Spitfire List Web site and blog of anti-fascist researcher and radio personality Dave Emory.

News & Supplemental  

Rifle? Rifle? Who’s Got the Rifle? “Lee Harvey” Robinson and The Assassination of Charlie Kirk UPDATED (Twice) ON 9/16 and ONCE on 9/17

WFMU-FM is pod­cast­ing For The Record–You can sub­scribe to the pod­cast HERE.

Mr. Emory’s entire life’s work is avail­able on a 64GB flash dri­ve, avail­able for a con­tri­bu­tion of $65.00 or more (to KFJC). (This is a new feature–the old, 32GB flash­drive will not hold the new mate­r­i­al. Click Here to obtain Dav­e’s 46+ years’ work, com­plete through fall/early win­ter of 2024.)

“Polit­i­cal language…is designed to make lies sound truth­ful and mur­der respectable, and to give an appear­ance of solid­i­ty to pure wind.”

Mr. Emory has launched a new Patre­on site. Vis­it at: Patreon.com/DaveEmory

COMMENT: Among the many unan­swered (and, per­haps, unasked) ques­tions about Tyler Robin­son con­cerns the absence of a rifle in pic­tures of him ascend­ing to the roof.

Pre­sum­ably, the rifle was dis­as­sem­bled and in the back-pack he is seen car­ry­ing.

Oth­ers have sug­gest­ed the weapon was secret­ed in his jeans.

Do note that Robin­son “is ‘not co-oper­at­ing’ with author­i­ties and has not con­fessed to car­ry­ing out the shoot­ing,” accord­ing to the BBC.

Oth­ers have not­ed the con­tra­dic­tions and numer­ous dodgy aspects of the offi­cial sto­ry.

Who is the per­son seen descend­ing the stairs as Robin­son is appar­ent­ly ascend­ing the stairs? What have they had to say? What might they have had to say about Robin­son’s gait?

How did Robin­son escape? The alleged mur­der weapon was found wrapped in a tow­el in the woods. How did it get there?

Was there a body of water near­by? Why did­n’t Robin­son dis­pose of the alleged mur­der weapon in that body of water?

How did he get home?

This soci­ety is thor­ough­ly sur­veilled. Where are pho­tos of Robin­son in an auto­mo­bile? Where is the com­put­er data from an auto­mo­bile that may have been dri­ven by him or by an accom­plice?

How about the pur­chase of the gun alleged­ly used in the shoot­ing? Were there any recov­er­able data from its pur­chase? It alleged­ly belonged to Robin­son’s grand­fa­ther. How did Robin­son get it to the scene of the assas­si­na­tion?

What about the pri­vate jet that left Pro­vo Air­port short­ly after the killing and then dropped off radar?

All of this is beside the myr­i­ad polit­i­cal infor­ma­tion about Robin­son.

Sim­ply put, we don’t think he had the mil­i­tary skills nec­es­sary to pull of a crime like this. A trained sniper would have no prob­lem with a shot like the one Robin­son is alleged to have exe­cut­ed, but Robin­son was not a trained sniper.

He is already being cat­e­go­rized: ” . . . . In the after­math of the killing, some lib­er­als held on to the faulty hope that Robin­son might be either a Groyper, the very online, infa­mous­ly big­ot­ed asso­ciates of hard-right Kirk crit­ic Nick Fuentes, or a dis­so­cia­tive wingnut in the John Hinck­ley vari­ety.

Hinck­ley was­n’t a “wing nut.” He was a Nazi.

Pic­tures of the alleged “sniper perch” and the late Char­lie Kirk also raise ques­tions. (Pho­tos are not the best arbiters of infor­ma­tion in this con­text.)

The sniper’s perch is slight­ly to the left of Robinson–Kirk was shot in the left side of his neck. Was the sniper posi­tioned far enough to Kirk’s left to have inflict­ed such a wound?

The rel­a­tive posi­tion of the alleged sniper and Kirk require addi­tion­al clar­i­fi­ca­tion. (We doubt this will be forth­com­ing.)

Recall how Lee Har­vey Oswald was framed. One of the pro­pa­gan­da props in that act con­cerned the cov­er phot of Life Mag­a­zine of Feb­ru­ary 21, 1964, show­ing “Oswald” with the weapons he alleged­ly used to kill JFK and offi­cer J.D. Tip­pitt, as well as a copy of The Mil­i­tant, the news­pa­per of the Social­ist Work­ers Par­ty.

Oswald him­self claimed that his head had been super­im­posed on the pic­ture, which was not of him.

The shad­ow under his nose goes straight down.

The shad­ow cast by his body, how­ev­er, goes in a dif­fer­ent direc­tion.

The tilt of “Oswald“ ‘s body is ludi­crous.

Among the ele­ments “paint­ing Oswald Red” is his inter­view with WDSU, broad­cast all over the coun­try in the wake of JFK’s assas­si­na­tion.

One can but won­der if Char­lie Kirk is a lat­ter-day Horst Wes­sel–a “Mar­tyr-Des­ig­nate?”

UPDATE: Do note that the vast bulk of what we “know” about “Lee Har­vey” Robin­son comes from his phone and (appar­ent) social media post­ings. The over­lap­ping Com/764/MKY/Purgatory net­works spe­cial­ize in man­i­fest­ing such things and fak­ing them via phones, etc.

These net­works include Edward “Big Balls” Coris­tine, who now has the per­son­al data of the Amer­i­can pub­lic at his dis­pos­al. He has spe­cial­ized in “SIM swap­ping.

In this con­text, we should not lose sight of the Inter­net and its gen­e­sis as a vehi­cle for counter-insur­gency.   Counter insur­gency was also the oper­a­tional assign­ment for Ger­man mil­i­tary intel­li­gence oper­a­tive Adolf Hitler.

The online and gam­ing milieu to which Robin­son belonged is very involved with cryp­tocur­ren­cy. Might Robin­son have been promised a lot of cryp­tocur­ren­cy if he took cred­it for the killing, anal­o­gous to the man­ner in which James Earl Ray was maneu­vered into admit­ting guilt for the killing of Mar­tin Luther King in exchange for a por­tion of the prof­its from a book?

Look how what the Kirk assas­si­na­tion is pre­cip­i­tat­ing:

Moon of Alaba­ma

Sep­tem­ber 16, 2025

On Free Speech Hypocrisy — by JD Vance

Feb­ru­ary 2025:

In Munich, Vance accus­es Euro­pean politi­cians of cen­sor­ing free speech — Reuters

U.S. Vice Pres­i­dent JD Vance on Fri­day took a swipe at Euro­pean gov­ern­ments for what he described as their cen­sor­ship of free speech and their polit­i­cal oppo­nents, ...
...
Vance adopt­ed a con­fronta­tion­al tone, accus­ing Euro­pean politi­cians of what he said was a fear of their own peo­ple and warned them that the real threat against their democ­ra­cy was not from Rus­sia or Chi­na.

“The threat I wor­ry the most about vis-à-vis Europe is not Rus­sia, it’s not Chi­na, it’s not any oth­er exter­nal actor. What I wor­ry about is the threat from with­in, the retreat of Europe from some its most fun­da­men­tal val­ues, val­ues shared with the Unit­ed States of Amer­i­ca,” Vance said.
...
.. he said Brus­sels had shut down social media over hate­ful con­tent, and crit­i­cized Ger­many for what he described as raids against its own cit­i­zens for post­ing anti-fem­i­nist com­ments, Swe­den for con­vict­ing a Chris­t­ian activist, and Unit­ed King­dom for back­slid­ing on reli­gious rights.

Sep­tem­ber 2025:

Vance calls for action against those cel­e­brat­ing Kirk’s assas­si­na­tion — AP via The Chris­t­ian Index

Vice Pres­i­dent JD Vance on Mon­day joined those demand­ing con­se­quences for those who have cheered Char­lie Kirk’s assas­si­na­tion, call­ing on the pub­lic to turn in any­one who cel­e­brate the assas­si­na­tion of his friend and polit­i­cal ally and encour­age fur­ther vio­lence.

“When you see some­one cel­e­brat­ing Charlie’s mur­der, call them out,” Vance urged lis­ten­ers on the slain activist’s pod­cast Mon­day. “And hell, call their employ­er.”

Vance’s call also includ­ed a vow to tar­get some of the biggest fun­ders of lib­er­al caus­es, as con­ser­v­a­tives stepped up their tar­get­ing of pri­vate indi­vid­u­als for their com­ments cel­e­brat­ing the killing and encour­ag­ing more vio­lence.

Repub­li­can-con­trolled states such as Flori­da, Okla­homa, and Texas have launched inves­ti­ga­tions of teach­ers accused of inap­pro­pri­ate state­ments after last week’s assas­si­na­tion. The U.S. mil­i­tary has invit­ed mem­bers of the pub­lic to report those who “cel­e­brate or mock” the killing and said some troops have already been removed for their com­ments.

At the same time, the Trump admin­is­tra­tion has vowed to tar­get what it con­tends is a vast lib­er­al net­work that inspired the shoot­er.

UPDATE #2: In the cur­rent polit­i­cal cli­mate, we should stress that we feel that Char­lie Kirk was:

  • A doc­tri­naire fas­cist. (Mus­soli­ni defined fas­cism as “cor­po­ratism” and called his sys­tem “the cor­po­rate state.”)
  • The author of fre­quent polit­i­cal pro­nounce­ments that were overt­ly and explic­it­ly racist.
  • An advo­cate for the mil­i­tary occu­pa­tion of Amer­i­can cities–a vio­la­tion of the Posse Comi­ta­tus Act.
  • One who demo­nized law­ful polit­i­cal oppo­si­tion and peo­ple of oth­er gen­der and sex­u­al per­sua­sions.
  • A sub­scriber to the the­o­ry of Jew­ish con­trol of: “not just the col­leges — it’s the non­prof­its, it’s the movies, it’s Hol­ly­wood, it’s all of it.”

That hav­ing been said, we strong­ly con­demn his killing. He did not deserve to be killed. Indeed, we doubt the devel­op­ing “offi­cial” ver­sion of the assas­si­na­tion and sus­pect it was a Reich­stag Fire/­False-flag/Provo­ca­tion, per­formed with the explic­it intent of cre­at­ing a polit­i­cal mar­tyr and jus­ti­fy­ing pre-ordained polit­i­cal repres­sion against a demo­nized, scape­goat­ed polit­i­cal oppo­si­tion.

We doubt his true killers will ever be caught. Ide­al­ly, we would love to net­work with Kirk’s fam­i­ly and sup­port­ers, shar­ing our decades-old body of infor­ma­tion about this coun­try’s polit­i­cal assas­si­na­tions.

Don’t hold your breath.

 

 

 

Discussion

5 comments for “Rifle? Rifle? Who’s Got the Rifle? “Lee Harvey” Robinson and The Assassination of Charlie Kirk UPDATED (Twice) ON 9/16 and ONCE on 9/17”

  1. Excel­lent com­men­tary espe­cial­ly giv­en your deep cog­nizance of the his­to­ry of fas­cist and far right move­ments.

    Was Char­lie intent on cre­at­ing a cadre of an Amer­i­can con­tem­po­rary “Hitler Youth” type move­ment?

    Posted by Stu | September 17, 2025, 4:15 am
  2. As more and more details about the shoot­ing of Char­lie Kirk pour in, a pic­ture is emerg­ing. It hap­pens to non­sense pic­ture, but that’s what’s emerg­ing. In addi­tion to what appears to be strong admis­sions of guilt on the part of Tyler Robin­son in the shoot­ing of Kirk, we’re also being shown what is pur­port­ed­ly evi­dence of that much-hyped roman­tic rela­tion­ship between Robin­son and his trans­gen­dered room­mate, Lance Twig­gs. Real­ly bizarre evi­dence that rais­es more ques­tions than it answers, as we’re going to see.

    For starters, author­i­ties have released a series of text exchanges between Robin­sons and Twig­gs sent in the hours fol­low­ing the shoot­ing. The texts were like­ly sent via Dis­cord. The exchanges starts with Robin­son ask­ing Twig­gs to drop every­thing they are doing and read a let­ter that was left under a key­board, pre­sum­ably at the con­do where they lived. This phys­i­cal note alleged­ly said “I had the oppor­tu­ni­ty to take out Char­lie Kirk and I’m going to take it.”

    We don’t know if there was any oth­er con­tent in this note. But as we’re going to see, Robin­son seemed to be con­fi­dent he could pull off this assas­si­na­tion with­out get­ting caught. It was only after he was unable to retrieve the rifle that he start­ed con­sid­er­ing the pos­si­bil­i­ty that he was­n’t going to get away with it. So for him to leave a let­ter under a key­board, pre­sum­ably a let­ter that would be found should he die dur­ing the act, it would be rather odd for him to leave no infor­ma­tion about why he did it. It’s not like the iden­ti­ty of the shoot­er would need clar­i­fy­ing at that point. But that’s all we’re about the con­tents of this note. Just a state­ment admit­ting he did it.

