Spitfire List Web site and blog of anti-fascist researcher and radio personality Dave Emory.

News & Supplemental  

Operations Against China



(Own report) — Sev­er­al front orga­ni­za­tions of Ger­man for­eign pol­i­cy have for years been sup­port­ing the Tibetan exile struc­tures in Dharam­sala, India. This includes sup­port for orga­ni­za­tion­al mea­sures enabling the “gov­ern­ment in exile” in Dharam­sala to orches­trate its activ­i­ties against the Peo­ple’s Repub­lic of Chi­na world­wide. Par­tic­u­lar­ly the Free Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ty (FDP) affil­i­at­ed Friedrich Nau­mann Foun­da­tion and the Hein­rich Boell Foun­da­tion (affil­i­at­ed with the Green Par­ty) are coop­er­at­ing with the “gov­ern­ment in exile” and oth­er exile Tibetan insti­tu­tions. Front orga­ni­za­tions of US for­eign pol­i­cy are work­ing toward the same objec­tives. Already in the 1950s Wash­ing­ton was inter­ven­ing in Tibet with mil­lions of dol­lars, at the time, even sup­port­ing Tibetan armed upris­ings against the Peo­ple’s Repub­lic of Chi­na. Ger­man orga­ni­za­tions took up the ques­tion of Tibet around the end of the 80s, at a time when Chi­na was begin­ning its rise to become a glob­al com­peti­tor of the west. The cur­rent activ­i­ties are apt to great­ly weak­en Chi­na. These sup­ple­ment oth­er Ger­man-US mea­sures aimed at thwart­ing the rise of their East-Asian rival.
Guer­ril­la Attacks
The first west­ern activ­i­ties in Tibet began only a few years after the found­ing of the Peo­ple’s Repub­lic of Chi­na. These activ­i­ties are still today embla­zoned in Chi­na’s polit­i­cal mem­o­ry and play no insignif­i­cant role in Chi­na’s judg­ment of the cur­rent seces­sion­ist ten­den­cies. The US logis­ti­cal and mil­i­tary sup­port for the armed Tibetan rebel­lions, begin­ning in 1957, was aimed at desta­bi­liz­ing the com­mu­nist government.[1] The inter­ven­tion out­last­ed the Dalai Lama’s flight into exile in Dharam­sala, India, where, after 1959, a Tibetan “gov­ern­ment in exile” was called into being. Accord­ing to offi­cial doc­u­ments from the gov­ern­ment in Wash­ing­ton, dur­ing the 1960s the CIA was pay­ing up to $1.7 mil­lion per year to main­tain “oper­a­tions against Chi­na.” Up to $180,000 was giv­en direct­ly to the Dalai Lama.[2] Iso­lat­ed skir­mish­es con­tin­ued up into the 1970s. Accord­ing to the Tibet expert, Prof. Karen­i­na Koll­mar-Paulenz, “Guer­ril­la attacks, orig­i­nat­ing in Mus­tang, a Tibetan enclave in Nepal, per­sist­ed with US-Amer­i­can sup­port until 1974, when the USA and the Nepalese gov­ern­ment stopped their help.”[3] Two years ear­li­er, Wash­ing­ton had entered into a new coop­er­a­tion with Bei­jing that defined their com­mon efforts against Moscow to be top pri­or­i­ty.
Green Alter­na­tive
Ger­man orga­ni­za­tions have become inten­sive­ly engaged in the Tibet ques­tion since the 1980s, when the Peo­ple’s Repub­lic of Chi­na began an eco­nom­ic upswing that has now placed it in the top ranks of glob­al com­mer­cial sta­tis­tics. Already at that time polit­i­cal strate­gists were pre­dict­ing the pos­si­bil­i­ty of Chi­na’s rise to becom­ing a major pow­er and fore­saw rival­ry between Chi­na and west­ern pow­ers. Using con­tacts to Tibet by “alter­na­tive” polit­i­cal cir­cles, who had con­vert­ed to Bud­dhism, the Green par­lia­men­tary group, through hear­ings and par­lia­men­tary res­o­lu­tions, placed the ques­tions of auton­o­my and the demands for seces­sion in that region of Chi­na on the polit­i­cal agen­da of the Bun­destag in 1985. Tse­wang Nor­bu, a for­mer assis­tant of the Dalai Lama, helped shape pol­i­cy on Tibet, first as an employ­ee of the Green par­lia­men­tar­i­an Petra Kel­ly and, since 1992, as an employ­ee of the Green Par­ty affil­i­at­ed Hein­rich Boell Foun­da­tion. In addi­tion, Nor­bu found­ed the Ger­man-Tibetan Cul­tur­al Soci­ety and, over an extend­ed peri­od of time, presided as its vice-chair­man. He also works as a “spe­cial cor­re­spon­dent” for the US financed “Radio Free Asia” (RFA). RFA is among the news sources of west­ern report­ing on the recent upris­ing in Tibet.
