Spitfire List Web site and blog of anti-fascist researcher and radio personality Dave Emory.
The tag 'Terrorism' is associated with 21 posts.

FTR#1427: Adam Parfrey, Boyd Rice and Counter-Culture Fascism, Part 3

NB: This post con­tains strong lan­guage, which may prove offen­sive to many. Mr. Emory feels it is impor­tant to present Par­frey’s ide­o­log­i­cal pro­nounce­ments in all of their can­dor, in order to present an unerr­ing pre­sen­ta­tion of his polit­i­cal out­look.

Intro­duc­tion: The con­clud­ing pro­gram of a three-part series, this broad­cast fur­ther devel­ops the Nazi and White Suprema­cist efforts and ide­ol­o­gy under­pin­ning Adam Par­frey, a pub­lish­er whose fas­cist out­look and pro­fes­sion­al works have flown large­ly below the radar.

The pro­gram also intro­duces the fas­cist ide­ol­o­gy and Nazi-fel­low trav­el­ing of Par­frey’s Abraxas Clique asso­ciate Boyd Rice, as well as plac­ing their efforts in the con­text of the dead­ly man­i­fes­ta­tions of the Atom­waf­fen group.

An impor­tant recent book by Spencer Sun­shine details the efforts of the two most impor­tant mem­bers of the Abraxas Clique, a neo­fas­cist “think tank,” that aimed at the cre­ation and dis­sem­i­na­tion of “coun­ter­cul­tur­al fas­cism.”

Com­bin­ing a fix­a­tion with, and ide­al­iza­tion of, Charles Man­son with ele­ments of Satanism and tra­di­tion­al Nazi and White Suprema­cist rhetoric and ide­ol­o­gy, Par­frey, Rice and Abraxas helped mint a sig­nif­i­cant, though large­ly over­looked, stra­tum in the con­tem­po­rary and ongo­ing fas­cist polit­i­cal land­scape.

From defunct “Unpop Art” site, run by Adam Par­frey and Boyd Rice.

These con­nec­tions and Boyd Rice’s out­look and pro­nounce­ments are fur­ther fleshed out in this, the third pro­gram in this series.

The phe­nom­e­non of counter-cul­ture fas­cism, the Man­son oper­a­tion and relat­ed top­ics are cov­ered in, among oth­er pro­grams, FTR#‘s 437, 1085, 1163, 1164, 1165 and FTR#‘s 1391, 1392, 1393.

Dis­cus­sion and Analy­sis Includes: Boyd Rice’s embrace of Rang­nar Red­beard’s Might is Right; Rice’s net­work­ing with Anton La Vey; Anton La Vey’s over­laps with the Nazi milieu; Abrax­as­’s 8/8/88 event; The cel­e­bra­tion of the Tate-La Bian­ca killings (which took place on the same date in 1969; Rice’s appear­ance on right-wing Chris­t­ian Bob Lar­son­’s show; The pres­ence of Doris Tate in that appear­ance (with the Man­son-cel­e­brat­ing Rice); Rice’s involve­ment with Nazi Robert Heick; Rice’s appear­ance in Nazi uni­form (bran­dish­ing a knife) along­side Heick; Heick­’s Amer­i­can Front and its involve­ment with the dead­ly Nazi skin­head move­ment; Rice’s belief that the world should return to a “Pre-Chris­t­ian” state; Rice’s belief that three-quar­ters of the earth­’s pop­u­la­tion should be exter­mi­nat­ed; The influ­ence of James Mason and “Siege” on the dead­ly Atom­waf­fen milieu; Mason’s embrace of total vio­lence or com­plete drop-out from soci­ety.


FTR#1426: Adam Parfrey, Boyd Rice and Counter-Culture Fascism, Part 2

Intro­duc­tion: The sec­ond pro­gram of a three-part series, this broad­cast fur­ther devel­ops the Nazi and White Suprema­cist efforts and ide­ol­o­gy under­pin­ning Adam Par­frey, a pub­lish­er whose fas­cist out­look and pro­fes­sion­al works have flown large­ly below the radar.

The pro­gram also intro­duces the fas­cist ide­ol­o­gy and Nazi-fel­low trav­el­ing of Par­frey’s Abraxas Clique asso­ciate Boyd Rice.

An impor­tant recent book by Spencer Sun­shine details the efforts of the two most impor­tant mem­bers of the Abraxas Clique, a neo­fas­cist “think tank,” that aimed at the cre­ation and dis­sem­i­na­tion of “coun­ter­cul­tur­al fas­cism.”

Com­bin­ing a fix­a­tion with, and ide­al­iza­tion of, Charles Man­son with ele­ments of Satanism and tra­di­tion­al Nazi and White Suprema­cist rhetoric and ide­ol­o­gy, Par­frey, Rice and Abraxas helped mint a sig­nif­i­cant, though large­ly over­looked, stra­tum in the con­tem­po­rary and ongo­ing fas­cist polit­i­cal land­scape.

These con­nec­tions and Boyd Rice’s out­look and pro­nounce­ments will be fur­ther fleshed out in the third pro­gram in this series.