    Fol­low­ing that ini­tial text ask­ing Twig­gs to read the note, Twig­gs responds with expres­sions of shock over the rev­e­la­tion that his room­mate com­mit­ted the shoot­ing, ask­ing if this is a joke. Robin­son’s reply is rather eye­brow rais­ing: “I am still ok my love, but am stuck in orem for a lit­tle while longer yet. Should­n’t be long until I can come home, but I got­ta grab my rifle still. To be hon­est I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sor­ry to involve you.”

    So let’s unpack that text: Robin­son refers to Twig­gs as “my love”, and then seems to express a kind of con­fi­dent that he’ll be back home soon. He just needs to grab his rifle. Then he express­es a sen­ti­ment about how he hon­est­ly hoped to keep the whole thing a secret until the day he dies of old age, a sen­ti­ment that points against a sui­ci­dal mind­set. And then he express­es regret for hav­ing involved Twig­gs. Think about the mess of con­tra­dic­tions in this text. He’s lit­er­al­ly tex­ting evi­dence of his role in this crime while stat­ing how he want­ed to keep it a secret until he dies of old age. And then he’s express­ing regret for involv­ing Twiggs..despite these mes­sages to Twig­gs being the things that got Twig­g’s involved! Twig­gs would have just been his unsus­pect­ing roommate/lover with­out these texts. Now he’s poten­tial­ly an accom­plice after the fact unless he imme­di­ate­ly went to the police. Robin­son did­n’t have to keep giv­ing Twig­gs updates on the rifle. But he did, utter­ly mess­ing up his alleged lover’s life in the process.

    Then we get to the text exchange where Twig­gs asks why Robin­son did it. Robin­son sim­ply replies “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be nego­ti­at­ed out.” In addi­tion to be odd­ly vague, that’s notably very sim­i­lar lan­guage to the account we got from the unnamed fam­i­ly mem­ber that we pub­licly revealed by Utah Gov­er­nor Spencer Cox. Recall how this unnamed fam­i­ly mem­ber recount to inves­ti­ga­tors hear­ing Robin­son and a dif­fer­ent fam­i­ly mem­ber dis­cussing Char­lie Kirk’s com­ing appear­ance at a recent fam­i­ly din­ner. But accord­ing to Cox’s recount­ing, it was this oth­er fam­i­ly mem­ber who described Kirk as being “full of hate”. It was an odd dis­crep­an­cy in that anec­dote. And now we have Robin­son appar­ent­ly using the same vague “full of hate” lan­guage when describ­ing his motive.

    The next text is Robin­son describ­ing how he’s still plan­ning on retriev­ing the rifle, and a sense of con­fi­dence that he will have left no evi­dence. “If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evi­dence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again, hope­ful­ly they have moved on. I haven’t seen any­thing about them find­ing it,” Robin­son texted to Twig­gs. Which, again, is a high­ly iron­ic mes­sage giv­en that the mes­sage itself is a form of evi­dence left behind.

    When asked by Twig­gs how long Robin­son had been plan­ning the attack, he replies “a bit over a week I believe,” which is also a weird­ly vague state­ment. Why add “I believe” to a state­ment like that? He pre­sum­ably can remem­ber pret­ty when he start­ed plan­ning some­thing like this, espe­cial­ly if it as that recent.

    Robin­son then fol­lows up with a fur­ther update on his attempts to retrieve the rifle. It’s at this point that he seems to be pon­der­ing leav­ing the rifle behind, con­clud­ing that it could­n’t be traced back to him. But he goes on to wor­ry about what he would tell his father about the miss­ing rifle. He goes on to wor­ry about prints he may have left behind one the weapon. “I’m wish­ing I had cir­cled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehi­cle.... I’m wor­ried what my old man would do if I did­n’t bring back grand­pas rifle ... idek if it had a ser­i­al num­ber, but it would­n’t trace to me. I wor­ry about prints I had to leave it in a bush where I changed out­fits. did­n’t have the abil­i­ty or time to bring it with.... I might have to aban­don it and hope they don’t find prints. how the [exple­tive] will I explain los­ing it to my old man....” Keep in mind he could have sim­ply worn gloves to avoid leav­ing prints on the weapons. But appar­ent­ly this star stu­dent did­n’t think that far ahead.

    Robin­son then sends Twig­gs a text seem­ing­ly explain­ing the memes left on the bul­let cas­ings, specif­i­cal­ly ref­er­enc­ing the “notices bulge uwu” meme that is appar­ent­ly a joke about fur­ry cul­ture, “remem­ber how I was engrav­ing bul­lets? The [exple­tive] mes­sages are most­ly a big meme, if I see ‘notices bulge uwu’ on fox new I might have a stroke alright im gonna have to leave it, that real­ly [exple­tive] sucks....” The mes­sages are most­ly a big meme. That’s how he described his mes­sag­ing to the world in this act. Just a big meme. And, impor­tant­ly for Twig­g’s crim­i­nal cul­pa­bil­i­ty, Robin­son indi­cates that Twig­gs was aware his roommate/lover had been engrav­ing bul­lets. Again, why put all of this incrim­i­nat­ing evi­dence in a series of texts?

    The next mes­sage is from Robin­son sim­ply ask­ing that Twig­gs, “delete this exchange”. Keep in mind that delet­ing mes­sages on a plat­form like Dis­cord does, in the­o­ry, tru­ly erase the dig­i­tal evi­dence. Had Twig­gs AND Robin­son BOTH delet­ed these texts, this exchange real­ly could have been entire­ly secret. That’s also part of what make Twig­gs’s coop­er­a­tion with author­i­ties notable. He had the option to just delete every­thing and act as if he had no idea his roommate/lover was involved when inves­ti­ga­tors inevitably arrive. But he end­ed up show­ing the mes­sages to inves­ti­ga­tors. Over­all, it’s the kind of behav­ior that sug­gests Robin­son did indeed have a deep lev­el of trust with Twig­gs. It was one incrim­i­nat­ing text after anoth­er. But at the same time, the dis­re­gard to Twig­gs’s well being is also hard to ignore. It’s just one legal­ly jeop­ar­diz­ing text from Robin­son after anoth­er.

    Then we get to a text that was clear­ly sent after a descrip­tion of the rifle was released by author­i­ties, which appar­ent made Robin­son’s par­ents wor­ried enough that their son was the cul­prit that his father asked Tyler for a pho­to of that rifle, per­haps so Tyler could prove the recov­ered rifle was his. Robin­son sends Twig­gs a mes­sage explain­ing how his dad is ask­ing for that pho­to and call­ing him but he’s not answers. That’s fol­lowed by a text where Robin­son explains how “since trump got into office [my dad] has been pret­ty diehard maga”, and then a text where he announces his plans to turn him­self in, adding “one of my neigh­bors here is a deputy for the sher­iff.

    Robin­son adds, “you are all I wor­ry about love.” Twig­gs responds with “I’m much more wor­ried about you.” Note how at no point in this exchange did we see Twig­gs use any terms of affec­tion back towards Robin­son. Grant­ed, almost all of the exchange was Robin­son’s mes­sages to Twig­gs, but it’s still notable.

    The final text we are shown, Robin­son asks Twig­gs to not speak with the media or give any inter­views. And also advis­es Twig­gs to ask for a lawyer and stay silent with the police. Which is iron­i­cal­ly pru­dent advice giv­en how deeply Robin­son impli­cat­ed his ‘love’ in this crime with all of these texts.

    All in all, the text serve as the next bizarre twist in a very strange sto­ry. Bizarre, in part, due to the lan­guage that many of observed don’t seem con­sis­tent with the kind of lan­guage some­one his age typ­i­cal­ly uses. It will be very inter­est­ing to see if Robin­son’s Dis­cord post­ing his­to­ry will be made avail­able to lan­guage experts. Did Robin­son typ­i­cal­ly refer to his dad as his “Old Man”? Or refer to “vehi­cles” instead of “cars” or “trucks”? And what about the use of phras­es like “my love”...was that remote­ly in char­ac­ter? As we’re going to see, the release text mes­sages have cre­at­ed so much sus­pi­cion that even Steven Ban­non has come out and said he thinks they are are fab­ri­ca­tion. In fact, Ban­non called for Gov­er­nor Cox to be inves­ti­gat­ed for lying about the facts of the case. So what does Ban­non think is being cov­ered up? Robin­son’s ties to antifa...and maybe even ties to the But­ler, PA, shoot­ing. Yep, Ban­non sus­pects Gov­er­nor Cox is like some sort of secret antifa sym­pa­thiz­er. That’s the nar­ra­tive he’s going with. The kind of nar­ra­tive that is an implic­it admis­sion that Robin­son’s ties to ‘the left’ at this point are over­whelm­ing­ly weak. Also note that Pres­i­dent Trump declared antifa a ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tion in the days fol­low­ing Kirk’s shoot­ing so direct­ly tying Robin­son to antifa will be impor­tant for that fur­ther domes­tic crack­down agen­da.

    We’ve also got more infor­ma­tion on what led up to Robin­son’s sur­ren­der. We are told his par­ents began fear­ing their son might be the killer when the images were first released. His moth­er called him the day after the shoot­ing, ask­ing what he was doing and he told her he was home sick and had been sick the pre­vi­ous day too. Then when author­i­ties released a descrip­tion of the rifle, Robin­son’s dad asked him to send a pho­to of the rifle but did­n’t get a response. Robin­son and his father even­tu­al­ly spoke on the phone where he admit­ted and sug­gest­ed he was going to take his life. His par­ents con­vinced him to meet at their home, and then con­vinced him to meet a fam­i­ly friend who is a retired deputy sher­iff. We are told that fam­i­ly friend is the per­son who con­vinced him to give up peace­ful­ly.

    Now we get to anoth­er rather inter­est­ing detail in this sto­ry: We are also told that Robin­son was very scared of being shot by the police and agreed to sur­ren­der only under assur­ances that it would be peace­ful and he would­n’t be shot. “He was tru­ly fear­ful about being shot by law enforce­ment,” accord­ing to a Wash­ing­ton Coun­ty sher­iff. Now, on the one hand, it’s not espe­cial­ly sur­pris­ing that some­one who con­duct­ed a high pro­file assas­si­na­tion might be con­cerned about being shot in the process of being appre­hend­ed. But this sounds like an excep­tion­al­ly high fear on Robin­son’s part. He need­ed this retired sher­iff to work out an agree­ment. Why is he so con­cerned about get­ting bumped off by the police? Odd pri­or­i­ties for some­one who was appar­ent­ly threat­en­ing sui­cide hours ear­li­er. But it’s a fur­ther indi­ca­tion that he was­n’t sui­ci­dal when he climbed up on that roof. The extreme fear of being shot to death by the police might also explain his ear­li­er threats to kill him­self. He seemed to think he could get away and take the secret to his grave based on the text he sent. And even after it all went awry, his pri­ma­ry con­cern was not get­ting shot by the police.

    But then there’s the very inter­est­ing update we got from Ken Klip­pen­stein, who has been giv­en access to the Dis­cord chats from Robin­son’s friend group that he’s been social­iz­ing with online for years. As Klip­pen­stein’s review makes clear, Robin­son bare­ly spoke of pol­i­tics. He men­tioned Biden and Trump once each. All of his friends described him as apo­lit­i­cal and most­ly inter­est­ed in video games and guns. The friend group is described maybe 30 peo­ple who have been keep­ing in touch on Dis­cord, most­ly just exchang­ing memes and talk­ing about video games. Mem­bers has pol­i­tics from across the polit­i­cal spec­trum. It did­n’t sound like Robin­son would have felt a need to avoid pol­i­tics with the group. He just did­n’t brings it up.

    Impor­tant­ly, a child­hood friend who spoke with Klip­pen­stein did seem to con­firm Robin­son is bisex­u­al and in a rela­tion­ship with his trans room­mate. The friend indi­cat­ed Robin­son’s par­ents weren’t ful­ly aware of this rela­tion­ship and described it as a low key rela­tion­ship they kept between them­selves. Recall the neigh­bor’s alleged account from rough­ly two weeks before the shoot­ing where the neigh­bor rode his bike past them while Robin­son and Twig­gs were walk­ing around out­side, hold­ing hand, kiss­ing, and talk­ing about going to the hos­pi­tal to get the gen­der tran­si­tion surgery. It was­n’t a very low key rela­tion­ship accord­ing to that neigh­bor.

