mas­sive red flag in the ancient Egypt­ian his­tor­i­cal nar­ra­tive but now, with this dis­cov­ery, I think it’s impos­si­ble to say that the Egyp­tians we’ve been taught about built these structures…It pro­vides the most extra­or­di­nary evi­dence for a pre-flood era civil­i­sa­tion that was flour­ish­ing in a way that we can scarce­ly com­pre­hend.”

It’s also rather notable that, of the two Dai­ly Mail arti­cle below on this sto­ry, it’s only the arti­cle from March 22 that even men­tions the fact that the study hasn’t been peer reviewed and has already been debunked by experts. The Dai­ly Mail piece from March 30 makes no men­tion but instead run with the head­line “Were the Pyra­mids built by aliens? Inside the bizarre con­spir­a­cy the­o­ry ‘backed’ by Elon Musk – after experts make aston­ish­ing dis­cov­ery.” Of course, as we’ve seen, not only has Elon Musk pro­mot­ed the ‘aliens built the pyra­mids’ meme but his mater­nal grand­fa­ther was utter­ly obsessed with dis­cov­er­ing ‘lost cities’ in South­ern Africa that would prove the exis­tences of advanced non-black civ­i­liza­tions. The main­stream­ing of the ‘lost civilization/alien astro­naut’ nar­ra­tives con­tin­ues.

But as we’re going to be remind­ed of in the fol­low­ing 2018 South­ern Pover­ty Law Cen­ter piece, the main­stream­ing of the ‘lost civilization/alien astro­naut’ nar­ra­tives is hard­ly new. It’s been going on for decades. Cen­turies, if you fac­tor in the real­i­ty that the notion of a lost white civ­i­liza­tion that pre-dat­ed the Native Amer­i­cans on North Amer­i­ca was a wide­ly held view from the colo­nial era until the 20th Cen­tu­ry. In fact, when Pres­i­dent Andrew Jack­son was jus­ti­fy­ing the eth­nic cleans­ing and forced relo­ca­tion of Native tribes, he cit­ed the mytho­log­i­cal exter­mi­na­tion of this alleged ancient Aryan tribe at the hands of Native Amer­i­cans as a kind of his­tor­i­cal prece­dent for his action. Nar­ra­tives whol­ly embraced by the Nazis’ anti-Enlight­en­ment myths and con­tin­ued per­co­lat­ing through the cul­ture for decades. Flash for­ward to the 2000s, and we find out­lets like the His­to­ry Chan­nel rou­tine­ly plat­form­ing ‘lost civ­i­liza­tion’ and ‘ancient alien’ nar­ra­tives. Nar­ra­tives still going strong today, thanks, in large part, to their now-rou­tine media main­stream­ing that has been going on for decades:

“Close encoun­ters of the racist kind” by Alexan­der Zaitchik; South­ern Pover­ty Law Cen­ter; 01/02/2018

The mod­ern far right is criss­crossed with pseu­do-sci­en­tif­ic research into lost Aryan super-civ­i­liza­tions, bib­li­cal giants, ancient astro­nauts and the occa­sion­al inter-dimen­sion­al alien.

On Decem­ber 6, 1830, Andrew Jack­son used his sec­ond State of the Union address to defend the Indi­an Removal Act, the administration’s sole leg­isla­tive vic­to­ry. He described the law pro­mul­gat­ing the expul­sion and reset­tle­ment of south­east­ern Native Amer­i­can tribes as the “hap­py con­sum­ma­tion” of U.S. Indi­an pol­i­cy. To his crit­ics who “wept over the fate of the abo­rig­ines” —and who, it turned out, accu­rate­ly pre­dict­ed the hor­rors of the forced migra­tions known col­lec­tive­ly to his­to­ry as the Trail of Tears — Jack­son offered an arche­ol­o­gy les­son. Any “melan­choly reflec­tions” were ahis­tor­i­cal, he said, because the Indi­ans were nei­ther inno­cent vic­tims nor first peo­ples, but per­pe­tra­tors of what Jackson’s mod­ern admir­ers might call “white geno­cide.”

Jack­son knew this because the evi­dence was every­where in plain sight.

“In the mon­u­ments and for­ti­fi­ca­tions of an unknown peo­ple, we behold the memo­ri­als of a once-pow­er­ful race,” said Jack­son, “exter­mi­nat­ed to make room for the exist­ing sav­age tribes.”

This ref­er­ence to a “once-pow­er­ful race” was not lost on the Amer­i­can pub­lic of 1830. Every school­boy and girl knew it to be the Lost Race of the Mound Builders, believed to be the continent’s orig­i­nal Cau­casian inhab­i­tants. From the colo­nial era into the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry, it was wide­ly accept­ed that cer­tain earth­en struc­tures and bur­ial grounds proved the exis­tence of “white” or Indo-Euro­pean peo­ples who set­tled North Amer­i­ca only to be wiped out by the arrival of Jackson’s “sav­age (Asi­at­ic) tribes.”

In the ear­ly 1890s, the U.S. eth­nol­o­gist Cyrus Vance dis­cred­it­ed the the­o­ry in a series pub­lished by the Smith­son­ian Insti­tu­tion. But the idea of a pre-Colom­bian “white geno­cide” nev­er dis­ap­peared. It sur­vived in sub­cul­tures, influ­enced by the occult and Atlantis leg­ends, which clung to the­o­ries of lost ancient super-civ­i­liza­tions that, curi­ous­ly, always seemed to be racial­ly “white.”

In recent decades, as evi­dence of a rich­er pale­oamer­i­can record than pre­vi­ous­ly real­ized has come to light, Jackson’s “once-pow­er­ful race” has found a new gen­er­a­tion of boost­ers on the far right, where fan­tasies of “white geno­cide” dis­tant­ly past and cur­rent­ly unfold­ing are an ani­mat­ing obses­sion.

In the frac­tured and con­stant­ly cross-fer­til­iz­ing galaxy of extrem­ist con­spir­a­cy cul­ture, the white Mound­builders —now known on the far right as “the Solutre­ans” — share a stage with oth­er char­ac­ters from an ancient and racial­ly glo­ri­ous but “sup­pressed” past: ancient Nordic-look­ing astro­nauts, bib­li­cal Aryan giants, Nazi sci­en­tists under the South Pole, and the occa­sion­al inter-dimen­sion­al alien in league with the Jews.