The phe­nom­e­non of counter-cul­ture fas­cism, the Man­son oper­a­tion and relat­ed top­ics are cov­ered in, among oth­er pro­grams, FTR#‘s 437, 1085, 1163, 1164, 1165 and FTR#‘s 1391, 1392, 1393.

1.The work of the Abraxas Clique is syn­op­sized by Spencer Sun­shine as fol­lows:

Neo-Nazi Ter­ror­ism and Coun­ter­cul­tur­al Fas­cism: The Ori­gins and After­life of James Mason’s Siege by Spencer Sun­shine; Rout­ledge Press [SC]; Copy­right 2024 by Spencer Sun­shine; ISBN 978–0‑367–19060‑6; pp. 164–165.

” . . . . Part of the goal of the Abraxas Clique’s inter­est in 1960s fig­ures like Man­son, [Church of Satan founder] Anton] La Vey . . . . was to help build a lin­eage of ‘coun­ter­cul­tur­al fas­cism.’ ”. . . This vision of a reac­tionary cul­tur­al move­ment was not based on tra­di­tion­al forms, but rather avant-garde and icon­o­clas­tic approaches–was anoth­er way in which the Alt Right of the 2010s inher­it­ed the fruits of Abraxas Clique’s labors. . . .”

From defunct “Unpop Art” site, run by Adam Par­frey and Boyd Rice.

2.Parfrey’s polit­i­cal out­look is exem­pli­fied by his com­mu­ni­ca­tions with Nazi the­o­reti­cian James Mason, whose Siege was pub­lished with Par­frey’s assis­tance.

Neo-Nazi Ter­ror­ism and Coun­ter­cul­tur­al Fas­cism: The Ori­gins and After­life of James Mason’s Siege by Spencer Sun­shine; Rout­ledge Press [SC]; Copy­right 2024 by Spencer Sun­shine; ISBN 978–0‑367–19060‑6; p. 212.

” . . . . Yeah, the Jews got pissed at that mag­a­zine I sent you. None of them want to see my friend Hitler get his due . . . [Hitler] lift­ed the pride of the white peo­ple up and tried to get rid of the com­mies and exile the Jews where they would­n’t has­sle any­one but them­selves . . . But of course ‘soci­ety’ is mak­ing an ‘exam­ple’ of Charles Man­son in the same way they made an exam­ple of the Ger­mans at Nurem­burg . . . . I was look­ing for a spot 3,000 miles away from Cal­i­for­nia, and found it in spades and spics and Jews and rich ass­holes . . . I want to work with you, but more than that, I hail you with a stiff-armed salute from ground zero. . . .”

3.Another reveal­ing pas­sage is con­tained in a lat­er com­mu­ni­ca­tion between Par­frey and Mason:

Neo-Nazi Ter­ror­ism and Coun­ter­cul­tur­al Fas­cism: The Ori­gins and After­life of James Mason’s Siege by Spencer Sun­shine; Rout­ledge Press [SC]; Copy­right 2024 by Spencer Sun­shine; ISBN 978–0‑367–19060‑6; pp. 215–216.

” . . . . I’m count­ing on heavy cen­sor­ship, con­dem­na­tion and sub­tle boy­cotts by ZOG [Zion­ist Occu­pa­tion Gov­ern­ment] when it appears. I’m try­ing to get togeth­er a book writ­ten by nig­ger and spic gang mem­bers on youth gangs for release at about the same time. To me, let­ting these cocaine-addled nig­ger mur­der­ers prat­tle on about their mis­er­able lives will be rope enough for them to hang them­selves. But then I can always point to the book when the ADL gets on my case about racism, neo-Nazism, etc. . . .”

4.Highlighting Par­frey’s big­otry against Lati­nos and his antic­i­pa­tion of “The Great Replace­ment The­o­ry” that has become a watch­word in the sec­ond Trump regime, Par­frey wrote to [impor­tant Nazi the­o­reti­cian and prac­ti­tion­er James] Mason:

Neo-Nazi Ter­ror­ism and Coun­ter­cul­tur­al Fas­cism: The Ori­gins and After­life of James Mason’s Siege by Spencer Sun­shine; Rout­ledge Press [SC]; Copy­right 2024 by Spencer Sun­shine; ISBN 978–0‑367–19060‑6; p. 216.

“ . . . . a coun­try that is over­come by immi­grants of racial dif­fer­ence would have been called an ‘inva­sion.’ I live in a Mex­i­can gang neigh­bor­hood, gun­fire every night. Many of the Mex­i­cans who move here aren’t aware that we have flush toi­lets, so many deposit their babies’ shit­ty dia­pers in pub­lic places. . . . What might hap­pen when these peo­ple can’t get food stamps or wel­fare? What about a sim­ple drought or a severe eco­nom­ic sit­u­a­tion? I don’t look for­ward to those times , but I do have front row seats to the apoc­a­lypse. . . .”

5.Exemplifying and illus­trat­ing Par­frey’s ide­o­log­i­cal ori­en­ta­tion is his descrip­tion of the Sec­ond World War. Note that he omits all ref­er­ence to the Pacif­ic the­ater of war.