    So the pic­ture emerg­ing is a kind of fur­ther con­fir­ma­tion of this trans room­mate romance sta­tus paired with fur­ther con­fir­ma­tion that he was almost com­plete­ly apo­lit­i­cal. He even described the mes­sages on the bul­let cas­ings as ‘most­ly a big meme’ accord­ing to those texts, which also pro­vid­ed fur­ther con­fir­ma­tion that Robin­son’s claimed motive was Kirk’s hatred, which can’t be ‘nego­ti­at­ed out’. And we’ve got­ten fur­ther con­fir­ma­tion that Robin­son was­n’t sui­ci­dal. He seemed to think he could get away with­out being iden­ti­fied, if we take those texts at face val­ue. And that near com­plete lack of any polit­i­cal motive is pre­sum­ably why Klip­pen­stein has pre­dict­ed that fed­er­al inves­ti­ga­tors will inevitably con­clude Robin­son falls into the Nihilist Vio­lent Extrem­ist (NVE) cat­e­go­ry. In oth­er words, Tyler Robin­son may not fit the clas­sic def­i­n­i­tion of an accel­er­a­tionist domes­tic ter­ror­ist, but that’s the clos­est avail­able fit:

    KenKlippenstein.com

    Exclu­sive: Leaked Mes­sages from Char­lie Kirk Assas­sin

    Accused shooter’s “pol­i­tics” is not what gov­ern­ment and media say

    Ken Klip­pen­stein
    Sep 16, 2025

    “Hey guys, I have bad news for you all … it was me at UVU yes­ter­day.” Thus Tyler Robin­son mes­saged his friends on Dis­cord, seem­ing­ly apol­o­giz­ing for mur­der­ing Char­lie Kirk. “I’m sor­ry for all of this.”

    I obtained this and oth­er Dis­cord chats I’ve decid­ed to pub­lish (the lega­cy news media, as usu­al, refus­es), along with new infor­ma­tion I’ve learned about Robin­son from the peo­ple who knew him best.

    Trump and com­pa­ny por­tray the alleged Utah shoot­er as left-wing and lib­er­als por­tray him as right-wing. The fed­er­al con­clu­sion will inevitably be that he was a so-called Nihilist Vio­lent Extrem­ist (NVE); mean­while, the crack­down has already begun, as I report­ed yes­ter­day. The coun­try is prac­ti­cal­ly ready to go to war.

    “It’s been so ter­ri­ble and see­ing it from an inside per­spec­tive is so frus­trat­ing,” a friend of Robinson’s since mid­dle school told me. The child­hood friend, who asked not to be named for fear of threats, pro­vid­ed me with the above non-pub­lic pho­to of Robin­son on a camp­ing trip (a favorite activ­i­ty of his) to cor­rob­o­rate their rela­tion­ship.

    “I think the main thing that’s caused so much con­fu­sion is that he was always gen­er­al­ly apo­lit­i­cal for the most part,” the friend told me. “That’s the big thing, he just nev­er real­ly talked pol­i­tics which is why it’s so frus­trat­ing.”

    The pic­ture that emerges bears lit­tle resem­blance to the media ver­sion. Robin­son, I am told, though qui­et, was a well-liked per­son with a sup­port­ive fam­i­ly. The friend group who he inter­act­ed with on Dis­cord, far from some kind of mili­tia camp or Antifa bunker it’s been por­trayed as, rep­re­sent­ed a range of dif­fer­ent polit­i­cal views but most­ly talked video games.

    Yes­ter­day, FBI Direc­tor Kash Patel said in an inter­view that Robin­son “sub­scribed to left-wing ide­ol­o­gy,” cit­ing his family’s remarks to inves­ti­ga­tors. But those close to Robin­son say there was a lot his fam­i­ly didn’t know about him.

    “Their ideas are based on some­one they did­n’t ful­ly under­stand,” the child­hood friend told me. Though the fam­i­ly was gen­er­al­ly sup­port­ive of Robin­son (a claim cor­rob­o­rat­ed by his mother’s Face­book account, brim­ming with praise for Tyler) they didn’t seem to know about his rela­tion­ship with a trans­gen­der per­son named Lance, the friend said.

    When I asked if his fam­i­ly would have been accept­ing, the friend replied: “I don’t think even Tyler knew the answer to that ques­tion, which is why he kept it so low key between them­selves.”

    Tyler’s bisex­u­al­i­ty, the friend said, was cou­pled with open­ness on LGBT issues. But his wasn’t some cook­ie cut­ter lefty posi­tion on every or even most issues, his friends say.

    “Obvi­ous­ly he’s okay with gay and trans peo­ple hav­ing a right to exist, but also believes in the Sec­ond Amend­ment,” the friend said, refer­ring to the right to bear arms.

    The friend described Robin­son as fair­ly typ­i­cal of a young man his age from Utah: some­one who loved the out­doors, was a gamer, and into guns.

    “To all of us he just seemed like a sim­ple guy who liked play­ing games like Sea of Thieves, Deep Rock Galac­tic and Hell­divers 2, loved to fish and loved to camp,” the friend said. “It real­ly did seem like that’s all he was about.”

    ...

    Pri­vate Dis­cord mes­sages shared with me by a friend of Robinson’s con­firm that Robin­son wasn’t some polit­i­cal mar­tyr. A search for posts of Robinson’s con­tain­ing key­words like “Biden” and “Trump” turned up just one hit each. The Trump post was a pass­ing ref­er­ence to the 2019 impeach­ment inquiry. The Biden one came on the day of the 2020 elec­tion, where he pro­vid­ed an update to anoth­er friend ask­ing about the sta­tus of the vote count.

    The child­hood friend is a mem­ber of mul­ti­ple Dis­cord chats with Robin­son. He described the group as try­ing to grap­ple with Robinson’s motive just like every­one else.

    “Even the good­bye mes­sage he sent in one of our servers [where Dis­cord chats are host­ed] was so hard to believe, we all just thought, what a weird joke to make … then the news came out and we all were call­ing each oth­er say­ing check the news,” he said. “Yeah I don’t know what makes a per­son like him decide he’s going to dri­ve 260 miles upstate to shoot some­one like Char­lie Kirk, then come back like noth­ing hap­pened. It leaves a lot of room for spec­u­la­tion and the­o­ries which is why I think they’re so ram­pant.”

    ...

    “He was a real­ly smart guy but super hard to read, stone cold pok­er face and you could always nev­er be con­fi­dent assum­ing any­thing.”

    When I asked if he opened up to any­one, the friend replied: “As far as we knew he was opened up.”

    Despite his ver­bal ret­i­cence, Robin­son was not a lon­er, accord­ing to his friends. Unlike the stereo­typ­i­cal out­cast shoot­er dri­ven to vio­lence by social rejec­tion, he was appar­ent­ly ami­able and well-liked.

    “Every­one who knew him liked him and he was always nice, a lit­tle qui­et and kept to him­self most­ly but was­n’t a recluse,” the child­hood friend said.

    “Regard­less of the hor­ri­ble actions that took place we must take this moment to remem­ber that God is a liv­ing and lov­ing God who loves all his chil­dren,” a Dis­cord post from anoth­er friend post­ed the day after the shoot­ing reads. “While Char­lie Kirk’s pol­i­tics were not accept­able to some l ask that we all say a prayer for him and his fam­i­ly dur­ing these con­fus­ing times.”

    “The last mes­sage is reli­gious in nature which just goes to show the apo­lit­i­cal nature of the serv­er, we all have pret­ty dif­fer­ing views on pol­i­tics,” the friend said of the dis­cord post. “We all just exist as friends and just play stuff.”

    Cat memes, weath­er updates, home improve­ment and the odd Garfield ref­er­ence pop­u­late Robinson’s posts.

    ...

    No one in Robinson’s group is cheer­ing or jus­ti­fy­ing the mur­der in any of the mes­sages I reviewed. They’re just strug­gling to under­stand what their friend did. But Wash­ing­ton has become obsessed with the Dis­cord chat, con­vinced it’s some kind of head­quar­ters for the mur­der and caul­dron of rad­i­cal­iza­tion and con­spir­a­cy. Today FBI Direc­tor Patel vowed to inves­ti­gate “any­one and every­one in that Dis­cord chat.”

    What I see is a bunch of young peo­ple shocked, hor­ri­fied and search­ing for answers, like the rest of the coun­try.

    Edit­ed by William M. Arkin

    —————

    “Exclu­sive: Leaked Mes­sages from Char­lie Kirk Assas­sin” by Ken Klip­pen­stein; KenKlippenstein.com; 09/16/2025

    “Trump and com­pa­ny por­tray the alleged Utah shoot­er as left-wing and lib­er­als por­tray him as right-wing. The fed­er­al con­clu­sion will inevitably be that he was a so-called Nihilist Vio­lent Extrem­ist (NVE); mean­while, the crack­down has already begun, as I report­ed yes­ter­day. The coun­try is prac­ti­cal­ly ready to go to war.’

    The avail­able evi­dence points towards Robin­son falling into the Nihilist Vio­lent Extrem­ist (NVE), which is anoth­er term for an accel­er­a­tionist. That was the con­clu­sion Ken Klip­pen­stein arrived at fol­low­ing a review of the leaked Dis­cord mes­sages he was giv­en access to by at least one of the mem­bers of the Dis­cord forum of what appears to a col­lec­tion of young men who com­prised Robin­son’s online social group. On one lev­el, Robin­son does­n’t real­ly fit that accel­er­a­tionist pro­file since he did­n’t appear to exhib­it the kind fix­a­tion on mass shoot­ers or gore that we find with so many spree killers inspired by accel­er­a­tionist ide­olo­gies. Or at least we haven’t had reports yet of that kind of fix­a­tion with Robin­son, which is con­sis­tent with the fact that he did­n’t go on a killing spree. And yet, with no dis­tinct polit­i­cal ide­ol­o­gy, vio­lent nihilism is arguably the clos­est fit. In that sense this is a lot like Thomas Matthew Crooks, who, while over­all polit­i­cal­ly con­ser­v­a­tive, did­n’t seem to have any out­ward­ly vis­i­ble strong ide­o­log­i­cal moti­va­tions and who also just select­ed one high pro­file con­ser­v­a­tive fig­ure to tar­get instead of going on a killing spree.

    Also keep in mind these Dis­cord chats with this friend group go back to at least 2019, so this review seems to cov­er the last 6+ years of his life, from high school up through these ear­ly adult years. This is the most mean­ing­ful peek inside Robin­son’s head we’ve got­ten so far and it reveals a dis­tinct lack of polit­i­cal inter­est. There was­n’t much dis­cus­sion of pol­i­tics. The terms “Trump” and “Biden” only showed up once in Robin­son’s posts. Robin­son appeared to be apo­lit­i­cal by all accounts. Or at least by all of the accounts of this online group of friends, who appear to have most­ly played video games and shared memes with each oth­er. It appeared to be a fair­ly typ­i­cal young online social group, with Robin­son appear­ing to be an typ­i­cal young adult. He spent a lot of time online, played video games, liked guns, and did­n’t appear to care much for pol­i­tics. The only alleged child­hood friend who claimed that Robin­son was vocal­ly left-wing was that anony­mous per­son who was the source for those now-retract­ed claims in the Guardian. That’s the pic­ture that has emerged from those who seem to have been Robin­son’s clos­est cir­cle of friends. He was apo­lit­i­cal and most­ly just into video games and guns:

    ...
    “I think the main thing that’s caused so much con­fu­sion is that he was always gen­er­al­ly apo­lit­i­cal for the most part,” the friend told me. “That’s the big thing, he just nev­er real­ly talked pol­i­tics which is why it’s so frus­trat­ing.”

    The pic­ture that emerges bears lit­tle resem­blance to the media ver­sion. Robin­son, I am told, though qui­et, was a well-liked per­son with a sup­port­ive fam­i­ly. The friend group who he inter­act­ed with on Dis­cord, far from some kind of mili­tia camp or Antifa bunker it’s been por­trayed as, rep­re­sent­ed a range of dif­fer­ent polit­i­cal views but most­ly talked video games.

    ...

    The friend described Robin­son as fair­ly typ­i­cal of a young man his age from Utah: some­one who loved the out­doors, was a gamer, and into guns.

    “To all of us he just seemed like a sim­ple guy who liked play­ing games like Sea of Thieves, Deep Rock Galac­tic and Hell­divers 2, loved to fish and loved to camp,” the friend said. “It real­ly did seem like that’s all he was about.”

    ...

    Pri­vate Dis­cord mes­sages shared with me by a friend of Robinson’s con­firm that Robin­son wasn’t some polit­i­cal mar­tyr. A search for posts of Robinson’s con­tain­ing key­words like “Biden” and “Trump” turned up just one hit each. The Trump post was a pass­ing ref­er­ence to the 2019 impeach­ment inquiry. The Biden one came on the day of the 2020 elec­tion, where he pro­vid­ed an update to anoth­er friend ask­ing about the sta­tus of the vote count.

