COMMENT: Look­ing ahead to what fig­ures to be a very, very dark future, we feel com­pelled to revis­it some key aspects of the AIDS epi­dem­ic, in light of the alarm­ing pro­lif­er­a­tion of genet­i­cal­ly-mod­i­fied organ­isms. Human­i­ty has failed bad­ly in its approach to the dis­ease, ignor­ing the evi­dence that it was delib­er­ate­ly cre­at­ed.

In FTR #606, we encap­su­lat­ed infor­ma­tion about AIDS col­lat­ed over more than a quar­ter of a cen­tu­ry, dove­tail­ing that with indi­ca­tions that the boil­er-plate research on the dis­ease may track back to the Third Reich and its min­ions hired by the U.S. under Project Paper­clip. We sup­ple­ment­ed this in FTR #682.

In that pro­gram, we made a num­ber of key points that should be revis­it­ed in the con­text of genet­i­cal­ly-mod­i­fied organ­isms and their rapid pro­lif­er­a­tion:

• The prospect of using genet­ic engi­neer­ing to cre­ate a dis­ease that would be resis­tant to and/or attack the human immune sys­tem was fore­cast in House Appro­pri­a­tions hear­ings for the defense bud­get for fis­cal year 1970: “. . . As long ago as 1962, forty sci­en­tists were employed at the U.S. Army bio­log­i­cal war­fare lab­o­ra­to­ries on full-time genet­ics research. ‘Many oth­ers,’ it was said, ‘appre­ci­ate the impli­ca­tions of genet­ics for their own work.’  The impli­ca­tions were made more spe­cific that genet­ic engi­neer­ing could solve one of the major dis­ad­van­tages of bio­log­i­cal war­fare, that it is lim­ited to dis­eases which occur nat­u­rally some­where in the world. ‘With­in the next 5 to 10 years, it would prob­a­bly be pos­si­ble to make a new infec­tive micro-organ­ism which could dif­fer in cer­tain impor­tant respects from any known dis­ease-caus­ing organ­isms. Most impor­tant of these is that it might be refrac­tory to the immuno­log­i­cal and ther­a­peu­tic process­es upon which we depend to main­tain our rel­a­tive free­dom from infec­tious dis­ease.’ The pos­si­bil­ity that such a ‘super germ’ may have been suc­cess­fully pro­duced in a lab­o­ra­tory some­where in the world in the years since that assess­ment was made is one which should not be too read­ily cast aside. . .”
• There is a hered­i­tary immu­ni­ty to HIV infec­tion that is present only in the white race and only in pure-bred north­ern Euro­peans (“Aryans”)
• There is anoth­er hered­i­tary trait that pre­dis­pos­es peo­ple of African extrac­tion to HIV infec­tion.
• At the end of World War II, the U.S. imple­ment­ed Project Paper­clip, under which Nazi sci­en­tists (many of them war crim­i­nals of the first order) were brought into the coun­try and put to work at the heart of the U.S. defense estab­lish­ment: “Near­ing the end of World War II, the Unit­ed States and the Sovi­et Union raced to recruit Ger­man sci­en­tists for post­war pur­poses. Under a top-secret pro­gram code-named Project PAPERCLIP, the U.S. mil­i­tary pur­sued Nazi sci­en­tific tal­ent ‘like for­bid­den fruit,’ bring­ing them to Amer­ica under employ­ment con­tracts and offer­ing them full U.S. cit­i­zen­ship. The recruits were sup­posed to be nom­i­nal par­tic­i­pants in Nazi activ­i­ties. But the zeal­ous mil­i­tary recruit­ed more than two thou­sand sci­en­tists, many of whom had dark Nazi par­ty pasts. . . .” (Lab 257 by Michael Car­roll; p. 7.)
• One of the Nazi researchers import­ed into the U.S. was Dr. Erich Traub.  Accord­ing to Michael C. Car­roll, author of Lab 257: The Dis­turb­ing Sto­ry of the Gov­ern­men­t’s Secret Plum Island Germ Lab­o­ra­to­ry, Traub was a key admin­is­tra­tor of the Third Reich’s bio­log­i­cal war­fare research pro­gram and report­ed direct­ly to SS chief Hein­rich Himm­ler. ” . . . . Every­body seemed will­ing to for­get about Erich Traub’s dirty past—that he played a cru­cial role in the Nazis’ ‘Can­cer Research Pro­gram,’ the cov­er name for their bio­log­i­cal war­fare pro­gram, and that he worked direct­ly under SS Reichs­fuhrer Hein­rich Himm­ler. They seemed will­ing to over­look that Traub in the 1930’s faith­fully attend­ed Camp Sigfried. In fact, the USDA liked him so much, it glossed over his dubi­ous past and offered him the top sci­en­tist job at the new Plum Island Laboratory—not once, but twice. Just months after the 1952 pub­lic hear­ings on select­ing Plum Island, Doc Sha­han dialed Dr. Traub at the naval lab­o­ra­tory to dis­cuss plans for estab­lish­ing the germ lab­o­ra­tory and a posi­tion on Plum Island. . . .” (Lab 257 by Michael Car­roll; p. 10.) NB: Traub was nev­er for­mal­ly induct­ed into the SS, but report­ed direct­ly to Hein­rich Himm­ler. He was Plum Island’s top sci­en­tist, not its founder.
• The Nazis began research­ing tox­ic agents on apes and then moved on to humans—inmates in con­cen­tra­tion camps. AIDS results from a mon­key virus that even­tu­ally jumped to humans as well. Does the pro­gres­sion in the Nazi death camps of test­ing on apes to test­ing on humans have any rela­tion­ship with the pro­gres­sion of a simi­an virus to infec­tion of humans? Might the cre­ation of AIDS have stemmed from Nazi research? Is it an acci­dent that the hered­i­tary immu­nity from HIV infec­tion is only present in the white race, and [accord­ing to some sources] North­ern Euro­peans in par­tic­u­lar? Is it an acci­dent that peo­ple of African extrac­tion are par­tic­u­larly sus­cep­ti­ble to HIV infec­tion?
• Dr. Franz Liesau Zac­cha­rias was the Abwehr agent who obtained the apes for the Nazi med­ical exper­i­ments. He was bad­ly want­ed by West­ern intel­li­gence after the war. Why?! West­ern intel­li­gence agen­cies cer­tain­ly did­n’t need any­one to teach them how to obtain apes from Africa. Exper­i­ment­ing on ani­mals is not a war crime. The sus­pi­cion here is that he had dis­cov­ered some­thing of val­ue dur­ing his pri­mate work. Evi­dence also sug­gests that he remained part of The Under­ground Reich.
• Among the dis­eases that Liesau Zacharias’ ani­mals were used for test­ing was “the plague”! Did the Nazis note that some peo­ple appeared to be immune to infec­tion with plague? Were tis­sue and/or sera sam­ples tak­en and pre­served for fur­ther study? Was this in any way con­nected to the even­tual evo­lu­tion of the CCR5-delta 32 gene as a hered­i­tary pro­tec­tion against infec­tion by HIV? Is it pos­si­ble that Liesau Zacharias was actu­ally tar­geted for recruit­ment by the U.S. for Project Paper­clip? Did Liesau Zacharias expe­ri­ence an out­break of immun­od­e­fi­ciency among his pri­mates await­ing ship­ment to Ger­many? Might such an out­break have been due to SIV? Did Liesau Zacharias take tis­sue and sera sam­ples from infect­ed pri­mates? Might such a devel­op­ment have been relat­ed to his impor­tance to the Allies?
  