Neo-Nazi Ter­ror­ism and Coun­ter­cul­tur­al Fas­cism: The Ori­gins and After­life of James Mason’s Siege by Spencer Sun­shine; Rout­ledge Press [SC]; Copy­right 2024 by Spencer Sun­shine; ISBN 978–0‑367–19060‑6; p. 216.

“ . . . . Par­frey described that war [World War II] as ‘real­ly a civ­il war between white peo­ple, and white peo­ple have been feel­ing guilty about them­selves ever since.’. . .”

6.Pafrey’s jour­nal­is­tic ethics are illus­trat­ed by an excerpt from his writ­ing in Nazi Robert Heick­’s Aryan War­rior.

Neo-Nazi Ter­ror­ism and Coun­ter­cul­tur­al Fas­cism: The Ori­gins and After­life of James Mason’s Siege by Spencer Sun­shine; Rout­ledge Press [SC]; Copy­right 2024 by Spencer Sun­shine; ISBN 978–0‑367–19060‑6; p. 217.

“ . . . . He [Par­frey] also specif­i­cal­ly men­tioned that [Nazi Robert] Heick’s Aryan War­rior includ­ed ‘con­tri­bu­tions from a Man­son-inspired group called the Abraxas Foun­da­tion that preach­es a doc­trine of evil’—while con­ve­nient­ly omit­ting his own mem­ber­ship in said group. . . .”

7.Parfrey man­i­fest­ed a vir­u­lent, pro­fane misog­y­nism.

Neo-Nazi Ter­ror­ism and Coun­ter­cul­tur­al Fas­cism: The Ori­gins and After­life of James Mason’s Siege by Spencer Sun­shine; Rout­ledge Press [SC]; Copy­right 2024 by Spencer Sun­shine; ISBN 978–0‑367–19060‑6; p. 223.

“ . . . . In Kevin Coogan’s arti­cle [‘How Black is Black Metal/’] one of the end­notes said ‘Fer­al House types hat­ed women like Andrea Juno.’ Par­frey replied that ‘Not one word has ever been print­ed in a Fer­al House book insult­ing or even dis­cussing Andrea Juno.’ Coogan’s reply was to quote an inter­view where Par­frey him­self called Juno ‘a psy­chot­ic cunt.’. . .”

8.Parfrey’s sig­nif­i­cance in the expan­sion of impor­tant Nazi James Mason’s ide­ol­o­gy is encap­su­lat­ed in a com­mu­ni­ca­tion to Par­frey by Mason:

Neo-Nazi Ter­ror­ism and Coun­ter­cul­tur­al Fas­cism: The Ori­gins and After­life of James Mason’s Siege by Spencer Sun­shine; Rout­ledge Press [SC]; Copy­right 2024 by Spencer Sun­shine; ISBN 978–0‑367–19060‑6; pp. 217–218.

“ . . . . In late 1992, Mason thanked Par­frey for being ‘pri­mar­i­ly the one that first picked up my old leaflets from the mid-Sev­en­ties and breathed new life into my stuff’ and sold him the mock­ups of his late 1970s fly­ers and mag­a­zines. Par­frey was also thanked in Siege and after he got is copy, told Mason that, ‘I’m bowled over by the SIEGE book’ and that ‘it’s bet­ter than good: it’s defin­i­tive!’. . .”


First Patreon Talk of The New Year: Murders, Murderers, Online Fascism and Trumpian Corruption

Dav­e’s first Patre­on talks of the New Year detail a num­ber of top­ics and inves­ti­ga­tions, high­light­ing mur­ders and mur­der­ers, from Cal­i­for­nia ser­i­al killers as ter­ror­ists to Ukrain­ian Nazis and the cor­rup­tion of Team Trump. As peo­ple with an oblig­a­tion to our descen­dants, we have the respon­si­bil­i­ty to pre­serve a record of the events lead­ing to the col­lapse of our social and polit­i­cal milieu. There is no bet­ter way of ful­fill­ing that oblig­a­tion than by obtain­ing the lat­est flash dri­ve, con­tain­ing all of Dav­e’s 45+ years on the air and a library of old anti-fas­cist books. WFMU-FM is pod­cast­ing For The Record–You can sub­scribe to the pod­cast HERE.


Important Talk by Spencer Sunshine About Counter-Cultural Fascism, Terrorism

In the lat­est talk on Mr. Emory’s Patre­on plat­form, he inter­viewed Spencer Sun­shine, author of an impor­tant recent book about counter-cul­tur­al fas­cism, ter­ror­ism and the pre­sen­ta­tion of Charles Man­son as a Nazi Icon.
As peo­ple with an oblig­a­tion to our descen­dants, we have the respon­si­bil­i­ty to pre­serve a record of the events lead­ing to the col­lapse of our social and polit­i­cal milieu. There is no bet­ter way of ful­fill­ing that oblig­a­tion than by obtain­ing the lat­est flash dri­ve, con­tain­ing all of Dav­e’s 45+ years on the air and a library of old anti-fas­cist books. WFMU-FM is pod­cast­ing For The Record–You can sub­scribe to the pod­cast HERE.