    ...

    Cat memes, weath­er updates, home improve­ment and the odd Garfield ref­er­ence pop­u­late Robinson’s posts.

    ...

    No one in Robinson’s group is cheer­ing or jus­ti­fy­ing the mur­der in any of the mes­sages I reviewed. They’re just strug­gling to under­stand what their friend did. But Wash­ing­ton has become obsessed with the Dis­cord chat, con­vinced it’s some kind of head­quar­ters for the mur­der and caul­dron of rad­i­cal­iza­tion and con­spir­a­cy. Today FBI Direc­tor Patel vowed to inves­ti­gate “any­one and every­one in that Dis­cord chat.”
    ...

    Then then we have at least one friend who appears to con­fir­ma­tion Robin­son’s rela­tion­ship with his trans­gen­dered room­mate Lance Twig­gs. Robin­son was bisex­u­al and in a rela­tion­ship with a trans per­son and, as a result, okay with gay and trans peo­ple. But that did­n’t appear to be some defin­ing aspect of his per­son­al­i­ty or pol­i­tics. As the friend put it, “Obvi­ous­ly he’s okay with gay and trans peo­ple hav­ing a right to exist, but also believes in the Sec­ond Amend­ment”:

    ...
    Yes­ter­day, FBI Direc­tor Kash Patel said in an inter­view that Robin­son “sub­scribed to left-wing ide­ol­o­gy,” cit­ing his family’s remarks to inves­ti­ga­tors. But those close to Robin­son say there was a lot his fam­i­ly didn’t know about him.

    “Their ideas are based on some­one they did­n’t ful­ly under­stand,” the child­hood friend told me. Though the fam­i­ly was gen­er­al­ly sup­port­ive of Robin­son (a claim cor­rob­o­rat­ed by his mother’s Face­book account, brim­ming with praise for Tyler) they didn’t seem to know about his rela­tion­ship with a trans­gen­der per­son named Lance, the friend said.

    When I asked if his fam­i­ly would have been accept­ing, the friend replied: “I don’t think even Tyler knew the answer to that ques­tion, which is why he kept it so low key between them­selves.”

    Tyler’s bisex­u­al­i­ty, the friend said, was cou­pled with open­ness on LGBT issues. But his wasn’t some cook­ie cut­ter lefty posi­tion on every or even most issues, his friends say.

    “Obvi­ous­ly he’s okay with gay and trans peo­ple hav­ing a right to exist, but also believes in the Sec­ond Amend­ment,” the friend said, refer­ring to the right to bear arms.
    ...

    Also note how Robin­son is described as being friend­ly but not over­ly expres­sive or emo­tion­al. He was super hard to read with a stone cold pok­er face:

    ...

    “He was a real­ly smart guy but super hard to read, stone cold pok­er face and you could always nev­er be con­fi­dent assum­ing any­thing.”

    When I asked if he opened up to any­one, the friend replied: “As far as we knew he was opened up.”

    Despite his ver­bal ret­i­cence, Robin­son was not a lon­er, accord­ing to his friends. Unlike the stereo­typ­i­cal out­cast shoot­er dri­ven to vio­lence by social rejec­tion, he was appar­ent­ly ami­able and well-liked.

    “Every­one who knew him liked him and he was always nice, a lit­tle qui­et and kept to him­self most­ly but was­n’t a recluse,” the child­hood friend said.
    ...

    As we’re going to see, that rel­a­tive­ly placid demeanor was­n’t exact­ly on dis­play in the text mes­sages Robin­son sent to his room­mate fol­low­ing the shoot­ing. Instead, Robin­son repeat­ed­ly refers to Twig­gs as “love”, stat­ing at one point, “you are all I wor­ry about love”. Those were the kinds of mes­sages Robin­son alleged­ly sent to Twig­gs while Robin­son was still in the town of Orem, Utah, wait­ing for an oppor­tu­ni­ty to retrieve the rifle he stashed. Start­ing with a mes­sage to Twig­gs ask­ing him to drop every­thing and read the let­ter Robin­son left under a key­board where Robin­son con­fessed to the shoot­ing he was plan­ning on comit­ting. Robin­son goes on to text all sorts of incrim­i­nat­ing details, includ­ing the mes­sage, “To be hon­est I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sor­ry to involve you.” Which was rather iron­ic giv­en that it was these mes­sages from Robin­son that appear to have ‘involved’ in room­mate in the whole sit­u­a­tion in the first place:

    BBC

    Read the text mes­sages between Char­lie Kirk sus­pect and room­mate

    Bra­jesh Upad­hyay
    09/16/2025

    The man sus­pect­ed of killing con­ser­v­a­tive com­men­ta­tor Char­lie Kirk texted his room­mate after the shoot­ing to dis­cuss a pos­si­ble motive, accord­ing to court doc­u­ments.

    The unnamed room­mate told inves­ti­ga­tors that Tyler Robin­son had alert­ed him to a con­fes­sion under his key­board after last Wednes­day’s shoot­ing at Utah Val­ley Uni­ver­si­ty cam­pus in the city of Orem, said pros­e­cu­tors.

    ...

    Here’s the full record of a series of text mes­sages exchanged with the alleged gun­man on the day of the shoot­ing, which the room­mate pro­vid­ed to inves­ti­ga­tors.

    Robin­son: drop what you are doing, look under my key­board.

    [When the room­mate looked under the key­board, there was a note that alleged­ly read: “I had the oppor­tu­ni­ty to take out Char­lie Kirk and I’m going to take it.”]

    Room­mate: “What?????????????? You’re jok­ing, right????

    Robin­son: I am still ok my love, but am stuck in orem for a lit­tle while longer yet. Should­n’t be long until I can come home, but I got­ta grab my rifle still. To be hon­est I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sor­ry to involve you.

    Room­mate: you weren’t the one who did it right????

    Robin­son: I am, I’m sor­ry

    Room­mate: I thought they caught the per­son?

    Robin­son: no, they grabbed some crazy old dude, then inter­ro­gat­ed some­one in sim­i­lar cloth­ing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point short­ly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. Its qui­et, almost enough to get out, but theres one vehi­cle lin­ger­ing.

    Room­mate: Why?

    Robin­son: Why did I do it?

    Room­mate: Yeah

    Robin­son: I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be nego­ti­at­ed out.

    Robin­son: If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evi­dence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again, hope­ful­ly they have moved on. I haven’t seen any­thing about them find­ing it.

    Room­mate: How long have you been plan­ning this?

    Robin­son: a bit over a week I believe. I can get close to it but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don’t wan­na chance it

    Robin­son: I’m wish­ing I had cir­cled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehi­cle.... I’m wor­ried what my old man would do if I did­n’t bring back grand­pas rifle ... idek if it had a ser­i­al num­ber, but it would­n’t trace to me. I wor­ry about prints I had to leave it in a bush where I changed out­fits. did­n’t have the abil­i­ty or time to bring it with.... I might have to aban­don it and hope they don’t find prints. how the [exple­tive] will I explain los­ing it to my old man....

    only thing I left was the rifle wrapped in a tow­el....

    remem­ber how I was engrav­ing bul­lets? The [exple­tive] mes­sages are most­ly a big meme, if I see “notices bulge uwu” on fox new I might have a stroke alright im gonna have to leave it, that real­ly [exple­tive] sucks.... judg­ing from today I’d say grand­pas gun does just fine idk. I think that was a $2k scope;-;

    Robin­son: delete this exchange

    Robin­son: my dad wants pho­tos of the rifle ... he says grand­pa wants to know who has what, the feds released a pho­to of the rifle, and it is very unique. Hes call­ing me rn, not answer­ing.

    Robin­son: since trump got into office [my dad] has been pret­ty diehard maga.

    Robin­son: Im gonna turn myself in will­ing­ly, one of my neigh­bors here is a deputy for the sher­iff.

    Robin­son: you are all I wor­ry about love

    Room­mate: I’m much more wor­ried about you

    Robin­son: don’t talk to the media please. don’t take any inter­views or make any com­ments. ... if any police ask you ques­tions ask for a lawyer and stay silent

    ———–

    “Read the text mes­sages between Char­lie Kirk sus­pect and room­mate” by Bra­jesh Upad­hyay; BBC; 09/16/2025

    “When the room­mate looked under the key­board, there was a note that alleged­ly read: “I had the oppor­tu­ni­ty to take out Char­lie Kirk and I’m going to take it.”

    The room­mate lover gets a text mes­sage alert­ing them to a note left under a key­board with a con­fes­sion about ‘tak­ing out’ Char­lie Kirk. That’s what we are told. It’s unclear of this was a hand­writ­ten note or a print­ed mes­sage. Nor is it clear if there was any­thing else writ­ten on the note. A motive per­haps? All we’ve heard about is this one sen­tence vague con­fes­sion. It’s not hard to imag­ine what Robin­son may have want­ed to leave a note. He had to real­ize he might not sur­vive that day. But why leave a ‘con­fes­sion’ note that gives almost no details oth­er than kind of ‘I did it’ con­fes­sion? What’s the point?

    And while it’s not incon­ceiv­able that Robin­son could have left a note, it’s very unclear why exact­ly he decid­ed to text his room­mate lover about it while he was still in Orem, wait­ing for an oppor­tu­ni­ty to retrieve his rifle. He states in a text how “I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age” while he’s tex­ting his alleged room­mate lover who pre­vi­ous­ly did­n’t know about it. And he refers to the room­mate as “my love” and talks about being able to come home soon after he grabs the rifle. Then adds “I am sor­ry to involve you.” He’s lit­er­al­ly shar­ing this secret he hoped to take to the grave with some­one who did­n’t know about it and involv­ing his roo­mate lover in doing so. Why? What was the pur­pose of alert­ing his room­mate lover and ensnar­ing them in this crime? It’s kind of a hor­ri­ble thing to do to some­one one claims to love:

    ...
    Robin­son: drop what you are doing, look under my key­board.

    ...

    Room­mate: “What?????????????? You’re jok­ing, right????

    Robin­son: I am still ok my love, but am stuck in orem for a lit­tle while longer yet. Should­n’t be long until I can come home, but I got­ta grab my rifle still. To be hon­est I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sor­ry to involve you.
    ...

    And as we can see from these ear­li­er texts, Robin­son had plans to drop the rifle off at a “drop point” and go back to pick it up lat­er. He goes on to add how he just needs to pick up that rifle and no evi­dence will have been left behind, an utter­ly delu­sion­al state­ment giv­en the range of cam­eras that picked up images of him that were broad­cast across the world. Did he real­ly think he could car­ry out that shoot­ing with­out any sort of out­fit to obscure his iden­ti­ty and he would­n’t be caught on cam­era? This is a star stu­dent we’re talk­ing about. He’s not stu­pid. And yet he seemed to be inex­plic­a­bly stu­pid about his chances of pulling off this attack with­out get­ting caught. Or at least that’s the nar­ra­tive put out with these texts:

    ...
    Room­mate: you weren’t the one who did it right????

    Robin­son: I am, I’m sor­ry

    Room­mate: I thought they caught the per­son?

    Robin­son: no, they grabbed some crazy old dude, then inter­ro­gat­ed some­one in sim­i­lar cloth­ing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point short­ly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. Its qui­et, almost enough to get out, but theres one vehi­cle lin­ger­ing.

    Robin­son: If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evi­dence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again, hope­ful­ly they have moved on. I haven’t seen any­thing about them find­ing it.
    ...

    And then we get to the texts were Robin­son refers to chang­ing out­fits in a bush and wor­ries about leav­ing prints and also explain­ing to his father the loss of the rifle. So he had the pres­ences of mind to be wor­ried about leav­ing prints but appar­ent­ly did­n’t have the pres­ence of mind to wear gloves and not leave prints in the first place? Again, this star stu­dent seems inex­plic­a­bly stu­pid:

    ...
    Robin­son: I’m wish­ing I had cir­cled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehi­cle.... I’m wor­ried what my old man would do if I did­n’t bring back grand­pas rifle ... idek if it had a ser­i­al num­ber, but it would­n’t trace to me. I wor­ry about prints I had to leave it in a bush where I changed out­fits. did­n’t have the abil­i­ty or time to bring it with.... I might have to aban­don it and hope they don’t find prints. how the [exple­tive] will I explain los­ing it to my old man....

    only thing I left was the rifle wrapped in a tow­el....
    ...