• Kaiser Per­ma­nente has dis­cussed the dan­gers of GMO’s in a newslet­ter, link­ing them to “dev­as­tat­ing” threats to human health.
• We should not fail to rec­og­nize the dan­ger of using GMO’s in food, water, med­i­cine or oth­er “vec­tors” to achieve the goals of Nazi geno­cide.
• In FTR #305, we dis­cussed the absorp­tion of Beck­er GMBH into ConA­gra foods, a major play­er in the food indus­try. Beck­er was begun by an SS offi­cer with funds from Holo­caust vic­tims. How many oth­er major food firms are Under­ground Reich prop­er­ties? Might they slow­ly destroy their “racial ene­mies” by using food as a vec­tor for “pro-Aryan” GMO’s?
• In that con­text, we are very sus­pi­cious of Jorge Paulo Lemann and 3G Cap­i­tal, a major play­er in the food and brew­ing indus­tries. They own Anheuser-Busch (the largest Amer­i­can brew­er), Heinz foods, the com­pa­ny that sup­plies McDon­ald’s, Burg­er King and many oth­er firms. Lemann is a Brazil­ian-born, Swiss-based “self-made man.” His  pro­file and that of his busi­ness inter­ests fit the pro­file of a Bor­mann firm to a tee. Keep on eye on this.
•  Leman­n’s “new” Anheuser-Busch is fac­ing class-action lit­i­ga­tion for water­ing its beer! What else are they doing to the food and bev­er­ages that they man­u­fac­ture?
• In time, as well, the health crises that will stem from the indis­crim­i­nate use of GMO’s, lax envi­ron­men­tal reg­u­la­tion become man­i­fest, the increase in health care costs will place addi­tion­al (per­haps cat­a­stroph­ic) strain on the U.S. bud­get. The calls for aus­ter­i­ty will sure­ly mul­ti­ply and become more shrill in this event.

 “Top US Health­care Giant: GMOs Are Dev­as­tat­ing Health” by Antho­ny Guc­cia­r­di [Nat­u­ral­So­ci­ety]; Read­er Sup­port­ed News; 11/28/2012.

Just days after a lead­ing genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied organ­ism (GMO) researcher spoke out against GMOs and how many pro-GMO ‘sci­en­tists’ are in bed with Mon­san­to or car­ry their own GMO patents, the largest man­aged health­care provider in the Unit­ed States is now pub­licly speak­ing out against GMOs. In a recent newslet­ter, the Kaiser Per­ma­nente com­pa­ny dis­cussed the numer­ous dan­gers of GMOs in a recent newslet­ter and how to avoid them.

Explain­ing how GM ingre­di­ents have been linked to tumors and organ dam­age in rats in the only life­long rat study avail­able, the newslet­ter high­light­ed how the only real long- term research indi­cates that GMOs are a seri­ous health dan­ger. The newslet­ter, which you can view here, states:

“Despite what the biotech indus­try might say, there is lit­tle research on the long-term effects of GMOs on human health. Inde­pen­dent research has found sev­er­al vari­eties of GMO corn caused organ dam­age in rats. Oth­er stud­ies have found that GMOs may lead to an inabil­i­ty in ani­mals to repro­duce.” . . .