Alt-His­to­ry Goes Prime Time

Over the last decade, the His­to­ry Chan­nel has exploit­ed and fueled the pop­u­lar­iza­tion of alter­na­tive arche­ol­o­gy, or alt-his­to­ry. Numer­ous pro­grams on the net­work show­case ideas that, while not explic­it­ly racist or anti-Semit­ic, have ori­gins in colo­nial projects and have been cham­pi­oned (for a rea­son) by mod­ern extrem­ists.

Take “Amer­i­ca Unearthed,” which aired between 2012 and 2015 on H2, a defunct His­to­ry Chan­nel net­work. That show’s host, a geol­o­gist named Scott Wolter, pro­mot­ed the­o­ries that ancient Celts and Scots set­tled North Amer­i­ca and hybridized Native Amer­i­cans cen­turies before Colum­bus. The details can be found in Wolter’s con­tri­bu­tions to Lost Worlds of Ancient Amer­i­ca, a 2012 anthol­o­gy edit­ed by Frank Joseph, born Frank Collin, founder of the Nation­al Social­ist Par­ty of Amer­i­ca. (In 1993, fol­low­ing his expul­sion from the par­ty for “impure blood”, Collin became edi­tor of Ancient Amer­i­can mag­a­zine and has authored dozens of books deal­ing with ancient “sup­pressed” his­to­ry.) In anoth­er episode, when a guest pro­fess­es admi­ra­tion for the Knights of the Gold­en Cir­cle, a group of wealthy South­ern­ers who sought to cre­ate a hemi­spher­ic slave empire, Wolter just nods. (Wolter has denied that he or his ideas are racist, and claims to be polit­i­cal­ly lib­er­al.)

What­ev­er the per­son­al pol­i­tics of the host, these shows serve as vec­tors for racist ideas and schol­ar­ship, argues the inde­pen­dent schol­ar Jason Colav­i­to, who has been track­ing this cul­tur­al crossover and ampli­fi­ca­tion of fringe his­to­ry for years. In books like Foun­da­tions of Atlantis, Ancient Astro­nauts, and Oth­er Alter­na­tive Pasts, Colav­i­to explores and debunks many of the ideas pro­mot­ed on the His­to­ry Chan­nel and far right web­sites alike.

Shows like “Amer­i­ca Unearthed” are heav­i­ly dis­cussed on white nation­al­ist alt-his­to­ry forums, as well as gen­er­al far right polit­i­cal sites like Storm­front. They are rou­tine­ly praised for intro­duc­ing view­ers to vari­a­tions on the Solutre­an Hypoth­e­sis (see below) and rais­ing the pro­file of racist pseu­do-schol­ar­ship.

Con­sid­er the H2 series “In Search of Aliens,” which, before its demise, pro­mot­ed the work of Jan Udo Holey, a Ger­man writer whose anti­se­mit­ic books have been banned across Europe. (Holey’s pen name, Jan Van Hel­sig, is a blunt Drac­u­la ref­er­ence, i.e. Jews are blood­suck­ers.) The His­to­ry Channel’s long-run­ning series “Ancient Aliens,” mean­while, fea­tures David Chil­dress, whose books cite and build on the work of James Church­ward, who pro­mot­ed an ancient empire called the “lost con­ti­nent of Mu,” whose “dom­i­nant race” was an “exceed­ing­ly hand­some peo­ple, with clear white or olive skin.”

While the appeal of these the­o­ries has roots in Jack­son­ian jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for Man­i­fest Des­tiny, their cur­rent man­i­fes­ta­tions are close­ly inter­twined with the ven­omous per­se­cu­tion com­plex­es that moti­vate the mod­ern far right .

“Pseu­do-his­to­ries feed the self-impor­tance and aggriev­e­ment of neo-Nazis and alt-right folk,” says Ben­jamin Rad­ford, a fel­low with the Com­mit­tee for Skep­ti­cal Inquiry who has writ­ten wide­ly on pseu­do-his­to­ry and claims of para­nor­mal activ­i­ty. “They feel their right­ful place in the world has been denied them — by‘Big Arche­ol­o­gy’, byJews, by an oppres­sive gov­ern­ment.”

The Nazi Con­nec­tion

The basic tenets of alt-arche­ol­o­gy and alt-his­to­ry were foun­da­tion­al to the ide­ol­o­gy and pro­gram of Nation­al Social­ism, but the Nazis did not invent them. The Nazi belief in a pure Aryan race with a glo­ri­ous ancient past and dis­tinct genet­ic his­to­ry was cen­tral to a transat­lantic nine­teenth-cen­tu­ry occult scene (that fea­tured a heavy Ger­man influ­ence.) After Hitler assumed pow­er, this belief was insti­tu­tion­al­ized in the form of the Ances­tral Her­itage and Teach­ing Soci­ety, or the Ahnenerbe, an alt-arche­ol­o­gy research out­fit found­ed by Hein­rich Himm­ler and the Atlantis the­o­rist Her­man Wirth.

Under the ban­ner of the Ahnerbe, Nazi explor­ers fanned out across Europe and the globe in search of relics hold­ing (pos­si­bly super­nat­ur­al) hints of ancient Aryan glo­ry. In 1938, a team was dis­patched to Ice­land in search of the lost Aryan civ­i­liza­tion of Thule, which Nazi lead­ers dis­cov­ered in an Ice­landic epic poem. Among the Nazis’ inter­ests in Thule was the leg­end of a race of ancient Aryan giants. (Ver­sions of this myth remain com­mon among bib­li­cal­ly focused alt-his­to­ri­ans like Steve Quayle and L.A. Marzul­li.)

Belief in these leg­ends was pos­si­ble because of the Nazis’ sharp rejec­tion of the Enlight­en­ment. Dis­miss­ing the sci­ence of racial diver­si­fi­ca­tion and the arche­o­log­i­cal record, they rev­eled in sym­bol­o­gy, myths and leg­ends of “pure” ancient king­doms that con­quered the world under its sym­bol, the swasti­ka. (This, the Nazis believed, explained the symbol’s pres­ence in both Native Amer­i­can and Indi­an art.)