    Then we get to the texts where Robin­son seems to be real­iz­ing he was caught. Specif­i­cal­ly, author­i­ties had released a pho­to of the rifle and now his dad, pre­sum­ably very sus­pi­cious at this point, wants a pho­to of rifle to con­firm that his son was­n’t the cul­prit. A pho­to that Robin­son is not in a posi­tion to pro­vide. He appears to have decid­ed to turn him­self in will­ing­ly at this point, refer­ring to the fact that “one of my neigh­bors here is a deputy for the sher­iff.” So he’s pre­sum­ably mak­ing these texts after he’s spo­ken to his par­ents, although we can’t be sure since there were no time­stamps pro­vid­ed. But the next text is the state­ment “you are all I wor­ry about love”, fol­lowed by a plea to not talk to the media, make com­ments, or even talk to the police. That’s quite a list of requests from some­one who just ruined his alleged lover’s life with these actions:

    ...
    Robin­son: my dad wants pho­tos of the rifle ... he says grand­pa wants to know who has what, the feds released a pho­to of the rifle, and it is very unique. Hes call­ing me rn, not answer­ing.

    Robin­son: since trump got into office [my dad] has been pret­ty diehard maga.

    Robin­son: Im gonna turn myself in will­ing­ly, one of my neigh­bors here is a deputy for the sher­iff.

    Robin­son: you are all I wor­ry about love

    Room­mate: I’m much more wor­ried about you

    Robin­son: don’t talk to the media please. don’t take any inter­views or make any com­ments. ... if any police ask you ques­tions ask for a lawyer and stay silent
    ...

    But the legal predica­ment he places his room­mate in gets worse with a ref­er­ence to “remem­ber how I was engrav­ing bul­lets?” So the room­mate was appar­ent­ly aware of of the bul­let meme-engrav­ing. AND THEN he asks his room­mate lover to delete the exchange, some­thing that would be a crim­i­nal act at that point. He just keeps ensnar­ing this alleged lover in a hor­ri­ble legal predica­ment Twig­gs seem­ing­ly had noth­ing to do with:

    ...
    remem­ber how I was engrav­ing bul­lets? The [exple­tive] mes­sages are most­ly a big meme, if I see “notices bulge uwu” on fox new I might have a stroke alright im gonna have to leave it, that real­ly [exple­tive] sucks.... judg­ing from today I’d say grand­pas gun does just fine idk. I think that was a $2k scope;-;

    Robin­son: delete this exchange

    ...

    Next, we get to the remark­ably vague alleged motive: “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be nego­ti­at­ed out.” That was the appar­ent moti­va­tion for some­one who, by all cred­i­ble accounts, was almost entire­ly apo­lit­i­cal:

    ...
    Room­mate: Why?

    Robin­son: Why did I do it?

    Room­mate: Yeah

    Robin­son: I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be nego­ti­at­ed out.

    ...

    Room­mate: How long have you been plan­ning this?

    Robin­son: a bit over a week I believe. I can get close to it but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don’t wan­na chance it
    ...

    All in all, it’s quite a bizarre set of com­mu­ni­ca­tions giv­en the cir­cum­stances. So bizarre that even fig­ures like Steve Ban­non are decry­ing it all as hoax orches­trat­ed by law enforce­ment. Ban­non is even call­ing for an inves­ti­ga­tion of Gov­er­nor Cox. So what does Ban­non sus­pect Cox is cov­er­ing up? Links to antifa. Yep, Ban­non is sug­gest­ing the text mes­sages are a hoax designed to OBSCURE Robin­son’s alleged left-wing ties:

    The Dai­ly Beast

    Steve Ban­non ‘Not Buy­ing’ Char­lie Kirk Shoot­ing Suspect’s Text Mes­sages

    The Trump ally isn’t con­vinced by the mes­sages report­ed­ly sent by Tyler Robin­son to his room­mate.

    Cather­ine Bouris
    Night News Reporter
    Updat­ed Sep. 17 2025 3:15AM EDT
    Pub­lished Sep. 16 2025 10:25PM EDT

    For­mer Trump advis­er Steve Ban­non has expressed skep­ti­cism over the text mes­sages alleged­ly sent by Char­lie Kirk’s sus­pect­ed killer to his room­mate, telling view­ers of his War Room pod­cast that he’s “not buy­ing the script.”

    ...

    “I’m par­tic­u­lar­ly not buy­ing those text mes­sages, it just seems too stilt­ed, too much like a script—actually, like a bad script. So we got­ta get to the bot­tom of it,” Ban­non told his view­ers on Tues­day.

    “You’ve got­ta get to the bot­tom of these groups, you’ve got­ta get to the bot­tom of antifa, you’ve got­ta see if there’s any con­nec­tions to But­ler,” he con­tin­ued.

    “We’ve got a whole lot of work to do, and no, I’m not buy­ing the script that was in the text mes­sages.”

    Ban­non also didn’t believe that Robinson’s pri­ma­ry con­cern in the imme­di­ate after­math of the shoot­ing was mis­plac­ing his grandfather’s rifle.

    “You just mur­dered the most impor­tant young per­son in the con­ser­v­a­tive move­ment, you shot him down like a dog, and you’re telling me you’re tex­ting, ‘Dad’s going to be very upset I lost grandpa’s rifle.‘ Are you kid­ding me? You expect me to believe that?”

    “How did the guy have time to write a son­net? How did he wor­ry about ‘Dad’s real­ly going to be upset about grandpa’s rifle‘? Dude, I think your father may be upset that you shot a man in cold blood in front of the world,” Ban­non argued.

    “I am absolute­ly not buy­ing this.”

    Ban­non has also called for an inves­ti­ga­tion into Utah’s Repub­li­can gov­er­nor, Spencer Cox, describ­ing him as being “part of the prob­lem” that result­ed in Kirk’s mur­der.

    “He needs to be inves­ti­gat­ed. His admin­is­tra­tion needs to be inves­ti­gat­ed... He’s not a truth­ful nar­ra­tive. He’s part of the prob­lem that needs to be inves­ti­gat­ed.“

    “That’s why it’s a mass inves­ti­ga­tion,” Ban­non said. “When is the FBI going to go talk to him?”

    In an episode record­ed soon after Kirk’s death, Ban­non described Kirk as a “casu­al­ty of war,” telling his view­ers, “We have to have steely resolve. Char­lie Kirk is a casu­al­ty of war. We are at war in this coun­try. We are.”

    His com­ment mir­rored sim­i­lar state­ments from across the MAG­A­s­phere, includ­ing from fringe fig­ures like Alex Jones who claimed the left had “put a bulls­eye on Trump” and his sup­port­ers, as well as Fox News host Jesse Wat­ters, who said on The Five, “Whether we want to accept it or not, they are at war with us.”

    ...

    ———–

    “Steve Ban­non ‘Not Buy­ing’ Char­lie Kirk Shoot­ing Suspect’s Text Mes­sages” by Cather­ine Bouris; The Dai­ly Beast; 09/16/2025

    ““I’m par­tic­u­lar­ly not buy­ing those text mes­sages, it just seems too stilt­ed, too much like a script—actually, like a bad script. So we got­ta get to the bot­tom of it,” Ban­non told his view­ers on Tues­day.”

    Steve Ban­non has sus­pi­cions. But not sus­pi­cions of some sort of orches­trat­ed psy­op where a myth of a ‘trans shoot­er’ was con­coct­ed by the state to cre­ate a polit­i­cal­ly con­ve­nient nar­ra­tive. No, no, Ban­non sus­pects it’s a cov­er up, designed to obscure Robin­son’s antifa ties. And maybe even ties to the But­ler, PA, shoot­ing:

    ...
    “You’ve got­ta get to the bot­tom of these groups, you’ve got­ta get to the bot­tom of antifa, you’ve got­ta see if there’s any con­nec­tions to But­ler,” he con­tin­ued.

    “We’ve got a whole lot of work to do, and no, I’m not buy­ing the script that was in the text mes­sages.”
    ...

    Now, in fair­ness, Ban­non does bring up a valid point: the texts real­ly do demon­strate a shock­ing lev­el of detach­ment from the grav­i­ty of what he just did. Robin­son just assas­si­nat­ed a very high pro­file polit­i­cal fig­ure but was wor­ried about how upset his MAGA dad would be about a lost rifle. It real­ly is a very bizarre thing for Robin­son to be tex­ting to his room­mate at that point:

    ...
    Ban­non also didn’t believe that Robinson’s pri­ma­ry con­cern in the imme­di­ate after­math of the shoot­ing was mis­plac­ing his grandfather’s rifle.

    “You just mur­dered the most impor­tant young per­son in the con­ser­v­a­tive move­ment, you shot him down like a dog, and you’re telling me you’re tex­ting, ‘Dad’s going to be very upset I lost grandpa’s rifle.‘ Are you kid­ding me? You expect me to believe that?”

    “How did the guy have time to write a son­net? How did he wor­ry about ‘Dad’s real­ly going to be upset about grandpa’s rifle‘? Dude, I think your father may be upset that you shot a man in cold blood in front of the world,” Ban­non argued.

    “I am absolute­ly not buy­ing this.”
    ...

    And then we get this remark­able sug­ges­tion: Ban­non wants to see Gov­er­nor Cox inves­ti­gat­ed for lying. So it appears Ban­non thinks the Repub­li­can Utah Gov­er­nor is mak­ing up a nar­ra­tive to cov­er up Robin­son’s ties to a broad­er vio­lent antifa plot. That’s the nar­ra­tive Ban­non is going with at this point:

    ...
    Ban­non has also called for an inves­ti­ga­tion into Utah’s Repub­li­can gov­er­nor, Spencer Cox, describ­ing him as being “part of the prob­lem” that result­ed in Kirk’s mur­der.

    “He needs to be inves­ti­gat­ed. His admin­is­tra­tion needs to be inves­ti­gat­ed... He’s not a truth­ful nar­ra­tive. He’s part of the prob­lem that needs to be inves­ti­gat­ed.“

    “That’s why it’s a mass inves­ti­ga­tion,” Ban­non said. “When is the FBI going to go talk to him?”
    ...

    Now, let’s take a quick look at the fol­low­ing arti­cle that pro­vides some addi­tion­al details on Robin­son’s inter­ac­tions with his par­ents and the ulti­mate deci­sion to turn him­self in. Inter­est­ing­ly, it sounds like Robin­son ini­tial­ly told his par­ents he would kill him­self before turn­ing him­self in. But then his father con­vinced him to speak with a fam­i­ly friend who hap­pened to be a retire deputy sher­iff. We are told that it was that fam­i­ly friend who con­vinced Robin­son to turn him­self in:

    Time

    ‘I Had Enough of His Hatred’: Pros­e­cu­tors Reveal Texts Sent by Char­lie Kirk Sus­pect in Hours After Killing

    by Con­nor Greene
    Edi­to­r­i­al Fel­low
    Updat­ed: Sep 16, 2025 10:10 PM CT

    Tyler Robin­son has been charged with the aggra­vat­ed mur­der of con­ser­v­a­tive com­men­ta­tor Char­lie Kirk, pros­e­cu­tors announced on Tues­day, as they revealed text mes­sages he alleged­ly sent in the hours after the shoot­ing in which he admit­ted his guilt.

    In one mes­sage sent to his room­mate, who inves­ti­ga­tors say he was dat­ing, Robin­son alleged­ly said of Kirk: “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be nego­ti­at­ed out.”

    Robin­son, 22, was charged with sev­en counts total: one count of aggra­vat­ed mur­der and felony dis­charge of a firearm, two counts of obstruc­tion of jus­tice, two counts of wit­ness tam­per­ing, and one count of com­mis­sion of a vio­lent offense in the pres­ence of a child.

    ...

    Gray also revealed the key role Robin­son’s par­ents played in crack­ing the case.

    It was Robin­son’s moth­er, after see­ing the first images released by police of the sus­pect on tele­vi­sion, who first expressed con­cern that her son might be the killer. When she raised it with her hus­band, they both agreed the images resem­bled their son. Robinson’s moth­er called him the day after the shoot­ing and asked what he was doing, and Robin­son told his moth­er that he was home, sick, and that he had also been home sick the day pri­or, on Sept. 10.

    When author­i­ties released a descrip­tion of the gun used in the crime and it matched one that Robin­son’s father had giv­en him as a gift, he asked his son to send him a pho­to of the rifle, Gray said. Robin­son did not respond to his father.

    When they even­tu­al­ly spoke on the phone, Robin­son admit­ted to the crime and implied to his father that he intend­ed to take his own life. Robinson’s par­ents were able to con­vince him to meet at their home, where he implied that he was the shoot­er. They even­tu­al­ly con­vinced Robin­son to speak with a fam­i­ly friend who is a retired deputy sher­iff, who ulti­mate­ly con­vinced him to turn him­self in.