Analysis of Iran, U.S., Israel War on Patreon

Dave is pre­sent­ing ongo­ing analy­sis of the Iran/U.S./Israel war on his Patre­on site. One can but won­der how the world will escape World War III? As peo­ple with an oblig­a­tion to our descen­dants, we have the respon­si­bil­i­ty to pre­serve a record of the events lead­ing to the col­lapse of our social and polit­i­cal milieu. There is no bet­ter way of ful­fill­ing that oblig­a­tion than by obtain­ing the lat­est flash dri­ve, con­tain­ing all of Dav­e’s 45+ years on the air and a library of old anti-fas­cist books. WFMU-FM is pod­cast­ing For The Record–You can sub­scribe to the pod­cast HERE.


Biden and “BCCI Bipartisanship”

Joe Biden has had much to say about “bipar­ti­san­ship” dur­ing his term so far. When he served on the Sen­ate Bank­ing Com­mit­tee, he and GOP com­pa­tri­ot Orrin Hatch were recip­i­ents of funds from the ter­ror­ist and drug-deal­ing BCCI. The Com­mit­tee did not inves­ti­gate the bank. ” . . . . among lat­er high­ly placed recip­i­ents of largesse from BCCI, its own­ers, and its affil­i­ates were Ronald Reagan’s trea­sury sec­re­tary, James Bak­er, who declined to inves­ti­gate BCCI, and Demo­c­ra­t­ic Sen­a­tor Joseph Biden and Repub­li­can Sen­a­tor Orrin Hatch, the rank­ing mem­bers of the Sen­ate Judi­cia­ry com­mit­tee, which declined to inves­ti­gate BCCI. . . .” WFMU-FM is pod­cast­ing For The Record–You can sub­scribe to the pod­cast HERE.


“C‑4” No Evil

With height­ened ten­sion about increased ter­ror­ism from domes­tic extrem­ists, we note that ten pounds of C‑4 plas­tic explo­sive has been report­ed miss­ing from the twen­ty-nine palms Marine Corps base in South­ern Cal­i­for­nia. ” . . . . Sources report that approx­i­mate­ly 10 pounds of Com­po­si­tion C‑4 dis­ap­peared dur­ing a long train­ing exer­cise two weeks ago. They also believe the man­u­fac­tured plas­tic explo­sives may have been stolen. . . . The base would not con­firm any details with ABC 10News. Capt. Zachary Colvin, with the Marine Air Ground Task Force Train­ing Com­mand, told this sta­tion that ‘the ongo­ing inves­ti­ga­tion into this inci­dent is being han­dled by NCIS and the affect­ed units.’ . . . .”


Don’t Drink the Water

With the explic­it threat of domes­tic fas­cist (yes, not “right wing”) ter­ror­ism loom­ing large in the wake of the Capi­tol Riot and the 2nd Trump impeach­ment pro­ceed­ings, a hack­ing attempt at poi­son­ing the water sup­ply of a town very near Tam­pa in the run-up to the Super Bowl war­rants scruti­ny. ” . . . . Some­one had tak­en remote con­trol of a plant operator’s machine – and in just a few min­utes, they increased the lev­el of sodi­um hydrox­ide in the city’s drink­ing water by a fac­tor of 100. After spik­ing the caus­tic sub­stance to unsafe lev­els, the hack­er imme­di­ate­ly left the sys­tem. . . . ‘The hack­er changed the sodi­um hydrox­ide from about 100 parts per mil­lion to 11,100 parts per mil­lion,’ [Pinel­las Coun­ty Sher­iff Bob] Gualtieri said on Mon­day, dur­ing a brief­ing about the attack. . . . ‘Some­one hacked into the sys­tem, not just once but twice,’ to take con­trol of the sys­tem and change the water chem­istry to unsafe lev­els. . . .”


FTR #965 Are We Going to Have a Third World War?

Recent devel­op­ments are sug­ges­tive of the omi­nous pos­si­bil­i­ty of an immi­nent Third World War. We present some new infor­ma­tion and recap and fur­ther ana­lyze sto­ries cov­ered in pre­vi­ous pro­grams in order to under­score and high­light the poten­tial dev­as­ta­tion of these events.

As the furor (“fuehrer”?) sur­round­ing the poten­tial­ly lethal polit­i­cal hoax known as “Rus­sia-gate” gains momen­tum, it should be not­ed that the point man for the Trump busi­ness inter­ests in their deal­ings with Rus­sia is Felix Sater. A Russ­ian-born immi­grant, Sater is a pro­fes­sion­al crim­i­nal and a con­vict­ed felon with his­tor­i­cal links to the Mafia. Beyond that, and more impor­tant­ly, Sater is an FBI infor­mant and a CIA con­tract agent: “. . . . There is every indi­ca­tion that the extra­or­di­nar­i­ly lenient treat­ment result­ed from Sater play­ing a get-out-of-jail free card. Short­ly before his secret guilty plea, Sater became a free­lance oper­a­tive of the Cen­tral Intel­li­gence Agency. One of his fel­low stock swindlers, Sal­va­tore Lau­ria, wrote a book about it. The Scor­pi­on and the Frog is described on its cov­er as ‘the true sto­ry of one man’s fraud­u­lent rise and fall in the Wall Street of the nineties.’ Accord­ing to Lauria–and the court files that have been unsealed–Sater helped the CIA buy small mis­siles before they got to ter­ror­ists. He also pro­vid­ed oth­er pur­port­ed nation­al secu­ri­ty ser­vices for a report­ed fee of $300,000. Sto­ries abound as to what else Sater may or may not have done in the are­na of nation­al secu­ri­ty. . . .”