The Solutre­ans and the Orig­i­nal “White Geno­cide”

In the U.S., the aver­age mem­ber of the far right is like­ly more famil­iar with the mod­ern ver­sion of Jackson’s Race of the Mound­builders, known as the Solutre­ans.

The name is tak­en from a hypoth­e­sis first pro­mot­ed in the 1930s by the Amer­i­can arche­ol­o­gist Frank Hibben, who dis­cov­ered arrow­heads in North Amer­i­ca that pre-dat­ed the ear­li­est Native Amer­i­can cul­ture known at the time, the Clo­vis. The arrow­heads, argued Hibben, resem­bled those of the Solutre­ans, a Stone Age peo­ple who inhab­it­ed south­west­ern Europe. Most of the field quick­ly dis­missed the sim­i­lar­i­ty as mean­ing­less, but Hibben found adher­ents among those yearn­ing for a new and more sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly respectable ver­sion of Jackson’s “once-pow­er­ful race.” For them, the arrow­heads (and oth­er con­test­ed find­ings) prove that “Euro­pean” Solutre­ans migrat­ed to Amer­i­ca across the north­ern ice-shelf mil­len­nia before “the Mon­goloids” (as Solutre­an adher­ents are apt to describe Native Amer­i­cans.)

There is a sec­ond punch­line to white nation­al­ists con­tin­u­ing to hold up the Solutre­ans as vic­tims of a pre­his­toric white per­se­cu­tion dra­ma: Most schol­ars believe the Solutre­ans pre­ced­ed racial diver­si­fi­ca­tion, and their arrow­heads are arti­facts of a dark-skinned peo­ple not long out of North Africa.

Atlantis, Aliens & Ancient Astro­nauts

In 1882, a decade before the Smith­son­ian debunked the Race of the Mound­builders, a Min­neso­ta Con­gress­man and writer named Ignatius Loy­ola Don­nel­ly pub­lished Atlantis: The Ante­dilu­vian World. The book pro­vid­ed anoth­er and more elab­o­rate the­o­ry of an Aryan-look­ing super civ­i­liza­tion that dif­fused tech­nol­o­gy to the rest of the world. Donnell’s book, based on men­tions of Atlantis by Pla­to, cut the tem­plate for the sci-fi-tinged lost white civ­i­liza­tion the­o­ries now expe­ri­enc­ing a revival on cable tele­vi­sion and beyond.

But just as Atlantis the­o­ry gained trac­tion fol­low­ing the debunk­ing of the Mound­builders, so have the­o­ries of ancient Aryan astro­nauts super­seded Atlantis with the map­ping of the oceans and their floors.

In the 1960s and 70s, Erich von Daniken and Zecharia Sitchin put a twist on myths about Aryan vis­i­tors from a lost civ­i­liza­tion pre­dat­ing the last Ice Age. These vis­i­tors to Mesoamer­i­ca didn’t come from Atlantis but from the sky. Best­sellers like von Daniken’s Char­i­ots of the Gods (sev­en mil­lion sold and count­ing) pop­u­lar­ized the idea that Aryan-look­ing aliens brought sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy to prim­i­tive peo­ples around the world. In recent years, Gra­ham Han­cock has repack­aged Ancient Astro­naut The­o­ry for a new gen­er­a­tion in his best­selling Fin­ger­prints of the Gods, and through steady work as a His­to­ry Chan­nel talk­ing head.

Today’s far right is divid­ed on Ancient Astro­naut the­o­ry. On the one hand, it denies agency to brown-skinned peo­ples, and fea­tures Aryan-look­ing heroes, which they con­sid­er good things; but it also deprives ancient (human) Aryans of the accom­plish­ments cred­it­ed to them so lav­ish­ly in Atlantis and oth­er the­o­ries.

Con­sid­er the case of Patrick Chouinard, a pro­lif­ic writer who oper­ates the alt-his­to­ry sites RenegadeTribune.com and ancientaryans.com. (The lat­ter site’s sym­bol, the Norse rune, was also the logo of the Nazi Ahnenerbe.) Like the Nazis, the sites are ded­i­cat­ed to recap­tur­ing a lost, pure Aryan civ­i­liza­tion —one respect­ful of, but not depen­dent on alien life. In Sep­tem­ber, Chouinard cast a crit­i­cal eye on the upcom­ing tenth sea­son of the His­to­ry Channel’s Ancient Aliens, in an arti­cle titled “Are Ancient Aliens The­o­rists Sell­ing Our Peo­ple Short?”

Chouinard believes they are. He cites an old episode of the H2’s In Search of Aliens in which the hosts, Gior­gio Tsouka­los and David Chil­dress (see above), explore the alleged mys­tery of some “elon­gat­ed skulls” dis­cov­ered in Peru. Chouinard scoffs at the hosts’ con­clu­sion that the skulls belonged to aliens. Rather, he argued, recon­struc­tions “show a very Nordic facial struc­ture with [a] huge cra­ni­um.” This could be proof, fur­ther­more, of “a sep­a­rate branch of the White race the went along its own evo­lu­tion­ary path over 5,000 years ago.”

And who, you might won­der, does Chouinard believe is behind the Ancient Alien The­o­ry that is “sell­ing his peo­ple short”?

“The Jews,” writes Chouinard, “are using … the ancient alien camp to con­found our race to the point that we deny our own accom­plish­ments. The White race did not need ancient aliens to build our ancient civ­i­liza­tions, or to found oth­er civ­i­liza­tions in remote cor­ners of the Earth. Our race is capa­ble of so much more.”

In 2018, it is dan­ger­ous in alt-ancient his­to­ry cir­cles to com­plete­ly dis­count Ancient Aliens. Chouinard knows this. Rather than risk alien­at­ing his read­ers, he con­cedes, “It is very pos­si­ble that vis­i­ta­tions from extrater­res­tri­als did hap­pen in ancient times, [but] I will not con­clude that the major­i­ty of our accom­plish­ments as a race can be attrib­uted to extrater­res­tri­als.”