    FBI Direc­tor Kash Patel tes­ti­fied Tues­day at a heat­ed Sen­ate Judi­cia­ry Com­mit­tee hear­ing about the inves­ti­ga­tion. The FBI is inter­view­ing “a lot more” than 20 peo­ple who par­tic­i­pat­ed in a chat with Robin­son on online plat­form Dis­cord, Patel tes­ti­fied. The plat­form con­firmed reports that Robin­son had post­ed mes­sages to a Dis­cord chat two hours before being tak­en into cus­tody.

    “Hey guys, I have bad news for you all,” a mes­sage read. “It was me at UVU yes­ter­day. im sor­ry for all of this.”

    The FBI is “inves­ti­gat­ing any­one and every­one involved in that Dis­cord chat,” Patel said. “We’re run­ning them all down.”

    ...

    —————-

    “‘I Had Enough of His Hatred’: Pros­e­cu­tors Reveal Texts Sent by Char­lie Kirk Sus­pect in Hours After Killing” by Con­nor Greene; Time; 09/16/2025

    “It was Robin­son’s moth­er, after see­ing the first images released by police of the sus­pect on tele­vi­sion, who first expressed con­cern that her son might be the killer. When she raised it with her hus­band, they both agreed the images resem­bled their son. Robinson’s moth­er called him the day after the shoot­ing and asked what he was doing, and Robin­son told his moth­er that he was home, sick, and that he had also been home sick the day pri­or, on Sept. 10.

    As we can see, Robin­son’s par­ents appar­ent­ly rec­og­nized him imme­di­ate­ly after author­i­ties released the first pho­tos. And then, after the release of a descrip­tion of the rifle, his father asks for a pho­to of the rifle. Robin­son does­n’t respond to the request but ends up talk­ing to his par­ents and con­fess­ing. He sug­gests he’ll take his own life before turn­ing him­self. They then some­how con­vince Robin­son to speak to the fam­i­ly friend who is a retired deputy sher­iff, and we are told that is the per­son who con­vinced him to turn him­self in:

    ...
    When author­i­ties released a descrip­tion of the gun used in the crime and it matched one that Robin­son’s father had giv­en him as a gift, he asked his son to send him a pho­to of the rifle, Gray said. Robin­son did not respond to his father.

    When they even­tu­al­ly spoke on the phone, Robin­son admit­ted to the crime and implied to his father that he intend­ed to take his own life. Robinson’s par­ents were able to con­vince him to meet at their home, where he implied that he was the shoot­er. They even­tu­al­ly con­vinced Robin­son to speak with a fam­i­ly friend who is a retired deputy sher­iff, who ulti­mate­ly con­vinced him to turn him­self in.
    ...

    Last­ly, here’s a piece describ­ing the arrange­ment police had to make to secure Robin­son’s sur­ren­der. He was appar­ent­ly very scared of being shot by the police and need­ed assur­ances the police would be peace­ful:

    Newsweek

    Tyler Robin­son Update: Sher­iff Reveals Why Alleged Kirk Shoot­er Sur­ren­dered

    By Gabe Whis­nant
    Break­ing News Edi­tor
    Pub­lished Sep 17, 2025 at 6:03 PM EDT
    Updat­ed Sep 17, 2025 at 7:11 PM EDT

    Tyler Robin­son, the Utah man accused of assas­si­nat­ing con­ser­v­a­tive activist Char­lie Kirk, agreed to sur­ren­der only under assur­ances it would be peace­ful because he feared being shot by police, a sher­iff said Wednes­day.

    Robin­son appeared qui­et and somber when he arrived with his par­ents at the Wash­ing­ton Coun­ty Sher­if­f’s Office last Thurs­day, a day after Kirk was fatal­ly shot at Utah Val­ley Uni­ver­si­ty, Sher­iff Nate Brooks­by said.

    “He did­n’t want a big SWAT team at his par­en­t’s house or his apart­ment,” Brooks­by said. “He was tru­ly fear­ful about being shot by law enforce­ment.”

    Brooks­by said Robin­son sur­ren­dered vol­un­tar­i­ly after learn­ing author­i­ties were search­ing for him. The sher­iff said Robin­son was fear­ful of being killed by police and asked to avoid a SWAT stand­off.

    “He knew it was inevitable that he would be caught,” Brooks­by said Wednes­day. “If at the end of the day we accom­plish him sur­ren­der­ing peace­ful­ly on his own, I’m going to make some con­ces­sions to make that hap­pen.”

    ...

    ————–

    “Tyler Robin­son Update: Sher­iff Reveals Why Alleged Kirk Shoot­er Sur­ren­dered” By Gabe Whis­nant; Newsweek; 09/17/2025

    ““He did­n’t want a big SWAT team at his par­en­t’s house or his apart­ment,” Brooks­by said. “He was tru­ly fear­ful about being shot by law enforce­ment.”

    It’s one more remark­able twist in this sto­ry: the guy was so ter­ri­fied of being shot by the police he had his retired deputy sher­iff fam­i­ly friend nego­ti­ate the sur­ren­der. It’s one more indi­ca­tion Robin­son was­n’t com­mit­ting an act of sui­cide. He appar­ent­ly thought he could get away with it.

    Or at least that’s the nar­ra­tive we’ve been giv­en. A nar­ra­tive that leaves a vague rejec­tion of Char­lie Kirk’s ‘hatred’ as the sole motive dri­ven a gun­man who seemed to have no plau­si­ble polit­i­cal motive beyond his qua­si-secret roman­tic rela­tion­ship with a trans room­mate. His “love” who Robin­son hap­pened to place in hor­ri­ble legal jeop­ardy with one incrim­i­nat­ing text after anoth­er.

    And while Steve Ban­non’s angst over the verac­i­ty of the inves­ti­ga­tion is a reflec­tion of the ten­u­ous­ness of the ‘left-wing motive’ nar­ra­tive Gov­er­nor Cox has been aggres­sive­ly push­ing, that clear­ly has­n’t stopped the Trump admin­is­tra­tion from turn­ing this event into a pre­text for a much broad­er domes­tic crack­down on his polit­i­cal ene­mies. In oth­er words, Steve Ban­non does indeed have plen­ty to wor­ry about when it comes to the integri­ty of this inves­ti­ga­tion. But much less to wor­ry about when it comes to the Trump admin­is­tra­tion’s preda­to­ry response. Which, of course, Steve Ban­non knows well. Gov­er­nor Cox isn’t the only one push­ing polit­i­cal­ly con­ve­nient nar­ra­tives. ‘It’s all a big meme’, as Robin­son apt­ly put it to his room­mate. Except he’s no longer the one craft­ing the big meme.

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | September 18, 2025, 4:12 pm
  3. @Pterrafractyl–

    This makes even less sense, the more one delves into it.

    260 mile dri­ve to get to the Char­lie Kirk event? That dri­ve should itself have pro­duced a lot of data.

    I have seen so many videos, many of which appear to be deep­fakes and/or doc­tored, it is dif­fi­cult to process them all.

    I don’t think Tyler Robin­son did this at all.

    I think he is a “Dig­i­tal Lee Har­vey” Robin­son.

    Too many con­tra­dic­tions and too much weird-ass self incrim­i­na­tion.

    What did the guy descend­ing the stairs when Robin­son was sup­pos­ed­ly ascend­ing say about his gait?

    Now we are told he stashed the rifle in his pants.

    Real­ly? There is no rifle vis­i­ble in the video alleged­ly of him jump­ing off the roof and pro­ceed­ing off cam­pus.

    A guy is non­cha­lant­ly walk­ing up a side­walk near­by, this after a fatal shot has been fired and peo­ple are flee­ing in pan­ic.

    Again, I have seen so many videos, adding up to Fresh Fer­til­iz­er.

    I think the actu­al killer may very well have been on the jet that left Pro­vo air­port.

    Now, BTW, we are hear­ing “It vas de Jews, Ja?”

    We heard that after JFK was killed too.

    And the Crooks shoot­ing in But­ler?

    Pure B.S.

    Keep up the great work!

    Best,

    Dave

    Posted by Dave Emory | September 18, 2025, 7:30 pm
  4. It’s not the mag­ic bul­let. It’s the mir­a­cle bul­let. Or, rather, the mir­a­cle body. That would be Char­lie Kirk’s body, which was appar­ent­ly so extra dense that it stopped the .30–06 bul­let from even exit­ing Kirk’s body at all. That’s the remark­able anec­dote that was recent­ly shared by Andrew Kol­vet, the pro­duc­er of Kirk’s pop­u­lar talk show. One of many remark­able details we are digest­ing with this case. Details that con­tin­ue to con­found, with one new wrin­kle after anoth­er.

    Yes, Mirac­u­lous­ly stopped bul­lets are now part of this sto­ry. Kol­vet described how sur­geons at the hos­pi­tal where Kirk was tak­en were sur­prised by the fact that this round did­n’t exit Kirk, attribut­ing it to the den­si­ty of Kirk’s body. The bul­let “should have just gone through and through. It like­ly would have killed those stand­ing behind him too,” Kol­vet claims he was told by a physi­cian. Instead, it was found just beneath the skin. Kol­vet says it should be seen as a mir­a­cle that the peo­ple behind Kirk weren’t killed too.

    And then we get to the remark­able rea­son Kol­vet gives for shar­ing this anec­dote: to address the ‘online chat­ter’ about a lack of exit wound. Because it real­ly is unde­ni­ably the case that round with that kind of fire­pow­er should have torn through Kirk’s body. The .30–06 round is used to hunt big game. It has dev­as­tat­ing pow­er up against a human body. How did it not slice through him? Either he was mirac­u­lous­ly dense or the bul­let kept ric­o­chet­ing off bones in just the right way to expend all of that ener­gy before com­ing to a stop. We don’t know what exact­ly caused the bul­let to spare the peo­ple behind Kirk but there’s no argu­ing it was in improb­a­ble out­come giv­en the cir­cum­stances. Tyler Robin­son’s shot real­ly should have been more lethal whether that was his intent or not.

    We’ll see if Kol­vet’s sto­ry silences the ‘online chat­ter’ about the lack of an exit wound but it’s hard to imag­ine an expla­na­tion that involves a mir­a­cle hav­ing the intend­ed effect. And that grow­ing online chat­ter brings us to anoth­er anom­aly that has emerged as we’ve received more and more infor­ma­tion about Robin­son’s alleged actions and motive: it appears Robin­son had ‘Plan A’ of ditch­ing the rifle and then pick­ing it up lat­er but also a ‘Plan B’ of just leav­ing the rifle and hop­ing it would­n’t be traced back to him. As we’re going to see, it would appear that ‘Plan A’ entailed get­ting away with­out leav­ing any evi­dence at all about the motive of the shoot­er. No meme-engraved bul­let cas­ings. Just shoot­ing Kirk and dis­ap­pear­ing. The meme-engraved cas­ings were appar­ent­ly only to be left behind in the event of the rifle being left behind. The memes were only involved with Plan B. How about that.

    At least that’s what we sort of have to infer from the avail­able infor­ma­tion about what inves­ti­ga­tors have found. Because it turns out Robin­son’s Mouser 98 — which was passed down to him from his grand­fa­ther — was old enough to pre-date the 1968 laws requir­ing rifles sold in the US to have ser­i­al num­bers. Inves­ti­ga­tors sug­gest that it’s pos­si­ble it nev­er would have been traced back to him. As we saw in his alleged texts to his trans room­mate lover Lance Twig­gs, Robin­son described the rifle as being unique and he fret­ted over explain­ing to his father how it was lost. But Robin­son also seemed hope­ful that the rifle would­n’t be traced back to him if author­i­ties found it. That appears to have been the case accord­ing to these reports.

    So Robin­son could have poten­tial­ly got­ten away with it even had that rifle been found. Which brings us to anoth­er detail we’ve learned: it turns out the bolt-action rifle had­n’t yet expelled the spent car­tridge. It was still in the rifle when they found it. Mean­ing no meme-engraved car­tridge was left at the alleged scene of the shoot­ing. The memes were only found as a result of the rifle being left behind and found by author­i­ties. That’s a remark­able detail in terms of the plan­ning Robin­son is sup­posed to have engaged in for this attack. Why use meme-engraved bul­lets but only acci­den­tal­ly leave them behind to be found. Because that’s what we are told hap­pened. Robin­son acci­den­tal­ly left the meme bul­lets. He was­n’t sup­posed to leave any­thing behind and we were sup­posed to be com­plete­ly scratch­ing our heads about the motive of the cul­prit. But then things did­n’t go to plan and he acci­den­tal­ly leaves the meme bul­lets to be dis­cov­ered. That’s the sto­ry we’ve got­ten at this point. The kind of sto­ry that tends to gen­er­ate plen­ty of ‘online chat­ter’.

