Dave Emory’s entire lifetime of work is available on a flash drive that can be obtained here. (The flash drive includes the anti-fascist books available on this site.)
COMMENT: Supplementing FTR #762, we note, again, the extreme right-wing nature of the forces underlying Snowden’s “Op.” This post supplements that program, analyzing L’Affaire Snowden as a destabilization operation against Obama.
A recent lawsuit against the NSA about its spying operations was brought by Larry Klayman, who is far more than just the “conservative” that he is labeled.
Klayman is an extreme right-winger who called on the “Muslim” Obama to put down the “Quran” and come out of the White House with his hands up!
The judge–Richard J. Leon–was appointed by George W. Bush to the Federal bench in 2002. A loyal Bush family running dog, Leon helped cover-up the Iran-Contra scandal, the October Surprise and was involved with the destabilization of the Clinton administration over the non-existent Whitewater “crimes.”
Klayman and Leon worked together on the Whitewater destabilization of Clinton.
Don’t fail to note the revolting pronouncement by Snowden about what a great triumph of civil liberties this is.
EXCERPT: Angered by the closure of national landmarks due to the partial government shutdown, a crowd of conservatives removed barricades Sunday at the World War II Memorial and the Lincoln Memorial as they rallied against President Barack Obama and Democrats for their role in the ongoing stalemate.
High-profile speakers with close ties to the tea party appeared at the event, including former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas. . . .
. . . . One speaker went as far as saying the president was a Muslim and separately urged the crowd of hundreds to initiate a peaceful uprising.
“I call upon all of you to wage a second American nonviolent revolution, to use civil disobedience, and to demand that this president leave town, to get up, to put the Quran down, to get up off his knees, and to figuratively come out with his hands up,” said Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, a conservative political advocacy group. . . .”
EXCERPT: A federal district judge ruled on Monday that the National Security Agency program that is systematically keeping records of all Americans’ phone calls most likely violates the Constitution, describing its technology as “almost Orwellian” and suggesting that James Madison would be “aghast” to learn that the government was encroaching on liberty in such a way.
Judge Richard J. Leon of the District of Columbia ordered the government to stop collecting data on the personal calls of the two plaintiffs in the case and to destroy the records of their calling history. But the judge, appointed to the bench in 2002 by President George W. Bush, stayed his injunction “in light of the significant national security interests at stake in this case and the novelty of the constitutional issues,” allowing the government time to appeal it, a matter that he said could take at least six months. The case is the first in which a federal judge who is not on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which authorized the once-secret program, has examined the bulk data collection on behalf of someone who is not a criminal defendant.
The Justice Department has said that 15 separate judges on the surveillance court have held on 35 occasions that the calling data program is legal. It also marks the first successful legal challenge brought against the program since it was revealed in June after leaks by the former N.S.A. contractor Edward J. Snowden. . . . .
. . . .. . . . “I acted on my belief that the N.S.A.’s mass surveillance programs would not withstand a constitutional challenge, and that the American public deserved a chance to see these issues determined by open courts,” Mr. Snowden said in his statement. It was distributed by Glenn Greenwald, a journalist who received leaked documents from Mr. Snowden and wrote the first article about the bulk data collection. “Today, a secret program authorized by a secret court was, when exposed to the light of day, found to violate Americans’ rights,” the statement said. “It is the first of many.” . . . .
. . . . The case was brought by several plaintiffs led by Larry Klayman, a conservative legal activist. Mr. Klayman, who represented himself and the other plaintiffs, said in an interview on Monday that he was seeking to turn the case into a class action on behalf of all Americans. “I’m extremely gratified that Judge Leon had the courage to make this ruling,” he said. “He is an American hero.” . . . .
“Who Is Judge Richard Leon?” by Robert Parry; Consortium News; 11/9/2011.
EXCERPT: . . . Leon was appointed to his lifetime judicial post by George W. Bush in 2002 after Leon had “earned” the gratitude of the Bush Family by protecting its interests as an aggressive and reliable Republican legal apparatchik on Capitol Hill. There, the heavy-set Leon gained a reputation as a partisan bully who made sure politically charged investigations reached a desired outcome, whatever the facts.