UFOs & “Refract­ed” Anti-Semi­tism

Mas­sive and hope­less­ly intri­cate cov­er-ups. Nefar­i­ous alien races with gnomish phys­i­cal fea­tures. Tales of secret Nazi super-tech­nolo­gies. It was always inevitable that the UFO and far right scenes would end up in bed togeth­er. UFO cul­ture cast a shad­ow over every­thing in the post­war years, and as not­ed above, the far right has nev­er been a stranger to the super­nat­ur­al.

In Cul­ture of Con­spir­a­cy, the his­to­ri­an Michael Barkun locates the ear­ly 1990s as the decade this con­ver­gence accel­er­at­ed. Books like William Cooper’s Behold a Pale Horse and jour­nals pub­lished by Gye­or­gos Ceres Hatonn described UFO con­spir­a­cies that fit snug­ly into the New World Order con­spir­a­cy tem­plate, heav­i­ly influ­enc­ing that decade’s mili­tia move­ment. (Okla­homa City bomber Tim­o­thy McVeigh was report­ed­ly a fan of Cooper’s radio show.)

But the seeds of this union are much deep­er in the post­war record. One of the most impor­tant ear­ly UFO writ­ers in the ear­ly 1950s, William Dud­ley Pel­ly, was an Amer­i­can occultist and fas­cist; his most impor­tant dis­ci­ple, George Hunt Williamson, pro­duced Byzan­tine UFO the­o­ries that incor­po­rat­ed anti-Semit­ic themes. Williamson’s 1958 book, UFOsCon­fi­den­tial, claimed every gov­ern­ment on earth was under the con­trol of a hand­ful of (most­ly Jew­ish) “inter­na­tion­al bankers,” which for some rea­son the author believed includ­ed U.S. Supreme Court Jus­tice Felix Frank­furter.

Pel­ley and Williamson’s suc­ces­sors are not always or even often so bla­tant­ly anti-Semit­ic. But the fin­ger­prints of anti-Semi­tes are vis­i­ble in the works of influ­en­tial mod­ern UFO writ­ers like Jim Marrs and Jim Kei­th. These fin­ger­prints appear in what Barkun calls “refract­ed racism and anti-Semi­tism,” in which old tropes are repack­aged as an episode of the X‑Files. This repack­ag­ing often includes not very sub­tle dis­tinc­tions between “benev­o­lent” aliens (tall, Aryan-look­ing) and “malev­o­lent” aliens (short, grotesque, often in league with “inter­na­tion­al bankers”).

More than any­one else, the British con­spir­acist David Icke has pop­u­lar­ized the Alien ver­sion of New World Order con­spir­a­cy. The for­mer sportscaster’s elab­o­rate the­o­ry is the Sgt. Pep­pers album-cov­er of the genre, fea­tur­ing the Masons, the Vat­i­can, the Illu­mi­nati, the House of Wind­sor —every­one is there. At the cen­ter of the the­o­ry is an alien race of lizard peo­ple from the fifth-dimen­sion. Though Icke has always denied traf­fick­ing in anti-Semi­tism, he has endorsed the Pro­to­cols of the Elders of Zion —the famous forgery and foun­da­tion­al text of mod­ern anti-Semi­tism —choos­ing to call it “The Illu­mi­nati Pro­to­cols.”

Hol­low Earth, Secret Nazi Labs & the South Pole

Anoth­er inevitable devel­op­ment in post­war con­spir­a­cy sub­cul­ture was the rise of a belief in secret Nazi bases under­neath Antarc­ti­ca. The idea of a “hol­low” or “inner” earth was a key tenet of nine­teenth-cen­tu­ry occultism, and in the post­war years it reemerged as a set­ting for escaped Nazi sci­en­tists work­ing in secret tech­nol­o­gy and weapons labs.

The leg­end took root dur­ing the mid-1970s, nur­tured by the Cana­di­an neo-Nazi Ernst Zun­del, who argued that Nazis invent­ed fly­ing saucers and had tak­en their break­through tech­nol­o­gy to bases deep under the South Pole.

The Third Reich was inter­est­ed in a pos­si­ble base at the South Pole, and a few high-lev­el Nazis did escape to Argenti­na, whose nation­al ter­ri­to­ry includes a slice of Antarc­ti­ca extend­ing to the South Pole. Zun­del and his suc­ces­sors have infused these facts with Vic­to­ri­an inner-earth leg­ends, and then mar­i­nat­ed them over mul­ti­ple view­ings of the 1968 B‑flick, They Saved Hitler’s Brain. Ver­sions of the the­o­ry remain pop­u­lar on neo-Nazi alt-his­to­ry sites, and in recent years British tabloids like the Mir­ror and Dai­ly Star have found click-bait gold in spread­ing them.

The story’s per­sis­tence led Col­in Sum­mer­hayes of Cam­bridge University’s Polar Research Insti­tute to look into the mat­ter. In a 2006 edi­tion of The Polar Record, Sum­mer­hayes pre­sent­ed his heav­i­ly foot­not­ed and researched con­clu­sion that secret Nazi bases do not exist, and have nev­er exist­ed, on or below Antarc­ti­ca.

As exhaus­tive as it was, it is unlike­ly Sum­mer­hayes’ study had much impact among the theory’s adher­ents. It was, after all, com­pet­ing with an ever expand­ing glut of “hid­den his­to­ry” books, pod­casts and web­sites. One of many such titles to appear that year was SS Broth­er­hood of the Bell: The Nazi’s Incred­i­ble Secret Tech­nol­o­gy, penned by Joseph P. Far­rell, a pro­lif­ic alt-his­to­ri­an and reg­u­lar on Red Ice Radio.