Sater was active on behalf of the Trumps in the fall of 2015: “. . . . Sater worked on a plan for a Trump Tow­er in Moscow as recent­ly as the fall of 2015, but he said that had come to a halt because of Trump’s pres­i­den­tial cam­paign. . . .”

Sater was ini­ti­at­ing con­tact between the Rus­sians and “Team Trump” in Jan­u­ary of this year: “ . . . . Nev­er­the­less, in late Jan­u­ary, Sater and a Ukrain­ian law­mak­er report­ed­ly met with Trump’s per­son­al lawyer, Michael Cohen, at a New York hotel. Accord­ing to the [New York] Times, they dis­cussed a plan that involved the U.S. lift­ing sanc­tions against Rus­sia, and Cohen said he hand-deliv­ered the plan in a sealed enve­lope to then-nation­al secu­ri­ty advi­sor Michael Fly­nn. Cohen lat­er denied deliv­er­ing the enve­lope to any­one in the White House, accord­ing to the Wash­ing­ton Post. . . .”

A stun­ning devel­op­ment con­cerns extreme ret­i­cence on the part of the U.S. intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty:

The Office of the Direc­tor of Nation­al Intel­li­gence had an “inter­est­ing” response to a Free­dom of Infor­ma­tion Act law­suit demand­ing the release of the clas­si­fied report giv­en to Pres­i­dent Oba­ma back in Jan­u­ary pur­port­ing to show the Russ­ian gov­ern­ment was behind the hacks. Accord­ing to the ODNI, the request­ed doc­u­ment would present a risk to human intel­li­gence sources by reveal­ing the com­par­a­tive weight giv­en to human vs tech­ni­cal evi­dence, risk­ing US sources and meth­ods. But the ODNI went fur­ther, sug­gest­ing that even releas­ing a ful­ly redact­ed doc­u­ment would present sim­i­lar risks!

It is NOT easy to see the ODNI’s reluc­tance to release even a ful­ly-redact­ed copy of the report as any­thing but disin­gen­u­ous. In the con­text of poten­tial­ly dev­as­tat­ing dete­ri­o­ra­tion of Russian/U.S. rela­tions over Syr­ia, Ukraine, and the Russ­ian “elec­tion-hack­ing” uproar, the ODNI’s behav­ior can­not be any­thing but dis­qui­et­ing:

” . . . . The intel­li­gence offi­cial argued that a redact­ed ver­sion of the orig­i­nal report would allow a trained eye to assess ‘com­par­a­tive weight’ of human intel­li­gence and sig­nals intel­li­gence report­ing includ­ed in the com­pendi­um. Release of some of the infor­ma­tion the pri­va­cy-focused orga­ni­za­tion wants made pub­lic ‘could prove fatal to U.S. human intel­li­gence sources,’ [Deputy Direc­tor of Nation­al Intel­li­gence for Intel­li­gence Inte­gra­tion Edward] Gis­taro warned.

Gis­taro also appears to argue that even if offi­cials blacked out the whole report, high­ly clas­si­fied infor­ma­tion would be at risk.

‘I agree with the [Nation­al Intel­li­gence Coun­cil] that a heav­i­ly or even ful­ly redact­ed ver­sion of the clas­si­fied report can not be pub­licly released with­out jeop­ar­diz­ing nation­al secu­ri­ty infor­ma­tion prop­er­ly clas­si­fied as SECRET or TOP SECRET,’ he wrote. . . . ‘The ODNI should release the com­plete report to EPIC so that the pub­lic and the Con­gress can under­stand the full extent of the Russ­ian inter­fer­ence with the 2016 Pres­i­den­tial elec­tion,’ EPIC’s Marc Roten­berg told POLITICO Tues­day. ‘It is already clear that gov­ern­ment secre­cy is frus­trat­ing mean­ing­ful over­sight. The FBI, for exam­ple, will not even iden­ti­fy the states that were tar­get­ed by Rus­sia.’ . . . ”

With the high-pro­file hacks being attributed–almost cer­tain­ly falsely–to Rus­sia, there are omi­nous devel­op­ments tak­ing place that may well lead to a Third World War. Dur­ing the clos­ing days of his Pres­i­den­cy, Oba­ma autho­rized the plant­i­ng of cyber weapons on Russ­ian com­put­er net­works. Oba­ma did this after talk­ing with Putin on the Hot Line, estab­lished to pre­vent a Third World War. Putin denied inter­fer­ing in the U.S. elec­tion.

The con­clu­sion that Rus­sia hacked the U.S. elec­tion on Putin’s orders appears to have been based on a CIA source in the Krem­lin. Even when that intel­li­gence was deliv­ered, oth­er agen­cies weren’t ready to accept the CIA’s con­clu­sion and it took intel­li­gence from anoth­er nation (not named) to pro­vide the final intel­li­gence tip­ping point that led to a broad-based con­clu­sion the not only was the Russ­ian gov­ern­ment behind the cyber­at­tacks but that Vladimir Putin him­self ordered it.