Polit­i­cal Deci­sion-Mak­ing Process
Two of the most influ­en­tial Ger­man par­ty-affil­i­at­ed foun­da­tions are par­tic­u­lar­ly engaged in Tibet-relat­ed activ­i­ties. For­mer Pres­i­dent of Ger­many, Roman Her­zog, qual­i­fies their work as “effec­tive instru­ments of Ger­man for­eign policy”.[4] These foun­da­tions are main­ly gov­ern­ment financed. One, the FDP-affil­i­at­ed Friedrich Nau­mann Foun­da­tion (FNSt) has been coun­sel­ing the Tibetan exile par­lia­ment “in all ques­tions of polit­i­cal edu­ca­tion” since 1991. A few years ago the foun­da­tion claimed that this func­tion will be “very impor­tant for the polit­i­cal deci­sion-mak­ing process of Tibetan parliamentarians”.[5] One of their project part­ners, the “Tibetan Par­lia­men­tary and Pol­i­cy Research Cen­ter” (TPPRC) orga­nizes work­shops for the Tibetan exile com­mu­ni­ties that are most­ly found in India or in Nepal.[6] It also teach­es Tibetan stu­dents “how they can serve their coun­try with­in and out­side the government.”[7] 500 stu­dents took part in the sem­i­nars between 2003 and 2007. The FNSt has also been orga­niz­ing con­fer­ences since the mid-90s that are meant to “coor­di­nate the work of the inter­na­tion­al Tibet groups and strength­en their links to the cen­tral Tibetan ‘gov­ern­ment in exile’,” a com­pli­cat­ed enter­prise that facil­i­tates the world­wide net­work­ing of Tibet mil­i­tants with Dharam­sala. The most recent of these con­fer­ences end­ed in May 2007 with agree­ment on an “plan of action” which would include the use of the sum­mer Olympic Games to take place in Bei­jing for the exile Tibetan cause. (german-foreign-policy.com reported.[8])
Also active for the “Tibet cause” is the Green Par­ty affil­i­at­ed Hein­rich Boell Foun­da­tion, which, like the FNSt works out of its branch office in India. Accord­ing to its own indi­ca­tions, it “inten­si­fied the focus of its years long sup­port for the exile Tibetan com­mu­ni­ty at the turn of the year 2005/2006.”[9] They are now con­cen­trat­ing their sup­port on two orga­ni­za­tions that have their head­quar­ters in the exile Tibetan “cap­i­tal” Dharam­sala. They are the “Tibetan Cen­ter for Con­flict Res­o­lu­tion” (TCCR) that medi­ates con­flicts that arise with­in the com­mu­ni­ty and more par­tic­u­lar­ly the “Tibetan Cen­ter for Human Rights and Democ­ra­cy” (TCHRD). The TCHRD pub­lish­es annu­al reports on Human Rights vio­la­tions in Tibet and is very sig­nif­i­cant for the jus­ti­fi­ca­tion of Tibetan polit­i­cal demands. The Hein­rich Boell Foun­da­tion writes that “tak­ing into con­sid­er­a­tion the per­sist­ing — even though seem­ing­ly futile — demands for Tibetan self-deter­mi­na­tion, there still exists (...) an urgent need for doc­u­men­ta­tion of human rights vio­la­tions and the pol­i­cy of assim­i­la­tion car­ried out by the Chi­nese state author­i­ties in Tibet, such as pro­duced by the TCHRD.”[10] The TCHRD is also being sup­port­ed by the “Nation­al Endow­ment for Democ­ra­cy” (NED), a front orga­ni­za­tion for US for­eign pol­i­cy that has become noto­ri­ous for spon­sor­ing the “col­or rev­o­lu­tions” in East­ern Europe and Cen­tral Asia.
Ger­man foun­da­tions’ activ­i­ties around Tibet touch one of the most sen­si­tive spots in Chi­nese pol­i­cy. Not only do they rep­re­sent inter­fer­ence into the domes­tic affairs of that nation, they also threat­en the Peo­ple’s Repub­lic’s ter­ri­to­r­i­al integri­ty. “To a cer­tain extent, Tibet is the cor­ner­stone of a frag­ile mul­ti-eth­nic state,” writes a pol­i­cy advi­sor at the Insti­tute of Asian Stud­ies of the Ger­man Insti­tute of Glob­al and Area Stud­ies (GIGA) in Ham­burg. “A hor­ror sce­nario for Bei­jing is that begin­ning with Tibet, a con­fla­gra­tion devel­ops.” One finds “des­ig­nat­ed on a map pub­lished in a 1990 auto­bi­og­ra­phy of the Dalai Lama (...) along­side Greater Tibet also ‘East Turkestan,’ as the area where Moslem Uygurs set­tled, Inner Mon­go­lia and Manchuria.”[11] The seces
sion of these regions would have dras­tic con­se­quences: “the remain­ing Chi­nese set­tled areas would have shrunk to a third of the Peo­ple’s Repub­lic.”