4. And that SPLC report from back in 2018 brings us to the fol­low­ing sto­ry that has received quite a bit of cov­er­age in recent weeks. The kind of sto­ry that has advo­cates of both ‘ancient astro­nauts’ as well as ‘long lost advanced civ­i­liza­tions’ tit­ter­ing with excite­ment: a pair of Ital­ian researchers claim to have dis­cov­ered a vast under­ground city beneath the pyra­mids of Giza. So vast is this pre­vi­ous­ly undis­cov­ered under­ground com­plex that a num­ber of researchers are treat­ing it like a par­a­digm-shat­ter­ing dis­cov­ery that should force a rein­ter­pre­ta­tion of the his­to­ry of the Pyra­mids. That’s the nar­ra­tive get­ting main­stream treat­ment in pub­li­ca­tions like The Dai­ly Mail. Ancient non-advance peo­ple could not have built these vast struc­tures. Only a lost advanced civ­i­liza­tion could have done it. Or aliens:

“Were the Pyra­mids built by aliens? Inside the bizarre con­spir­a­cy the­o­ry ‘backed’ by Elon Musk – after experts make aston­ish­ing dis­cov­ery” By HARRY HOWARD; Dai­ly Mail; 03/30/2025

They were not, so the polemic went, the work of ‘puny’ man, but instead those ‘giants of Mars’.

Yes, the Pyra­mids of Giza – those mon­u­ments to god-like splen­dour that have stood for more than 4,000 years – were built by aliens.

That was the ‘claim’ made by Amer­i­can astronomer Gar­rett P. Serviss in his 1898 book Edison’s Con­quest of Mars.

Per­cep­tive read­ers will have not­ed that Serviss’s work – an unau­tho­rised re-write of HG Wells’ 1897 alien inva­sion nov­el The War of the Worlds – was fic­tion­al.

But it did pop­u­larise a the­o­ry that, even in more recent years, has con­tin­ued to find trac­tion.

In 2020, bil­lion­aire Tes­la boss Elon Musk drew the scorn of experts when he took to Twit­ter – the social net­work that he bought in 2022 for $44billion – to write: ‘Aliens built the pyra­mids obv’.

Now, the dis­cov­ery this month that an ‘under­ground city’ lies in a ‘hid­den world’ beneath Egypt’s most famous pyra­mids has again focused atten­tion on the struc­tures that have obsessed experts and ama­teurs alike for mil­len­nia.

Just what could the vast net­work, which descends more than a mile into the sands, have been used for?

The largest of the three pyra­mids at Giza – the Great Pyra­mid – was built more than 4,500 years ago in around 2560BC for King Khu­fu, who was the sec­ond pharaoh of Ancient Egypt’s fourth dynasty.

Until the com­ple­tion of Lin­coln Cathe­dral in the 14th cen­tu­ry, it was the tallest build­ing in the world.

The pyra­mid, which was topped with a gold or elec­trum cap­ping stone, was built as a sacred tomb for Khu­fu, who believed him­self to be divine.

The oth­er two pyra­mids, built for pharaohs Menkau­re and Khafre, were con­struct­ed decades lat­er.

The notion that the struc­tures were built by or with the help of aliens gained fur­ther trac­tion with Swiss author Erich von Däniken’s influ­en­tial 1968 book Char­i­ots of the Gods.

He argued that Giza’s Great Pyra­mid could not have been built with­out the help of advanced alien tech­nol­o­gy.

The author wrote: ‘If we meek­ly accept the neat pack­age of knowl­edge that the Egyp­tol­o­gists serve up to us, ancient Egypt appears sud­den­ly and with­out tran­si­tion with a fan­tas­tic ready-made civ­i­liza­tion.

‘Great cities and enor­mous tem­ples, colos­sal sta­tus with tremen­dous expres­sive pow­er, splen­did streets flanked by mag­nif­i­cent sculp­tures, per­fect drainage sys­tems, lux­u­ri­ous tombs carved out of the rock, pyra­mids of over­whelm­ing size – these and many oth­er won­der­ful things shot out of the ground, so to speak.

‘Gen­uine mir­a­cles in a coun­try that is sud­den­ly capa­ble of such achieve­ments with­out rec­og­niz­able pre­his­to­ry!’

He added: ‘An arti­fi­cial moun­tain, some 490 feet high and weigh­ing 6,500,000 tons, stands there as evi­dence of an incred­i­ble achieve­ment, and this mon­u­ment is sup­posed to be noth­ing more than the bur­ial place of an extrav­a­gant king!

‘Any­one who can believe that expla­na­tion is wel­come to it…’

The late Bel­gian author Philip Cop­pens was sim­i­lar­ly forth­right in his 2011 book The Ancient Alien Ques­tion.

He said in one pas­sage: ‘If aliens built the Great Pyra­mid, then it needs to be argued that they were also respon­si­ble for at least some of the oth­er pyra­mids in ancient Egypt.’

But experts have rub­bished any notion that beings from oth­er plan­ets might have been involved in the con­struc­tion of the pyra­mids.

Speak­ing on the BBC’s His­to­ry Extra pod­cast, British Egyp­tol­o­gist Pro­fes­sor Joyce Tyldes­ley said: ‘It’s almost almost sort of a bit like a form of racism, isn’t it, that these peo­ple couldn’t do it, so some­one else must have done it.’

‘But I think there’s a bit more to it than that. Because pri­or to the idea of aliens help­ing build the pyra­mids, we had the idea that maybe peo­ple from Atlantis might have helped build the pyra­mids, and pri­or to that, we had the idea that God inspired builders to use the pyra­mid inch, a divine­ly inspired mea­sure­ment to build the pyra­mids.

‘So I think it’s that there’s always been a long suc­ces­sion of the­o­ries about how the pyra­mids might have been built, and as one is sort of super­seded by the oth­er.

‘So it doesn’t just come out of nowhere. I think it’s a sort of chang­ing and evolv­ing belief as how the pyra­mids might have been built, and that’s just the lat­est one that we have.

‘As we become more inter­est­ed in space and aliens, then they’ve sort of been attached to this the­o­ry as well.’

The Great Pyra­mid was sup­pos­ed­ly com­plet­ed in 24 years.

But it was built from 2.3million lime­stone blocks, with each one weigh­ing between 2.5tons 70 tons.

British writer Gra­ham Han­cock not­ed: ‘Assum­ing the masons worked ten hours a day, 365 days a year, they would have need­ed to place one block every two min­utes.’