That ally’s intel­li­gence is described as “the most crit­i­cal tech­ni­cal intel­li­gence on Rus­sia,” how­ev­er the NSA still wasn’t con­vinced based on what sounds like a lack of con­fi­dence in that source. Thus, it looks like a CIA Krem­lin source and an unnamed for­eign intel­li­gence agency with ques­tion­able cre­den­tials are the basis of what appears to be a like­ly future full-scale US/Russian cyber­war.

Of para­mount sig­nif­i­cance is the fact that IF, on Putin’s orders (and we are to believe such) Rus­sia con­tin­ued to hack U.S. com­put­er sys­tems to influ­ence the elec­tion, Putin would have to have gone utter­ly mad. Those hacks would have pre­clud­ed any rap­proche­ment between Rus­sia and the Unit­ed States under a Pres­i­dent Trump. There is no indi­ca­tion that Putin went off the deep end.

Also augur­ing a pos­si­ble Third World War are two devel­op­ments in Syr­ia. Sey­mour Hersh pub­lished an arti­cle in “Die Welt” reveal­ing that, not only was the April 4 alleged Sarin attack NOT a chem­i­cal weapons attack but there was wide­spread knowl­edge of this in Amer­i­can mil­i­tary and intel­li­gence cir­cles.

What did the intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty know about the attack? The Russ­ian and Syr­i­an air force had informed the US in advance of that airstrike that they had intel­li­gence that top lev­el lead­ers of Ahrar al-Sham and Jab­hat al-Nus­ra were meet­ing in that build­ing and they informed of the US of the attack plan in advance of the attack and that it was on a “high-val­ue” tar­get. And the attack involved the unusu­al use of a guid­ed bomb and Syria’s top pilots. ” . . . . Russ­ian and Syr­i­an intel­li­gence offi­cials, who coor­di­nate oper­a­tions close­ly with the Amer­i­can com­mand posts, made it clear that the planned strike on Khan Sheikhoun was spe­cial because of the high-val­ue tar­get. ‘It was a red-hot change. The mis­sion was out of the ordi­nary – scrub the sked,’ the senior advis­er told me. ‘Every oper­a­tions offi­cer in the region’ – in the Army, Marine Corps, Air Force, CIA and NSA – ‘had to know there was some­thing going on. The Rus­sians gave the Syr­i­an Air Force a guid­ed bomb and that was a rar­i­ty. They’re skimpy with their guid­ed bombs and rarely share them with the Syr­i­an Air Force. And the Syr­i­ans assigned their best pilot to the mis­sion, with the best wing­man.’ The advance intel­li­gence on the tar­get, as sup­plied by the Rus­sians, was giv­en the high­est pos­si­ble score inside the Amer­i­can com­mu­ni­ty. . . .”

Fol­low­ing the attack, US intel­li­gence con­clud­ed that there was no sarin gas attack, Assad wouldn’t have been that polit­i­cal­ly sui­ci­dal. The symp­toms of chem­i­cal poi­son­ing fol­low­ing the bomb­ing was like­ly due to a mix­ture of chlo­rine, fer­til­iz­ers, and oth­er chem­i­cals stored in the build­ing that was tar­get­ed by the Syr­i­an air­force cre­at­ed by sec­ondary explo­sions from the ini­tial bomb­ing. ” . . . ‘This was not a chem­i­cal weapons strike,’ the advis­er said. ‘That’s a fairy tale. . . .”

The symp­toms of chem­i­cal poi­son­ing fol­low­ing the bomb­ing was like­ly due to a mix­ture of chlo­rine, fer­til­iz­ers, and oth­er chem­i­cals stored in the build­ing that was tar­get­ed by the Syr­i­an air­force cre­at­ed by sec­ondary explo­sions from the ini­tial bomb­ing. ” . . . . A Bomb Dam­age Assess­ment (BDA) by the U.S. mil­i­tary lat­er deter­mined that the heat and force of the 500-pound Syr­i­an bomb trig­gered a series of sec­ondary explo­sions that could have gen­er­at­ed a huge tox­ic cloud that began to spread over the town, formed by the release of the fer­til­iz­ers, dis­in­fec­tants and oth­er goods stored in the base­ment, its effect mag­ni­fied by the dense morn­ing air, which trapped the fumes close to the ground. . . .”

The behav­ior of the Trump admin­is­tra­tion was not only in direct con­flict with intel­li­gence on the attack, but rein­forced pro­pa­gan­da by some of the Al-Qae­da-linked jihadists the West has been using as proxy war­riors in Syr­ia and else­where: ” . . . . ‘The Salafists and jihadists got every­thing they want­ed out of their hyped-up Syr­i­an nerve gas ploy,’ the senior advis­er to the U.S. intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty told me, refer­ring to the flare up of ten­sions between Syr­ia, Rus­sia and Amer­i­ca. ‘The issue is, what if there’s anoth­er false flag sarin attack cred­it­ed to hat­ed Syr­ia? Trump has upped the ante and paint­ed him­self into a cor­ner with his deci­sion to bomb. And do not think these guys are not plan­ning the next faked attack. Trump will have no choice but to bomb again, and hard­er. He’s inca­pable of say­ing he made a mis­take.’ . . .”