    Those were some of the updates we’ve received on the ongo­ing inves­ti­ga­tion. Updates guar­an­teed to inflame spec­u­la­tion. But it’s worth not­ing an update we haven’t received: an update on the out­fit he alleged­ly wore dur­ing the attack. The black t‑shirt with the flag and pis­tol across the front and blue jeans that con­cealed the rifle as he made he limped his way towards the roof. There aren’t any reports on what hap­pened to those. It’s notable in part because we are told DNA on the rifle match­es that of Robin­son. The clothes would have had plen­ty of his DNA too but those appear to have been suc­cess­ful­ly dis­posed of by Robin­son.

    It’s also rather notable that Robin­son does­n’t appear to have tak­en the kind of mea­sures that would pre­vent his DNA from show­ing up on a rifle that he oth­er­wise assumed would­n’t be trace­able back to him. This isn’t the 1960s. DNA evi­dence in crimes is a very com­mon and expect­ed thing, with advances on that front to be expect­ed too. For some­one who claimed in the bizarre string of text to his alleged trans room­mate lover that he had hopes of tak­ing this crime to his death bed as an old man, leav­ing any DNA at all on that rifle was a mas­sive over­sight.

    Also keep in mind that it’s prob­a­bly extra risky for some­one in a Mor­mon fam­i­ly to leave any DNA evi­dence behind at a crime scene they are plan­ning on get­ting away with. Espe­cial­ly if they are hop­ing to take the secret to their death bed as an old man, decades from now. Because as sto­ries like the unmask­ing of the Gold­en State Killer thanks to the help of GED­match, a per­son­al genomics ser­vice that was used by a close enough rel­a­tive of the killer to allow inves­ti­ga­tors to use the ser­vice to hone in on the killer, leav­ing DNA at a crime scene can lead to your iden­ti­fi­ca­tion even if you aren’t in any DNA data­bas­es thanks to all your cousins curi­ous about the fam­i­ly tree. And Mor­mon fam­i­lies are known for a high inter­est in geneal­o­gy. So much so that Ancestry.com and the LDS Church worked out a deal that allows all LDS Church mem­bers to sign up for a free mem­ber­ship. When it comes to inves­ti­ga­tors using ances­try web­sites and genet­ics to tri­an­gu­late and prune their sus­pect list, Tyler Robin­son hap­pens to hail from a high­ly tri­an­gu­la­ble demo­graph­ic.

    But inves­ti­ga­tors did­n’t have to go down those kinds of inves­tiga­tive avenues thanks to the fact that Robin­son did almost noth­ing to hide his face and was imme­di­ate­ly rec­og­nized by his par­ents and friends when the pho­tos were blast­ed out to world. It was a high­ly effec­tive assas­si­na­tion from a lethal­i­ty and social reac­tion stand­point. But it was weird­ly hap­less when it comes to being a plan that Robin­son was going to get away with. He was almost guar­an­teed to get caught in this age of cam­eras every­where. Noth­ing oth­er than sun­glass­es to obscure his iden­ti­ty as he limped his way to the rooftop and then fired a shot and ran away. It’s remark­able how few cam­era angles we’ve seen at this point. His plan was mad­ness from an oper­a­tional secu­ri­ty stand­point. But it sure got a reac­tion. A reac­tion that is being shaped and ampli­fied by the increas­ing­ly bizarre nar­ra­tive we are get­ting from an inves­ti­ga­tion being led/meddled with by an utter­ly dis­cred­it­ed FBI in the midst of an insti­tu­tion­al cri­sis of basic ethics and com­pe­tence.

    And let’s not for­get one of the oth­er major mys­ter­ies loom­ing over this sto­ry: was it just a coin­ci­dence that a 16 year old high school stu­dent inspired by the same meme-dri­ven nihilis­tic online com­mu­ni­ties that have been inspir­ing almost all of the school shoot­ers of recent years began a school shoot­ing attack on Ever­green High School in Den­ver at 12:24 pm, almost the exact same time as the 12:23 pm assas­si­na­tion of Kirk? Both attacks fueled by an online meme-dri­ven zeit­geist. Was that just chance? More ques­tions to add to all the ‘online chat­ter’ swirling around this sto­ry.

    A sto­ry that makes less and less sense the more details we learn. Details like Robin­son appar­ent­ly try­ing to get away with­out leav­ing any evi­dence of a motive...unless he had to ditch the rifle in which case he want­ed to leave all sorts of memes for inves­ti­ga­tors to focus on. The kind of details that make the most sense if Robin­son left the memes as a form of mis­di­rec­tion:

    New York Post

    Gun that killed Char­lie Kirk is WWI-era rifle that may be untrace­able

    By Kather­ine Don­levy
    Pub­lished Sep. 20, 2025, 2:12 p.m. ET

    The gun Tyler Robin­son alleged­ly used to assas­si­nate Char­lie Kirk was so old that it pre­dat­ed ser­i­al num­ber man­dates — mak­ing the weapon impos­si­ble to track.

    The Mauser mod­el rifle, described in texts by Robin­son as “grandpa’s rifle,” is a decades-old, Ger­man-made gun used in both world wars and on the mar­ket years before a law cre­at­ed after the assas­si­na­tion of for­mer Pres­i­dent John F. Kennedy man­dat­ed weapons to be etched with unique, trace­able num­bers.

    There are believed to be mil­lions of such weapons in homes through­out the coun­try — rais­ing con­cerns among fed­er­al author­i­ties of the poten­tial for oth­er assas­sins to car­ry out sim­i­lar attacks with their untrace­able rifles.

    “Short of the secu­ri­ty afford­ed to the pres­i­dent, there’s no way to defend against the threat posed by this,” Scott Swee­t­ow, a retired offi­cial with the Bureau of Alco­hol, Tobac­co, Firearms and Explo­sives, told NBC News

    ...

    Cops found the weapon hours after the assas­si­na­tion — but it’s not clear whether they would have been able to trace it to Robin­son had his fam­i­ly not pres­sured him into sur­ren­der­ing to cops.

    The gun is a Mauser mod­el 98, pros­e­cu­tors said. The 30–06 cal­iber rifle fires car­tridges slight­ly small­er than 8 mil­lime­ters and is a bolt-action style weapon, mean­ing it needs to be reloaded between shots.

    Robin­son said in texts to his room­mate that the gun had belonged to his grand­fa­ther, but it is not clear how the grand­fa­ther came into pos­ses­sion of it.

    The Mauser 98 was the stan­dard rifle used by the Ger­mans dur­ing World War I, and Nazi dic­ta­tor Adolf Hitler favored a short­er ver­sion of the gun for the Ger­man Army in World War II.

    Thou­sands of Amer­i­can GIs brought the rifles home with them fol­low­ing World War I and II, and they have since become pop­u­lar with hunters.

    The vin­tage rifles are also wide­ly avail­able at firearm stores, pawn shops and gun shows, but new­er mod­els have unique ser­i­al num­bers brand­ed along the sides.

    Ser­i­al num­bers were not man­dat­ed until after Kennedy’s assas­si­na­tion in 1963, even­tu­al­ly lead­ing to the Gun Con­trol Act of 1968.

    Under the law, firearms were required to have mark­ings and paper­work iden­ti­fy­ing the buy­er to enable trac­ing.

    Robin­son appar­ent­ly knew his grandfather’s rifle was free of any such etch­ings, accord­ing to text mes­sages he sent in the wake of the mur­der.

    “I’m wor­ried what my old man would do if I don’t bring back grandpa’s rifle,” Robin­son wrote to his room­mate just hours after the assas­si­na­tion.

    “IDK if it has a ser­i­al num­ber but it wouldn’t trace to me. I’m wor­ried about prints, I had to leave it in a bush where i changed out­fits, didn’t have the abil­i­ty or time to take it with.”

    The Utah State Bureau of Inves­ti­ga­tions claimed it recov­ered DNA from the mur­der weapon that is con­sis­tent with Robin­son, court papers stat­ed.

    ...

    ———–

    “Gun that killed Char­lie Kirk is WWI-era rifle that may be untrace­able” By Kather­ine Don­levy; New York Post; 09/20/2025

    “Cops found the weapon hours after the assas­si­na­tion — but it’s not clear whether they would have been able to trace it to Robin­son had his fam­i­ly not pres­sured him into sur­ren­der­ing to cops.

    A poten­tial­ly untrace­able rifle from a time before ser­i­al num­bers made manda­to­ry after the Kennedy assas­si­na­tion. One of mil­lions cir­cu­lat­ing in the US. That would osten­si­bly explain Robin­son’s will­ing­ness to leave it behind:

    ...
    The Mauser mod­el rifle, described in texts by Robin­son as “grandpa’s rifle,” is a decades-old, Ger­man-made gun used in both world wars and on the mar­ket years before a law cre­at­ed after the assas­si­na­tion of for­mer Pres­i­dent John F. Kennedy man­dat­ed weapons to be etched with unique, trace­able num­bers.

    There are believed to be mil­lions of such weapons in homes through­out the coun­try — rais­ing con­cerns among fed­er­al author­i­ties of the poten­tial for oth­er assas­sins to car­ry out sim­i­lar attacks with their untrace­able rifles.

    ...

    The vin­tage rifles are also wide­ly avail­able at firearm stores, pawn shops and gun shows, but new­er mod­els have unique ser­i­al num­bers brand­ed along the sides.

    Ser­i­al num­bers were not man­dat­ed until after Kennedy’s assas­si­na­tion in 1963, even­tu­al­ly lead­ing to the Gun Con­trol Act of 1968.
    ...

    And as we saw, Robin­son’s texts to Twig­gs indi­cat­ed an assump­tion on his part that the rifle, while unique, was ulti­mate­ly untrace­able. An assump­tion that assumed Robin­son’s DNA was­n’t in any DNA data­bas­es since DNA was appar­ent­ly recov­ered from the rifle. Keep in mind that Mor­mon com­mu­ni­ties are noto­ri­ous­ly big con­sumers of ances­try-relat­ed ser­vices includ­ing the new genet­ic-based ser­vices like Ancestry.com. In fact, mem­bers of the LDS Church can get a free account mem­ber­ship at Ancestry.com. And as we learned with the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of the Gold­en State Killer thanks to the GED­match ances­try ser­vice, the more rel­a­tives you have on ser­vices like this, the more vul­ner­a­ble you are to being found from DNA alone, whether you are per­son­al­ly in a DNA data­base or not. It would be inter­est­ing to know how many or Robin­son’s rel­a­tives are on such ser­vices just to have a sense of how vul­ner­a­ble he poten­tial­ly was based on that evi­dence alone. But it’s also worth ask­ing what hap­pened to the ditched clothes. He appar­ent­ly ditch­es the rifle AND changed closed in the woods. Where are the clothes? Because he would have pre­sum­ably left ample DNA on clothes, would­n’t he? How has there been no report on iden­ti­fied clothes? Did he ditch them some­where else?

    ...
    Robin­son appar­ent­ly knew his grandfather’s rifle was free of any such etch­ings, accord­ing to text mes­sages he sent in the wake of the mur­der.

    “I’m wor­ried what my old man would do if I don’t bring back grandpa’s rifle,” Robin­son wrote to his room­mate just hours after the assas­si­na­tion.

    “IDK if it has a ser­i­al num­ber but it wouldn’t trace to me. I’m wor­ried about prints, I had to leave it in a bush where i changed out­fits, didn’t have the abil­i­ty or time to take it with.”

    The Utah State Bureau of Inves­ti­ga­tions claimed it recov­ered DNA from the mur­der weapon that is con­sis­tent with Robin­son, court papers stat­ed.
    ...

    And that update on the details of whether or not the rifle could have been traced back to Robin­son brings us to the fol­low­ing sto­ry that was pub­lished short­ly after Kirk’s killing but con­tained a detail that has only grown more and more intrigu­ing the more we’ve been told about Robin­son’s alleged actions and motive: the shell case for the lone shot was left in the bolt-action rifle, mean no meme-engraved bul­let was left at the scene of the shot. And that implies Robin­son intend­ed to leave no meme mes­sage for his ‘Plan A’ of get­ting away and pick­ing up the rifle lat­er. But he also had a Plan B of just leav­ing the rifle behind since he sus­pect­ed it could­n’t be traced back to him. And he appar­ent­ly decid­ed to leave those four memes for author­i­ties to find under Plan B. That’s quite the shift in pub­lic mes­sag­ing for these two sce­nar­ios. Plan A was to leave the cul­prit a com­plete mys­tery, until he died an old man as Robin­son alleged­ly told Twig­gs in the texts. And then Plan B was to leave some sort of vague meme mes­sages. Why go through the effort of engrav­ing bul­lets with memes for your big assas­si­na­tion but only leave them to be found under a Plan B sce­nario? It’s a strange appar­ent con­tra­dic­tion for such a sig­nif­i­cant act. Were the memes intend­ed to throw inves­ti­ga­tors off his trail? Or are we look­ing at a fab­ri­cat­ed nar­ra­tive that just was­n’t very well thought out:

    The New York Times

    Police Recov­er a ‘High-Pow­ered’ Rifle as Spec­u­la­tion Grows About Shoot­er

    Lit­tle is known about the killer, who may have used a pop­u­lar type of hunt­ing rifle in the shoot­ing of Char­lie Kirk.