The lat­est dis­cov­ery that cav­ernous spaces exist beneath the pyra­mids was made by researchers from the Uni­ver­si­ty of Strath­clyde in Glas­gow and the Ital­ian Uni­ver­si­ty of Pisa.

‘When we mag­ni­fy the images we will reveal that beneath it lies what can only be described as a true under­ground city… an entire hid­den world of many struc­tures,’ said Cor­ra­do Malan­ga, one of the archae­o­log­i­cal researchers.

It remains a mys­tery how much old­er than the pyra­mids the struc­tures are.

It is also unknown was their pur­pose is, but they are con­nect­ed by geo­met­ric pas­sages.

Even more spec­tac­u­lar are eight ver­ti­cal columns that descend 2,1245feet into a pair of huge cham­bers.

The depth is is almost five times the height of the Khafre Pyra­mid.

The cylin­ders are aligned in two rows of four that run north to south.

Giv­en that the edges of the Great Pyra­mids face exact­ly north, south, east and west, the arrange­ments of the cylin­ders is cer­tain to be sig­nif­i­cant.

And around each pil­lar is a stair­case-like walk­way.

5.And that Dai­ly Mail report from March 30 brings us to the fol­low­ing Dai­ly Mail report from 8 days ear­li­er. A report that includes some rather impor­tant details regard­ing the verac­i­ty of these find­ings. Details left out of the March 30 report entire­ly: the study hasn’t been peer reviewed and experts have already debunked it:

“The bomb­shell the­o­ry – which many experts claim to have already debunked – comes from a study that used radar puls­es to cre­ate high-res­o­lu­tion images deep into the ground beneath the struc­tures, the same way sonar radar is used to map the depths of the ocean.”

A bomb­shell theory…that hap­pens to have already been debunked by experts. It’s a rather impor­tant detail in this sto­ry. A detail the Dai­ly Mail decid­ed to include in this March 22 ver­sion of that sto­ry but left out of the above March 30 ver­sion entire­ly. No men­tion at all of all the prob­lems with this ‘ground­break­ing research’. That’s part of the con­text of this sto­ry of the amaz­ing dis­cov­ery beneath the pyra­mids. The Dai­ly Mail went from pro­mot­ing this sto­ry – while at least includ­ing some expert caveats – to just pro­mot­ing it with­out the caveats. So when we see how Joe Rogan has been pro­mot­ing the idea that the pyra­mids are some sort of ancient hydro­gen-gen­er­at­ing pow­er plant or oth­er ‘experts’ sug­gest it’s all evi­dence of a “pre-flood era civil­i­sa­tion that was flour­ish­ing in a way that we can scarce­ly com­pre­hend”, keep in mind how the pub­lic at large is being ‘informed’ about these ‘alter­na­tive his­to­ries’ from a vari­ety of dif­fer­ence sources. Between online news like the Dai­ly Mail or pod­cast­ers like Joe Rogan, the main­stream­ing of the ‘ancient aliens’ meme has gone well being the His­to­ry Chan­nel. Learn­ing that one of the two researchers, Cor­ra­do Malan­ga, is a UFOl­o­gist and has appeared on YouTube shows about aliens is kind of what we should expect at this point:


Amer­i­can pod­cast­er Joe Rogan has now weighed in on the ‘mind-blow­ing’ devel­op­ment, call­ing it ‘very very very weird’.

Rogan said: ‘This is insane. It’s quite stun­ning. They don’t under­stand what it is but it’s a uni­form struc­ture. There are sev­er­al pil­lars and all of this is very very very weird.

‘It’s real­ly crazy.’

He added: ‘Christo­pher Dunne believes that the Pyra­mid of Giza is a big pow­er plant.

‘He has a the­o­ry about why its built the way its built.

‘He thinks it coin­cides with the abil­i­ty to pro­duce hydro­gen, to utilise the rays of space and to gen­er­ate elec­tric­i­ty through this.’

Researcher Jay Ander­son added: ‘What has just been announced in rela­tion to the pyra­mids at the Giza plateau and the plateau itself is so incred­i­ble, so awe-inspir­ing and nar­ra­tive shat­ter­ing that I’ve been sit­ting here for the last hour try­ing to wrap my heard around the impli­ca­tions of what we were just told.

‘It’s noth­ing short of mind­blow­ing. What’s been dis­cov­ered is that there are huge struc­tures com­ing down from the base of the pyra­mid deep into the bedrock.

‘It then con­nects to mas­sive inter­nal struc­tures deep deep down.

‘The pyra­mid itself was already a mas­sive red flag in the ancient Egypt­ian his­tor­i­cal nar­ra­tive but now, with this dis­cov­ery, I think it’s impos­si­ble to say that the Egyp­tians we’ve been taught about built these struc­tures.

‘It pro­vides the most extra­or­di­nary evi­dence for a pre-flood era civil­i­sa­tion that was flour­ish­ing in a way that we can scarce­ly com­pre­hend.’

Malan­ga is a UFOl­o­gist and has appeared on YouTube shows about aliens, where he has dis­cussed his more than decade-long career of study­ing UFO sight­ings in Italy.

Bion­di, on the oth­er hand spe­cial­izes radar tech­nol­o­gy.

Malan­ga and Biondi’s pub­lished a sep­a­rate peer-reviewed paper in Octo­ber 2022 in the sci­en­tif­ic jour­nal Remote Sens­ing which found hid­den rooms and ramps inside Khafre, along with evi­dence of a ther­mal anom­aly near the pyramid’s base.

The new study used sim­i­lar tech­nol­o­gy, but got a boost from a satel­lite orbit­ing Earth.

The new radar tech­nique works by com­bin­ing satel­lite radar data with tiny vibra­tions from nat­u­ral­ly-occur­ring seis­mic move­ments, to con­struct 3D images of what lies beneath the sur­face of the earth, with­out doing any phys­i­cal dig­ging.

Sad­ly, instead, it appears that the researchers behind this bomb­shell report are engag­ing in a “huge exag­ger­a­tion” at best, mak­ing claims that sim­ply aren’t pos­si­ble giv­en the tech­nol­o­gy. And then there’s the pro­pri­etary data analy­sis soft­ware that doesn’t lend itself to peer review. How con­ve­nient:


The paper, which has not been peer-reviewed by inde­pen­dent experts, found eight ver­ti­cal cylin­der-shaped struc­tures extend­ing more than 2,100 feet below the pyra­mid and more unknown struc­tures 4,000 feet deep­er.