Pro­gram High­lights Include: Review of a Trump admin­is­tra­tion warn­ing of anoth­er sup­posed, impend­ing “Syr­i­an chem­i­cal weapons strike”–a warn­ing that has since been retract­ed; dis­cus­sion of bril­liant Nazi hack­er Andrew Aueren­heimer’s orches­tra­tion of an “Alt-right” online intim­i­da­tion cam­paign against CNN employ­ees; Aueren­heimer’s cur­rent res­i­dence in Ukraine; the omi­nous pos­si­bil­i­ty of the activation/manipulation of the NSA cyber-weapons installed on Russ­ian com­put­er net­works by a third par­ty (per­haps some­one with the capa­bil­i­ties of the bril­liant Aueren­heimer); review of the obser­va­tions by a Ger­man professor–opposed to Nazism/Hitler–who described the essence of what it was like, sub­jec­tive­ly, to live through the rise of Hitler–his obser­va­tion pre­sent­ed in the con­text of the ODNI’s deci­sion not to release even a ful­ly-redact­ed ver­sion of the intel­li­gence report on “Russ­ian med­dling” in the U.S. elec­tion: ” . . . . . . . . What hap­pened here was the grad­ual habit­u­a­tion of the peo­ple, lit­tle by lit­tle, to being gov­erned by sur­prise, to receiv­ing deci­sions delib­er­at­ed in secret, to believ­ing that the sit­u­a­tion was so com­pli­cat­ed that the gov­ern­ment had to act on infor­ma­tion which the peo­ple could not under­stand because of nation­al­i­ty secu­ri­ty, so dan­ger­ous that even if the peo­ple the peo­ple could under­stand it, it could not be released because of nation­al secu­ri­ty. . . .”


FTR #964 Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics

As we have not­ed in many pre­vi­ous broad­casts and posts, cyber attacks are eas­i­ly dis­guised. Per­pe­trat­ing a “cyber false flag” oper­a­tion is dis­turbing­ly easy to do.

This is of para­mount sig­nif­i­cance in eval­u­at­ing the increas­ing­ly neo-McCarthyite New Cold War pro­pa­gan­da about “Russ­ian inter­fer­ence” in the U.S. elec­tion.

Com­pound­ing the sit­u­a­tion are some recent dis­clo­sures and devel­op­ments:

1.–We learn that the CIA’s hack­ing tools are specif­i­cal­ly craft­ed to mask CIA author­ship of the attacks. Most sig­nif­i­cant­ly, for our pur­pos­es, is the fact that the Agen­cy’s hack­ing tools are engi­neered in such a way as to per­mit the authors of the event to rep­re­sent them­selves as Russ­ian.

2.–The NSA’s elite hack­ing tech­nol­o­gy has been made wide­ly avail­able to the hack­ing com­mu­ni­ty, cour­tesy of “The Shad­ow Bro­kers.”

3.–During the 2016 Pres­i­den­tial cam­paign, Michael Fly­nn was pro­fes­sion­al­ly involved with numer­ous cyber-secu­ri­ty and cyber arms man­u­fac­tur­ing firms: “ . . . . The month before Fly­nn joined the advi­so­ry board of OSY Tech­nolo­gies, NSO Group opened up a new arm called West­Bridge Tech­nolo­gies, Inc., in the D.C. region. (The com­pa­ny was orig­i­nal­ly reg­is­tered in Delaware in 2014, but formed in Mary­land in April 2016.) Led by NSO Group co-founder Lavie, West­Bridge is vying for fed­er­al gov­ern­ment con­tracts for NSO Group’s prod­ucts. Hir­ing Fly­nn would pro­vide NSO Group with a well-con­nect­ed fig­ure in Wash­ing­ton, to help get its foot in the door of the noto­ri­ous­ly insu­lar world of secret intel­li­gence bud­get­ing. . . .When you’re try­ing to build up your busi­ness, you need some­one who has con­nec­tions, some­one who is seen as an author­i­ty and a legit­i­mate pres­ence,” John­son said. Hir­ing some­one with Flynn’s back­ground in intel­li­gence would ‘open up doors that they wouldn’t have had access to,’ John­son said.Throughout 2016, Fly­nn worked for a num­ber of cyber­se­cu­ri­ty firms per­son­al­ly and through his con­sult­ing firm, Fly­nn Intel Group. In addi­tion to his advi­so­ry board seat at OSY Tech­nolo­gies, he sat on the board of Adobe Sys­tems, a large soft­ware com­pa­ny with Pen­ta­gon con­tracts, and the boards of the cyber­se­cu­ri­ty com­pa­nies Green­Zone Sys­tems and HALO Pri­va­cy. (Though Fly­nn described him­self as an Adobe advi­so­ry board mem­ber in his finan­cial dis­clo­sure paper­work, the group said in a state­ment that he pro­vid­ed only “peri­od­ic coun­sel to Adobe’s pub­lic sec­tor team.”) . . .”