In the 1990s, Leon served as special counsel to the House Banking Committee as it transformed President Bill Clinton’s minor Whitewater real estate deal into a major scandal that eventually led to the House vote to impeach Clinton in 1998 and thus set the stage for Bush’s disputed election victory in 2000.
However, Leon’s most important work for the Bushes may have come in the 1980s and early 1990s when he helped construct legal justifications for Republican law-breaking and sought to intimidate Iran-Contra-related witnesses who came forward to expose GOP wrongdoing.
In 1987, when Rep. Dick Cheney, R‑Wyoming, was leading the Republican counteroffensive against the Iran-Contra investigation into evidence that President Ronald Reagan and Vice President George H.W. Bush had engaged in a wide-ranging conspiracy involving illegal weapons shipments and money transfers, Leon stepped forward as deputy chief counsel on the Republican side.
Leon worked with Cheney not only in fending off accusations of wrongdoing, but in coming up with a counter-argument that accused Congress of intruding on foreign policy prerogatives of the President.
“Congressional actions to limit the President in this area … should be reviewed with a considerable degree of skepticism,” the Republican minority report said. “If they interfere with the core presidential foreign policy functions, they should be struck down.”
In 2005 as vice president, Cheney harkened back to that Iran-Contra minority report in defending George W. Bush’s assertion of unlimited presidential powers during wartime.
“If you want reference to an obscure text, go look at the minority views that were filed with the Iran-Contra committee,” Cheney told a reporter. Cheney said those old arguments “are very good in laying out a robust view of the president’s prerogatives with respect to the conduct of especially foreign policy and national security matters.”
So, one could say that Richard Leon was there at the birth of what became George W. Bush’s imperial presidency.
Cover-up of Crimes
But Leon’s crucial work went beyond building a legal framework for Republican presidents to ignore the law. More significantly, he conducted cover-ups of their crimes.
In 1992, when a House task force was examining evidence that Reagan and Bush began their secret contacts with Iran in 1980 while trying to unseat President Jimmy Carter, Leon was the Republican point man to make sure nothing too damaging came out. Leon served as chief minority counsel to the House task force investigating the so-called October Surprise allegations.
EXCERPT. . . . the fastest trigger finger in D.C. when it comes to filing legal briefs, the founder of Judicial Watch is best known for playing an instrumental role in fueling the Whitewater crisis that drowned President Clinton in multiple scandals. . . .
It’s been quite a week for the NSA: First we have the NSA possibly float an amnesty offer that would have strongly benefitted from Snowden having whistleblower status. Then on Monday, we have Judge Leon’s ruling, which would potentially facilitate that whistleblower status by finding the meta-data collection to be unconstitutional. And then on Tuesday, Snowden publishes a letter in Brazil about how he’d love to help them investigate NSA spying in Brazil while simultaneously pointing out that he can’t assist them without first getting asylum (which must have puzzled the EU parliament a bit). On Wedsnesday, Brazil’s president sort of denies the request while Brazil’s government proceeds to make a surprise announcement that Brazil will not be building its next generation fighter jet with Boeing. It was surpising in terms of the choice of contract and any announcement about Brazil’s next-generation fighter jet contract wasn’t expected for another couple of years until after next elections. And also on Wednesday, the Obama Administration authorizes the release of an NSA-review advisory panel weeks ahead of schedule that recommends shutting down the hoovering up of metadata.
Lot’s of twists and turns and a few questions raised...for instance, did the NSA float the amnesty idea in anticipation of Judge Leon’s ruling on Monday? Was Snowden’s letter to Brazil intended to be an indirect response to the amnesty proposal? And was Brazil’s surprise announcement of the Swedish jet deal in response to public pressure placed on Brazil’s government to grant Snowden amnesty? And, more generally, which country is going to finally grant Snowden asylum since he doesn’t appear to be very keen on staying in Russia?
Also, interesting fun fact: If Snowden had stayed in Hong Kong instead traveling to Moscow and then dug a hole to the opposite side of the earth, he would almost make it to Brazil and might actually end up in Bolivia! Freedom! Everyone is assuming a Snowden movie will be non-fiction but that’s totally not necessary.
Great article by Sean Wilentz in The New Republic:
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116253/edward-snowden-glenn-greenwald-julian-assange-what-they-believe
Readers of Spitfire will not be surprised, as Dave has covered most of the material, but it’s good to see skepticism of motive in the mainslime media.