A press release described the find­ings as ‘ground­break­ing’ and if true could rewrite the his­to­ry of ancient Egypt.

How­ev­er, inde­pen­dent experts have raised seri­ous con­cerns about the study.

Pro­fes­sor Lawrence Cony­ers, a radar expert at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Den­ver who focus­es on archae­ol­o­gy, told DailyMail.com that it is not pos­si­ble for the tech­nol­o­gy to pen­e­trate that deeply into the ground, mak­ing the idea of an under­ground city ‘a huge exag­ger­a­tion.’

Pro­fes­sor Cony­ers said it is con­ceiv­able there are small struc­tures, such as shafts and cham­bers, beneath the pyra­mids that exist­ed before they were built because the site was ‘spe­cial to ancient peo­ple.’

He high­light­ed how ‘the Mayans and oth­er peo­ple in ancient Mesoamer­i­ca often built pyra­mids on top of the entrances of caves or cav­erns that had cer­e­mo­ni­al mean­ing to them.’

The work by Cor­ra­do Malan­ga, from Italy’s Uni­ver­si­ty of Pisa, and Fil­ip­po Bion­di with the Uni­ver­si­ty of Strath­clyde in Scot­land has only been released dur­ing an in-per­son brief­ing in Italy this week and is yet to be pub­lished in a sci­en­tif­ic jour­nal, where it would need to be ana­lyzed by inde­pen­dent experts.

Despite the scep­ti­cism, Pro­fes­sor Cony­ers added that the only way to prove the dis­cov­er­ies to be true would be ‘tar­get­ed exca­va­tions.’

He also told DailyMail.com that he could not tell if the tech­nol­o­gy used actu­al­ly picked up hid­den struc­ture below the pyra­mid.

‘They are using all kinds of fan­cy pro­pri­etary data analy­sis soft­ware,’ said Pro­fes­sor Cony­ers.

Final­ly, note the mem­ber of con­gress who decid­ed to share their inter­est in the alleged find­ings: Anna Pauli­na Luna, the same mem­ber of con­gress who has tak­en the lead in the dis­clo­sure of state secrets sur­round­ing events like the assas­si­na­tions of JFK, MLK, and UFOs. Again, how con­ve­nient:


The news has gone viral this week, with X flood­ed with posts about the poten­tial dis­cov­ery.

Flori­da con­gress­woman Anna Pauli­na Luna shared a post about the struc­tures on her X page.

It’s kind of amaz­ing that we aren’t get­ting more reports of mem­bers of Con­gress tout­ing this sto­ry. Unfound­ed claims of ancient aliens and lost civ­i­liza­tions are weird­ly on brand for the sec­ond Trump admin­is­tra­tion. How long before we get a con­gres­sion­al hear­ing on the hor­rors of Crit­i­cal Race The­o­ry wip­ing away the proud his­to­ry of the Aryan Mound Builders? It’s just a mat­ter of time at this point. It’s the actu­al cred­i­ble evi­dence for the Aryan Mound Builders that we’ll have to keep wait­ing for.

“Wild new the­o­ries emerge after sci­en­tists claim to have dis­cov­ered a ‘vast CITY’ 6,500ft below the Pyra­mids of Giza – as Joe Rogan weighs in on ‘mind-blow­ing’ devel­op­ment” By EMILY JANE DAVIES and STACY LIBERATORE; Dai­ly Mail; 03/22/2025

“The bomb­shell the­o­ry – which many experts claim to have already debunked – comes from a study that used radar puls­es to cre­ate high-res­o­lu­tion images deep into the ground beneath the struc­tures, the same way sonar radar is used to map the depths of the ocean.”

The ‘ground­break­ing’ dis­cov­ery beneath the Egypt­ian pyra­mids has tak­en the world by storm and new the­o­ries have emerged to cast doubt on how the struc­tures were built.

Researchers from Italy and Scot­land claim to have uncov­ered ‘a vast under­ground city’ which stretch­es more than 6,500 feet direct­ly under­neath the Pyra­mids of Giza, mak­ing them 10 times larg­er than the pyra­mids them­selves.

The bomb­shell the­o­ry – which many experts claim to have already debunked – comes from a study that used radar puls­es to cre­ate high-res­o­lu­tion images deep into the ground beneath the struc­tures, the same way sonar radar is used to map the depths of the ocean.

Amer­i­can pod­cast­er Joe Rogan has now weighed in on the ‘mind-blow­ing’ devel­op­ment, call­ing it ‘very very very weird’.

Rogan said: ‘This is insane. It’s quite stun­ning. They don’t under­stand what it is but it’s a uni­form struc­ture. There are sev­er­al pil­lars and all of this is very very very weird.

‘It’s real­ly crazy.’

He added: ‘Christo­pher Dunne believes that the Pyra­mid of Giza is a big pow­er plant.

‘He has a the­o­ry about why its built the way its built.

‘He thinks it coin­cides with the abil­i­ty to pro­duce hydro­gen, to utilise the rays of space and to gen­er­ate elec­tric­i­ty through this.’

Researcher Jay Ander­son added: ‘What has just been announced in rela­tion to the pyra­mids at the Giza plateau and the plateau itself is so incred­i­ble, so awe-inspir­ing and nar­ra­tive shat­ter­ing that I’ve been sit­ting here for the last hour try­ing to wrap my heard around the impli­ca­tions of what we were just told.

‘It’s noth­ing short of mind­blow­ing. What’s been dis­cov­ered is that there are huge struc­tures com­ing down from the base of the pyra­mid deep into the bedrock.

‘It then con­nects to mas­sive inter­nal struc­tures deep deep down.

‘The pyra­mid itself was already a mas­sive red flag in the ancient Egypt­ian his­tor­i­cal nar­ra­tive but now, with this dis­cov­ery, I think it’s impos­si­ble to say that the Egyp­tians we’ve been taught about built these struc­tures.