    By Thomas Gib­bons-Neff
    Pub­lished Sept. 11, 2025
    Updat­ed Sept. 13, 2025

    In the hours after the con­ser­v­a­tive activist Char­lie Kirk was shot and killed on the cam­pus of Utah Val­ley Uni­ver­si­ty on Wednes­day much of the spec­u­la­tion focused on the shoot­er: What train­ing did the assas­sin have? What weapon was used? What was the motive?

    Robert Bohls, the spe­cial agent in charge of the F.B.I.’s Salt Lake City field office, said in a news con­fer­ence Thurs­day morn­ing that “a high-pow­ered, bolt-action rifle” was recov­ered in a wood­ed area near the site of the shoot­ing.

    ...

    Three law-enforce­ment offi­cials, speak­ing on the con­di­tion of anonymi­ty, said the recov­ered gun was an old­er-mod­el Mauser rifle. Sev­er­al car­tridges, includ­ing a spent round in the rifle’s cham­ber, were also found, the offi­cials said. World War II-era Mauser rifles, used by the Ger­man Army and import­ed to the Unit­ed States in large num­bers after the war, were cham­bered in 8 mil­lime­ter, a car­tridge slight­ly larg­er that .30–06.

    A bolt-action rifle like the Mauser is a firearm com­mon among marks­men and hunters. Bolt action refers to the mech­a­nism that inserts and extracts the bul­let into the cham­ber after each shot is fired, mean­ing the bolt needs to be man­u­al­ly oper­at­ed after the trig­ger is pulled, unlike a semi­au­to­mat­ic firearm. Bolt-action weapons have slow­er rates of fire but are gen­er­al­ly more pre­cise than their semi­au­to­mat­ic coun­ter­parts.

    A bul­let of almost any cal­iber hit­ting a per­son where Mr. Kirk was shot would inflict sim­i­lar dam­age. The weapon’s loud report was caught on mul­ti­ple phone record­ings. No infor­ma­tion has been released on the bul­let that hit Mr. Kirk.

    The shooter’s train­ing has also been a point of debate. Footage shows a per­son run­ning from a rooftop after the shoot­ing. It remains unknown if the shoot­er was sit­ting, kneel­ing, stand­ing or lying down when he fired at Mr. Kirk. Each of those posi­tions changes the accu­ra­cy of the shot and the skill required to hit a tar­get. Inves­ti­ga­tors have said they found a palm imprint, a fore­arm imprint and a “footwear impres­sion.”

    Breath­ing, adren­a­line and phys­i­cal fit­ness all affect the abil­i­ty to shoot accu­rate­ly at any range, no mat­ter the weapon. The shoot­er could have been trained in the mil­i­tary but also could have been self-taught from YouTube videos.

    ...

    ————

    “Police Recov­er a ‘High-Pow­ered’ Rifle as Spec­u­la­tion Grows About Shoot­er” By Thomas Gib­bons-Neff; The New York Times; 09/11/2025

    “Three law-enforce­ment offi­cials, speak­ing on the con­di­tion of anonymi­ty, said the recov­ered gun was an old­er-mod­el Mauser rifle. Sev­er­al car­tridges, includ­ing a spent round in the rifle’s cham­ber, were also found, the offi­cials said. World War II-era Mauser rifles, used by the Ger­man Army and import­ed to the Unit­ed States in large num­bers after the war, were cham­bered in 8 mil­lime­ter, a car­tridge slight­ly larg­er that .30–06.”

    A spent round was found in the rifle’s cham­ber, one of sev­er­al found with the rifle. These are pre­sum­ably the bul­lets with the meme-engraved cas­ings. And since the spent round was found still in the cham­ber, that also pre­sum­ably means there was no meme-engraved shell cas­ing found at the loca­tion where Robin­son alleged­ly fired the shot. So Robin­son appar­ent­ly decid­ed to leave zero sym­bols at the scene of the crime, not even the cas­ing for the one fired shot. But then he stash­es the rifle in a wood­ed area, with plans of swing­ing back of pick­ing it up lat­er. Plans that went awry, result­ing in the meme-cov­ered bul­lets being dis­cov­ered. It’s one more odd wrin­kle in the nar­ra­tive we’ve been get­ting about this sto­ry: we are being led to believe that Robin­son’s Plan A did­n’t involved leav­ing memes, but ditch­ing the rifle for Plan B had four meme bul­lets he him­self engraved:

    ...
    A bolt-action rifle like the Mauser is a firearm com­mon among marks­men and hunters. Bolt action refers to the mech­a­nism that inserts and extracts the bul­let into the cham­ber after each shot is fired, mean­ing the bolt needs to be man­u­al­ly oper­at­ed after the trig­ger is pulled, unlike a semi­au­to­mat­ic firearm. Bolt-action weapons have slow­er rates of fire but are gen­er­al­ly more pre­cise than their semi­au­to­mat­ic coun­ter­parts.

    A bul­let of almost any cal­iber hit­ting a per­son where Mr. Kirk was shot would inflict sim­i­lar dam­age. The weapon’s loud report was caught on mul­ti­ple phone record­ings. No infor­ma­tion has been released on the bul­let that hit Mr. Kirk.
    ...

    And that self-con­tra­dic­to­ry bul­let sit­u­a­tion brings us to the fol­low­ing update on the foren­sic find­ings of the assas­si­na­tion: it turns out the rea­son no one sit­ting behind Kirk was hurt despite the .30–06 round being pow­er­ful enough to eas­i­ly tear through a human body is because the bul­let hap­pened to be stopped. In fact, it was found just beneath Kirk’s skin, which is what there was no exit wound. That was the remark­able update we got from Andrew Kol­vet, pro­duc­er of Kirk’s talk show. The sur­geons at the hos­pi­tal expressed sur­prise the bul­let did­n’t go fur­ther but also not­ed the “den­si­ty” of Kirk’s body. The bul­let “should have just gone through and through. It like­ly would have killed those stand­ing behind him too”, accord­ing to Kol­vet. So Kirk was appar­ent­ly so dense it stopped the kind of round that would nor­mal­ly slice through a per­son. Kol­vet char­ac­ter­ized it as a “mir­a­cle”, adding that he only shared the anec­dote to address ‘online chat­ter’ about the lack of an exit wound. So attribut­ing the bul­let’s lack of an exit wound to a mir­a­cle is part of an effort to address skep­ti­cism over the sto­ry we’re get­ting:

    News Nation Now

    Char­lie Kirk stop­ping bul­let a life-sav­ing ‘mir­a­cle’: Spokesman

    Kel­lie Mey­er, Michael Ram­sey
    Updat­ed: Sep 21, 2025 / 07:15 PM CDT

    (News­Na­tion) — The high-veloc­i­ty bul­let that claimed the life of Char­lie Kirk on Sept. 10 mirac­u­lous­ly did not exit the con­ser­v­a­tive activist and harm oth­ers at the crowd­ed event where Kirk was assas­si­nat­ed, the exec­u­tive pro­duc­er of “The Char­lie Kirk Show” said Sat­ur­day.

    Kirk was fatal­ly wound­ed when a sniper fired a sin­gle round from 200 yards away on the cam­pus of Utah Val­ley Uni­ver­si­ty and struck him in the neck.

    Andrew Kol­vet, who pro­duced Kirk’s pop­u­lar talk show, sug­gest­ed the bullet’s fail­ure to injure or kill oth­ers who were behind Kirk is cause for cel­e­bra­tion. He said the sur­geon who tried to save Kirk at the hos­pi­tal expressed sur­prise the bul­let went no far­ther but also not­ed the “den­si­ty” of the patient’s body.

    Where the bul­let that killed Char­lie Kirk was found

    The bul­let “should have just gone through and through. It like­ly would have killed those stand­ing behind him too,” Kol­vet said the physi­cian told him on Sat­ur­day. The anec­dote was shared on the social media plat­form X.

    The coro­ner found the bul­let “just beneath the skin,” said Kol­vet, who also serves as spokesman for Kirk’s Turn­ing Point USA.

    “Even in death, Char­lie man­aged to save the lives of those around him. Remark­able. Mirac­u­lous,” he said.

    Turn­ing Point spokesman responds to ‘online chat­ter’ about Kirk death

    Kol­vet said he had per­mis­sion to share the infor­ma­tion Sat­ur­day, the eve of Kirk’s memo­r­i­al ser­vice in sub­ur­ban Phoenix. He said he was respond­ing to “online chat­ter” about the lack of an exit wound.

    ...

    ————

    “Char­lie Kirk stop­ping bul­let a life-sav­ing ‘mir­a­cle’: Spokesman” by Kel­lie Mey­er, Michael Ram­sey; News Nation Now; 09/21/2025

    “Kol­vet said he had per­mis­sion to share the infor­ma­tion Sat­ur­day, the eve of Kirk’s memo­r­i­al ser­vice in sub­ur­ban Phoenix. He said he was respond­ing to “online chat­ter” about the lack of an exit wound.

    The bul­let mir­a­cle sto­ry is intend­ed to address “online chat­ter” about the lack of an exit wound. Yes, Andrew Kol­vet decid­ed to share his bul­let mir­a­cle sto­ry in order to qui­et the skep­tics. It prob­a­bly was­n’t the best strat­e­gy:

    ...
    Andrew Kol­vet, who pro­duced Kirk’s pop­u­lar talk show, sug­gest­ed the bullet’s fail­ure to injure or kill oth­ers who were behind Kirk is cause for cel­e­bra­tion. He said the sur­geon who tried to save Kirk at the hos­pi­tal expressed sur­prise the bul­let went no far­ther but also not­ed the “den­si­ty” of the patient’s body.

    ...

    The bul­let “should have just gone through and through. It like­ly would have killed those stand­ing behind him too,” Kol­vet said the physi­cian told him on Sat­ur­day. The anec­dote was shared on the social media plat­form X.

    The coro­ner found the bul­let “just beneath the skin,” said Kol­vet, who also serves as spokesman for Kirk’s Turn­ing Point USA.

    “Even in death, Char­lie man­aged to save the lives of those around him. Remark­able. Mirac­u­lous,” he said.
    ...

    We’ll see if this mir­a­cle sto­ry ends up qui­et­ing the crit­ics of this nar­ra­tive. Crit­ics who have ques­tions about a lot more than just the lack of an exit wound. It’s hard to imag­ine many will be per­suad­ed. But who knows. Mir­a­cles hap­pen, right?

    Posted by Pterrafractyl | September 22, 2025, 4:35 pm
  5. @Pterrafractyl–

    NO WAY re the bul­let. A 30–06 round would have gone right through Kirk.

    Whether it would have killed peo­ple behind him would depend on the angle from which the shot came.

    I don’t buy any of this. All we know about “Lee Har­vey” Robin­son comes from texts and a let­ter, all of which could have been sim­u­lat­ed.

    Don’t lose sight of the fact that Dread Pirate Roberts was par­doned by Trump when he assumed pow­er.

    Roberts was offer­ing online mur­der for hire, paid in cryp­tocur­ren­cy.

    Big Balls has every­body’s data.

    Com/MKY/764/Purgatory run­ning amok.

    Bomb threats, school shoot­ings, oth­er mass shootings–Yikes!

    I think the mar­tyr­dom of Char­lie Kirk was planned long ago, with the goal of pre­cip­i­tat­ing what Alex Jones and oth­ers sali­vat­ed over–starting a “war” against polit­i­cal oppo­nents.

    The casu­al behav­ior of pedes­tri­ans as “Lee Har­vey” Robin­son was alleged­ly run­ning past (with a “rifle”?). Peo­ple near­by were freak­ing out, a guy was mor­tal­ly wound­ed by a loud gun­shot and pedes­tri­ans seem unin­ter­est­ed in a black-clad guy with a “rifle,” climb­ing down off of a roof?!!

    I would begin an inves­ti­ga­tion with Robin­son’s fam­i­ly.

    A sec­ond “Mag­ic Bul­let!”

    Keep up the great work!

    Best,

    Dave

    Posted by Dave Emory | September 22, 2025, 5:17 pm

Post a comment