Strate­gic, Rather Than Legal­is­tic
In fact, the cur­rent Tibet cam­paign, with the par­tic­i­pa­tion of Ger­man orga­ni­za­tions, is but an exam­ple of Berlin’s and Wash­ing­ton’s grow­ing anti-Chi­nese pol­i­cy. In Africa, Ger­many and the USA are now open­ly agi­tat­ing against China.[12] Aggres­sive com­pe­ti­tion is being prac­ticed also in Latin Amer­i­ca [13] as well as in Cen­tral Asia [14]. India is seen as a pos­si­ble counter-bal­ance for the con­tain­ment of the Peo­ple’s Repub­lic. The west is woo­ing it accordingly.[15] Here, Tibet could also pro­vide lever­age for spurring New Del­hi’s ret­i­cent rul­ing cir­cles on course. Accord­ing to the dec­la­ra­tion of a for­mer offi­cial of the Indi­an For­eign Min­istry, it is “high time for India” to give up its “timid rap­proche­ment” with Chi­na and place Bei­jing “under pres­sure” also on the Tibet ques­tion. The rela­tions with Chi­na must be devel­oped “from a strate­gic, rather than legal­is­tic per­spec­tive.” The posi­tion paper has been put up for debate by the Hein­rich Boell Foun­da­tion’ Indi­an field office.[16]
Not Tol­er­at­ed
Not least among the con­se­quences, the Tibet cam­paign is also stim­u­lat­ing an anti-Chi­nese atmos­phere in Ger­many leav­ing a dwin­dling amount of room for crit­i­cism. Opin­ions that are at vari­ance with the anti-Bei­jing main­stream are, in the mean­time, being pun­ished. In Cologne a sinol­o­gist’s lec­ture on the theme of Tibet had to be can­celled at the last minute. The orga­niz­ers had crit­i­cized the one-sided west­ern media report­ing and sought to ini­ti­ate a dif­fer­en­ti­at­ed debate of the conflict.[17] This inten­tion led to the can­cel­la­tion on short notice of the rental con­tract for the loca­tion in the Cologne Com­mu­ni­ty Cen­ter. Those respon­si­ble for the com­mu­ni­ty cen­ter made it known that no “anti-Tibetan” events would be tol­er­at­ed.
[1] Karen­i­na Koll­mar Paulenz: Kleine Geschichte Tibets, München 2006
[2] CIA fund­ed covert Tibet exile cam­paign in 1960s; The Age (Aus­tralia) 16.09.1998
[3] Karen­i­na Koll­mar Paulenz: Kleine Geschichte Tibets, München 2006
[4] see also “The Most Effec­tive Instru­ments of Ger­man For­eign Pol­i­cy”
[5] Buchbe­sprechung: “Tibet im Exil”; www.fnst-freiheit.org
[6] Inten­sive work­shop for Tibetan Local Assem­bly Mem­bers; www.southasia.fnst-freiheit.org
[7] “The objec­tive is to make the stu­dent under­stand one­self and the exile gov­ern­ment, enabling them to know exact­ly how to serve their coun­try by work­ing with­in the gov­ern­ment or out­side it.” Youth Lead­er­ship Train­ing with a Dif­fer­ence; www.southasia.fnst-freiheit.org
[8] see also The Olympic Torch Relay Cam­paign
[9], [10] Hein­rich-Böll-Stiftung: Poli­tis­ch­er Jahres­bericht Län­der­büro Indi­en, 2005/2006
[11] “Der Dis­sens unter den Exilti­betern wächst”. Inter­view mit Chi­na-Experten: Unruhen unter­minieren paz­i­fistis­ches Cre­do des Dalai Lama — Bei­jing fürchtet Vision eines Großti­bet; GIGA News 20.03.2008
[12] see also Mr. Horst Koehler, Man­ag­ing Direc­tor, Auf gle­ich­er Augen­höhe, Hege­mon­ic Rival­ry and Näher an Afri­ka
[13] see also New strate­gic ori­en­ta­tion, Schlüs­sel­po­si­tio­nen and To the Mines
[14] see also Spät, aber nach­haltig and Gün­stige Lage
[15] see also Mil­i­tary Part­ner, Friedens­mächte and Der dritte Pfeil­er
[16] “It is time for India to get out of its defen­sive mind­set and timid approach in deal­ing with Chi­na. There are vital nation­al secu­ri­ty inter­ests at stake. Rela­tions with Chi­na must be han­dled from a strate­gic, not a legal­is­tic, per­spec­tive. The approach India fol­lows should be mul­ti-dimen­sion­al. India does want bet­ter rela­tions with Chi­na, but it must also evolve a cal­cu­lat­ed and cal­i­brat­ed pol­i­cy to put Chi­na under some pres­sure to safe­guard its inter­ests and con­cerns.” Rajiv Sikri: India’s Tibet Pol­i­cy: Need for a Change; www.boell-india.org
[17] Für Infor­ma­tio­nen zu Tibet in der Alten Feuerwache kein Platz? www.salz-köln.de


No comments for “Operations Against China”

Post a comment