‘It pro­vides the most extra­or­di­nary evi­dence for a pre-flood era civil­i­sa­tion that was flour­ish­ing in a way that we can scarce­ly com­pre­hend.’

The paper, which has not been peer-reviewed by inde­pen­dent experts, found eight ver­ti­cal cylin­der-shaped struc­tures extend­ing more than 2,100 feet below the pyra­mid and more unknown struc­tures 4,000 feet deep­er.

A press release described the find­ings as ‘ground­break­ing’ and if true could rewrite the his­to­ry of ancient Egypt.

How­ev­er, inde­pen­dent experts have raised seri­ous con­cerns about the study.

Pro­fes­sor Lawrence Cony­ers, a radar expert at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Den­ver who focus­es on archae­ol­o­gy, told DailyMail.com that it is not pos­si­ble for the tech­nol­o­gy to pen­e­trate that deeply into the ground, mak­ing the idea of an under­ground city ‘a huge exag­ger­a­tion.’

Pro­fes­sor Cony­ers said it is con­ceiv­able there are small struc­tures, such as shafts and cham­bers, beneath the pyra­mids that exist­ed before they were built because the site was ‘spe­cial to ancient peo­ple.’

He high­light­ed how ‘the Mayans and oth­er peo­ple in ancient Mesoamer­i­ca often built pyra­mids on top of the entrances of caves or cav­erns that had cer­e­mo­ni­al mean­ing to them.’

The work by Cor­ra­do Malan­ga, from Italy’s Uni­ver­si­ty of Pisa, and Fil­ip­po Bion­di with the Uni­ver­si­ty of Strath­clyde in Scot­land has only been released dur­ing an in-per­son brief­ing in Italy this week and is yet to be pub­lished in a sci­en­tif­ic jour­nal, where it would need to be ana­lyzed by inde­pen­dent experts.

Despite the scep­ti­cism, Pro­fes­sor Cony­ers added that the only way to prove the dis­cov­er­ies to be true would be ‘tar­get­ed exca­va­tions.’

‘My take is that as long as authors are not mak­ing things up and that their basic meth­ods are cor­rect, their inter­pre­ta­tions should be giv­en a look by all who care about the site,’ he explained.

‘We can quib­ble about inter­pre­ta­tions, and that is called sci­ence. But the basic meth­ods need to be sol­id.’

He also told DailyMail.com that he could not tell if the tech­nol­o­gy used actu­al­ly picked up hid­den struc­ture below the pyra­mid.

‘They are using all kinds of fan­cy pro­pri­etary data analy­sis soft­ware,’ said Pro­fes­sor Cony­ers.

Malan­ga is a UFOl­o­gist and has appeared on YouTube shows about aliens, where he has dis­cussed his more than decade-long career of study­ing UFO sight­ings in Italy.

Bion­di, on the oth­er hand spe­cial­izes radar tech­nol­o­gy.

Malan­ga and Biondi’s pub­lished a sep­a­rate peer-reviewed paper in Octo­ber 2022 in the sci­en­tif­ic jour­nal Remote Sens­ing which found hid­den rooms and ramps inside Khafre, along with evi­dence of a ther­mal anom­aly near the pyramid’s base.

The new study used sim­i­lar tech­nol­o­gy, but got a boost from a satel­lite orbit­ing Earth.

The new radar tech­nique works by com­bin­ing satel­lite radar data with tiny vibra­tions from nat­u­ral­ly-occur­ring seis­mic move­ments, to con­struct 3D images of what lies beneath the sur­face of the earth, with­out doing any phys­i­cal dig­ging.

Nicole Cic­co­lo, the project’s spokesper­son, said: ‘A vast under­ground city has been dis­cov­ered beneath the pyra­mids,’

‘[The] ground­break­ing study has rede­fined the bound­aries of satel­lite data analy­sis and archae­o­log­i­cal explo­ration.’

The cylin­der-shaped struc­tures, which Cic­co­lo referred to as ‘shafts,’ were arranged in two par­al­lel rows and sur­round­ed by descend­ing spi­ral path­ways.

Cic­co­lo said the cylin­der struc­tures were found under­neath each of the three pyra­mids and appeared ‘to serve as access points to this under­ground sys­tem.’

The team explained the sys­tem as oth­er cham­ber-like struc­tures inter­con­nect­ing under all three of the pyra­mids.

‘The exis­tence of vast cham­bers beneath the earth’s sur­face, com­pa­ra­ble in size to the pyra­mids them­selves, which have a remark­ably strong cor­re­la­tion between the leg­endary Halls of Amen­ti,’ Cic­co­lo said.

‘These new archae­o­log­i­cal find­ings could rede­fine our under­stand­ing of the sacred topog­ra­phy of ancient Egypt, pro­vid­ing spa­tial coor­di­nates for pre­vi­ous­ly unknown and unex­plored sub­ter­ranean struc­tures,’ she added.

The news has gone viral this week, with X flood­ed with posts about the poten­tial dis­cov­ery.

Flori­da con­gress­woman Anna Pauli­na Luna shared a post about the struc­tures on her X page.

———–

 

Discussion

2 comments for “FTR#‘s 1379 & 1380: Team Trump Takes the Field, Parts 5 and 6”

  1. Good after­noon, Mr. Every, I’ve been fol­low­ing your work since then, and I find the top­ics you’ve cov­ered inter­est­ing. I’ll get straight to the point. I’ve cer­tain­ly heard or read the work of Pol­ish jour­nal­ist and researcher Igor Witkows­ki on UFOs and their rela­tion­ship with the Third Reich, and on the so-called Die Glocke.

    Have you con­sid­ered writ­ing or ana­lyz­ing what this per­son has said in recent years? With­out going into too much detail, what is your opin­ion of the work Joseph P. Far­rell has done on the sub­ject of the Nazis?

    Sin­cere­ly, Chris.

    Posted by Chris | May 12, 2025, 11:18 am
  2. @Chris–

    My name is spelled “E‑M-O-R‑Y,” not “E‑V-E-R‑Y.”

    Cor­dial­ly,

    Dave Emory

    Posted by Dave Emory | May 12, 2025, 6:07 pm

Post a comment