Comment: Although there is MUCH more investigating to be done, it is interesting to view the “deconstruction” of Tiger Woods’ public persona in light of the O.J. Simpson case. (Simpson’s follies in connection with his Las Vegas conviction notwithstanding, there is a monumental amount of exculpatory evidence that received little or no publicity. That evidence proves beyond a doubt that Simpson was framed.) With Tiger Woods achieving widespread fame and success in a field that had previously been a province dominated by whites, will his decline reflect on the public’s regard for Barack Obama, who has also excelled in an area previously dominated by whites?
Woods mother-in-law, Barbro Holmberg, has served as Sweden’s Immigration Minister. With that country having successfully served as a haven for Baltic Nazi war criminals, the possibility that Holmberg may have links with the Underground Reich is one to be considered. This subject is discussed at greater lengthy in FTR #702. STAY TUNED!
War criminals and human rights violators from Afghanistan, Africa, the Middle East and the Balkans find refuge in Sweden where they are protected from repatriation and never prosecuted, officials and activists say. A respected voice on human rights which is quick to denounce abuses abroad, Sweden was one of the most vocal European Union members demanding in March that Croatia find war crime suspect Ante Gotovina before starting negotiations to join the EU.
But Sweden itself has only one policeman investigating human rights abusers who have found refuge on its own soil. He reckons as many as 1,000 live here, protected from deportation by a UN convention and with little risk of being brought to justice.
“If someone sits down and goes through the immigration files he or she will easily find several hundred or maybe a thousand potential war criminals,” detective superintendent Hans Olvebro, the Swedish police’s one-man war crimes unit, told Reuters.
Human rights groups say the situation undermines Sweden’s international reputation as a pioneer in asylum law and has led to cases where victims of torture who have found refuge here have bumped into their tormentors on the streets of Stockholm.
It contrasts with the government’s recent refusal to stop the deportation of about 150 child asylum-seekers suffering from trauma and depression. It argued that bending the rules would only encourage more such cases.
Frida Blom of human rights group Swedish Peace called it “really hollow” for Sweden to tout itself as a champion of the persecuted but have one person investigating war crimes whereas Denmark has a Special International Crimes Office with 17 staff. . . . Sweden has never in modern times put anyone on trial for war crimes. It angered Jewish Nazi hunters at the Simon Wiesenthal Centre by refusing to investigate 100–200 suspected Baltic Nazi collaborators who fled here after World War II.
The country was bound by a 25-year statute of limitations on all crimes — which it plans to drop soon under a 1998 Rome treaty scrapping such limitations for crimes against humanity.
The Geneva Convention forbids giving anyone suspected of war crimes or crimes against humanity asylum, but at the same time Sweden is a signatory of a UN torture convention which outlaws repatriating anyone likely to be tortured in their homeland.
Like other states, Sweden gives such people permits to stay, but rights groups say it falls short of EU requirements that the police and immigration departments be equipped to prosecute any war criminals discovered on European soil.
Amnesty International’s Carl Soderbergh said there was a “legal limbo” in Sweden for fugitive war criminals.
Immigration Minister Barbro Holmberg said Olvebro’s estimate was “an exaggeration” but there was a “small number” of war criminals in Sweden “kept under surveillance all the time”.
The Swedish Hannibal Lecter apparently was not guilty of the crimes he confessed too. Which begs the question: who was?
http://news.msn.com/crime-justice/swedens-hannibal-lecter-is-set-free