4.–NSO Group and OSY Tech­nolo­gies spe­cial­ize in spear-fish­ing attacks, one of the method­olo­gies used in the hacks of U.S. elec­tion com­put­ers. Is there any link between Fly­n­n’s cyber-secu­ri­ty/­cy­ber arms links and the high-pro­file hacks dur­ing the cam­paign?

5.–A GOP tech database–Deep Root–Exposed the data of almost two hun­dred mil­lion Amer­i­can vot­ers to wide­spread scruti­ny. Is there any con­nec­tion between Deep Root, the GOP and the alleged Russ­ian hack­ing of U.S. vot­ing com­put­ers?

Fol­low­ing a Bloomberg report about wide­spread Russ­ian hack­ing of Amer­i­can elec­tions sys­tems: “ . . . . Kay Stim­son, spokes­woman for the Nation­al Asso­ci­a­tion of Sec­re­taries of State, said the mem­bers of her group — which rep­re­sents the chief elec­tion offi­cials in 40 states — were tak­en aback by the alle­ga­tion that 39 states were hacked. ‘We can­not ver­i­fy any infor­ma­tion in that report,’ Stim­son told Ben­zin­ga. “It has some claims that have raised some red flags. I don’t know where they’re get­ting it. We’re not able to assess to the cred­i­bil­i­ty.’ She said that some cyber­se­cu­ri­ty firms were engag­ing in scare tac­tics at the state and local lev­els. ‘There are cyber­se­cu­ri­ty firms mak­ing some wild claims,’ she said. ‘It is a very aggres­sive indus­try.’ . . .”

With the high-pro­file hacks being attributed–almost cer­tain­ly falsely–to Rus­sia, there are omi­nous devel­op­ments tak­ing place that may well lead to a Third World War. Dur­ing the clos­ing days of his Pres­i­den­cy, Oba­ma autho­rized the plant­i­ng of cyber weapons on Russ­ian com­put­er net­works. Oba­ma did this after talk­ing with Putin on the Hot Line, estab­lished to pre­vent a Third World War. Putin denied inter­fer­ing in the U.S. elec­tion.

The con­clu­sion that Rus­sia hacked the U.S. elec­tion on Putin’s orders appears to have been based on a CIA source in the Krem­lin. Even when that intel­li­gence was deliv­ered, oth­er agen­cies weren’t ready to accept the CIA’s con­clu­sion and it took intel­li­gence from anoth­er nation (not named) to pro­vide the final intel­li­gence tip­ping point that led to a broad-based con­clu­sion the not only was the Russ­ian gov­ern­ment behind the cyber­at­tacks but that Vladimir Putin him­self ordered it.

That ally’s intel­li­gence is described as “the most crit­i­cal tech­ni­cal intel­li­gence on Rus­sia,” how­ev­er the NSA still wasn’t con­vinced based on what sounds like a lack of con­fi­dence in that source. Thus, it looks like a CIA Krem­lin source and an unnamed for­eign intel­li­gence agency with ques­tion­able cre­den­tials are the basis of what appears to be a like­ly future full-scale US/Russian cyber­war.

Of para­mount sig­nif­i­cance is the fact that IF, on Putin’s orders (and we are to believe such) Rus­sia con­tin­ued to hack U.S. com­put­er sys­tems to influ­ence the elec­tion, Putin would have to have gone utter­ly mad. Those hacks would have pre­clud­ed any rap­proche­ment between Rus­sia and the Unit­ed States under a Pres­i­dent Trump. There is not indi­ca­tion that Putin went off the deep end.

Also augur­ing a Third World War are two devel­op­ments in Syr­ia. Sey­mour Hersh pub­lished an arti­cle in Die Welt reveal­ing that, not only was the April 4 alleged Sarin attack NOT a chem­i­cal weapons attack but there was wide­spread knowl­edge of this in Amer­i­can mil­i­tary and intel­li­gence cir­cles.

Omi­nous­ly, the Trump White House is claim­ing they have advance knowl­edge of an impend­ing Syr­i­an chem­i­cal weapons strike and will pun­ish Syr­ia heav­i­ly, and hold Rus­sia account­able.

Pro­gram High­lights Include: The fact that the bulk of activ­i­ty detect­ed by the DHS on U.S. elec­tion sys­tems was “scanning”–standard oper­at­ing pro­ce­dure for hack­ing; a for­mer NSA hack­ing specialist–Jake Williams–said that spear-phish­ing oper­a­tion was of “medi­um sophis­ti­ca­tion” that “prac­ti­cal­ly any hack­er can pull off”; the ques­tion of whether or not GOP Sec­re­taries of State might have delib­er­ate­ly respond­ed to the spear-phish­ing e‑mails that per­mit­ted the “hit” on U.S. elec­tion sys­tems; the Russ­ian autho­riza­tion of the use by the Syr­i­an air force of a smart bomb to elim­i­nate Al-Qae­da-linked jihadists; the release of a chem­i­cal cloud as a result of that strike that was caused by sec­ondary explo­sions; Cam­bridge Ana­lyt­i­ca’s hir­ing of GOP online data-bas­ing king­pin Dar­ren Bold­ing.